Chronic Graft Versus Host DiseasePhase 1/2TREG2015001NCT02749084
Multiple Donor Treg DLI for Severe Refractory Chronic GVHD
A Phase 1/2 study testing T reg DLI in people with Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease, run by Mario Arpinati at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
This is a INTERVENTIONAL TRANSPLANTATION STUDY WITHOUT DRUGS. The INTERVENTION is represented by the INFUSION of DONOR T REGULATORY CELL-ENRICHED LYMPHOCYTES to PATIENTS suffering from REFRACTORY CHRONIC GVHD after ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
- What is being tested?
- T reg DLI
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 3 Aug 2016to Jun 2022
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Any patient who has undergone allogeneic stem cell transplantation with steroid refractory severe chronic GvHD either occurring post transplant, or induced by donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) or T-cell add back. The diagnosis of chronic GvHD will based on NIH criteria, 2014 update. Chronic GvHD grading will be performed based on the updated NIH criteria. Severe chronic GVHD will be defined as having SCORE 3 in at least one organ or SCORE 2-3 in the lung.
- Refractoriness to steroids will be defined based on the following criteria:
- use of at least another immunosuppressive medication/strategy besides prophylactic calcineurin inhibitor for previous treatment for cGVHD .
- use of prednisone ≥ 0.25 mg/kg/day (or 0.5 mg/kg every other day) (or equivalent dosing of alternate glucocorticoids) for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment without complete resolution of signs and symptoms.
Who cannot join
- Inability to obtain informed consent.
- Patients with documented active EBV, CMV or fungal infection.
- Patients with active HBV, HCV o HIV infection.
- Patients with a diagnosis of solid tumor within the previous year with the exception of NON melanoma skin cancer.
- Patients with evidence of Residual Disease at their last hematologic evaluation.
- Patients in poor clinical conditions (ECOG 3-4)
- Female patients with confirmed pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
University Hospital St. Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic
Bologna, BO, 40138
About this study
Official title: Multiple Donor Regulatory T Cell (Treg) Infusions (T Reg DLI) for Severe Refractory Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
This is a INTERVENTIONAL TRANSPLANTATION STUDY WITHOUT DRUGS.
The INTERVENTION is represented by the INFUSION of DONOR T REGULATORY CELL-ENRICHED LYMPHOCYTES to PATIENTS suffering from REFRACTORY CHRONIC GVHD after ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION.
Read more
The study includes a DOSE ESCALATION PHASE followed by a MTD PHASE as detailed in the following chapter.
The primary objective of the dose escalation study will be SAFETY, leading to the definition of the MTD of T reg cells. For the MTD study the primary objective will be the OVERALL RESPONSE RATE at three months after the 3rd Treg infusion.
The study is single center single arm open label and includes a DOSE ESCALATION phase followed by an EXTENDED PHASE with the MAXIMUM TOLERATED DOSE (MTD).
The aim of the study is to assess whether multiple infusions of donor-derived purified T regulatory cells (T reg DLI) in patients with steroid-refractory chronic GVHD is safe and whether it may induce clinical remission of GVHD.
Read the detailed description
The procedure under study is the infusion of patients with chronic GVHD with purified Treg cells obtained from the original HSC donor (T reg DLI).
T reg cells are PURIFIED utilizing the CliniMACS Plus Systems for depletion of CD8 and CD19 positive cells and enrichment for CD25high expressing. Treg purification will be performed according to GMP procedure by using the clinical grade CLINI-MACS® device. The protocol is detailed in chapter 3.5
The entire manufacturing process including cell harvesting, transport and Treg purification has been validated.
The feasibility of the selection of nTreg from human peripheral blood using the CliniMACS® System has been previously documented. In these studies, CD8+ and CD19+ cells were undetectable in the final blood products. Final content of CD4+CD25+CD127lo-expressing cells was in mean 79% (range 52-82%) with the improved CD25 enrichment procedure. This protocol has also been validated by two partner Centres in the Treg GENERATION CONSORTIUM, Liège and Boston, with results that meet the release criteria for infusion. These purification procedures provided between 0.98 and 2.93x10e6 Treg per kg. It is noteworthy that the degree of purity in terms of CD4+CD25+CD127- cells ranged between 72.80% and 93.90%.
According to the "Reflection paper on classification of advanced therapy medicinal therapy", published by the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) of the European Medicine Agency on June 20th 2014 [EMA/CAT/600280/2010 Rev.1 lines 118-131] the Treg DLI SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED CELL THERAPY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS. Indeed somatic cell therapy medicinal product means a biological medicinal product which fulfils BOTH following two characteristics: (a) contains or consists of cells or tissues that have been subject to substantial manipulation so that biological characteristics, physiological functions or structural properties relevant for the intended clinical use have been altered, or of cells or tissues that are not intended to be used for the same essential function(s) in the recipient and the donor; (b) is presented as having properties for, or is used in or administered to human beings with a view to treating, preventing or diagnosing a disease through the pharmacological, immunological or metabolic action of its cells or tissues. For the purposes of point (a), the manipulations listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007, including cutting, grinding, shaping, centrifugation, soaking in antibiotic or antimicrobial solutions, sterilization, irradiation, cell separation, concentration or purification, filtering, lyophilization, freezing, cryopreservation, and vitrification, shall not be considered as substantial manipulations. The procedures listed above for the preparation of the purified T reg product DO NOT FULFILL the definition of substantial manipulation.
Moreover, according to the same document [lines 286-306] T reg DLI SHOULD BE REGARDED as administered for HOMOLOGOUS USE. Indeed, as outlined in "Reflection paper on classification of advanced therapy medicinal therapy" the cells harvested and separated by a simple selection method, and re-administered to fulfil their same essential function will generally be regarded as homologous use. The same essential function for a cell population means that the cells when removed from their original environment in the human body are used to maintain the original function in the same anatomical or histological environment.
Therefore the INFUSION of donor purified T reg cells in TRANSPLANTED PATIENTS (T reg DLI) SHOULD be considered as TRANSPLANTATION rather than the administration of ADVANCED THERAPY MEDICINAL PRODUCT.
The aim of the study is to assess whether multiple infusions of donor-derived purified T regulatory cells (T reg DLI) in patients with steroid-refractory chronic GVHD is safe and whether it may induce clinical remission of GVHD. Based on the observation of the pathophysiological involvement of T regulatory cells in chronic GVHD, the adoptive transfer of donor T regulatory cells appears more reproducible and effective than their in vivo expansion following the administration of drugs.
We will determine feasibility, toxicity and MTD; assess clinical impact and effect on Treg and Tcon homeostasis; and determine whether these effects can be maintained and the extent to which they persist. We will also assess for predictors of response to therapy, both clinical (e.g., patient, disease, concurrent agents) and biological (e.g., degree of Treg expansion; Treg:Tcon ratio; Treg function).
As of 1/1/2015, the current TRIAL PROPOSAL has received funding by the European Union Framework Program on Research and Innovation as a part of a project titled "Repair of tissue and organ damage in refractory chronic graft versus host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation by the infusion of purified allogeneic donor regulatoryT lymphocytes" (acronym TREGeneration, code 643776). The project includes a set of proposals by different European institutions (University of Lisbona, University of Liege, University of Regensburg and the University of Bologna) all investigating the role of Treg DLI in the treatment of chronic GVHD. The GRANT AGREEMENT signed with the EUROPEAN COMMISSION is attached to the proposal.
- Conditions
- Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
- Being tested
- T reg DLI
- Keywords
- chronic graft versus host disease, T regulatory cell
- Medical subject headings
- Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
T reg DLIBiological
Also called T regulatory cell infusion
Purified Treg cells will be obtained from the original HSC donor (T reg DLI).
Tregs preparation will start with unstimulated donor leukapheresis from the original stem cell donor.
The apheresis product will be provided to the Cell Factory "Calori",Milano, where T reg purification will take place.
T reg cells will be PURIFIED utilizing the CliniMACS Plus Systems for depletion of CD8 and CD19 positive cells and enrichment for CD25high cells.
Release Criteria of Treg cell preparation will be defined.
The product will be infused into the recipient through a venous catheter.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| T reg DLI | Experimental | This is a INTERVENTIONAL TRANSPLANTATION STUDY WITHOUT DRUGS.
The INTERVENTION is represented by the INFUSION of DONOR T REGULATORY CELL-ENRICHED LYMPHOCYTES to PATIENTS suffering from REFRACTORY CHRONIC GVHD after ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION.
The study is single center single arm open label and includes a DOSE ESCALATION phase followed by an EXTENDED PHASE with the MAXIMUM TOLERATED DOSE (MTD).
During the dose escalation phase each patient will receive three doses of purified donor T reg cells each administered intravenously 1 month apart. Dose levels of purified Tregs will be 5x10e5/kg, 1x10e6/kg and 2x10e6/kg, resulting in three doses of 1.7x10e5/kg, 3.3x10e5/kg and 6.6x10e5/kg, respectively.
In the dose escalation study at least 9 patients will be required depending on the occurrence of adverse events during the study).
Patients in the MTD study should be about 10, according to Fleming. Receives: Biological: T reg DLI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
OVERALL RESPONSE RATE
The response of chronic GVHD to treatment will be assessed per NIH consensus criteria.
Overall response will be defined as either a complete o partial response.
Complete Response is defined as resolution of all reversible manifestations related to cGVHD in a specific organ.
Partial Response will be defined as at least 50% improvement in the scale used to measure disease manifestations related to cGVHD (e.g. a 50% decrease in skin rash from 80% BSA to 40% BSA), in at least one organ or site, without progression in measures at any other organ or site.
Measured: 3 months after last T reg infusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study start3 Aug 2016
- Primary completion31 Dec 2021
- Study completionJun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Graft Versus Host DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mario Arpinati
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Commission
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Mario Arpinati, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
- Investigators
- Mario Arpinati, Principal investigator, Hematology and Medical Oncology Institute "L. e A. Seràgnoli"
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02749084
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 160/2015/O/Sper
- Acronym
- TREG2015001
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 20 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 2 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multiple Donor Regulatory T Cell (Treg) Infusions (T Reg DLI) for Severe Refractory Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02749084
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TREG2015001 / 160/2015/O/Sper
- Conditions
- Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
- Keywords
- chronic graft versus host disease, T regulatory cell
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mario ArpinatiUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Commission
- Study start
- 3 Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a INTERVENTIONAL TRANSPLANTATION STUDY WITHOUT DRUGS.
The INTERVENTION is represented by the INFUSION of DONOR T REGULATORY CELL-ENRICHED LYMPHOCYTES to PATIENTS suffering from REFRACTORY CHRONIC GVHD after ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION.
The study includes a DOSE ESCALATION PHASE followed by a MTD PHASE as detailed in the following chapter.
The primary objective of the dose escalation study will be SAFETY, leading to the definition of the MTD of T reg cells. For the MTD study the primary objective will be the OVERALL RESPONSE RATE at three months after the 3rd Treg infusion.
The study is single center single arm open label and includes a DOSE ESCALATION phase followed by an EXTENDED PHASE with the MAXIMUM TOLERATED DOSE (MTD).
The aim of the study is to assess whether multiple infusions of donor-derived purified T regulatory cells (T reg DLI) in patients with steroid-refractory chronic GVHD is safe and whether it may induce clinical remission of GVHD.
Detailed description
The procedure under study is the infusion of patients with chronic GVHD with purified Treg cells obtained from the original HSC donor (T reg DLI).
T reg cells are PURIFIED utilizing the CliniMACS Plus Systems for depletion of CD8 and CD19 positive cells and enrichment for CD25high expressing. Treg purification will be performed according to GMP procedure by using the clinical grade CLINI-MACS® device. The protocol is detailed in chapter 3.5
The entire manufacturing process including cell harvesting, transport and Treg purification has been validated.
The feasibility of the selection of nTreg from human peripheral blood using the CliniMACS® System has been previously documented. In these studies, CD8+ and CD19+ cells were undetectable in the final blood products. Final content of CD4+CD25+CD127lo-expressing cells was in mean 79% (range 52-82%) with the improved CD25 enrichment procedure. This protocol has also been validated by two partner Centres in the Treg GENERATION CONSORTIUM, Liège and Boston, with results that meet the release criteria for infusion. These purification procedures provided between 0.98 and 2.93x10e6 Treg per kg. It is noteworthy that the degree of purity in terms of CD4+CD25+CD127- cells ranged between 72.80% and 93.90%.
According to the "Reflection paper on classification of advanced therapy medicinal therapy", published by the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) of the European Medicine Agency on June 20th 2014 [EMA/CAT/600280/2010 Rev.1 lines 118-131] the Treg DLI SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED CELL THERAPY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS. Indeed somatic cell therapy medicinal product means a biological medicinal product which fulfils BOTH following two characteristics: (a) contains or consists of cells or tissues that have been subject to substantial manipulation so that biological characteristics, physiological functions or structural properties relevant for the intended clinical use have been altered, or of cells or tissues that are not intended to be used for the same essential function(s) in the recipient and the donor; (b) is presented as having properties for, or is used in or administered to human beings with a view to treating, preventing or diagnosing a disease through the pharmacological, immunological or metabolic action of its cells or tissues. For the purposes of point (a), the manipulations listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007, including cutting, grinding, shaping, centrifugation, soaking in antibiotic or antimicrobial solutions, sterilization, irradiation, cell separation, concentration or purification, filtering, lyophilization, freezing, cryopreservation, and vitrification, shall not be considered as substantial manipulations. The procedures listed above for the preparation of the purified T reg product DO NOT FULFILL the definition of substantial manipulation.
Moreover, according to the same document [lines 286-306] T reg DLI SHOULD BE REGARDED as administered for HOMOLOGOUS USE. Indeed, as outlined in "Reflection paper on classification of advanced therapy medicinal therapy" the cells harvested and separated by a simple selection method, and re-administered to fulfil their same essential function will generally be regarded as homologous use. The same essential function for a cell population means that the cells when removed from their original environment in the human body are used to maintain the original function in the same anatomical or histological environment.
Therefore the INFUSION of donor purified T reg cells in TRANSPLANTED PATIENTS (T reg DLI) SHOULD be considered as TRANSPLANTATION rather than the administration of ADVANCED THERAPY MEDICINAL PRODUCT.
The aim of the study is to assess whether multiple infusions of donor-derived purified T regulatory cells (T reg DLI) in patients with steroid-refractory chronic GVHD is safe and whether it may induce clinical remission of GVHD. Based on the observation of the pathophysiological involvement of T regulatory cells in chronic GVHD, the adoptive transfer of donor T regulatory cells appears more reproducible and effective than their in vivo expansion following the administration of drugs.
We will determine feasibility, toxicity and MTD; assess clinical impact and effect on Treg and Tcon homeostasis; and determine whether these effects can be maintained and the extent to which they persist. We will also assess for predictors of response to therapy, both clinical (e.g., patient, disease, concurrent agents) and biological (e.g., degree of Treg expansion; Treg:Tcon ratio; Treg function).
As of 1/1/2015, the current TRIAL PROPOSAL has received funding by the European Union Framework Program on Research and Innovation as a part of a project titled "Repair of tissue and organ damage in refractory chronic graft versus host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation by the infusion of purified allogeneic donor regulatoryT lymphocytes" (acronym TREGeneration, code 643776). The project includes a set of proposals by different European institutions (University of Lisbona, University of Liege, University of Regensburg and the University of Bologna) all investigating the role of Treg DLI in the treatment of chronic GVHD. The GRANT AGREEMENT signed with the EUROPEAN COMMISSION is attached to the proposal.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| T reg DLI | Experimental | Biological: T reg DLIThis is a INTERVENTIONAL TRANSPLANTATION STUDY WITHOUT DRUGS. The INTERVENTION is represented by the INFUSION of DONOR T REGULATORY CELL-ENRICHED LYMPHOCYTES to PATIENTS suffering from REFRACTORY CHRONIC GVHD after ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION. The study is single center single arm open label and includes a DOSE ESCALATION phase followed by an EXTENDED PHASE with the MAXIMUM TOLERATED DOSE (MTD). During the dose escalation phase each patient will receive three doses of purified donor T reg cells each administered intravenously 1 month apart. Dose levels of purified Tregs will be 5x10e5/kg, 1x10e6/kg and 2x10e6/kg, resulting in three doses of 1.7x10e5/kg, 3.3x10e5/kg and 6.6x10e5/kg, respectively. In the dose escalation study at least 9 patients will be required depending on the occurrence of adverse events during the study). Patients in the MTD study should be about 10, according to Fleming. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Any patient who has undergone allogeneic stem cell transplantation with steroid refractory severe chronic GvHD either occurring post transplant, or induced by donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) or T-cell add back. The diagnosis of chronic GvHD will based on NIH criteria, 2014 update. Chronic GvHD grading will be performed based on the updated NIH criteria. Severe chronic GVHD will be defined as having SCORE 3 in at least one organ or SCORE 2-3 in the lung.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Inability to obtain informed consent.
- Patients with documented active EBV, CMV or fungal infection.
- Patients with active HBV, HCV o HIV infection.
- Patients with a diagnosis of solid tumor within the previous year with the exception of NON melanoma skin cancer.
- Patients with evidence of Residual Disease at their last hematologic evaluation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| T reg DLIAlso: T regulatory cell infusionPurified Treg cells will be obtained from the original HSC donor (T reg DLI). Tregs preparation will start with unstimulated donor leukapheresis from the original stem cell donor. The apheresis product will be provided to the Cell Factory "Calori",Milano, where T reg purification will take place. T reg cells will be PURIFIED utilizing the CliniMACS Plus Systems for depletion of CD8 and CD19 positive cells and enrichment for CD25high cells. Release Criteria of Treg cell preparation will be defined. The product will be infused into the recipient through a venous catheter. | Biological | T reg DLI |
Primary outcome
OVERALL RESPONSE RATE
Time frame: 3 months after last T reg infusion
The response of chronic GVHD to treatment will be assessed per NIH consensus criteria. Overall response will be defined as either a complete o partial response. Complete Response is defined as resolution of all reversible manifestations related to cGVHD in a specific organ. Partial Response will be defined as at least 50% improvement in the scale used to measure disease manifestations related to cGVHD (e.g. a 50% decrease in skin rash from 80% BSA to 40% BSA), in at least one organ or site, without progression in measures at any other organ or site.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Feb 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Not yet recruiting
Digital Use, 24-Hour Movement Behaviors, and Myofascial Release in University Students With Neck Pain
Forward Head Posture, Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Virtual Reality Exergames Versus Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low-back Pain, CNSLBP
Recruiting
Dietary Intervention for Migraine Relief
Migraine
RecruitingPhase 2
Neurovascular Regulation During Exercise in Humans With Chronic Kidney Disease: Sympatholysis in CKD
Chronic Kidney Disease
Not yet recruiting
Combined Versus Multicomponent Training in People With Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3a and 3b
Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3A, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3B
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mario Arpinati principal investigator
Hematology and Medical Oncology Institute "L. e A. Seràgnoli"
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing T reg DLI in people with Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease, run by Mario Arpinati at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
OVERALL RESPONSE RATE (time frame: 3 months after last T reg infusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2023.