AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral Arterial DiseaseRISCAIDNCT02749942

RISCAID Study: Remote ISchemic Conditioning for Angiopathy In Diabetes

A study testing AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic Conditioning in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Objective The objective of this study is to investigate if long-term ambulatory remote ischemic conditioning can improve symptoms and signs of peripheral arterial disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Peripheral Arterial Disease
What is being tested?
AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic Conditioning
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
11 May 2016to 11 Jul 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Age 40-80
  • Complaints of claudication or reduced walking distance compared to equals
  • Toe pressure from 40 mmHG to 70 mmHg

Who cannot join

  • Foot ulcer
  • Peripheral gangrene or infection
  • Toe pressure < 40 mmHg or > 90 mmHg
  • Heart failure
  • Pregnancy
  • Treatment with anti-platelet drugs besides acetylsalicylic acid
  • Cancer
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Steno Diabetes Center

    Gentofte Municipality, 2820

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: The RISCAID Study: Remote ISchemic Conditioning for Angiopathy In Diabetes

Objective The objective of this study is to investigate if long-term ambulatory remote ischemic conditioning can improve symptoms and signs of peripheral arterial disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Background Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a vast socioeconomic challenge in the community of diabetes patients, causing foot ulcers and lower extremity amputations. The main treatment option for the complication is operative revascularisation. Thus there is a need for new treatment modalities for diabetes patients with PAD.

Read more

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is at non-invasive non-pharmacological treatment which has been shown to attenuate tissue damage caused by ischemia e.g. in hearts subjected to ischemia. RIC treatment consists of brief repetitive periods of ischemia induced in an extremity e.g. an arm. Recent findings show that six week RIC treatment improves healing of diabetic foot ulcers, suggesting a possible effect on the underlying pathological causes of ulcers e.g. PAD.

Hypothesis The investigators hypothesize that RIC treatment can improve markers of inflammation, vascular and neuronal function and the sense of empowerment in type 2 diabetes patients with reduced peripheral blood supply.

Aim to conduct a single center double-blinded randomized placebo controlled study investigating the efficacy of home based 12-week RIC treatment on markers of vascular, neuronal function, inflammation and serum lipid composition in 40 type 2 diabetes patients from Steno Diabetes Center with non-critical PAD.

to qualitatively investigate the experience of empowerment related to the use of Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) treatment and the mechanisms affecting if and how participants take up the RIC treatment.

Read the detailed description

Objective The driving objective of this study is to investigate if long-term ambulatory remote ischemic conditioning can improve symptoms and signs of peripheral arterial disease and the sense of empowerment in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Background Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is vast challenge in the community of diabetes patients. The prevalence of PAD in diabetes patients exceeds that of non-diabetic individuals and is estimated to be about 26% in diabetes patients over 65 years of age and 71% in patients over 70 years . PAD is the major cause of foot ulcers and lower extremity amputations, which has great socioeconomic implications . The main treatment option for the complication is operative revascularisation which in diabetes patient is associated with increased rates of complication and mortality compared to non-diabetes patients . Pharmacological treatment with e.g. anti-platelet drugs in patients with PAD has shown effect on walking distance has not been indorsed as standard treatment.

Thus there is a need for new treatment options for diabetes patients with PAD. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a non-invasive non-pharmacological treatment that has been shown to attenuate tissue damage caused by ischemia, reducing infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction , reducing organ damage in patient undergoing transplantation and having neuroprotective effects in patients with stroke .

RIC treatment consists of brief repetitive periods of ischemia induced in an extremity e.g. an arm. It is believed that the effect of RIC is mediated through both neuronal and humoral pathways, however the mechanisms behind are not fully understood.

RIC has been shown to have beneficial effects by attenuating platelet activation and aggregation, improving endothelial function , improvement of microcirculation , down-regulation of neutrophil function , down-regulation of inflammatory gene expression , improving mitochondrial function and inducing changes in serum lipid composition One of few long-term RIC treatment studies has shown that twice daily RIC treatment for 300 days is feasible. The study showed that RIC could reduce the recurrence of stroke

. No studies are presently investigating the effect of long-term RIC on PAD in diabetes patients (Clinicaltrials.gov search 22nd of October 2015), the concept has however recently been presented in the literature . Two studies have addressed the acute effect of one RIC treatment on walking distance in non-diabetic patients with claudication. The results were inconclusive due to small sample sizes, but a trend towards improvement was shown. It is however likely that long-term RIC treatment is needed to show a beneficial effect of RIC on the pathology behind claudication - vascular and neuronal damage.

Hypothesis We hypothesize that the long-term RIC treatment can improve PAD. PAD is caused by both micro- and macrovascular deficits. Reduced microvascular circulation can lead to distal nerve damage which in turn can both reduce peripheral circulation and cause tissue degeneration. Reduced macro vascular function is a direct cause of peripheral ischemia (2). It is possible that RIC could attenuate the pathophysiological processes in the micro- and microvasculature related to PAD by the abovementioned mechanisms and thereby improving of both neuronal and vascular function.

Thus the present clinical evidence of the beneficial effects of RIC may be translated into a new safe and simple non-invasive non-pharmacological treatment of PAD in diabetes patients, preventing progression to critical ischemia and amputation.

We also hypothesize that home-based and self-administered RIC treatment can improve the sense of empowerment in patients with non-critical peripheral arterial disease and type 2 diabetes.

Aims and Methods

Primary aim:

to study the underlying mechanisms of the effects of long-term ambulatory RIC by investigating the effect on vascular function, neuronal function, markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction and lipidomic profiles.

Secondary aim to study the the experience of the use of RIC treatment and with focus on barriers that affect the uptake of the RIC treatment, and the effects of treatment on life quality and empowerment.

Study design The study will consist of a single-center randomised double blinded placebo controlled trial.

The trial will be performed to investigate the beneficial effects of RIC treatment on the study outcomes described below. The RIC treatment duration will be 12 weeks and 40 patients from the Steno Diabetes Center will be included in the trial. All tests and analyses will performed at Steno Diabetes Center expect for markers of inflammation and oxidative stress which will be performed at Dept. of inflammation, German Diabetes Center and institute of Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center. All necessary facilities are available at the study sites.

Most present knowledge of the beneficial effects of RIC listed above has come from short term trials (duration = 1 day. 20 days for one study) with small populations (n ≤ 40). Thus it is plausible that the study setup will yield significant differences in outcomes between the study arms. The study may also indicate if changes in outcomes will occur post RIC treatment.

For the qualitative part of the study relevant questionnaires will be filled out at baseline and end-of trial. In addition 15 random patients will be asked to attend "think-aloud" interviews within the last 4 weeks of treatment.

Power calculation RIC has shown to increase tissue oxygen tension (a measure of microcirculation) in a short-term study we hypothesize that RIC treatment will increase tissue oxygen tension in the feet (Primary outcome) by 13% (SD = 10%). With 90% power and a two sided significance level of 0.05 the sample size needed to detect this change is 16 in each group - 32 participants in total. Taking a drop-out ratio of 10% into account and given the inaccurate nature of this power calculation the sample size of the study will be 20 patients in each group.

Statistics The effects of treatment on outcome measures will be estimated by using complete-case logistic regression analyses. If needed outcome variables will be log-transformed using the natural logarithm to meet model assumptions of the distribution of the model residuals if necessary. Interactions between sex and all determinants will be investigated in all models to investigate possible sex interactions differences. A level of significance of 5% will be used.

Analyses will be performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Discontinuation of single person participation in study or cancellation of whole study The doctor responsible for the study can at any time discontinue the study for any reason e.g. for safety concerns. The responsible doctor can discontinue the participation of any single participant if informed consent is withdrawn, the a participant wants to get pregnant or get pregnant, if a participant does not follow the study protocol. A participant can withdraw his or her participation without justification at any time and this will not influence the treatment at Steno Diabetes Center of the participant.

Data storage All procedures and facilities for data handling and storage will follow the rules and regulations of Datatilsynet. Permission from Datatilsynet for collecting and storing the data will be sought prior to the study start.

All data from will be stored at the Steno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 4, in Gentofte, Denmark. No person sensitive data will be shared with collaborator outside of Steno Diabetes Center. Data on analyses done at the German Diabetes Institute will be handle only by use of the patients trail number.

All data gathered on paper during the clinical examination will be stored in a locked archive at Steno Diabetes Center.

Publication Data is owned by the Steno Diabetes Center A/S. Positive (significant), negative (non-significant) and inconclusive results will be published as soon as it is scientifically justifiable.

Significance and perspectives If the project shows an effect of RIC on PAD the next step will to test the treatment method in a larger trial where walking distance will be the primary outcome. Also it is possible that patients with foot ulcers and patients with critical peripheral ischemia could benefit from the treatment.

RIC treatment could prove to be an attractive non-pharmacological non-surgical treatment option for a large population of diabetes patients. The trial will result in 5 publications on the efficacy of RIC on neuronal function, on vascular function, on lipidomic profiles, on marker of inflammation and oxidative stress (Tentative titles of articles are listed in Appendix 3) and patient empowerment and quality of life. The study is recommended by an independent Professor of Cardiology (Appendix 4).

Possible limitations It is debated whether or not diabetes can attenuated the efficacy of RIC treatment. Data from randomised clinical trials are conflicting . As the patients in the present study population will have some degree of neuropathy this may attenuate the effect of RIC on our outcomes. However a recent study has showed an effect of RIC on diabetic foot ulcers contradicting the above-mentioned hypothesis, as all diabetes patients with foot ulcers have some degree of neuropathy .

Being tested
AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic Conditioning, AutoRIC: Sham device treatment
Keywords
Diabetes, Remote Ischemic Conditioning, Neuropathy, Angiopathy
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Arterial Disease, Diabetes Mellitus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic ConditioningDevice

    4 cycles of 5 minute forearm ischemia/reperfusion (200 mmHG) using the reusable fully automated RIC device "AutoRIC" from CellAegis Devices, Canada

  • AutoRIC: Sham device treatmentDevice

    4 cycles of 5 minute forearm sham treatment (no ischemia/reperfusion, 0 mmHG pressure) with the reusable fully automated RIC device "AutoRIC" from CellAegis Devices, Canada

Study groups in NCT02749942
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic ConditioningActive comparatorDaily cuff treatment of arm with 4 cycles of 5 minute forearm ischemia/reperfusion (200 mmHG of pressure) on top of standard care.
Receives: Device: AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic Conditioning
AutoRIC: Sham device treatmentSham comparatorDaily sham device treatment of arm, 4 cycles of 5 minute (0 mmHG of pressure) on top of standard care. No ischemia induced.
Receives: Device: AutoRIC: Sham device treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Peripheral tissue oxygen oxygenation of dorsal part of foot

    Transcutaneous oxygen tension

    Measured: Change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Toe Pressure

    pressure

    Measured: At baseline and fter 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment

  2. Central vasculopathy

    Arterial stiffness assessed and central blood pressure by pulse wave velocity measures

    Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment

  3. Glycocalyx assessment

    Arterial function assessed by sublingual capillary density and perfused boundary region

    Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment

  4. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy, E/I ratio

    Cardiovascular reflex test: E/I ratio

    Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment

  5. Peripheral autonomic function

    Peripheral small-fibre sympathetic function by sudomotor function testing assessed by electrochemical skin conductance

    Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment

  6. Peripheral nerve conduction function

    Sural nerve conduction velocity

    Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment

  7. Sensory peripheral neuropathy, vibration

    toe vibration sensation threshold

    Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment

  8. Sensory peripheral neuropathy, light touch

    light touch assessed by 10 gram monofilament

    Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment

  9. Sensory peripheral neuropathy, pain sensation

    pain sensation assessed by pin prick

    Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment

  10. symptoms of neuropathy

    Minnesota Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire

    Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment

  11. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy; 30/15 ratio

    Cardiovascular autonomic reflex test; E/I ratio

    Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment

  12. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy, Valsalva maneuvre

    Cardiovascular autonomic reflex test; Valsalva maneuvre

    Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment

  13. Cardiovascular Autonomic neuropathy; Heart rate variability

    5 minute resting hear rate variability measure.

    Measured: At baseline and 1, 4 and 12 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks post treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start11 May 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2017
  4. Study completion11 Jul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02749942
Sponsor's protocol ID
RISCAID
Acronym
RISCAID
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
4 Apr 2016
Last updated
12 Apr 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: To ensure data security no data will be shared outside the study group

Publications

  • Hansen CS, Jorgensen ME, Fleischer J, Botker HE, Rossing P. Efficacy of Long-Term Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Vascular and Neuronal Function in Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 2;8(13):e011779. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011779. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

    PubMed 31215299

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing AutoRIC: Remote Ischemic Conditioning in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Peripheral tissue oxygen oxygenation of dorsal part of foot (time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02749942, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in