AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart Failure, Left Ventricular DysfunctionRAFT-LVendoNCT02757976

Resynchronization for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial - LV Endocardial

A study testing Conventional CRT and LV endocardial CRT in people with Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Dysfunction, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 11 sites in Canada.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This trial will compare two strategies for patients with Heart Failure, Left Ventricular systolic dysfunction, and intermediate QRS durations. The control group is conventional CRT. The experimental group is LVendo CRT Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Conventional CRT and LV endocardial CRT
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
8 participants
Where
11 sitesCanada
Study dates
8 Mar 2018to 20 Jun 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with NYHA Class II or III or ambulatory IV HF symptoms
  • Optimal HF Medical Therapy of at least 3 months (2009 ACCF/AHA, ESC 2012)
  • LVEF less than or equal to 35%
  • Sinus rhythm (can have paroxysmal atrial fibrillation)
  • QRS morphology is non-RBBB
  • QRS durations more than or equal to 120 ms, but less than 150 ms
  • Patients are able to receive chronic oral anticoagulation
  • Patients with pacemaker or ICD that meet the above criteria may be upgraded to CRT-D or CRT-P

Who cannot join

  • Planned Atrial Fibrillation Ablation within 12 months
  • Patients with mitral or tricuspid prosthetic valve that precludes the placement of an LV lead transvenously or trans-septally
  • Patients with RBBB
  • Patients with LV thrombus
  • Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation
  • Patients with contraindications to oral anti-coagulation
Show all 17Show fewer
  • In-hospital patients with acute cardiac or non-cardiac illness that requires intensive care
  • Acute coronary syndrome (including MI) < 4 weeks
  • Coronary revascularization (CABG or PCI) < 3 months
  • Uncorrected or uncorrectable primary valvular disease
  • Restrictive, hypertrophic or reversible form of cardiomyopathy
  • Severe primary pulmonary disease such as cor pulmonale
  • Expected to undergo cardiac transplantation within one year (status I)
  • Patients with a life expectancy of less than one year from non-cardiac cause.
  • Patients included in other clinical trials that will affect the objectives of this study
  • Those unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
  • Those with a history of noncompliance to medical therapy

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 1 country.

11 sites in 1 country

Canada11 sites
  • Libin Cardiovascular Institute

    Calgary, Alberta

  • Queen Elizabeth II Health Science

    Halifax, Nova Scotia

  • London Health Science Centre

    London, Ontario

  • McGill University Health Centre

    Montreal, Quebec

  • Montreal Heart Institute

    Montreal, Quebec

  • Royal Columbia Hospital

    New Westminster, British Columbia

  • University of Ottawa Heart Institute

    Ottawa, Ontario

  • Institut Univ.cardiologie/pneumologie de Québec

    Québec, Quebec

  • CHUS Le Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke

    Sherbrooke, Quebec

  • St. Michael Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario

  • Vancouver General Hospital

    Vancouver, British Columbia, K4A 3B2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

This trial will compare two strategies for patients with Heart Failure, Left Ventricular systolic dysfunction, and intermediate QRS durations. The control group is conventional CRT. The experimental group is LVendo CRT

Read the detailed description

Patients randomized to the Conventional CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD. Device implantation will be performed within 10 working days of randomization.

Patients randomized to LV endocardial CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD, placed in the same time frame and will have RA and RV leads implanted as the conventional CRT group. The device will be implanted in a facility that has the capacity to perform trans-atrial septal puncture with ultrasound guidance. The LV lead will be placed using a trans-atrial septal approach using a specially designed puncture tools and LVendo delivery tool kits specifically designed for this study

Being tested
Conventional CRT, LV endocardial CRT
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Conventional CRTDevice

    Patients randomized to the Conventional CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD. Device implantation will be performed within 10 working days of randomization. Conscious sedation or general anesthesia can be used for the implant procedure. The device will be implanted in a facility that has the capacity to perform coronary sinus venography at the time of implantation. The RA lead will be placed in the RA appendage or high RA. The RV lead should be placed at the RV apex or distal RV septum (R wave > 7 mV, pacing threshold < 1.5 V at a pulse-width of 0.5 ms). The LV lead should be positioned through the CS to an LV branch. The lead should be placed at one of the left ventricular venous branches, avoiding the LV apex and scar region identified by pre-implant imaging.

  • LV endocardial CRTDevice

    Patients randomized to LV endocardial CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD, placed in the same time frame, and will have RA and RV leads implanted as the conventional CRT group. The device will be implanted in a facility that has the capacity to perform trans-atrial septal puncture with ultrasound guidance (TEE or ICE) at the time of implantation. The LV lead will be placed using a trans-atrial septal approach, using a specially designed puncture tools and LVendo delivery tool kits specifically designed for this study. Special care will be taken to avoid the LV apex and transmural scar identified by pre-implant imaging.

Study groups in NCT02757976
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional CRTActive comparatorPatients randomized to the Conventional CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD. Device implantation will be performed within 10 working days of randomization. Conscious sedation or general anesthesia can be used for the implant procedure. The device will be implanted in a facility that has the capacity to perform coronary sinus venography at the time of implantation. The RA lead will be placed in the RA appendage or high RA. The RV lead should be placed at the RV apex or distal RV septum (R wave > 7 mV, pacing threshold < 1.5 V at a pulse-width of 0.5 ms). The LV lead should be positioned through the CS to an LV branch. The lead should be placed at one of the left ventricular venous branches, avoiding the LV apex and scar region identified by pre-implant imaging
Receives: Device: Conventional CRT
LV endocardial CRTExperimentalPatients randomized to LV endocardial CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD, placed in the same time frame, and will have RA and RV leads implanted as the conventional CRT group. The device will be implanted in a facility that has the capacity to perform trans-atrial septal puncture with ultrasound guidance (TEE or ICE) at the time of implantation. The LV lead will be placed using a trans-atrial septal approach, using a specially designed puncture tools and LVendo delivery tool kits specifically designed for this study. Special care will be taken to avoid the LV apex and transmural scar identified by pre-implant imaging.
Receives: Device: LV endocardial CRT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assessment of LVESVi

    LV reverse remodeling as measured by the difference of LVESVi on echocardiography (echo)

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months & 12 months

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Ventricular arrhythmia burden determined by the device capture of arrhythmias and adjudication by a device review committee blinded to patient's treatment allocation.

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months & 12 months

  2. NT-proBNP measurement

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months & 12 months

  3. 6 Minute Hall Walk Distance

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months & 12 months

  4. Quality of Life Measure

    EQ5D-5L \& Minnesota Living with HF

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months & 12 months

  5. Mortality

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months & 12 months

  6. Heart Failure Admissions

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months & 12 months

  7. Reduction of LVEF

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months & 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 May 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start8 Mar 2018
  3. Primary completion20 Jun 2019
  4. Study completion20 Jun 2019

Why it stopped: Consensus RAFT-LVendo Steering Committee to terminate.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This trial will compare two management strategies for patients with Heart Failure, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and intermediate prolonged QRS duration (120-149ms). The control group is conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). The experimental group is LV endocardial CRT.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
8 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02757976
Sponsor's protocol ID
252410
Acronym
RAFT-LVendo
Status last verified
Sep 2020
First submitted
28 Apr 2016
Last updated
4 Sep 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Conventional CRT and LV endocardial CRT in people with Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Dysfunction, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 11 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Consensus RAFT-LVendo Steering Committee to terminate.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assessment of LVESVi (time frame: Baseline to 6 months & 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in