Pediatric CancerNCT02749877
Efficacy of Cognitive and Physical Trainings in Pediatric Cancer Survivors
A study testing Working Memory Training and Physical Training in people with Pediatric Cancer, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Cancer survival comes at a price: pediatric cancer survivors have a high risk for a wide range of cognitive difficulties, particularly survivors of cancer involving the central nervous system (CNS, e.g., brain tumors [BT]) are prone to neurocognitive impairments in areas such as executive functions, working memory… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 16 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pediatric Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Working Memory Training and Physical Training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 81 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Jan 2017to Dec 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 16 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Informed consent as documented by signature of participants and / or parents / legal guardians
- Age 7-16 years
- A history of cancer either with or without CNS involvement in the past 10 years and termination of treatment at least 12 months prior to participation in the study
- Treatment of cancer including either radiation and / or chemotherapy in addition to surgical tumor removal if the cancer did not involve the CNS
Who cannot join
- Contraindication to cognitive training and / or presentation of physical activity on a TV- or computer screen, in particular epilepsy
- Any other instable neurological or physical condition
- Cancer treatment of only surgical intervention without subsequent radiation and / or chemotherapy if the CNS was not affected
- For female participants: Pregnancy or breast feeding; or, intention to become pregnant during the course of the experiment; or, lack of safe contraception (defined as: female participants of childbearing potential, not using a medically reliable method of contraception, such as oral, injectable, or implantable contraceptives, or intrauterine contraceptive devices, or who are not using any other method considered sufficiently reliable by the investigator in individual cases). A pregnancy test will be provided for participants of ages 14 and older
- Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, etc. of the participant
- Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Cancer survival comes at a price: pediatric cancer survivors have a high risk for a wide range of cognitive difficulties, particularly survivors of cancer involving the central nervous system (CNS, e.g., brain tumors [BT]) are prone to neurocognitive impairments in areas such as executive functions, working memory, attention, memory, visuospatial and motor skills, processing speed as well as language. The aim of this interdisciplinary longitudinal study is to extend empirical knowledge on training and transfer effects in children with a history of cancer. It is hypothesized that early cognitive and physical interventions affect the remediation of pediatric cancer survivors in terms of cognitive functions. These changes are further hypothesized to be associated with white matter changes.
Read the detailed description
Aims and Hypotheses:
The overall purpose of this study is threefold: first, this study aims to deepen the knowledge about particular patterns of long-term cognitive impairment in pediatric cancer survivors. Understanding the nature of cognitive deficits in this population will be helpful for developing tailored therapeutic strategies. Second, the availability of well-designed child-friendly evidence-based training is of major clinical relevance to prevent school problems and further decline of cognitive functions. Third, the detection of training-induced neuronal changes in white-matter structure will give insight into the functional plasticity of the child's brain. In addition, training-induced changes in white matter would build strong evidence for the effect of the particular intervention.
The following hypotheses will be assessed in particular in the present study:
- Children with history of brain tumors (BT) show particular problems in memory and attention, resulting in a general deficit in several cognitive areas. Children with a history of cancer without involvement of the CNS show fewer problems than children with a history of cancer with BT in the same cognitive domains but more problems than healthy control children.
- Standardized working memory training leads to improvement of working memory performance. Transfer of the training effect especially to the areas of executive functions, memory and attention is expected.
- Physical training leads to improvement of coordination, endurance and motor strength. A transfer to several cognitive areas (i.e. executive functions) and physical self-concept is expected.
- After working memory training and physical training, the white matter structure of the patients will show significant changes in fractional anisotropy. There will also be changes in functional connectivity.
- Neuropsychological effects of training will still be present after 6 months post training for both experimental groups.
All comparisons will be carried out on an individual level (intra-individual level, primary objective) as well as on an inter-individual level (between-groups comparisons, secondary objective). The level of significance is set to α = 0.05.
Participants:
Cancer Survivors: Researchers will include 150 children and adolescents aged 7-16 years who received an initial diagnosis of cancer with / without CNS (central nervous system) involvement in the past 10 years and terminated their treatment (surgery, radiation, and / or chemotherapy) at least 12 months prior to their participation in the study. Cancer survivors will be recruited at two different specialized pediatric units in Switzerland. In order to minimize the heterogeneity of the sample, children with a history of cancer without CNS involvement and only surgical removal of the tumor without subsequent radiation and / or chemotherapy will be excluded from the study. Because of the increased likelihood of drop-out of children with a history of cancer in a longitudinal study, more than the statistically required quantity of participants (> 25 children per group) will be recruited to reach sufficient statistical power.
Healthy Controls: 40 healthy children and adolescents (matched for age and gender) will be included in the first assessment and serve as a healthy control sample. They will be recruited mainly via their siblings, who are included in the cancer survivor group and also from personal acquaintances among hospital staff and the study collaborators.
Design The present study is designed as a randomized stratified controlled trial including two intervention groups, one waiting group (children with a history of cancer [both CNS+ and CNS-] and a healthy control group (matched for age and gender). Some children of the patient group will be allocated to a waiting-control group to determine the training effects (their training starts later on). After random assignment to the respective conditions, the interventional material (XBOX or computer), will be installed at the participants home. Thereby, a supervised first training session will take place. The executive functions before and after as well as more details on the effects of a single intervention session (on enjoyment, arousal etc.) will be examined. Subsequently, the respective group will either follow a standardized, computerized working memory training or a physical training. Neuropsychological assessment will be carried out before the intervention / training and re-performed with all participants at the end of the memory training or physical training and at 6 months posttraining. Structural and functional imaging will be performed prior and shortly after working memory training and physical training. A 3 Tesla whole body MRI system will be used (Siemens; Erlangen, Germany). Anatomical imaging will be obtained using a sequence for T1 weighted structural brain imaging with whole brain coverage. Structural connectivity images will be acquired by using a q-ball sequence, functional connectivity will be measured by using a multiband echo planar imaging sequence (MB EPI). Pre- and post-processing of the structural data will be performed using SPM8 (Welcome Departement of Imaging Neuroscience, London) and MATLAB programs (MATLAB version 8.2). In order to perform functional connectivity analyses, the CONN fMRI connectivity toolbox 13.1 (Whitfield-Gabrieli \& Nieto-Castanon, 2012) is used. The fractional anisotropy maps are provide by the Siemens software and can be directly used for further statistical evaluation.
Interventions:
All 150 participants with a history of cancer will be randomly but in a stratified manner assigned to 3 groups (group A, B and C) (see Fig.1).
Training A: Group A (n1= 25 CNS+, n2 = 25 CNS-) will undergo working memory training program. The children will receive individual memory training based on the computer program Cogmed RM (Klingberg et al., 2005) and will be supervised by trained neuropsychologists. Its efficacy in the use with children with cancer has been recently published (e.g. Hardy et al., 2012). The children will undergo 25 training sessions "online"; each session takes about 45 minutes and consists of a selection of various tasks that target the different aspects of working memory. The difficulty level of the training is always adjusted based on the user's performance. The children will perform the memory training program at home over a period of 8 weeks. The child and a licensed Cogmed RM coach (neuropsychologist) will review and monitor the results of each day's training online. In an initial session at the Hospital (Zurich or Bern) the Cogmed RM coach plans and structures the training together with the child and the parents. The coach will provide weekly supervision and feedback on the child's performance and progress via phone call to the child's home. In the closing session with the child and the parents, the training experience will be reviewed .
Training B: Group B (n1= 25 CNS+, n2 = 25 CNS-) will receive a physical training that can be executed at home. The training will be based on xbox Kinect games (e.g. Shape Up) and comprise games and activities such as jump'n'run games, physical training, and dance activities. All material will be provided by the Inselspital Bern. One training session will last approximately 45 minutes and will be performed 3days a week over a period of 8 weeks.
Group C (n1= 25 CNS+, n2 = 25 CNS-) will serve as a waiting control group and will receive either the physical or the working memory training program after completion of the Neuropsychological Assessment II.
- Conditions
- Pediatric Cancer
- Being tested
- Working Memory Training, Physical Training
- Keywords
- Pediatric Cancer, Training, Working Memory, Physical Activity, Brain Tumor, Physical Exercise
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Motor Activity, Brain Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Working Memory TrainingBehavioural
(Training Details already described above)
Physical TrainingBehavioural
(Training Details already described above)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Training | Experimental | This group will undergo a working memory training program (Training A). The children will receive individual memory training based on the computer program Cogmed RM and will be supervised by trained neuropsychologists. Its efficacy in the use with children with cancer has been recently published. The children will undergo 25 training sessions "online"; each session takes about 45 minutes and consists of a selection of various tasks that target the different aspects of working memory. Receives: Behavioral: Working Memory Training |
| Physical Training | Experimental | This group will receive a physical training that can be executed at home (Training B). The training will be based on xbox Kinect games and comprise games and activities such as jump'n'run games, physical training, and dance activities. One training session will last approximately 45 minutes and will be performed 3 days a week over a period of 8 weeks (in total 25 sessions). Receives: Behavioral: Physical Training |
| Waiting Control Group | Active comparator | This group will serve as a waiting control group and will receive either the physical or the working memory training program after completion of the Neuropsychological Assessment II Receives: Behavioral: Working Memory Training; Behavioral: Physical Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Participant's individual score in executive functions (Subtest Block Recall; Color-Word Interference Test)
The primary endpoint in this study will be the participant's scores in executive functions based on the model of Miyake et al. (2000) which will be assessed using two different subtests: The subtest Block Recall from the Working Memory Test Battery for Children, WMTB-C (Pickering \& Gathercole, 2001) and the Color-Word Interference Test from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System™ (D-KEFS™, (Delis, Kaplan, \& Kramer, 2001).These tests will be administered at each neuropsychological testing, specifically, before and after the training intervention. It is expected to find a statistically significant amelioration in performance after the intervention (effect size f = 0.14 at a level of significance of α =0.05).
Measured: baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2017
- Primary completionJun 2018
- Study completionDec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pediatric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kurt Leibundgut, MD Prof, Principal investigator, Inselspital Bern, Switzerland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02749877
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 196/15
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 12 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 19 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Benzing V, Spitzhuttl J, Siegwart V, Schmid J, Grotzer M, Heinks T, Roebers CM, Steinlin M, Leibundgut K, Schmidt M, Everts R. Effects of Cognitive Training and Exergaming in Pediatric Cancer Survivors-A Randomized Clinical Trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Nov;52(11):2293-2302. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002386.
PubMed 33064404Benzing V, Eggenberger N, Spitzhuttl J, Siegwart V, Pastore-Wapp M, Kiefer C, Slavova N, Grotzer M, Heinks T, Schmidt M, Conzelmann A, Steinlin M, Everts R, Leibundgut K. The Brainfit study: efficacy of cognitive training and exergaming in pediatric cancer survivors - a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 3;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3933-x.
PubMed 29298678
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Cognitive and Physical Trainings in Pediatric Cancer Survivors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02749877
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 196/15
- Conditions
- Pediatric Cancer
- Keywords
- Pediatric Cancer, Training, Working Memory, Physical Activity, Brain Tumor, Physical Exercise
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2017
- Primary completion
- Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cancer survival comes at a price: pediatric cancer survivors have a high risk for a wide range of cognitive difficulties, particularly survivors of cancer involving the central nervous system (CNS, e.g., brain tumors [BT]) are prone to neurocognitive impairments in areas such as executive functions, working memory, attention, memory, visuospatial and motor skills, processing speed as well as language. The aim of this interdisciplinary longitudinal study is to extend empirical knowledge on training and transfer effects in children with a history of cancer. It is hypothesized that early cognitive and physical interventions affect the remediation of pediatric cancer survivors in terms of cognitive functions. These changes are further hypothesized to be associated with white matter changes.
Detailed description
Aims and Hypotheses:
The overall purpose of this study is threefold: first, this study aims to deepen the knowledge about particular patterns of long-term cognitive impairment in pediatric cancer survivors. Understanding the nature of cognitive deficits in this population will be helpful for developing tailored therapeutic strategies. Second, the availability of well-designed child-friendly evidence-based training is of major clinical relevance to prevent school problems and further decline of cognitive functions. Third, the detection of training-induced neuronal changes in white-matter structure will give insight into the functional plasticity of the child's brain. In addition, training-induced changes in white matter would build strong evidence for the effect of the particular intervention.
The following hypotheses will be assessed in particular in the present study:
- Children with history of brain tumors (BT) show particular problems in memory and attention, resulting in a general deficit in several cognitive areas. Children with a history of cancer without involvement of the CNS show fewer problems than children with a history of cancer with BT in the same cognitive domains but more problems than healthy control children.
- Standardized working memory training leads to improvement of working memory performance. Transfer of the training effect especially to the areas of executive functions, memory and attention is expected.
- Physical training leads to improvement of coordination, endurance and motor strength. A transfer to several cognitive areas (i.e. executive functions) and physical self-concept is expected.
- After working memory training and physical training, the white matter structure of the patients will show significant changes in fractional anisotropy. There will also be changes in functional connectivity.
- Neuropsychological effects of training will still be present after 6 months post training for both experimental groups.
All comparisons will be carried out on an individual level (intra-individual level, primary objective) as well as on an inter-individual level (between-groups comparisons, secondary objective). The level of significance is set to α = 0.05.
Participants:
Cancer Survivors: Researchers will include 150 children and adolescents aged 7-16 years who received an initial diagnosis of cancer with / without CNS (central nervous system) involvement in the past 10 years and terminated their treatment (surgery, radiation, and / or chemotherapy) at least 12 months prior to their participation in the study. Cancer survivors will be recruited at two different specialized pediatric units in Switzerland. In order to minimize the heterogeneity of the sample, children with a history of cancer without CNS involvement and only surgical removal of the tumor without subsequent radiation and / or chemotherapy will be excluded from the study. Because of the increased likelihood of drop-out of children with a history of cancer in a longitudinal study, more than the statistically required quantity of participants (> 25 children per group) will be recruited to reach sufficient statistical power.
Healthy Controls: 40 healthy children and adolescents (matched for age and gender) will be included in the first assessment and serve as a healthy control sample. They will be recruited mainly via their siblings, who are included in the cancer survivor group and also from personal acquaintances among hospital staff and the study collaborators.
Design The present study is designed as a randomized stratified controlled trial including two intervention groups, one waiting group (children with a history of cancer [both CNS+ and CNS-] and a healthy control group (matched for age and gender). Some children of the patient group will be allocated to a waiting-control group to determine the training effects (their training starts later on). After random assignment to the respective conditions, the interventional material (XBOX or computer), will be installed at the participants home. Thereby, a supervised first training session will take place. The executive functions before and after as well as more details on the effects of a single intervention session (on enjoyment, arousal etc.) will be examined. Subsequently, the respective group will either follow a standardized, computerized working memory training or a physical training. Neuropsychological assessment will be carried out before the intervention / training and re-performed with all participants at the end of the memory training or physical training and at 6 months posttraining. Structural and functional imaging will be performed prior and shortly after working memory training and physical training. A 3 Tesla whole body MRI system will be used (Siemens; Erlangen, Germany). Anatomical imaging will be obtained using a sequence for T1 weighted structural brain imaging with whole brain coverage. Structural connectivity images will be acquired by using a q-ball sequence, functional connectivity will be measured by using a multiband echo planar imaging sequence (MB EPI). Pre- and post-processing of the structural data will be performed using SPM8 (Welcome Departement of Imaging Neuroscience, London) and MATLAB programs (MATLAB version 8.2). In order to perform functional connectivity analyses, the CONN fMRI connectivity toolbox 13.1 (Whitfield-Gabrieli \& Nieto-Castanon, 2012) is used. The fractional anisotropy maps are provide by the Siemens software and can be directly used for further statistical evaluation.
Interventions:
All 150 participants with a history of cancer will be randomly but in a stratified manner assigned to 3 groups (group A, B and C) (see Fig.1).
Training A: Group A (n1= 25 CNS+, n2 = 25 CNS-) will undergo working memory training program. The children will receive individual memory training based on the computer program Cogmed RM (Klingberg et al., 2005) and will be supervised by trained neuropsychologists. Its efficacy in the use with children with cancer has been recently published (e.g. Hardy et al., 2012). The children will undergo 25 training sessions "online"; each session takes about 45 minutes and consists of a selection of various tasks that target the different aspects of working memory. The difficulty level of the training is always adjusted based on the user's performance. The children will perform the memory training program at home over a period of 8 weeks. The child and a licensed Cogmed RM coach (neuropsychologist) will review and monitor the results of each day's training online. In an initial session at the Hospital (Zurich or Bern) the Cogmed RM coach plans and structures the training together with the child and the parents. The coach will provide weekly supervision and feedback on the child's performance and progress via phone call to the child's home. In the closing session with the child and the parents, the training experience will be reviewed .
Training B: Group B (n1= 25 CNS+, n2 = 25 CNS-) will receive a physical training that can be executed at home. The training will be based on xbox Kinect games (e.g. Shape Up) and comprise games and activities such as jump'n'run games, physical training, and dance activities. All material will be provided by the Inselspital Bern. One training session will last approximately 45 minutes and will be performed 3days a week over a period of 8 weeks.
Group C (n1= 25 CNS+, n2 = 25 CNS-) will serve as a waiting control group and will receive either the physical or the working memory training program after completion of the Neuropsychological Assessment II.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Training | Experimental | Behavioral: Working Memory TrainingThis group will undergo a working memory training program (Training A). The children will receive individual memory training based on the computer program Cogmed RM and will be supervised by trained neuropsychologists. Its efficacy in the use with children with cancer has been recently published. The children will undergo 25 training sessions "online"; each session takes about 45 minutes and consists of a selection of various tasks that target the different aspects of working memory. |
| Physical Training | Experimental | Behavioral: Physical TrainingThis group will receive a physical training that can be executed at home (Training B). The training will be based on xbox Kinect games and comprise games and activities such as jump'n'run games, physical training, and dance activities. One training session will last approximately 45 minutes and will be performed 3 days a week over a period of 8 weeks (in total 25 sessions). |
| Waiting Control Group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Working Memory Training, Behavioral: Physical TrainingThis group will serve as a waiting control group and will receive either the physical or the working memory training program after completion of the Neuropsychological Assessment II |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 16 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Informed consent as documented by signature of participants and / or parents / legal guardians
- Age 7-16 years
- A history of cancer either with or without CNS involvement in the past 10 years and termination of treatment at least 12 months prior to participation in the study
- Treatment of cancer including either radiation and / or chemotherapy in addition to surgical tumor removal if the cancer did not involve the CNS
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Contraindication to cognitive training and / or presentation of physical activity on a TV- or computer screen, in particular epilepsy
- Any other instable neurological or physical condition
- Cancer treatment of only surgical intervention without subsequent radiation and / or chemotherapy if the CNS was not affected
- For female participants: Pregnancy or breast feeding; or, intention to become pregnant during the course of the experiment; or, lack of safe contraception (defined as: female participants of childbearing potential, not using a medically reliable method of contraception, such as oral, injectable, or implantable contraceptives, or intrauterine contraceptive devices, or who are not using any other method considered sufficiently reliable by the investigator in individual cases). A pregnancy test will be provided for participants of ages 14 and older
- Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Working Memory Training(Training Details already described above) | Behavioural | Cognitive Training, Waiting Control Group |
| Physical Training(Training Details already described above) | Behavioural | Physical Training, Waiting Control Group |
Primary outcome
Participant's individual score in executive functions (Subtest Block Recall; Color-Word Interference Test)
Time frame: baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
The primary endpoint in this study will be the participant's scores in executive functions based on the model of Miyake et al. (2000) which will be assessed using two different subtests: The subtest Block Recall from the Working Memory Test Battery for Children, WMTB-C (Pickering \& Gathercole, 2001) and the Color-Word Interference Test from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System™ (D-KEFS™, (Delis, Kaplan, \& Kramer, 2001).These tests will be administered at each neuropsychological testing, specifically, before and after the training intervention. It is expected to find a statistically significant amelioration in performance after the intervention (effect size f = 0.14 at a level of significance of α =0.05).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33064404Benzing V, Spitzhuttl J, Siegwart V, Schmid J, Grotzer M, Heinks T, Roebers CM, Steinlin M, Leibundgut K, Schmidt M, Everts R. Effects of Cognitive Training and Exergaming in Pediatric Cancer Survivors-A Randomized Clinical Trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Nov;52(11):2293-2302. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002386.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29298678Benzing V, Eggenberger N, Spitzhuttl J, Siegwart V, Pastore-Wapp M, Kiefer C, Slavova N, Grotzer M, Heinks T, Schmidt M, Conzelmann A, Steinlin M, Everts R, Leibundgut K. The Brainfit study: efficacy of cognitive training and exergaming in pediatric cancer survivors - a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 3;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3933-x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Pediatric Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
Psychological Benefits of a Normalized Camping Experience for Children With Cancer
Pediatric Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
An Extension Study Evaluating 6-week Treatment Cycles of Rozanolixizumab in Pediatric Study Participants With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
RecruitingObservational study
The Decision To Enroll In Therapeutic Clinical Trials In A Pediatric Cancer Clinical Network
Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kurt Leibundgut, MD Prof principal investigator
Inselspital Bern, Switzerland
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Working Memory Training and Physical Training in people with Pediatric Cancer, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Participant's individual score in executive functions (Subtest Block Recall; Color-Word Interference Test) (time frame: baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02749877, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2019.