Peripheral Arterial DiseaseRISCAIDNCT02749942
RISCAID Study: Remote ISchemic Conditioning for Angiopathy In Diabetes
A study testing AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic Conditioning in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Objective The objective of this study is to investigate if long-term ambulatory remote ischemic conditioning can improve symptoms and signs of peripheral arterial disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
- What is being tested?
- AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic Conditioning
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 11 May 2016to 11 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 2 diabetes
- Age 40-80
- Complaints of claudication or reduced walking distance compared to equals
- Toe pressure from 40 mmHG to 70 mmHg
Who cannot join
- Foot ulcer
- Peripheral gangrene or infection
- Toe pressure < 40 mmHg or > 90 mmHg
- Heart failure
- Pregnancy
- Treatment with anti-platelet drugs besides acetylsalicylic acid
- Cancer
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The RISCAID Study: Remote ISchemic Conditioning for Angiopathy In Diabetes
Objective The objective of this study is to investigate if long-term ambulatory remote ischemic conditioning can improve symptoms and signs of peripheral arterial disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Background Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a vast socioeconomic challenge in the community of diabetes patients, causing foot ulcers and lower extremity amputations. The main treatment option for the complication is operative revascularisation. Thus there is a need for new treatment modalities for diabetes patients with PAD.
Read more
Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is at non-invasive non-pharmacological treatment which has been shown to attenuate tissue damage caused by ischemia e.g. in hearts subjected to ischemia. RIC treatment consists of brief repetitive periods of ischemia induced in an extremity e.g. an arm. Recent findings show that six week RIC treatment improves healing of diabetic foot ulcers, suggesting a possible effect on the underlying pathological causes of ulcers e.g. PAD.
Hypothesis The investigators hypothesize that RIC treatment can improve markers of inflammation, vascular and neuronal function and the sense of empowerment in type 2 diabetes patients with reduced peripheral blood supply.
Aim to conduct a single center double-blinded randomized placebo controlled study investigating the efficacy of home based 12-week RIC treatment on markers of vascular, neuronal function, inflammation and serum lipid composition in 40 type 2 diabetes patients from Steno Diabetes Center with non-critical PAD.
to qualitatively investigate the experience of empowerment related to the use of Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) treatment and the mechanisms affecting if and how participants take up the RIC treatment.
Read the detailed description
Objective The driving objective of this study is to investigate if long-term ambulatory remote ischemic conditioning can improve symptoms and signs of peripheral arterial disease and the sense of empowerment in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Background Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is vast challenge in the community of diabetes patients. The prevalence of PAD in diabetes patients exceeds that of non-diabetic individuals and is estimated to be about 26% in diabetes patients over 65 years of age and 71% in patients over 70 years . PAD is the major cause of foot ulcers and lower extremity amputations, which has great socioeconomic implications . The main treatment option for the complication is operative revascularisation which in diabetes patient is associated with increased rates of complication and mortality compared to non-diabetes patients . Pharmacological treatment with e.g. anti-platelet drugs in patients with PAD has shown effect on walking distance has not been indorsed as standard treatment.
Thus there is a need for new treatment options for diabetes patients with PAD. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a non-invasive non-pharmacological treatment that has been shown to attenuate tissue damage caused by ischemia, reducing infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction , reducing organ damage in patient undergoing transplantation and having neuroprotective effects in patients with stroke .
RIC treatment consists of brief repetitive periods of ischemia induced in an extremity e.g. an arm. It is believed that the effect of RIC is mediated through both neuronal and humoral pathways, however the mechanisms behind are not fully understood.
RIC has been shown to have beneficial effects by attenuating platelet activation and aggregation, improving endothelial function , improvement of microcirculation , down-regulation of neutrophil function , down-regulation of inflammatory gene expression , improving mitochondrial function and inducing changes in serum lipid composition One of few long-term RIC treatment studies has shown that twice daily RIC treatment for 300 days is feasible. The study showed that RIC could reduce the recurrence of stroke
. No studies are presently investigating the effect of long-term RIC on PAD in diabetes patients (Clinicaltrials.gov search 22nd of October 2015), the concept has however recently been presented in the literature . Two studies have addressed the acute effect of one RIC treatment on walking distance in non-diabetic patients with claudication. The results were inconclusive due to small sample sizes, but a trend towards improvement was shown. It is however likely that long-term RIC treatment is needed to show a beneficial effect of RIC on the pathology behind claudication - vascular and neuronal damage.
Hypothesis We hypothesize that the long-term RIC treatment can improve PAD. PAD is caused by both micro- and macrovascular deficits. Reduced microvascular circulation can lead to distal nerve damage which in turn can both reduce peripheral circulation and cause tissue degeneration. Reduced macro vascular function is a direct cause of peripheral ischemia (2). It is possible that RIC could attenuate the pathophysiological processes in the micro- and microvasculature related to PAD by the abovementioned mechanisms and thereby improving of both neuronal and vascular function.
Thus the present clinical evidence of the beneficial effects of RIC may be translated into a new safe and simple non-invasive non-pharmacological treatment of PAD in diabetes patients, preventing progression to critical ischemia and amputation.
We also hypothesize that home-based and self-administered RIC treatment can improve the sense of empowerment in patients with non-critical peripheral arterial disease and type 2 diabetes.
Aims and Methods
Primary aim:
to study the underlying mechanisms of the effects of long-term ambulatory RIC by investigating the effect on vascular function, neuronal function, markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction and lipidomic profiles.
Secondary aim to study the the experience of the use of RIC treatment and with focus on barriers that affect the uptake of the RIC treatment, and the effects of treatment on life quality and empowerment.
Study design The study will consist of a single-center randomised double blinded placebo controlled trial.
The trial will be performed to investigate the beneficial effects of RIC treatment on the study outcomes described below. The RIC treatment duration will be 12 weeks and 40 patients from the Steno Diabetes Center will be included in the trial. All tests and analyses will performed at Steno Diabetes Center expect for markers of inflammation and oxidative stress which will be performed at Dept. of inflammation, German Diabetes Center and institute of Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center. All necessary facilities are available at the study sites.
Most present knowledge of the beneficial effects of RIC listed above has come from short term trials (duration = 1 day. 20 days for one study) with small populations (n ≤ 40). Thus it is plausible that the study setup will yield significant differences in outcomes between the study arms. The study may also indicate if changes in outcomes will occur post RIC treatment.
For the qualitative part of the study relevant questionnaires will be filled out at baseline and end-of trial. In addition 15 random patients will be asked to attend "think-aloud" interviews within the last 4 weeks of treatment.
Power calculation RIC has shown to increase tissue oxygen tension (a measure of microcirculation) in a short-term study we hypothesize that RIC treatment will increase tissue oxygen tension in the feet (Primary outcome) by 13% (SD = 10%). With 90% power and a two sided significance level of 0.05 the sample size needed to detect this change is 16 in each group - 32 participants in total. Taking a drop-out ratio of 10% into account and given the inaccurate nature of this power calculation the sample size of the study will be 20 patients in each group.
Statistics The effects of treatment on outcome measures will be estimated by using complete-case logistic regression analyses. If needed outcome variables will be log-transformed using the natural logarithm to meet model assumptions of the distribution of the model residuals if necessary. Interactions between sex and all determinants will be investigated in all models to investigate possible sex interactions differences. A level of significance of 5% will be used.
Analyses will be performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Discontinuation of single person participation in study or cancellation of whole study The doctor responsible for the study can at any time discontinue the study for any reason e.g. for safety concerns. The responsible doctor can discontinue the participation of any single participant if informed consent is withdrawn, the a participant wants to get pregnant or get pregnant, if a participant does not follow the study protocol. A participant can withdraw his or her participation without justification at any time and this will not influence the treatment at Steno Diabetes Center of the participant.
Data storage All procedures and facilities for data handling and storage will follow the rules and regulations of Datatilsynet. Permission from Datatilsynet for collecting and storing the data will be sought prior to the study start.
All data from will be stored at the Steno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 4, in Gentofte, Denmark. No person sensitive data will be shared with collaborator outside of Steno Diabetes Center. Data on analyses done at the German Diabetes Institute will be handle only by use of the patients trail number.
All data gathered on paper during the clinical examination will be stored in a locked archive at Steno Diabetes Center.
Publication Data is owned by the Steno Diabetes Center A/S. Positive (significant), negative (non-significant) and inconclusive results will be published as soon as it is scientifically justifiable.
Significance and perspectives If the project shows an effect of RIC on PAD the next step will to test the treatment method in a larger trial where walking distance will be the primary outcome. Also it is possible that patients with foot ulcers and patients with critical peripheral ischemia could benefit from the treatment.
RIC treatment could prove to be an attractive non-pharmacological non-surgical treatment option for a large population of diabetes patients. The trial will result in 5 publications on the efficacy of RIC on neuronal function, on vascular function, on lipidomic profiles, on marker of inflammation and oxidative stress (Tentative titles of articles are listed in Appendix 3) and patient empowerment and quality of life. The study is recommended by an independent Professor of Cardiology (Appendix 4).
Possible limitations It is debated whether or not diabetes can attenuated the efficacy of RIC treatment. Data from randomised clinical trials are conflicting . As the patients in the present study population will have some degree of neuropathy this may attenuate the effect of RIC on our outcomes. However a recent study has showed an effect of RIC on diabetic foot ulcers contradicting the above-mentioned hypothesis, as all diabetes patients with foot ulcers have some degree of neuropathy .
- Conditions
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
- Being tested
- AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic Conditioning, AutoRIC: Sham device treatment
- Keywords
- Diabetes, Remote Ischemic Conditioning, Neuropathy, Angiopathy
- Medical subject headings
- Peripheral Arterial Disease, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic ConditioningDevice
4 cycles of 5 minute forearm ischemia/reperfusion (200 mmHG) using the reusable fully automated RIC device "AutoRIC" from CellAegis Devices, Canada
AutoRIC: Sham device treatmentDevice
4 cycles of 5 minute forearm sham treatment (no ischemia/reperfusion, 0 mmHG pressure) with the reusable fully automated RIC device "AutoRIC" from CellAegis Devices, Canada
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic Conditioning | Active comparator | Daily cuff treatment of arm with 4 cycles of 5 minute forearm ischemia/reperfusion (200 mmHG of pressure) on top of standard care. Receives: Device: AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic Conditioning |
| AutoRIC: Sham device treatment | Sham comparator | Daily sham device treatment of arm, 4 cycles of 5 minute (0 mmHG of pressure) on top of standard care. No ischemia induced. Receives: Device: AutoRIC: Sham device treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Peripheral tissue oxygen oxygenation of dorsal part of foot
Transcutaneous oxygen tension
Measured: Change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment
Secondary outcomes (13)
Toe Pressure
pressure
Measured: At baseline and fter 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Central vasculopathy
Arterial stiffness assessed and central blood pressure by pulse wave velocity measures
Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Glycocalyx assessment
Arterial function assessed by sublingual capillary density and perfused boundary region
Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy, E/I ratio
Cardiovascular reflex test: E/I ratio
Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Peripheral autonomic function
Peripheral small-fibre sympathetic function by sudomotor function testing assessed by electrochemical skin conductance
Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Peripheral nerve conduction function
Sural nerve conduction velocity
Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Sensory peripheral neuropathy, vibration
toe vibration sensation threshold
Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Sensory peripheral neuropathy, light touch
light touch assessed by 10 gram monofilament
Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Sensory peripheral neuropathy, pain sensation
pain sensation assessed by pin prick
Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
symptoms of neuropathy
Minnesota Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire
Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy; 30/15 ratio
Cardiovascular autonomic reflex test; E/I ratio
Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy, Valsalva maneuvre
Cardiovascular autonomic reflex test; Valsalva maneuvre
Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Cardiovascular Autonomic neuropathy; Heart rate variability
5 minute resting hear rate variability measure.
Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study start11 May 2016
- Primary completion1 Jul 2017
- Study completion11 Jul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Peripheral Arterial DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital, German Diabetes Center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Peter Rossing, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
- Investigators
- Peter Rossing, Professor, Principal investigator, Head of department
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02749942
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RISCAID
- Acronym
- RISCAID
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 12 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: To ensure data security no data will be shared outside the study group
Publications
Hansen CS, Jorgensen ME, Fleischer J, Botker HE, Rossing P. Efficacy of Long-Term Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Vascular and Neuronal Function in Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 2;8(13):e011779. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011779. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
PubMed 31215299
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The RISCAID Study: Remote ISchemic Conditioning for Angiopathy In Diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02749942
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RISCAID / RISCAID
- Conditions
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
- Keywords
- Diabetes, Remote Ischemic Conditioning, Neuropathy, Angiopathy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Steno Diabetes Center CopenhagenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital, German Diabetes Center
- Study start
- 11 May 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objective The objective of this study is to investigate if long-term ambulatory remote ischemic conditioning can improve symptoms and signs of peripheral arterial disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Background Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a vast socioeconomic challenge in the community of diabetes patients, causing foot ulcers and lower extremity amputations. The main treatment option for the complication is operative revascularisation. Thus there is a need for new treatment modalities for diabetes patients with PAD.
Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is at non-invasive non-pharmacological treatment which has been shown to attenuate tissue damage caused by ischemia e.g. in hearts subjected to ischemia. RIC treatment consists of brief repetitive periods of ischemia induced in an extremity e.g. an arm. Recent findings show that six week RIC treatment improves healing of diabetic foot ulcers, suggesting a possible effect on the underlying pathological causes of ulcers e.g. PAD.
Hypothesis The investigators hypothesize that RIC treatment can improve markers of inflammation, vascular and neuronal function and the sense of empowerment in type 2 diabetes patients with reduced peripheral blood supply.
Aim to conduct a single center double-blinded randomized placebo controlled study investigating the efficacy of home based 12-week RIC treatment on markers of vascular, neuronal function, inflammation and serum lipid composition in 40 type 2 diabetes patients from Steno Diabetes Center with non-critical PAD.
to qualitatively investigate the experience of empowerment related to the use of Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) treatment and the mechanisms affecting if and how participants take up the RIC treatment.
Detailed description
Objective The driving objective of this study is to investigate if long-term ambulatory remote ischemic conditioning can improve symptoms and signs of peripheral arterial disease and the sense of empowerment in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Background Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is vast challenge in the community of diabetes patients. The prevalence of PAD in diabetes patients exceeds that of non-diabetic individuals and is estimated to be about 26% in diabetes patients over 65 years of age and 71% in patients over 70 years . PAD is the major cause of foot ulcers and lower extremity amputations, which has great socioeconomic implications . The main treatment option for the complication is operative revascularisation which in diabetes patient is associated with increased rates of complication and mortality compared to non-diabetes patients . Pharmacological treatment with e.g. anti-platelet drugs in patients with PAD has shown effect on walking distance has not been indorsed as standard treatment.
Thus there is a need for new treatment options for diabetes patients with PAD. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a non-invasive non-pharmacological treatment that has been shown to attenuate tissue damage caused by ischemia, reducing infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction , reducing organ damage in patient undergoing transplantation and having neuroprotective effects in patients with stroke .
RIC treatment consists of brief repetitive periods of ischemia induced in an extremity e.g. an arm. It is believed that the effect of RIC is mediated through both neuronal and humoral pathways, however the mechanisms behind are not fully understood.
RIC has been shown to have beneficial effects by attenuating platelet activation and aggregation, improving endothelial function , improvement of microcirculation , down-regulation of neutrophil function , down-regulation of inflammatory gene expression , improving mitochondrial function and inducing changes in serum lipid composition One of few long-term RIC treatment studies has shown that twice daily RIC treatment for 300 days is feasible. The study showed that RIC could reduce the recurrence of stroke
. No studies are presently investigating the effect of long-term RIC on PAD in diabetes patients (Clinicaltrials.gov search 22nd of October 2015), the concept has however recently been presented in the literature . Two studies have addressed the acute effect of one RIC treatment on walking distance in non-diabetic patients with claudication. The results were inconclusive due to small sample sizes, but a trend towards improvement was shown. It is however likely that long-term RIC treatment is needed to show a beneficial effect of RIC on the pathology behind claudication - vascular and neuronal damage.
Hypothesis We hypothesize that the long-term RIC treatment can improve PAD. PAD is caused by both micro- and macrovascular deficits. Reduced microvascular circulation can lead to distal nerve damage which in turn can both reduce peripheral circulation and cause tissue degeneration. Reduced macro vascular function is a direct cause of peripheral ischemia (2). It is possible that RIC could attenuate the pathophysiological processes in the micro- and microvasculature related to PAD by the abovementioned mechanisms and thereby improving of both neuronal and vascular function.
Thus the present clinical evidence of the beneficial effects of RIC may be translated into a new safe and simple non-invasive non-pharmacological treatment of PAD in diabetes patients, preventing progression to critical ischemia and amputation.
We also hypothesize that home-based and self-administered RIC treatment can improve the sense of empowerment in patients with non-critical peripheral arterial disease and type 2 diabetes.
Aims and Methods
Primary aim:
to study the underlying mechanisms of the effects of long-term ambulatory RIC by investigating the effect on vascular function, neuronal function, markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction and lipidomic profiles.
Secondary aim to study the the experience of the use of RIC treatment and with focus on barriers that affect the uptake of the RIC treatment, and the effects of treatment on life quality and empowerment.
Study design The study will consist of a single-center randomised double blinded placebo controlled trial.
The trial will be performed to investigate the beneficial effects of RIC treatment on the study outcomes described below. The RIC treatment duration will be 12 weeks and 40 patients from the Steno Diabetes Center will be included in the trial. All tests and analyses will performed at Steno Diabetes Center expect for markers of inflammation and oxidative stress which will be performed at Dept. of inflammation, German Diabetes Center and institute of Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center. All necessary facilities are available at the study sites.
Most present knowledge of the beneficial effects of RIC listed above has come from short term trials (duration = 1 day. 20 days for one study) with small populations (n ≤ 40). Thus it is plausible that the study setup will yield significant differences in outcomes between the study arms. The study may also indicate if changes in outcomes will occur post RIC treatment.
For the qualitative part of the study relevant questionnaires will be filled out at baseline and end-of trial. In addition 15 random patients will be asked to attend "think-aloud" interviews within the last 4 weeks of treatment.
Power calculation RIC has shown to increase tissue oxygen tension (a measure of microcirculation) in a short-term study we hypothesize that RIC treatment will increase tissue oxygen tension in the feet (Primary outcome) by 13% (SD = 10%). With 90% power and a two sided significance level of 0.05 the sample size needed to detect this change is 16 in each group - 32 participants in total. Taking a drop-out ratio of 10% into account and given the inaccurate nature of this power calculation the sample size of the study will be 20 patients in each group.
Statistics The effects of treatment on outcome measures will be estimated by using complete-case logistic regression analyses. If needed outcome variables will be log-transformed using the natural logarithm to meet model assumptions of the distribution of the model residuals if necessary. Interactions between sex and all determinants will be investigated in all models to investigate possible sex interactions differences. A level of significance of 5% will be used.
Analyses will be performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Discontinuation of single person participation in study or cancellation of whole study The doctor responsible for the study can at any time discontinue the study for any reason e.g. for safety concerns. The responsible doctor can discontinue the participation of any single participant if informed consent is withdrawn, the a participant wants to get pregnant or get pregnant, if a participant does not follow the study protocol. A participant can withdraw his or her participation without justification at any time and this will not influence the treatment at Steno Diabetes Center of the participant.
Data storage All procedures and facilities for data handling and storage will follow the rules and regulations of Datatilsynet. Permission from Datatilsynet for collecting and storing the data will be sought prior to the study start.
All data from will be stored at the Steno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 4, in Gentofte, Denmark. No person sensitive data will be shared with collaborator outside of Steno Diabetes Center. Data on analyses done at the German Diabetes Institute will be handle only by use of the patients trail number.
All data gathered on paper during the clinical examination will be stored in a locked archive at Steno Diabetes Center.
Publication Data is owned by the Steno Diabetes Center A/S. Positive (significant), negative (non-significant) and inconclusive results will be published as soon as it is scientifically justifiable.
Significance and perspectives If the project shows an effect of RIC on PAD the next step will to test the treatment method in a larger trial where walking distance will be the primary outcome. Also it is possible that patients with foot ulcers and patients with critical peripheral ischemia could benefit from the treatment.
RIC treatment could prove to be an attractive non-pharmacological non-surgical treatment option for a large population of diabetes patients. The trial will result in 5 publications on the efficacy of RIC on neuronal function, on vascular function, on lipidomic profiles, on marker of inflammation and oxidative stress (Tentative titles of articles are listed in Appendix 3) and patient empowerment and quality of life. The study is recommended by an independent Professor of Cardiology (Appendix 4).
Possible limitations It is debated whether or not diabetes can attenuated the efficacy of RIC treatment. Data from randomised clinical trials are conflicting . As the patients in the present study population will have some degree of neuropathy this may attenuate the effect of RIC on our outcomes. However a recent study has showed an effect of RIC on diabetic foot ulcers contradicting the above-mentioned hypothesis, as all diabetes patients with foot ulcers have some degree of neuropathy .
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic Conditioning | Active comparator | Device: AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic ConditioningDaily cuff treatment of arm with 4 cycles of 5 minute forearm ischemia/reperfusion (200 mmHG of pressure) on top of standard care. |
| AutoRIC: Sham device treatment | Sham comparator | Device: AutoRIC: Sham device treatmentDaily sham device treatment of arm, 4 cycles of 5 minute (0 mmHG of pressure) on top of standard care. No ischemia induced. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Type 2 diabetes
- Age 40-80
- Complaints of claudication or reduced walking distance compared to equals
- Toe pressure from 40 mmHG to 70 mmHg
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Foot ulcer
- Peripheral gangrene or infection
- Toe pressure < 40 mmHg or > 90 mmHg
- Heart failure
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic Conditioning4 cycles of 5 minute forearm ischemia/reperfusion (200 mmHG) using the reusable fully automated RIC device "AutoRIC" from CellAegis Devices, Canada | Device | AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic Conditioning |
| AutoRIC: Sham device treatment4 cycles of 5 minute forearm sham treatment (no ischemia/reperfusion, 0 mmHG pressure) with the reusable fully automated RIC device "AutoRIC" from CellAegis Devices, Canada | Device | AutoRIC: Sham device treatment |
Primary outcome
Peripheral tissue oxygen oxygenation of dorsal part of foot
Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment
Transcutaneous oxygen tension
13 secondary outcomes
Toe Pressure
Time frame: At baseline and fter 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Central vasculopathy
Time frame: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Glycocalyx assessment
Time frame: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy, E/I ratio
Time frame: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Peripheral autonomic function
Time frame: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Peripheral nerve conduction function
Time frame: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Sensory peripheral neuropathy, vibration
Time frame: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Sensory peripheral neuropathy, light touch
Time frame: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Sensory peripheral neuropathy, pain sensation
Time frame: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
symptoms of neuropathy
Time frame: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy; 30/15 ratio
Time frame: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy, Valsalva maneuvre
Time frame: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Cardiovascular Autonomic neuropathy; Heart rate variability
Time frame: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Apr 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31215299Hansen CS, Jorgensen ME, Fleischer J, Botker HE, Rossing P. Efficacy of Long-Term Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Vascular and Neuronal Function in Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 2;8(13):e011779. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011779. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. To ensure data security no data will be shared outside the study group
Related trials for Peripheral Arterial Disease
Active, not recruiting
SUCCESS (SelUtion, Safety, effiCaCy, hEalth economicS and promS) PTA Study
Peripheral Artery Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Reducing Adverse Vascular Outcomes With Factor XI Inhibition in Adult Participants With Peripheral Artery Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)
Recruiting
The THOR IDE Study
Peripheral Artery Disease, Peripheral Artery Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Daily Stretching to Improve Walking in Older Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: The STRETCH PAD Study
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD), Intermittent Claudication
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter Rossing, Professor principal investigator
Head of department
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic Conditioning in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Peripheral tissue oxygen oxygenation of dorsal part of foot (time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02749942, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2018.