AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain AssessmentBERN-PAINNCT02749461

Validation of the Bernese Pain Scale for Neonates

An observational study of Pain Assessment, run by Bern University of Applied Sciences at 4 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aims of this validation study are the testing of the Bernese Pain Scale for Neonates' (BPSN) psychometric properties. The variability of pain reactions related to behavioral and physiological patterns across time will also be examined. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 24 to 41 weeks
Conditions the study is for
Pain Assessment
What is being tested?
heel stick
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
156 participants
Where
4 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Nov 2015to Jan 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 24 to 41 weeks
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: The study includes preterm infants born between 24 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation and term infants born between 37 0/7 and 42 0/7 weeks of gestation if they are hospitalised in a NICU in the University Hospitals in Basel, Bern and Zurich (Switzerland).

Who may be able to join

  • Preterm infants born between 24 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation will be included if they are expected to undergo 5 routine heel capillary blood samples during the first 14 days of life; if they are ventilated or not ventilated; and if their parents give informed consent.
  • Term infants born between 37 0/7 and 42 0/7 weeks of gestation will be included if they are expected to have at least 2 routine heel capillary blood samples during the first days of life and if their parents give informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Grade III oder IV intraventricular haemorrhaging
  • Severe life-threatening malformation or suffer from any condition involving partial or total loss of sensitivity
  • pHa < 7.15 (umbilical cord)
  • Surgery for any reason
  • Congenital malformation affecting brain circulation and cardiovascular system

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 2 countries.

4 sites in 2 countries

Switzerland3 sites
  • Department of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital of Basel (UKBB)

    Basel

  • Neonatology, Children's Hospital, University Hospital of Bern

    Bern

  • Neonatology, University Hospital of Zurich

    Zurich

Other trials in Switzerland

Canada1 site
  • Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing and Faculties of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Toronto

    Toronto

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Validation of the Bernese Pain Scale for Neonates With Consideration for Contextual Factors

The aims of this validation study are the testing of the Bernese Pain Scale for Neonates' (BPSN) psychometric properties. The variability of pain reactions related to behavioral and physiological patterns across time will also be examined. Furthermore, the influence of contextual factors on the variability of pain reactions across gestational age groups will be explored. The results will be used for modifications of the BPSN to account for contextual factors in future clinical pain assessment in neonates.

Read the detailed description

Preterm birth rates are rising worldwide, including in Europe. In 2014, Switzerland's rate of premature births reached 7.2%. Still, while significant progress in neonatal care has increased the long-term survival of preterm infants, other long-term outcomes remain problematic. As a result, affected infants commonly undergo exceedingly high numbers of painful procedures on a daily basis. For many, these treatment interventions take place at a crucial period in the development of the nociceptive and central nervous systems, i.e., at a developmental stage when repeated painful stimulus may induce both structural and functional reorganization of the nervous system and an altered pain response.

As infants are unable to communicate verbally, clinical pain assessment in neonates, particularly those delivered preterm, is highly challenging. Therefore, pain responses have to be observed according to physiological and behavioral indicators which might vary across preterm infants depending on their physiological and neurological development stages.

The Bernese Pain Scale for Neonates (BPSN) is a multidimensional pain assessment tool which is already widely used in clinical settings in the German speaking areas of Europe. Recent findings suggest that pain reaction is influenced by more than noxious stimulation alone: it is assumed that contextual factors, e.g., gestational age (GA) or gender, might also impact pain reactivity.

The aims of this validation study are:

  • to undertake the psychometric testing of the BPSN regarding its concurrent validity with the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R), construct validity, interrater and intrarater reliability, specificity and sensitivity;
  • to examine the variability of pain reactions related to behavioural and physiological patterns across time;
  • to assess the influence of contextual factors on the variability of pain reactions across GA groups; and
  • to examine the relationship between behavioural and physiological indicators across time.

This multisite psychometric measurement study of the BPSN will use repeated measures design. The study will take place in three tertiary care hospitals (Bern, Zurich and Basel) in Switzerland. To examine the impact of GA on pain reaction and its variability, the infants will be stratified into six GA groups ranging from 24 0/7 to 42 0/7. Among preterm infants with GAs up to 36 6/7 weeks, five consecutive heel sticks within the first 14 days of life will be documented. Among healthy-term infants two heel sticks within the first days after birth will be documented. For each heel stick, measurements will be recorded for each of three phases: baseline, heel stick, and recovery. All phases will be videotaped and the child's pain reaction later rated according to the BPSN by five independent raters blinded to the measurement phase. Individual contextual factors of interest for this study are documented in a standardised way in all three participating Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), and can be extracted from patient charts.

This diagnostic study is intended to validate the BPSN with consideration for contextual factors influencing neonatal pain responses. Understanding and embedding the influences of contextual factors into a final version of the BPSN-Context will help clinicians more accurately assess pain in the clinical setting, and will eventually help them minimize the pain endured by neonates, particularly preterm neonates in NICUs. For preterm infants requiring intensive care, adequate and efficient pain management is an important factor in later motor and cognitive development. The investigators hope this study will contribute to the prevention of negative long-term outcomes in this patient population.

Conditions
Pain Assessment
Being tested
heel stick
Keywords
preterm infants, pain, assessment, contextual factors, diagnostic accuracy
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • heel stickProcedure or surgery

    Consecutive routine blood sampling heel sticks

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in pain response across time

    Change and variability of pain response across different time points will be measured with the BPSN

    Measured: 2-5 timepoints within the first 14 days of life

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Influence of individual contextual factors on pain response across time

    Time points of contextual factors documentation are determined by the clinical need for routine heel stick procedures within the first 14 days of life. These time points are not fixed before hand but are based on ongoing clinical judgement during the first 14 days of life. For each clinically determined time point for a heel stick appropriate contextual factors being relevant the day of the determined heel stick date will be extracted from patient chart.

    Measured: 2-5 within the first 14 days of life

  2. Psychometric testing of the BPSN

    Psychometric testing will be done across all the five time points for baseline, heel stick and recovery phases

    Measured: 2-5 timepoints within the first 14 days of life

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2015
  3. Primary completionJan 2017
  4. Study completionJan 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
156 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02749461
Sponsor's protocol ID
SNF 320030_159573
Acronym
BERN-PAIN
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
12 Apr 2016
Last updated
3 Aug 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Schenk K, Stoffel L, Burgin R, Stevens B, Bassler D, Schulzke S, Nelle M, Cignacco E. The influence of gestational age in the psychometric testing of the Bernese Pain Scale for Neonates. BMC Pediatr. 2019 Jan 15;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1380-8.

    PubMed 30646872
  • Cignacco E, Schenk K, Stevens B, Stoffel L, Bassler D, Schulzke S, Nelle M. Individual contextual factors in the validation of the Bernese pain scale for neonates: protocol for a prospective observational study. BMC Pediatr. 2017 Jul 19;17(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0914-9.

    PubMed 28724434

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pain Assessment, run by Bern University of Applied Sciences at 4 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Switzerland, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in pain response across time (time frame: 2-5 timepoints within the first 14 days of life). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02749461, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in