Rheumatoid ArthritisVALUENCT02750800
Post-marketing Observational Study to Evaluate the Incremental Impact of AbbVie's Patient Support Program on Patient Reported Outcomes and Health Resource Utilization in Inflammatory Arthritis, Psoriasis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Hungary (VALUE)
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by AbbVie.
Trial summary
The objective of this post-marketing observational study (PMOS) was to evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab plus the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient support program in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (Ps), Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Psoriatic Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Adalimumab and AbbVie Care 2.0
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 427 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 7 Apr 2016to 3 Apr 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (Ps), Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC)
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (Ps), Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) by the treating physician
- Age ≥ 18 years at the time of enrollment
- RA, AS, PsA, Ps, UC or CD patients for whom adalimumab treatment was indicated as per local Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and professional/reimbursement guidelines
- Participants assigned to adalimumab treatment not more than 1 month prior to inclusion
- Participants to whom participation in AbbVie Care 2.0 Patient Support Program (PSP) program was offered and participant decided to join and had started the PSP
- Participants willing to be involved in the study and to sign patient informed consent form (ICF) and subject information form (SIF) in order to allow use and disclosure of his/her personal health information
Who cannot join
- Participants who could not be treated with adalimumab according to the local adalimumab SmPC and local professional and reimbursement guidelines
- Participants treated with > 1 prior biologic disease modifying anti rheumatic drug (DMARD) for RA, AS, PsA, Ps, UC or CD
- Prior treatment with adalimumab for more than 1 month
- Participants currently participating in other clinical research studies
- Participants who were unwilling or unable to complete the quality of life and other patient-reported questionnaires
About this study
Official title: Post-marketing Observational Study to Evaluate the Effect of HUMIRA (Adalimumab) Treatment With AbbVie's Patient Support Program on Patient Reported Outcomes and Health Resource Utilization in Inflammatory Arthritis, Psoriasis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Hungary in a Real-life Setting: VALUE
The objective of this post-marketing observational study (PMOS) was to evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab plus the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient support program in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (Ps), Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in the routine clinical setting in Hungary.
Read the detailed description
This was a prospective, open label, multicenter, observational cohort study. Adalimumab was prescribed in the usual manner in accordance with the terms of the local marketing authorization and professional and reimbursement guidelines with regards to dose, population and indication. AbbVie offered an array of services as part of a patient support program, called AbbVie Care 2.0, to study participants. The purpose of the AbbVie Care 2.0 program was to provide educational resources that aimed to help participants understand their health condition and disease management (e.g., lifestyle - exercise or diet), but also help to them understand how to administer the product safely and be empowered to stay on track with their prescribed treatment plan, all with the goal of maximizing patient outcomes. There were five target visits: a baseline visit at enrollment and follow-up visits at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Psoriasis, Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis
- Being tested
- Adalimumab, AbbVie Care 2.0
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid arthritis, Ankylosing spondylitis, Psoriatic arthritis, Psoriasis, Crohn's disease, Ulcerative colitis, Patient support program, Quality of life, Patient related outcomes, Observational study, Adalimumab, Humira, Adherence, Health-related quality of life, Healthcare resource utilization, Disease activity, Treatment satisfaction, Workability
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Spondylitis, Ankylosing, Arthritis, Psoriatic, Psoriasis, Crohn Disease, Colitis, Ulcerative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AdalimumabBiological
Also called Humira, ABT-D2E7
Pre-filled syringe or pen, administered by subcutaneous injection
AbbVie Care 2.0Behavioural
Supportive services provided to participants included reminder calls, emails, text messages, nursing services, dietician, and psychological support. An adalimumab starter pack, injection guide, digital and print educational materials were also provided.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab and AbbVie Care 2.0 | Adalimumab administered via subcutaneous (SC) injection for 12 months according to the approved EMA label and Hungarian financial protocols and supportive services via the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient support program Receives: Biological: Adalimumab; Behavioral: AbbVie Care 2.0 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at 12 Months
The health assessment questionnaire Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2 ) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best"). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (21)
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at 12 Months
The health assessment questionnaire Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2 ) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best"). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at 12 Months
The EQ-5D-5L measures quality of life in five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on five levels of severity (1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, 5: extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS). Responses to the five dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score. The range for the EQ-5D-5L index score is 0 to 1 with '0' defined as a health state equivalent to being dead and '1' is full health. The higher the score the better the health status. Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale Score at 12 Months
The EQ-5D-5L measures quality of life in five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on five levels of severity (1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, 5: extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS). Participants rated their health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints were labelled 100, "The best health you can imagine"and 0, "The worst health you can imagine". Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis
The SIBDQ is a disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire, able to detect and define meaningful clinical changes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) participants by measuring physical, social and emotional status. The SIBDQ consists of 10 questions; each question is scored on a scale from 1 (poor QOL) to 7 (optimum QOL). A higher score indicates a better health-related quality of life. Total scores range from 10 (poor QoL) to 70 (good QoL). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis
The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a self-reported questionnaire for capturing psychosocial effects of chronic skin disease on different areas of life within the previous seven days. The ten questions cover six areas: symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationship, effects of treatment on daily life. Total DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with 0 corresponding to the best quality of life and 30 to the worst. Negative numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis With Axial Symptoms
The Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) questionnaire is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with AS. Participants answer yes/no to 18 items assessing the current impact of AS on their quality of life status. The total score ranges from 0 to 18, with lower scores representing better AS-specific quality of life. Negative numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 Months
The 14-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Version 1.4 is an instrument to show that adherence is expected to be related with participants' satisfaction with therapy and that such satisfaction can be a function of not only the effect of the treatment, but also the services offered. TSQM responses are used to derive scores for scales measuring effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction (based on participant evaluation over the last 2 to 3 weeks, or since last medication use). Scores for each of the 4 scales range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a better state or outcome (e.g., greater perceived effectiveness or satisfaction). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Satisfaction With Information About Medicines Scale (SIMS) Score at 12 Months
The Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale (SIMS) assesses whether an individual has received enough information about a range of topics relating to prescribed medication. Participants are asked to rate the amount of information they have received using the following response scale: "too much", "about right", "too little", "none received", "none needed". Total satisfaction rating is obtained by summing the scores for each item. If the participant is satisfied that he/she has received a particular aspect of medication information (with a rating of "about right" or "none needed"), this is given a score of 1. If the participant is dissatisfied with the amount of information received (with a rating of "too much", "too little", or "none received"), this is scored 0. Total scores range from 0 to 17 with high scores indicating a high degree of overall satisfaction with the amount of medication information received. Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, 4 Questions (MMAS-4) Score at 12 Months
The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-4 (MMAS-4 ) is a 4-item self-reported measure of medication-taking behavior. It measures intentional and non-intentional non-adherence. The MMAS-4 score is the sum of four questions and ranges from 0 to 4: The coding is 0, 1 (low adherence), 2, 3 (moderate adherence) and 4 (high adherence). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 Months
The WPAI-SHP is a questionnaire used to assess the effect of the participant's health problems on their ability to work and perform regular activities. Presenteeism indicates the percentage of impairment while working due to health problems. Absenteeism indicates the percentage of work time missed due to health problems. Total activity impairment (TAI) indicates the percentage of general (non-work) activity impairment due to health problems. Total work productivity impairment (TWPI) indicates the percentage of overall work impairment due to health problems. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity. Negative numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave Days
The number of hospital inpatient days over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total post-treatment hospital inpatient days was obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. The number of sick leave days (in employed participants) over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total post-treatment sick leave days was obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Negative numbers indicate improvement from the prior 12 months.
Measured: 12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick Leaves
The number of hospitalizations over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total hospitalizations were obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. The number of sick leaves (in employed participants) over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total sick leaves were obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Negative numbers indicate improvement from the prior 12 months.
Measured: 12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient Visits
The number of outpatient visits to general practitioners, immune-mediated inflammatory disease specialists, ophthalmologists, gastroenterologists, dermatologists, rheumatologists, physiatrists, physiotherapists, and nurses over the 3 months preceding the first adalimumab administration was documented and multiplied by 4 to obtain an estimate of 12-month data. The 12-month total outpatient visits were obtained by adding the values obtained at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Negative numbers indicate improvement from the prior 12 months.
Measured: 12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)
Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at 12 Months
The Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the patient's assessment of global disease activity (on a visual analog scale [VAS] from 0 to 10 cm) are included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score >5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score <3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score <2.6 indicates clinical remission. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ESR) at 12 Months
The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) tool is a self-administered questionnaire/objective laboratory evaluation. The questionnaire assesses disease activity, back pain, and peripheral pain/swelling on a numeric rating scale (from 0 (normal) to 10 (very severe)) and duration of morning stiffness on a numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 representing a duration of ≥2 hours). The laboratory parameter is a measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hour; ESR). Data from five variables (disease activity, back pain, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling, and ESR) are combined to yield a score (0 to no defined upper limit). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at 12 Months
The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a research tool used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's disease. Participants were asked to record the frequency of stools, abdominal pain and general well-being on a daily basis. In addition to the diary data, the investigator assessed the following for the calculation of CDAI: presence of complications (arthritis/arthralgia, iritis/uveitis, erythema nodosum/pyoderma gangrenosum/aphthous stomatitis, anal fissure/fistula/abscess, other fistula, and fever), the use of antidiarrheal medicines, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight. The CDAI is the sum of the products of each item multiplied by a weighting factor and generally ranges from 0 up to 600, where remission of Crohn's disease is defined as CDAI < 150, and severe disease is defined as CDAI > 450. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo (pMayo) Score at 12 Months
The Partial Mayo score (Mayo score without endoscopy) ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment [PGA]), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at 12 Months
The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is a combination of the intensity of psoriasis, assessed by the erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness) and desquamation (scaling) on a scale from no symptoms (0), slight (1), moderate (2), marked (3) or very marked (4), together with the percentage of the area affected, rated on a scale from 0 to 6. PASI scoring is performed at four body areas, the head, arms, trunk, and legs. The total PASI score ranges from 0 to 72. The higher the total score, the more severe the disease. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Participants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 Months
All participants enrolled in the study were enrolled in the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient support (PSP) program. Participants rated the PSP program as either "Very good", "good", "less satisfying" or "I do not use the services" at the last study visit.
Measured: 12 months
Correlation Between Disease Activity Scores and Disease-specific Quality of Life Scores
To define possible correlations between disease activity scores and disease specific quality of life scores, correlation analyses were performed. Correlation between patient socio-demographics, patient type and indication was not completed because these were uninterpretable per protocol.
ASQoL= Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life questionnaire
ASDAS(ESR) = Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; laboratory parameter is a measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hour; ESR)
DAS28(ESR)= Disease Activity Score 28; laboratory parameter is a measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hour; ESR)
SIBDQ= Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire
CDAI= Clinical Disease Activity Index
DLQI= Dermatology Life Quality Index
PASI= Psoriasis Area and Severity Index
pMayo= Partial Mayo score (Mayo score without endoscopy)
Measured: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Correlation Between the Length of AbbVie Care 2.0 Duration and Participant Outcomes
The effectiveness of the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient care support program (PSP) on participant outcomes was to be analyzed by applying mixed linear models on outcomes including PSP utilization (continuous vs terminated) as fixed variables. Baseline participant outcome values were also to be included in the model.
Measured: From Baseline (Month 0) to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study start7 Apr 2016
- Primary completion3 Apr 2018
- Study completion3 Apr 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AbbVieThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 427 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- AbbVie Inc., Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02750800
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P15-673
- Acronym
- VALUE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 13 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 6 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Morisky DE, Green LW, Levine DM. Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care. 1986 Jan;24(1):67-74. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198601000-00007.
PubMed 3945130Morisky DE, Malotte CK, Choi P, Davidson P, Rigler S, Sugland B, Langer M. A patient education program to improve adherence rates with antituberculosis drug regimens. Health Educ Q. 1990 Fall;17(3):253-67. doi: 10.1177/109019819001700303.
PubMed 2228629Morisky DE, DiMatteo MR. Improving the measurement of self-reported medication nonadherence: response to authors. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;64(3):255-7; discussion 258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Dec 8. No abstract available.
PubMed 21144706
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Post-marketing Observational Study to Evaluate the Effect of HUMIRA (Adalimumab) Treatment With AbbVie's Patient Support Program on Patient Reported Outcomes and Health Resource Utilization in Inflammatory Arthritis, Psoriasis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Hungary in a Real-life Setting: VALUE
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02750800
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VALUE / P15-673
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Psoriasis, Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid arthritis, Ankylosing spondylitis, Psoriatic arthritis, Psoriasis, Crohn's disease, Ulcerative colitis, Patient support program, Quality of life
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 427 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVieIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 7 Apr 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Nov 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this post-marketing observational study (PMOS) was to evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab plus the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient support program in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (Ps), Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in the routine clinical setting in Hungary.
Detailed description
This was a prospective, open label, multicenter, observational cohort study. Adalimumab was prescribed in the usual manner in accordance with the terms of the local marketing authorization and professional and reimbursement guidelines with regards to dose, population and indication. AbbVie offered an array of services as part of a patient support program, called AbbVie Care 2.0, to study participants. The purpose of the AbbVie Care 2.0 program was to provide educational resources that aimed to help participants understand their health condition and disease management (e.g., lifestyle - exercise or diet), but also help to them understand how to administer the product safely and be empowered to stay on track with their prescribed treatment plan, all with the goal of maximizing patient outcomes. There were five target visits: a baseline visit at enrollment and follow-up visits at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab and AbbVie Care 2.0 | – | Biological: Adalimumab, Behavioral: AbbVie Care 2.0Adalimumab administered via subcutaneous (SC) injection for 12 months according to the approved EMA label and Hungarian financial protocols and supportive services via the AbbVie Care 2.0 patient support program |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (Ps), Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC)
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (Ps), Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) by the treating physician
- Age ≥ 18 years at the time of enrollment
- RA, AS, PsA, Ps, UC or CD patients for whom adalimumab treatment was indicated as per local Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and professional/reimbursement guidelines
- Participants assigned to adalimumab treatment not more than 1 month prior to inclusion
- Participants to whom participation in AbbVie Care 2.0 Patient Support Program (PSP) program was offered and participant decided to join and had started the PSP
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participants who could not be treated with adalimumab according to the local adalimumab SmPC and local professional and reimbursement guidelines
- Participants treated with > 1 prior biologic disease modifying anti rheumatic drug (DMARD) for RA, AS, PsA, Ps, UC or CD
- Prior treatment with adalimumab for more than 1 month
- Participants currently participating in other clinical research studies
- Participants who were unwilling or unable to complete the quality of life and other patient-reported questionnaires
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AdalimumabAlso: Humira, ABT-D2E7Pre-filled syringe or pen, administered by subcutaneous injection | Biological | Adalimumab and AbbVie Care 2.0 |
| AbbVie Care 2.0Supportive services provided to participants included reminder calls, emails, text messages, nursing services, dietician, and psychological support. An adalimumab starter pack, injection guide, digital and print educational materials were also provided. | Behavioural | Adalimumab and AbbVie Care 2.0 |
Primary outcome
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
The health assessment questionnaire Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2 ) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best"). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.
21 secondary outcomes
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale Score at 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Score at 12 Months in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis With Axial Symptoms
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine (TSQM) Version 1.4 Score at 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Satisfaction With Information About Medicines Scale (SIMS) Score at 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, 4 Questions (MMAS-4) Score at 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Score at 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospital Inpatient Days and Number of Sick Leave Days
Time frame: 12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Sick Leaves
Time frame: 12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)
Mean Change From the 12 Months Prior to Treatment With Adalimumab to the 12 Months After Beginning Treatment With Adalimumab in Health Resource Utilization: Number of Outpatient Visits
Time frame: 12 months prior to treatment start (Month 0 [baseline]) and 12 months after treatment start (total 24 months)
Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ESR) at 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo (pMayo) Score at 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score at 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Participants' Rating of the AbbVie Care 2.0 Program at 12 Months
Time frame: 12 months
Correlation Between Disease Activity Scores and Disease-specific Quality of Life Scores
Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months
Correlation Between the Length of AbbVie Care 2.0 Duration and Participant Outcomes
Time frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Nov 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 3945130Morisky DE, Green LW, Levine DM. Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care. 1986 Jan;24(1):67-74. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198601000-00007.
- Background: PubMed 2228629Morisky DE, Malotte CK, Choi P, Davidson P, Rigler S, Sugland B, Langer M. A patient education program to improve adherence rates with antituberculosis drug regimens. Health Educ Q. 1990 Fall;17(3):253-67. doi: 10.1177/109019819001700303.
- Background: PubMed 21144706Morisky DE, DiMatteo MR. Improving the measurement of self-reported medication nonadherence: response to authors. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;64(3):255-7; discussion 258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Dec 8. No abstract available.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Frequency and Complications of Major Orthopedic Procedures in Medicare Beneficiaries
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 2
A PHASE II PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-MASKED CONTROLLED STUDY ASSESSING THE SAFETY & EFFICACY OF RHPRG4 (450 µG/ML RECOMBINANT HUMAN PROTEOGLYCAN 4) COMPARED TO VEHICLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SJÖGREN'S RELATED DRY EYE DISEASE
Sjögren's Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Diseases With Salivary Gland Involvement
Healthy Volunteer, Sjogren's Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of MK-8690 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (MK-8690-004)
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
AbbVie Inc. study director
AbbVie
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by AbbVie.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at 12 Months (time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02750800, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2019.