AzTrials
AzTrials

Crohn DiseasePhase 4NCT02764762

Triple Combination Therapy in High Risk Crohn's Disease (CD)

A Phase 4 study testing Vedolizumab, Adalimumab and Methotrexate in people with Crohn Disease, run by Takeda at 32 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of triple combination therapy with an anti-integrin (vedolizumab intravenous [IV]), a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist (adalimumab subcutaneously [SC]), and an immunomodulator (oral methotrexate) on endoscopic remission in participants with newly-diagnosed CD… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Crohn Disease
What is being tested?
Vedolizumab, Adalimumab and Methotrexate
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
55 participants
Where
32 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
18 Apr 2017to 5 Jul 2022
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Has an initial diagnosis of CD established within 24 months prior to screening with involvement of the ileum and/or colon that can be assessed by ileocolonoscopy.
  • Has moderate to severely active CD during Screening defined by a centrally assessed simple endoscopic score for Crohn disease (SES-CD) score >=7 (or >=4 if isolated ileal disease).

Who cannot join

  • Gastrointestinal (GI) Exclusion Criteria
  • Has a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) or indeterminate colitis.
  • Has clinical evidence of a current abdominal abscess or a history of prior abdominal abscess.
  • Has a known perianal fistula with abscess. (The participant may have a perianal fistula without abscess.)
  • Has a known fistula (other than perianal fistula).

Trial locations and contacts

32 sites in 2 countries.

32 sites in 2 countries

United States27 sites
  • Digestive Health Partners, PS

    Asheville, North Carolina, 28801

  • Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342-5000

  • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants Baton Rouge

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809

  • Carolinas HealthCare System Digestive Health

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204

  • Gastro Florida

    Clearwater, Florida, 33761

  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • Digestive Health Specialists of the Southeast

    Dothan, Alabama, 36305

  • Northshore University HealthSystem

    Evanston, Illinois, 60201

  • Baylor College of Medicine

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Grand Teton Research Group, PLLC

    Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404

  • University of Mississippi Medical Center

    Jackson, Mississippi, 39216

  • University of Kansas Medical Center

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • Las Vegas Medical Research

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89113

  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Digestive Disease Specialists, Inc.

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112

  • Minnesota Gastroenterology, PA - Plymouth

    Plymouth, Minnesota, 55446

  • University of Utah Health Sciences Center

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132

  • Pinnacle Clinical Research

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Louisana Research Center, LLC

    Shreveport, Louisiana, 71105

  • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants Southlake

    Southlake, Texas, 76092

  • Digestive Health Specialists

    Tacoma, Washington, 98405

  • Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research

    Topeka, Kansas, 66606

  • Center for Digestive Health

    Troy, Michigan, 48098

  • Options Health Research, LLC

    Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104

  • Tyler Research Institute, LLC

    Tyler, Texas, 75701

  • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants, Webster

    Webster, Texas, 77598

  • Huron Gastroenterology Associates

    Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197

Other trials in United States

Canada5 sites
  • Covenant Health

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6L 6K3

  • LHSC - Victoria Hospital

    London, Ontario, N6A 5W9

  • CIUSSS de I'Estrie-CHUS

    Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1G 2E8

  • Toronto Digestive Disease Associates Inc

    Vaughan, Ontario, L4L 4Y7

  • PerCuro Clinical Research Ltd

    Victoria, British Columbia, V8V 3M9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: An Open-Label, Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Triple Combination Therapy With Vedolizumab IV, Adalimumab SC, and Oral Methotrexate in Early Treatment of Subjects With Crohn's Disease Stratified at Higher Risk for Developing Complications

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of triple combination therapy with an anti-integrin (vedolizumab intravenous [IV]), a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist (adalimumab subcutaneously [SC]), and an immunomodulator (oral methotrexate) on endoscopic remission in participants with newly-diagnosed CD stratified at higher risk for complications.

Read the detailed description

The drug being tested in this study is called vedolizumab. Vedolizumab is being tested to treat people who have CD. This study will look at the endoscopic remission and mucosal healing of gastrointestinal tract of people who take vedolizumab as triple combination therapy with adalimumab and methotrexate.

The study will enroll approximately 60 participants. Participants will receive triple combination therapy which includes:

  • Vedolizumab 300 mg (intravenous)
  • Adalimumab 160/80/40 mg (subcutaneous)
  • Methotrexate 15 mg (oral)

All participants will receive vedolizumab intravenous infusion on Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22 along with adalimumab 160 mg, subcutaneous injection at Week 0, 80 mg at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with methotrexate tablets orally, once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34. In monotherapy phase, all participants will receive vedolizumab intravenous infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.

This multi-center trial will be conducted in the United States and Canada. The overall time to participate in this study is 128 weeks. Participants will make multiple visits to the clinic, plus a final visit 18 weeks after last dose of study drug for a safety follow-up assessment. Participants will also participate in a long-term safety questionnaire, by phone, at 26 weeks (6 months) from the last dose of study drug.

Conditions
Crohn Disease
Being tested
Vedolizumab, Adalimumab, Methotrexate
Keywords
Drug Therapy
Medical subject headings
Crohn Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VedolizumabDrug

    Also called Entyvio, MLN0002 IV

    Vedolizumab intravenous infusion.

  • AdalimumabDrug

    Also called Humira

    Adalimumab injection for subcutaneous use.

  • MethotrexateDrug

    Methotrexate oral tablets.

Study groups in NCT02764762
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)ExperimentalIn Triple Combination Therapy Phase, vedolizumab 300 mg, intravenous (IV) infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg subcutaneously (SC), once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34. In Monotherapy Phase, vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
Receives: Drug: Vedolizumab; Drug: Adalimumab; Drug: Methotrexate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission at Week 26

    Endoscopic remission was defined as simple endoscopic score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) scale score from 0-2. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, proportion of the surface area that was ulcerated, proportion of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was the sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 26

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Healing at Week 26

    Endoscopic healing was defined as SES-CD score ≤4 and reduction from Baseline in SES-CD score of at least 2 points and no individual SES-CD subscore >1. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, proportion of the surface area that is ulcerated, proportion of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was the sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

    Measured: Week 26

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 26

    Endoscopic response was defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

    Measured: Week 26

  3. Change From Baseline in SES-CD Score at Week 26

    The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, proportion of the surface area that is ulcerated, proportion of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was the sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Negative change indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 26

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving Deep Remission at Week 26

    Deep remission was defined as Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) score <150 and SES-CD score from 0-2. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

    Measured: Week 26

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission and Endoscopic Response as a Measure of Mucosal Healing at Week 26

    Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. Endoscopic response was defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline, as mucosal healing. CDAI was scoring system for assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The SES-CD total was sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

    Measured: Week 26

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Weeks 10 and 26

    Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

    Measured: Weeks 10 and 26

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Weeks 10 and 26

    Clinical response was defined as ≥100-point decrease in CDAI score. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

    Measured: Weeks 10 and 26

  8. Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Weeks 10 and 26

    The change between the CRP levels were collected at Weeks 10 and 26 relative to Baseline. Negative change indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 10 and 26

  9. Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentrations at Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78, and 102

    The change between the fecal calprotectin concentrations collected at Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78, and 102 relative to Baseline were reported. Baseline is defined as the last observation prior to the first dose of the study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78 and 102

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission and CRP <5 Milligram Per Liter (mg/L) at Weeks 26, 52, 78, and 102

    Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150 and CRP level <5 mg/L in participants with elevated CRP level at Baseline. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicate active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

    Measured: Weeks 26, 52, 78 and 102

  11. Percentage of Participants Using Oral Corticosteroids at Baseline Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids and Are in Clinical Remission at Weeks 10, 26, and 102

    Percentage of participants using oral corticosteroids at Baseline who had discontinued corticosteroids and were in clinical remission at weeks 10, 26, and 102 were reported. Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicate active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

    Measured: Weeks 10, 26 and 102

  12. Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Remission at Weeks 52, 78, and 102

    Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

    Measured: Weeks 52, 78 and 102

  13. Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Response at Weeks 52, 78, and 102

    Clinical response was defined as ≥100-point decrease in CDAI score. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

    Measured: Weeks 52, 78 and 102

  14. Percentage of Participants Maintaining Endoscopic Remission at Week 102

    Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD score 0-2. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicated more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

    Measured: Week 102

  15. Percentage of Participants Maintaining Deep Remission at Week 102

    Deep remission was defined as CDAI score <150 and SES-CD score 0-2. Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score <150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

    Measured: Week 102

  16. Percentage of Participants Maintaining Endoscopic Healing at Week 102

    Endoscopic healing was defined as SES-CD score <=4 and reduction from Baseline in SES-CD score of at least 2 points and no individual SES-CD subscore >1. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.

    Measured: Week 102

  17. Percentage of Participants Maintaining Endoscopic Response at Week 102

    Endoscopic response was defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 102

  18. Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Remission and Endoscopic Response as a Measure of Mucosal Healing at Week 102

    Clinical remission is defined as CDAI score <150. Endoscopic response defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline, as mucosal healing. CDAI is scoring system for assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicate active disease and values above 450 are seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The SES-CD total is sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal value.

    Measured: Week 102

  19. Percentage of Participants With First Exacerbation of CD

    First exacerbation of CD after 26 weeks was defined as either: 1) a CDAI increase of >70 from the prior visit on 2 occasions separated by a 2-week interval, objective evidence of disease activity by colonoscopy or CRP above normal OR 2) fecal calprotectin >250 microgram per gram (mcg/g) alone. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 are seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal value.

    Measured: After 26 Weeks up to Week 120

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start18 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion22 Sep 2020
  4. Study completion5 Jul 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
55 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02764762
Sponsor's protocol ID
Vedolizumab-4006
Other IDs
U1111-1175-9094
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
5 May 2016
Last updated
14 Jul 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Publications

  • Colombel JF, Ungaro RC, Sands BE, Siegel CA, Wolf DC, Valentine JF, Feagan BG, Neustifter B, Kadali H, Nazarey P, James A, Jairath V, Qasim Khan RM. Vedolizumab, Adalimumab, and Methotrexate Combination Therapy in Crohn's Disease (EXPLORER). Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jul;22(7):1487-1496.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Sep 22.

    PubMed 37743037

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Vedolizumab, Adalimumab and Methotrexate in people with Crohn Disease, run by Takeda at 32 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 32 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Oct 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission at Week 26 (time frame: Week 26). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02764762, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in