Renal CalculiNCT02760134
The Influence of SMP on Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo
A study testing Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in people with Renal Calculi, run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a well-established treatment modality for renal stones. It offers a high stone free rates and less invasive than open surgery. Nevertheless PCNL is an invasive and technically demanding procedure with inherent risks and complications. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Calculi
- What is being tested?
- Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Apr 2016to Mar 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 to 70 years
- Anesthesia rating(ASA) score 1 and 2
- No obvious preoperative symptoms of infection(chills, fever, etc.)
- Symptomatic renal calculi and diameter smaller than 25mm
Who cannot join
- Couldn't tolerate SMP
- Hydronephrosis
- Ureteral calculi or urinary tract anomalies, stricture or obstruction
- Abdominal cavity effusion affecting breathe
- Patients with congenital anomalies, e.g. ectopic kidney, polycystic
- Patients who underwent transplant or urinary diversion
- Uncorrected coagulopathy
- Patient undergoing any other surgical procedure during the same admission. (e.g. ureteroscopy)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
epartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510230
Guohua Zeng, Ph.D and M.D, +86 13802916676, gzgyzgh@vip.tom.com
Guohua Zeng, Ph.D and M.D
About this study
Official title: The Influence of Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy on Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a well-established treatment modality for renal stones. It offers a high stone free rates and less invasive than open surgery. Nevertheless PCNL is an invasive and technically demanding procedure with inherent risks and complications. The most troublesome morbidities are bleeding and injury to the kidney and its adjacent structures. Complications of PCNL tend to be associated with the accuracy of tract placement and the size of the nephrostomy tract. To improve the safety of PCNL, there is a trend toward using smaller and smaller nephrostomy tracts . With the smaller nephrostomy tract, there also arise the problems of compromised visual field and increased difficulty in stone extraction. Increase irrigation using pressure pump might improve the visualization and the passive egress of the stone fragments, but it also may concomitantly increase the intra-luminal pressure.
The present system of Super-Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) was developed to address many of these deficiencies. The basic components of SMP system are an 8.0 F miniaturized nephroscope with a newly designed irrigation-suction sheath with enhanced irrigation capability and modified nephrostomy sheath with continuous negative pressure aspiration. Its design was intended not only to prevent the excessive intrarenal pressure but also improve the visualization and the stone fragments extraction.
Little was known about renal pelvic pressure in vivo during SMP and about any correlation it might have had with postoperative fever and urosepsis. We measure the renal pelvic pressure during SMP to determine whether it will improve the renal pelvic pressure and improve the incidence of postoperative fever.
Read the detailed description
To evaluate the influence of SMP on renal pelvic pressure for the treatment of renal calculi measuring smaller than 25 mm. Investigators will do a single center randomized open-label trial,and investigators plan to perform this study in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University of China.
Investigators plan to beginning their study at April in 2016 and end at March in 2018.One hundred patients with renal calculi measuring smaller than 25 mm will be enrolled in this study. By simple random sampling technique, patients will be assigned to two 50-patient groups(group 1:F14,group2 :F12).All the patients will be diagnosed definitely before operations with non-contrast CT. Patients with positive preoperative urine culture should be treated with suitable antibiotics based on the culture sensitivity result for at least 72h before SMP. Patients who have negative urine culture should receive a single dose of broad spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis just prior to the procedure.
Surgical technique Routine preoperative preparations are carried out as for conventional percutaneous surgery. Under general anesthesia and with the patient in the lithotomy position, an open-ended 5F ureteral catheter is advanced into the renal pelvis under direct vision. The patient is then turned into the prone position. Percutaneous access is achieved using an 18-gauge coaxial needle to puncture the selected calyx under fluoroscopic or ultrasonic guidance. The success of the puncture is confirmed both by the free flow of the irrigation fluid and by fluoroscopic images. Using a guidewire, the dilatation is carried out with 10 F fascial dilators. Thenan irrigation-suction straight sheath, with the obturator, is advanced over the guidewire and introduced into the pelvicalyceal system. The guidewireis then removed, and the "handle" is connected to the straight sheath. The irrigation port of the irrigation-suction sheath is connected to an irrigation pump. The oblique tube of the sheath is connected to the specimen collection bottle, and the bottle then to the negative pressure aspirator. The irrigation fluid pressure is set as 200-250 mmHg. The suction pressure is controlled to a setting of 100-150 mmHg. The irrigation is delivered through the irrigation channel of the sheath. Thus, a one-way flow is created as the inflow that comes out of the irrigation channel of the sheath is immediately aspirated through the suction conduitof the sheath. Stone fragmentation is accomplished using either holmium laser or pneumatic lithotripter. The tiny pulverized stone fragments will pass around the scope and evacuate through the oblique sluice. If the stone fragments are too large to pass around the scope inside the sheath, the scope can be withdrawn slowly to proximal to the bifurcation in order to create an unobstructed channel for larger fragments evacuation. At the end of the procedure, a single fluoroscopic image is obtained to assess the stone-free status. A Double-J stent is placed only when there is the presence of an obstructing inflammatory ureteric edema, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, or concurrent treatment of ipsilateral ureteric stone with rigid ureteroscope. The sheath is removed, and the wound is either sutured or seal with absorbable gelatin. For patients with significant bleeding or extravasation, a nephrostomy tube is placed.
Measurement of Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo While preparing for the SMP, the open-ended ureteric catheter, which had been inserted into the renal collecting system retrogradely, was connected to the invasive blood pressure channel of patient monitor with a baroceptor. The baroceptor was fixed onto the horizontal plane of renal pelvis; after a zero adjustment, the measurement of renal pelvic pressure was in session. A computer collected the renal pelvic pressure data each second. Any factor that caused a high renal pelvic pressure was noticed .
Data collection Data for the 2 groups -demographic characteristics, site of access ,Hb decrease, CRP increase, WBC increase, postoperative pain, operation time, hospital stay, cases of tubeless, postoperative infection complications (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, urosepsis), stone clearance rate and the need for auxiliary treatment are compared.
Primary study endpoint: The renal pelvic pressure. Secondary endpoint: Postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome or urosepsis, stone clearance rate, operation time, hospital stay.
Demographic characteristics include age, sex, BMI, stone size and location, etc.
Stone size is defined as the maximum diameter. Operation time is recorded from the time of the first percutaneous renal puncture to the completion of the stone removal.
Hospital stay are rounded to the nearest whole day and calculated from the day of surgery to the day of discharge.
Postoperative pain (visual analogue scale [VAS], use of analgesics) and Postoperative comfort scores (Bruggrmann comfort scale [BCS]) will be recorded.
The rate of hemoglobin decrease is assessed by comparing the preoperative Hb level with 24-hour postoperative Hb level.
Primary SFR and final SFR is assessed by KUB at day 1 and 1 month after operation.
Stone-free status are defined as either the absence of any residual stone fragments or the presence of clinically insignificant residual stone fragments in the kidney which were defined as ≦ 3mm, asymptomatic, non-obstructive and non-infectious stone particles.
If the procedure is considered as successful, the double J stent is removed as outpatient after 2 weeks. Follow-up including KUB or non-contrast CT will be generally scheduled in 1 month.
Bleeding severity is judged by the treating physician, and transfusions are administered according to local practice guideline.
Complications of all patients are recorded according to modified Clavien classification system.
- Conditions
- Renal Calculi
- Being tested
- Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
- Keywords
- Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy(SMP), Renal Pelvic Pressure
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Calculi
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Super-Mini Percutaneous NephrolithotomyProcedure or surgery
Patients undergo Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SMP with F14 sheath | Other | Patients undergo Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with F14 suction-evacuation sheath. Receives: Procedure: Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy |
| SMP with F12 sheath | Other | Patients undergo Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with F12 suction-evacuation sheath. Receives: Procedure: Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The renal pelvic pressure
The measurement of renal pelvic pressure was collected each second by the computer.
Measured: Every one second intraoperatively
Secondary outcomes (5)
Postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome
Postoperatively patients were monitored for signs of SIRS, which is manifested by two or more of the following conditions: (1)Temperature > 38°C or < 36°C,(2) Heart rate > 90 bpm,(3) Respiratory rate > 20 breaths/min or PaCO2 < 32 mmHg (< 4.3 kPa),(4) WBC > 12,000 cells/mm3 or < 4,000 cells/mm3 or > 10% immature (band) forms.
Measured: Within 1 month postoperatively
Operation time
Operation time is the duration of the operation from the time of the first percutaneous renal puncture to the completion of the stone removal.
Measured: Intraoperatively
Hospital stay
Hospital stay is rounded to the nearest whole day and calculated from the day of surgery to the day of discharge.
Measured: Within 1 month postoperatively
Hemoglobin decrease
The rate of hemoglobin decrease is assessed by comparing the preoperative Hb level with 24-hour postoperative Hb level.
Measured: Within 24 hours after the operation
Stone-free status
Stone-free status are defined as either the absence of any residual stone fragments or the presence of clinically insignificant residual stone fragments in the kidney which were defined as ≦ 3mm, asymptomatic, non-obstructive and non-infectious stone particles.
Measured: Within 1 month postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2016
- Primary completionMar 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Renal CalculiStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Guohua Zeng, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
- Investigators
- Guohua Zeng, PH.D and M.D, Study chair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02760134
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MRER(14)2016
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 30 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Influence of Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy on Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02760134
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MRER(14)2016
- Conditions
- Renal Calculi
- Keywords
- Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy(SMP), Renal Pelvic Pressure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2016
- Primary completion
- Mar 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a well-established treatment modality for renal stones. It offers a high stone free rates and less invasive than open surgery. Nevertheless PCNL is an invasive and technically demanding procedure with inherent risks and complications. The most troublesome morbidities are bleeding and injury to the kidney and its adjacent structures. Complications of PCNL tend to be associated with the accuracy of tract placement and the size of the nephrostomy tract. To improve the safety of PCNL, there is a trend toward using smaller and smaller nephrostomy tracts . With the smaller nephrostomy tract, there also arise the problems of compromised visual field and increased difficulty in stone extraction. Increase irrigation using pressure pump might improve the visualization and the passive egress of the stone fragments, but it also may concomitantly increase the intra-luminal pressure.
The present system of Super-Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) was developed to address many of these deficiencies. The basic components of SMP system are an 8.0 F miniaturized nephroscope with a newly designed irrigation-suction sheath with enhanced irrigation capability and modified nephrostomy sheath with continuous negative pressure aspiration. Its design was intended not only to prevent the excessive intrarenal pressure but also improve the visualization and the stone fragments extraction.
Little was known about renal pelvic pressure in vivo during SMP and about any correlation it might have had with postoperative fever and urosepsis. We measure the renal pelvic pressure during SMP to determine whether it will improve the renal pelvic pressure and improve the incidence of postoperative fever.
Detailed description
To evaluate the influence of SMP on renal pelvic pressure for the treatment of renal calculi measuring smaller than 25 mm. Investigators will do a single center randomized open-label trial,and investigators plan to perform this study in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University of China.
Investigators plan to beginning their study at April in 2016 and end at March in 2018.One hundred patients with renal calculi measuring smaller than 25 mm will be enrolled in this study. By simple random sampling technique, patients will be assigned to two 50-patient groups(group 1:F14,group2 :F12).All the patients will be diagnosed definitely before operations with non-contrast CT. Patients with positive preoperative urine culture should be treated with suitable antibiotics based on the culture sensitivity result for at least 72h before SMP. Patients who have negative urine culture should receive a single dose of broad spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis just prior to the procedure.
Surgical technique Routine preoperative preparations are carried out as for conventional percutaneous surgery. Under general anesthesia and with the patient in the lithotomy position, an open-ended 5F ureteral catheter is advanced into the renal pelvis under direct vision. The patient is then turned into the prone position. Percutaneous access is achieved using an 18-gauge coaxial needle to puncture the selected calyx under fluoroscopic or ultrasonic guidance. The success of the puncture is confirmed both by the free flow of the irrigation fluid and by fluoroscopic images. Using a guidewire, the dilatation is carried out with 10 F fascial dilators. Thenan irrigation-suction straight sheath, with the obturator, is advanced over the guidewire and introduced into the pelvicalyceal system. The guidewireis then removed, and the "handle" is connected to the straight sheath. The irrigation port of the irrigation-suction sheath is connected to an irrigation pump. The oblique tube of the sheath is connected to the specimen collection bottle, and the bottle then to the negative pressure aspirator. The irrigation fluid pressure is set as 200-250 mmHg. The suction pressure is controlled to a setting of 100-150 mmHg. The irrigation is delivered through the irrigation channel of the sheath. Thus, a one-way flow is created as the inflow that comes out of the irrigation channel of the sheath is immediately aspirated through the suction conduitof the sheath. Stone fragmentation is accomplished using either holmium laser or pneumatic lithotripter. The tiny pulverized stone fragments will pass around the scope and evacuate through the oblique sluice. If the stone fragments are too large to pass around the scope inside the sheath, the scope can be withdrawn slowly to proximal to the bifurcation in order to create an unobstructed channel for larger fragments evacuation. At the end of the procedure, a single fluoroscopic image is obtained to assess the stone-free status. A Double-J stent is placed only when there is the presence of an obstructing inflammatory ureteric edema, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, or concurrent treatment of ipsilateral ureteric stone with rigid ureteroscope. The sheath is removed, and the wound is either sutured or seal with absorbable gelatin. For patients with significant bleeding or extravasation, a nephrostomy tube is placed.
Measurement of Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo While preparing for the SMP, the open-ended ureteric catheter, which had been inserted into the renal collecting system retrogradely, was connected to the invasive blood pressure channel of patient monitor with a baroceptor. The baroceptor was fixed onto the horizontal plane of renal pelvis; after a zero adjustment, the measurement of renal pelvic pressure was in session. A computer collected the renal pelvic pressure data each second. Any factor that caused a high renal pelvic pressure was noticed .
Data collection Data for the 2 groups -demographic characteristics, site of access ,Hb decrease, CRP increase, WBC increase, postoperative pain, operation time, hospital stay, cases of tubeless, postoperative infection complications (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, urosepsis), stone clearance rate and the need for auxiliary treatment are compared.
Primary study endpoint: The renal pelvic pressure. Secondary endpoint: Postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome or urosepsis, stone clearance rate, operation time, hospital stay.
Demographic characteristics include age, sex, BMI, stone size and location, etc.
Stone size is defined as the maximum diameter. Operation time is recorded from the time of the first percutaneous renal puncture to the completion of the stone removal.
Hospital stay are rounded to the nearest whole day and calculated from the day of surgery to the day of discharge.
Postoperative pain (visual analogue scale [VAS], use of analgesics) and Postoperative comfort scores (Bruggrmann comfort scale [BCS]) will be recorded.
The rate of hemoglobin decrease is assessed by comparing the preoperative Hb level with 24-hour postoperative Hb level.
Primary SFR and final SFR is assessed by KUB at day 1 and 1 month after operation.
Stone-free status are defined as either the absence of any residual stone fragments or the presence of clinically insignificant residual stone fragments in the kidney which were defined as ≦ 3mm, asymptomatic, non-obstructive and non-infectious stone particles.
If the procedure is considered as successful, the double J stent is removed as outpatient after 2 weeks. Follow-up including KUB or non-contrast CT will be generally scheduled in 1 month.
Bleeding severity is judged by the treating physician, and transfusions are administered according to local practice guideline.
Complications of all patients are recorded according to modified Clavien classification system.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SMP with F14 sheath | Other | Procedure: Super-Mini Percutaneous NephrolithotomyPatients undergo Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with F14 suction-evacuation sheath. |
| SMP with F12 sheath | Other | Procedure: Super-Mini Percutaneous NephrolithotomyPatients undergo Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with F12 suction-evacuation sheath. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 18 to 70 years
- Anesthesia rating(ASA) score 1 and 2
- No obvious preoperative symptoms of infection(chills, fever, etc.)
- Symptomatic renal calculi and diameter smaller than 25mm
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Couldn't tolerate SMP
- Hydronephrosis
- Ureteral calculi or urinary tract anomalies, stricture or obstruction
- Abdominal cavity effusion affecting breathe
- Patients with congenital anomalies, e.g. ectopic kidney, polycystic
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Super-Mini Percutaneous NephrolithotomyPatients undergo Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy | Procedure or surgery | SMP with F12 sheath, SMP with F14 sheath |
Primary outcome
The renal pelvic pressure
Time frame: Every one second intraoperatively
The measurement of renal pelvic pressure was collected each second by the computer.
5 secondary outcomes
Postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome
Time frame: Within 1 month postoperatively
Operation time
Time frame: Intraoperatively
Hospital stay
Time frame: Within 1 month postoperatively
Hemoglobin decrease
Time frame: Within 24 hours after the operation
Stone-free status
Time frame: Within 1 month postoperatively
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2017.
Related trials for Renal Calculi
Not yet recruiting
Automated Versus Manual Irrigation During Flexible Ureteroscopy
Renal Stone Disease
Not yet recruiting
Optimal Intrarenal Pressure During Flexible Ureteroscopy
Renal Stone Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Stone Clearance With Aspiration vs Other Technologies: a Real-world Evidence Study
Urolithiasis, Stones, Kidney
Not yet recruiting
Intertransverse Process Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Kidney Stones, Urolithiasis, Hypocitraturia, Pain, Postoperative
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Smart Pressure-Controlled Flexible Ureteroscopy and Flexible Suction Ureteral Access Sheath-Assisted Flexible Ureteroscopy for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
Kidney Stones
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Guohua Zeng, PH.D and M.D study chair
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in people with Renal Calculi, run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Guohua Zeng, PH.D and M.D (+86 13802916676, gzgyzgh@vip.tom.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The renal pelvic pressure (time frame: Every one second intraoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2017.