Sickle Cell DiseasePhase 2STRIDE2NCT02766465
Bone Marrow Transplantation vs Standard of Care in Patients With Severe Sickle Cell Disease (BMT CTN 1503)
A Phase 2 study testing Busulfan, Fludarabine and r-ATG in people with Sickle Cell Disease, run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 35 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a clinical trial that will compare survival and sickle related outcomes in adolescents and young adults with severe sickle cell disease after bone marrow transplantation and standard of care. The primary outcome is 2-year overall survival. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 40 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sickle Cell Disease
- What is being tested?
- Busulfan, Fludarabine and r-ATG
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 138 participants
- Where
- 35 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 16 Mar 2017to 2 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 40 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 15 and < 41 years
- Severe sickle cell disease [Hemoglobin SS (Hb SS), Hemoglobin SC (Hb SC) or Hemoglobin SBeta thalassemia (Hb Sβ) genotype] with at least 1 of the following manifestations (a-e):
- Clinically significant neurologic event (stroke) or any neurological deficit lasting > 24 hours;
- History of two or more episodes of acute chest syndrome (ACS) in the 2-year period preceding enrollment despite the institution of supportive care measures (i.e. asthma therapy);
- An average of three or more pain crises per year in the 2-year period preceding enrollment (required intravenous pain management in the outpatient or inpatient hospital setting). Clinical documentation of pain management in the inpatient or outpatient setting is required.
- Administration of regular RBC transfusion therapy, defined as receiving 8 or more transfusion events per year (in the 12 months before enrollment) to prevent vaso-occlusive clinical complications (i.e. pain, stroke, and acute chest syndrome)
Show all 21Show fewer
- An echocardiographic finding of tricuspid valve regurgitant jet (TRJ) velocity ≥ 2.7 m/sec.
- Ongoing high impact chronic pain on a majority of days per month for ≥ 6 months as defined as ONE or more of the following: Chronic pain without contributory SCD complications, OR Mixed pain type in which chronic pain is occurring at site(s) (arms, back, chest, or abdominal pain) unrelated to any sites associated with Contributory SCD complications (e.g. leg ulcers and/or avascular necrosis).
- High impact chronic pain is identified as those reporting "severe interference" with life activities OR "usually or always" experiencing a limitation of their life or work activities including household chores. (See guidelines for identifying HICP in the BMT CTN 1503 Manual of Procedures) ii. Contributory SCD complications are defined as clinical signs (e.g. presence of leg ulcers) or clinical assessments (e.g. imaging confirmation of splenic infarct or avascular necrosis). Chronic pain attributed solely to contributory SCD complications is excluded.
- Adequate physical function as measured by all of the following:
- Karnofsky/Lansky performance score ≥ 60
- Cardiac function: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40%; or LV shortening fraction > 26% by cardiac echocardiogram or by Multi Gated Acquisition Scan (MUGA).
- Pulmonary function:
- Pulse oximetry with a baseline O2 saturation of ≥ 85% b. Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) > 40% (corrected for hemoglobin) d. Renal function: Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x the upper limit of normal for age as per local laboratory and 24 hour urine creatinine clearance >70 mL/min; or GFR > 70 mL/min/1.73 m2 by radionuclide Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR).
- Hepatic function:
- Serum conjugated (direct) bilirubin < 2x upper limit of normal for age as per local laboratory. Participants are not excluded if the serum conjugated (direct) bilirubin is >2x the upper limit of normal for age as per local laboratory and: There is evidence of a hyperhemolytic reaction after a recent RBC transfusion, OR there is evidence of moderate direct hyperbilirubinemia defined as direct serum bilirubin < 5 times ULN and not caused by underlying hepatic diseasePatients
- alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) < 5 times upper limit of normal as per local laboratory.
- Additional inclusion required for donor arm participants to proceed with transplant
- Liver MRI (≤ 90 days prior to initiation of transplant conditioning) to document hepatic iron content is required for participants who are currently receiving ≥8 packed red blood cell transfusions for ≥1 year or have received ≥20 packed red blood cell transfusions (cumulative). Participants who have hepatic iron content ≥7 mg Fe/ g liver dry weight by liver MRI must have a liver biopsy and histological examination/documentation of the absence of cirrhosis, bridging fibrosis and active hepatitis (≤ 90 days prior to initiation of transplant conditioning).
- Lack of clinical or radiologic evidence of a recent neurologic event (such as stroke or transient ischemic attack) by Cerebral MRI/MRA within 30 days prior to initiating transplant conditioning. Subjects with clinical or radiologic evidence of a recent neurologic event will be deferred for ≥ 6 months with repeat cerebral MRI/MRA to ensure stabilization of the neurologic event prior to proceeding to transplantation
- Documentation of participant's willingness to use approved contraception method until discontinuation of all immunosuppressive medications is to be documented in the medical record corresponding with the consent conference.
Who cannot join
- HLA typing with a donor search prior to referral (consultation with HCT physician).
- If a subject has had HLA typing and a related donor search that did not identify a suitably matched relative (i.e., sibling) at any time, and also did not have an unrelated donor search, the patient will be considered eligible.
- If a subject has had HLA typing and a related donor search that did not identify a suitably matched relative (i.e., sibling) at any time and had an unrelated donor search that did not identify a suitably matched unrelated donor ≥ 1 year prior to enrollment, the patient will be considered eligible.
- If a subject has had HLA typing with no related donor search and had an unrelated donor search that did not identify a suitably matched unrelated donor ≥ 1 year prior to enrollment, the patient will be considered eligible.
- Subjects with a known HLA-identical sibling or HLA-matched unrelated donor are excluded
- Uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection in the 6 weeks before enrollment.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Seropositivity for HIV.
- Previous HCT or solid organ transplant.
- Participation in a clinical trial in which the patient received an investigational drug or device must be discontinued at enrollment.
- A history of substance abuse as defined by version IV of the Diagnostic \& Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV).
- Demonstrated lack of compliance with prior medical care as determined by referring physician.
- Pregnant or breast feeding females.
- Inability to receive HCT due to alloimmunization, defined as the inability to receive packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion therapy.
Trial locations and contacts
35 sites in 1 country.
35 sites in 1 country
United States35 sites
Grady Memorial Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Augusta University Medical Center
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham & Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Boston University
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
Brooklyn, New York, 11215
University of North Carolina Hospital at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27516
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
University of Florida Gainsville
Gainesville, Florida, 32611
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Foundation for Sickle Cell Research/Florida Sickle Inc.
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
University of Texas Health Sciences Center
Houston, Texas, 77004
Baylor College of Medicine/The Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Texas/MD Anderson CRC
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136
Cohen Children's Medical Center
New Hyde Park, New York, 11040
Children's Hospital of New Orleans
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70118
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, 10065
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center
Newark, New Jersey, 07112
Benioff Children's Hospital at Oakland
Oakland, California, 94609
University of Oklahoma
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Oregon Health Sciences University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
Washington University/St. Louis Children's Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein School of Medicine
The Bronx, New York, 10467
Children's National Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
About this study
Official title: A Study to Compare Bone Marrow Transplantation to Standard Care in Adolescents and Young Adults With Severe Sickle Cell Disease (BMT CTN 1503)
This is a clinical trial that will compare survival and sickle related outcomes in adolescents and young adults with severe sickle cell disease after bone marrow transplantation and standard of care. The primary outcome is 2-year overall survival.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective phase II multi-center trial of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or standard of care based on availability of HLA-matched related or unrelated donor after confirmation of clinical eligibility. In order to minimize bias assignment to either treatment arm, clinical eligibility to both treatment arms are similar and donor availability is not known at referral. HLA typing and donor search is initiated upon confirmation of clinical eligibility for the study. Additionally, all analyses of primary and secondary endpoints will follow the Intent-to-Treat principle to address potential bias introduced by participants with donors not proceeding to transplantation or those without a matched donor receiving transplantation with less well-matched donors.
The primary outcome is 2-year overall survival. Our hypothesis is that patients who receive bone marrow transplantation will experience early deaths but that this will plateau by 2 years after transplantation. Patients who receive standard of care will not experience early death but will succumb to their disease at a rate much higher than the general population. Therefore, the goal of the study is to establish that the difference in the proportion of patients surviving is not significantly more than 15% lower in the donor arm at 2-years after assignment to treatment arm.
Secondary endpoints will compare changes in sickle cell disease related events (pulmonary hypertension, cerebrovascular events, renal function, avascular necrosis, leg ulcer) and functional outcomes [6-minute walk distance (6MWD), health-related quality of life, cardiac function, pulmonary function, and mean pain intensity as assessed by a multidimensional electronic pain diary] from baseline to 2-years after assignment to treatment arms.
Additionally for patients assigned to the donor arm and expected to undergo transplantation, hematopoietic recovery, graft rejection, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, other significant transplant-related complications and disease-free survival will be reported.
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Disease
- Being tested
- Busulfan, Fludarabine, r-ATG, Hematopoietic Cell Transplant, Tacrolimus
- Keywords
- Sickle Cell Disease, Young Adults, Phase II Trial, Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT), Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Sickle Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BusulfanDrug
Also called Busulfex
A:
Busulfan dose will be 3.2 mg/kg administered as a single daily dose IV on days -8 through -5 with dosing adjusted using targeted pharmacokinetics.
FludarabineDrug
Also called Fludara
A:
Fludarabine dose will be 35 mg/m^2/day administered IV on days -7 through -3 (total fludarabine dose is 175 mg/m^2).
C:
Fludarabine 30mg/m2 IV dose will be given on Days -8, -7, -6, -5, -4
r-ATGDrug
Also called Rabbit antithymocyte globulin
A:
r-ATG will be administered IV on day -6 at 0.5mg/kg, on day -5 at 1 mg/kg and on days -4, -3 and -2 at 1.5mg/kg (total r-ATG dose is 6 mg/kg).
Hematopoietic Cell TransplantProcedure or surgery
Also called Bone Marrow Transplant; BMT; HCT
A,B,C:
Day 0 is the day of transplantation.
TacrolimusDrug
Also called Prograf®
A:
Tacrolimus commences on day -3 and extends through day +180 after transplantation with doses adjusted to maintain appropriate levels according to institutional guidelines.
C:
Tacrolimus at therapeutic doses through Day 180, then taper per institutional guidelines
MethotrexateDrug
Also called MTX
A:
Methotrexate will be administered intravenously on day+1 at 15mg/m^2, day+3 at 10mg/m^2, day+6 at 10mg/m^2, and day+11 at 10mg/m^2.
C:
Methotrexate IV 7.5 mg/m2 dose will be given on Days +1, 3, +6 following transplant
Standard of CareProcedure or surgery
Continue to receive standard of care treatment per patient's SCD physician.
AlemtuzumabDrug
Also called Lemtrada
B:
Alemtuzumab 0.03 mg/kg IV dose will be given on Day -7, Alemtuzumab 0.1 mg/kg IV dose will be given on Day -6, Alemtuzumab 0.3 mg/kg IV dose will be given on Day -5,-4,-3
C:
Alemtuzumab test dose 3 mg IV once 24 hours prior to 1st dose of Alemtuzumab Alemtuzumab 10 mg IV, 15 mg IV, 20 mg IV given on Days -22 through Day -18. Alemtuzumab doses may be administered between Days -22 and -18 but are required to be on three consecutive days.
Total Body Irradiation (TBI)Drug
Total Body Irradiation 300 cGY on Day -2
SirolimusDrug
Also called Rapamune
Sirolimus at therapeutic doses through day 180, then taper per institutional guidelines if donor CD3+ >50%
MelphalanDrug
Also called Alkeran
C:
Melphalan 140 mg/m2 IV dose will be given on Day -3
G-CSFDrug
Also called Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
G-CSF 5 μg/kg/day continue until neutrophil engraftment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Donor Arm | Experimental | Donor Arm patients will undergo hematopoietic cell transplant. Patients with a matched unrelated donor will receive a bone marrow transplant (unless PBSC graft is pre-approved per section 2.5.1 using a preparative regimen with Busulfan, Fludarabine and rabbit ATG. Patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor can receive a transplant using one of three regimens:
A. Busulfan, Fludarabine, and rabbit ATG using a bone marrow graft (preferred regimen) B. Alemtuzumab/TBI 300 cGy using a peripheral blood graft C. Alemtuzumab, fludarabine, melphalan using a bone marrow graft Receives: Drug: Busulfan; Drug: Fludarabine; Drug: r-ATG; Procedure: Hematopoietic Cell Transplant; Drug: Tacrolimus; Drug: Methotrexate; Drug: Alemtuzumab; Drug: Total Body Irradiation (TBI); Drug: Sirolimus; Drug: Melphalan; Drug: G-CSF |
| No-Donor Arm | Active comparator | No-donor arm patients will continue with standard of care per their SCD physician. Receives: Procedure: Standard of Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) at 2 Years After Biologic Assignment
Due to incomplete accrual, there was not adequate statistical power to analyze the primary endpoint as specified. Instead, point estimates for the observed proportion of patients surviving at two years post-biologic assignment in each arm were generated descriptively, with 95% CI, using the Kaplan Meier methodology. The event of interest was death from any cause.
Measured: 2 Years
Secondary outcomes (29)
Frequencies of Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Events of Special Interest
Examination of the occurrence of the SCD-related events was performed. Participants can have multiple events. The following sickle cell disease related events of special interest (SCD-EOSI) are expected events for all participants, regardless of biologic assignment:
- pulmonary hypertension
- significant cerebrovascular events, including: stroke; transient ischemic attack; seizure
- renal function compromise, including: proteinuria; increased creatinine grades ≥2 per CTCAE version 4.0
- avascular necrosis of the hip or shoulder
- leg ulcers
- acute chest syndrome (ACS) requiring hospitalization
- vaso-occlusive pain crisis (VOC) requiring hospitalization or administration of parenteral opioid drugs in an outpatient setting. Self-reported events without clinical documentation should not be included.
Measured: 2 Years
Change in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD) Assessment From Baseline
The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) test is a test to measure how far you can walk in 6 minutes. It is used in this study to assess exercise capacity. The number of meters that a participant could walk in 6 minutes was selected as a direct measurement of physical function.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Transcuspid Regurgitant Jet Velocity (TRJV) Assessment From Baseline
Transcuspid regurgitant jet velocity (TRJV) is a measure of how fast blood is pumped through one of the heart valves on the right side of the heart, measured using an ultrasound of the heart (echocardiogram). Higher values can indicate pulmonary hypertension and more severe sickle cell disease. Increasing TRJV over time indicates worsening disease.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Albuminuria Assessment From Baseline
Albuminuria is the ratio of albumin (a protein) in the urine to creatinine in the urine. This may be assessed based on a 24-hour urine sample or a spot urine sample. Albumin in the urine may indicate kidney disease. Increases in albuminuria over time indicate increasing renal (kidney) disease.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Physical Function Changes From Baseline
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessed using the NIH's PROMIS 57 instrument. Physical Function asks about degree of difficulty in performing activities of daily living such as housework, errands, and going up and down stairs. It is scored from 0 to 10 and converted to a standardized T-score with mean 50 and standard deviation 10. A higher T-score represents better physical function.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Anxiety Changes From Baseline
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessed using the NIH's PROMIS 57 instrument. Anxiety asks about the frequency of feelings of fear, worry, and anxiety. It is scored from 0 to 10 and converted to a standardized T-score with mean 50 and standard deviation 10. A higher T-score represents more anxiety.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Depression Changes From Baseline
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessed using the NIH's PROMIS 57 instrument. Depression asks about the frequency of feelings of worthlessness, failure, unhappiness and depression. It is scored from 0 to 10 and converted to a standardized T-score with mean 50 and standard deviation 10. A higher T-score represents more depression.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Fatigue Score Changes in From Baseline
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessed using the NIH's PROMIS 57 instrument. Fatigue asks about the extent to which fatigue interferes with physical functioning and completing tasks. It is scored from 0 to 10 and converted to a standardized T-score with mean 50 and standard deviation 10. A higher T-score represents more fatigue.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Sleep Disturbance Changes From Baseline
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessed using the NIH's PROMIS 57 instrument. Sleep Disturbance asks about the quality of sleep and the frequency with which sleep was restless or difficult to achieve. It is scored from 0 to 10 and converted to a standardized T-score with mean 50 and standard deviation 10. A higher T-score represents more sleep disturbance.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Participation in Social Roles Score Changes From Baseline
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessed using the NIH's PROMIS 57 instrument. Participation in Social Roles asks about the frequency of limitations of social activities with friends and family. It is scored from 0 to 10 and converted to a standardized T-score with mean 50 and standard deviation 10. A higher T-score represents more satisfaction with participation in social roles.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Pain Interference Score Changes From Baseline
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessed using the NIH's PROMIS 57 instrument. Pain Interference asks about the frequency with which pain interferes with household chores, social activities and enjoyment of life. It is scored from 0 to 10 and converted to a standardized T-score with mean 50 and standard deviation 10. A higher T-score represents more pain interference in daily life.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Pain Intensity Changes From Baseline
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessed using the NIH's PROMIS 57 instrument. Pain Intensity is scored from 0 to 10 reflecting the level of pain over the previous 7 days. A score of 0 reflects no pain; a score of 10 reflects the maximum intensity of pain.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component 28-Day Pain Diary Average Pain Intensity Changes From Baseline
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessed using the NIH's PROMIS 57 instrument. The 28-Day Pain Diary Average Pain Intensity assesses pain on a score of 0 to 10 twice each day for 28 days. A score of 0 reflects no pain, and a score of 10 reflects maximum intensity of pain. The scores on a given day are averaged (if only one score is obtained on a given day, that score is taken as the measure), and then daily scores are averaged over the number of days on which a score is available.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component ASCQ-Me Stiffness Changes From Baseline
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessed using the NIH's PROMIS 57 instrument. The ASCQ-Me Stiffness Scale asks about the frequency and severity of joint stiffness. It is scored from 0 to 10 and converted to a standardized T-score with mean 50 and standard deviation 10. A higher T-score represents more stiffness.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Forced Expiratory Volume 1 Second (FEV1) From Baseline
Pulmonary function is assessed by the change from baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume 1 second (FEV1). The complete pulmonary function test will include forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC), vital capacity (VC), total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC), functional residual capacity (FRC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and oxygen saturation.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) From Baseline
Pulmonary function is assessed by the change from baseline in forced vital capacity (FVC). The complete pulmonary function test will include forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC), vital capacity (VC), total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC), functional residual capacity (FRC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and oxygen saturation.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC) From Baseline
Pulmonary function is assessed by the change from baseline in ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC). The complete pulmonary function test will include forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC), vital capacity (VC), total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC), functional residual capacity (FRC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and oxygen saturation.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Vital Capacity (VC) From Baseline
Pulmonary function is assessed by the change from baseline in vital capacity (VC). The complete pulmonary function test will include forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC), vital capacity (VC), total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC), functional residual capacity (FRC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and oxygen saturation.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Total Lung Capacity (TLC) From Baseline
Pulmonary function is assessed by the change from baseline in total lung capacity (TLC). The complete pulmonary function test will include forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC), vital capacity (VC), total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC), functional residual capacity (FRC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and oxygen saturation.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Residual Volume (RV) From Baseline
Pulmonary function is assessed by the change from baseline in residual volume (RV). The complete pulmonary function test will include forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC), vital capacity (VC), total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC), functional residual capacity (FRC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and oxygen saturation.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Expiratory Reserve Volume (ERV) From Baseline
Pulmonary function is assessed by the change from baseline in expiratory reserve volume (ERV). The complete pulmonary function test will include forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC), vital capacity (VC), total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC), functional residual capacity (FRC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and oxygen saturation.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Inspiratory Capacity (IC) From Baseline
Pulmonary function is assessed by the change from baseline in inspiratory capacity (IC). The complete pulmonary function test will include forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC), vital capacity (VC), total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC), functional residual capacity (FRC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and oxygen saturation.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) From Baseline
Pulmonary function is assessed by the change from baseline in functional residual capacity (FRC). The complete pulmonary function test will include forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC), vital capacity (VC), total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC), functional residual capacity (FRC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and oxygen saturation.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) From Baseline
Pulmonary function is assessed by the change from baseline in diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). The complete pulmonary function test will include forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC), vital capacity (VC), total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC), functional residual capacity (FRC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and oxygen saturation.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Oxygen Saturation From Baseline
Pulmonary function is assessed by the change from baseline in oxygen saturation. The complete pulmonary function test will include forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC), vital capacity (VC), total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC), functional residual capacity (FRC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and oxygen saturation.
Measured: Baseline, 2 years
Frequencies of Infections
All Grade 2 and 3 infections were reported according to the BMT CTN Technical Manual of Procedures (MOP) after biological assignment. The frequency of Grade 2-3 infections are tabulated by biological assignment at the event level.
Measured: 2 years
Percentage of Participants With Grades II-IV Acute GVHD at Day 180 After Biological Assignment
The time interval from day 0 of transplant until grade II-IV aGVHD will be described for each treatment arm using the the cumulative incidence estimator developed by Gray, with death prior to aGVHD treated as a competing risk. Estimates and 95% CIs of the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD will be provided at Day 180 after day 0 of transplant and compared between matched related and matched unrelated donors using the Gray test.
Acute GVHD was graded according to the BMT CTN Technical Manual of Operating Procedures (MOP). Higher aGVHD grade indicate worse outcomes. Grade I is defined as Skin stage 1-2 and stage 0 for both GI and liver. Grade II is stage 3 skin, stage 1 GI, or stage 1 liver. Grade III is stage 2-3 GI or stage 2-3 liver. Grade IV is stage 4 skin or stage 4 liver.
Measured: 180 days after biological assignment
Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD at Day 600 After Biological Assignment
Chronic GVHD was collected according to the recommendations of the NIH Consensus Conference. Eight organs will be scored on a 0-3 scale to reflect degree of chronic GVHD involvement. Liver and pulmonary function test results and use of systemic therapy for treatment of chronic GVHD was also recorded. Percentage of Participants with chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at Day 600 was estimated with 95% confidence intervals for each donor type group using the cumulative incidence estimate, treating death prior to cGVHD as a competing event.
Measured: Day 600 after biological assignment
Number of Participants With Primary and Secondary Graft Failure
Primary graft failure defined as never achieving ANC ≥ 500/µL or never achieving ≥ 5% donor whole blood or myeloid chimerism (myeloid is preferable) assessed by bone marrow or peripheral blood chimerism assays by day +42 post-transplant. Second infusion of hematopoietic cells is also considered indicative of primary graft failure by day +42 post-transplant. Secondary graft failure is defined as < 5% donor whole blood or myeloid chimerism (myeloid is preferable) in peripheral blood or bone marrow beyond day +42 post-transplant in patients with prior documentation of hematopoietic recovery with ≥ 5% donor cells by day +42 post-transplant. Second infusion of hematopoietic cells is also considered indicative of secondary graft failure.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study start16 Mar 2017
- Primary completion2 May 2023
- Study completion2 Aug 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sickle Cell DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical College of WisconsinThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients are enrolled without a known donor. All patients have 180 days from confirmation of eligibility to confirm a donor. Patients with a donor will be assigned to the Donor Arm and receive HCT; patients without a donor will be assigned to the no donor arm and continue receiving standard of care for their SCD.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 138 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical College of Wisconsin
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, National Marrow Donor Program, Emory University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mary Eapen, MD, Study director, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02766465
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BMT CTN 1503
- Other IDs
- 1U01HL128568-01
- Acronym
- STRIDE2
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 6 May 2016
- Last updated
- 18 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Results will be published in a manuscript and supporting information submitted to NIH BioLINCC (including data dictionaries, case report forms, data submission documentation, documentation for outcomes dataset, etc where indicated).
Publications
Walters MC, Eapen M, Liu Y, El Rassi F, Waller EK, Levine JE, Strouse JJ, Antin JH, Parikh SH, Bakshi N, Dampier C, Jaroscak JJ, Bergmann S, Wong T, Kota V, Pace B, Lekakis LJ, Lulla P, Nickel RS, Kasow KA, Popat U, Smith W, Yu L, DiFronzo N, Geller N, Kamani N, Klings ES, Hassell K, Mendizabal A, Sullivan K, Neuberg D, Krishnamurti L. Hematopoietic cell transplant compared with standard care in adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease. Blood Adv. 2025 Mar 11;9(5):955-965. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013926.
PubMed 39471440Leonard A, Furstenau D, Abraham A, Darbari DS, Nickel RS, Limerick E, Fitzhugh C, Hsieh M, Tisdale JF. Reduction in vaso-occlusive events following stem cell transplantation in patients with sickle cell disease. Blood Adv. 2023 Jan 24;7(2):227-234. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008137.
PubMed 36240296Krishnamurti L, Neuberg DS, Sullivan KM, Kamani NR, Abraham A, Campigotto F, Zhang W, Dahdoul T, De Castro L, Parikh S, Bakshi N, Haight A, Hassell KL, Loving R, Rosenthal J, Smith SL, Smith W, Spearman M, Stevenson K, Wu CJ, Wiedl C, Waller EK, Walters MC. Bone marrow transplantation for adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease: Results of a prospective multicenter pilot study. Am J Hematol. 2019 Apr;94(4):446-454. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25401. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
PubMed 30637784
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study to Compare Bone Marrow Transplantation to Standard Care in Adolescents and Young Adults With Severe Sickle Cell Disease (BMT CTN 1503)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02766465
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STRIDE2 / BMT CTN 1503
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Disease
- Keywords
- Sickle Cell Disease, Young Adults, Phase II Trial, Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT), Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 138 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical College of WisconsinUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, National Marrow Donor Program, Emory University
- Study start
- 16 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Aug 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Sep 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a clinical trial that will compare survival and sickle related outcomes in adolescents and young adults with severe sickle cell disease after bone marrow transplantation and standard of care. The primary outcome is 2-year overall survival.
Detailed description
This is a prospective phase II multi-center trial of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or standard of care based on availability of HLA-matched related or unrelated donor after confirmation of clinical eligibility. In order to minimize bias assignment to either treatment arm, clinical eligibility to both treatment arms are similar and donor availability is not known at referral. HLA typing and donor search is initiated upon confirmation of clinical eligibility for the study. Additionally, all analyses of primary and secondary endpoints will follow the Intent-to-Treat principle to address potential bias introduced by participants with donors not proceeding to transplantation or those without a matched donor receiving transplantation with less well-matched donors.
The primary outcome is 2-year overall survival. Our hypothesis is that patients who receive bone marrow transplantation will experience early deaths but that this will plateau by 2 years after transplantation. Patients who receive standard of care will not experience early death but will succumb to their disease at a rate much higher than the general population. Therefore, the goal of the study is to establish that the difference in the proportion of patients surviving is not significantly more than 15% lower in the donor arm at 2-years after assignment to treatment arm.
Secondary endpoints will compare changes in sickle cell disease related events (pulmonary hypertension, cerebrovascular events, renal function, avascular necrosis, leg ulcer) and functional outcomes [6-minute walk distance (6MWD), health-related quality of life, cardiac function, pulmonary function, and mean pain intensity as assessed by a multidimensional electronic pain diary] from baseline to 2-years after assignment to treatment arms.
Additionally for patients assigned to the donor arm and expected to undergo transplantation, hematopoietic recovery, graft rejection, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, other significant transplant-related complications and disease-free survival will be reported.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients are enrolled without a known donor. All patients have 180 days from confirmation of eligibility to confirm a donor. Patients with a donor will be assigned to the Donor Arm and receive HCT; patients without a donor will be assigned to the no donor arm and continue receiving standard of care for their SCD.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Donor Arm | Experimental | Drug: Busulfan, Drug: Fludarabine, Drug: r-ATG, Procedure: Hematopoietic Cell Transplant, Drug: Tacrolimus, Drug: Methotrexate, Drug: Alemtuzumab, Drug: Total Body Irradiation (TBI), Drug: Sirolimus, Drug: Melphalan, Drug: G-CSFDonor Arm patients will undergo hematopoietic cell transplant. Patients with a matched unrelated donor will receive a bone marrow transplant (unless PBSC graft is pre-approved per section 2.5.1 using a preparative regimen with Busulfan, Fludarabine and rabbit ATG. Patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor can receive a transplant using one of three regimens: A. Busulfan, Fludarabine, and rabbit ATG using a bone marrow graft (preferred regimen) B. Alemtuzumab/TBI 300 cGy using a peripheral blood graft C. Alemtuzumab, fludarabine, melphalan using a bone marrow graft |
| No-Donor Arm | Active comparator | Procedure: Standard of CareNo-donor arm patients will continue with standard of care per their SCD physician. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Age ≥ 15 and < 41 years
- Severe sickle cell disease [Hemoglobin SS (Hb SS), Hemoglobin SC (Hb SC) or Hemoglobin SBeta thalassemia (Hb Sβ) genotype] with at least 1 of the following manifestations (a-e):
- Adequate physical function as measured by all of the following:
- Additional inclusion required for donor arm participants to proceed with transplant
- Liver MRI (≤ 90 days prior to initiation of transplant conditioning) to document hepatic iron content is required for participants who are currently receiving ≥8 packed red blood cell transfusions for ≥1 year or have received ≥20 packed red blood cell transfusions (cumulative). Participants who have hepatic iron content ≥7 mg Fe/ g liver dry weight by liver MRI must have a liver biopsy and histological examination/documentation of the absence of cirrhosis, bridging fibrosis and active hepatitis (≤ 90 days prior to initiation of transplant conditioning).
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- HLA typing with a donor search prior to referral (consultation with HCT physician).
- Uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection in the 6 weeks before enrollment.
- Seropositivity for HIV.
- Previous HCT or solid organ transplant.
- Participation in a clinical trial in which the patient received an investigational drug or device must be discontinued at enrollment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BusulfanAlso: BusulfexA: Busulfan dose will be 3.2 mg/kg administered as a single daily dose IV on days -8 through -5 with dosing adjusted using targeted pharmacokinetics. | Drug | Donor Arm |
| FludarabineAlso: FludaraA: Fludarabine dose will be 35 mg/m^2/day administered IV on days -7 through -3 (total fludarabine dose is 175 mg/m^2). C: Fludarabine 30mg/m2 IV dose will be given on Days -8, -7, -6, -5, -4 | Drug | Donor Arm |
| r-ATGAlso: Rabbit antithymocyte globulinA: r-ATG will be administered IV on day -6 at 0.5mg/kg, on day -5 at 1 mg/kg and on days -4, -3 and -2 at 1.5mg/kg (total r-ATG dose is 6 mg/kg). | Drug | Donor Arm |
| Hematopoietic Cell TransplantAlso: Bone Marrow Transplant; BMT; HCTA,B,C: Day 0 is the day of transplantation. | Procedure or surgery | Donor Arm |
| TacrolimusAlso: Prograf®A: Tacrolimus commences on day -3 and extends through day +180 after transplantation with doses adjusted to maintain appropriate levels according to institutional guidelines. C: Tacrolimus at therapeutic doses through Day 180, then taper per institutional guidelines | Drug | Donor Arm |
| MethotrexateAlso: MTXA: Methotrexate will be administered intravenously on day+1 at 15mg/m^2, day+3 at 10mg/m^2, day+6 at 10mg/m^2, and day+11 at 10mg/m^2. C: Methotrexate IV 7.5 mg/m2 dose will be given on Days +1, 3, +6 following transplant | Drug | Donor Arm |
| Standard of CareContinue to receive standard of care treatment per patient's SCD physician. | Procedure or surgery | No-Donor Arm |
| AlemtuzumabAlso: LemtradaB: Alemtuzumab 0.03 mg/kg IV dose will be given on Day -7, Alemtuzumab 0.1 mg/kg IV dose will be given on Day -6, Alemtuzumab 0.3 mg/kg IV dose will be given on Day -5,-4,-3 C: Alemtuzumab test dose 3 mg IV once 24 hours prior to 1st dose of Alemtuzumab Alemtuzumab 10 mg IV, 15 mg IV, 20 mg IV given on Days -22 through Day -18. Alemtuzumab doses may be administered between Days -22 and -18 but are required to be on three consecutive days. | Drug | Donor Arm |
| Total Body Irradiation (TBI)Total Body Irradiation 300 cGY on Day -2 | Drug | Donor Arm |
| SirolimusAlso: RapamuneSirolimus at therapeutic doses through day 180, then taper per institutional guidelines if donor CD3+ >50% | Drug | Donor Arm |
| MelphalanAlso: AlkeranC: Melphalan 140 mg/m2 IV dose will be given on Day -3 | Drug | Donor Arm |
| G-CSFAlso: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factorG-CSF 5 μg/kg/day continue until neutrophil engraftment. | Drug | Donor Arm |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) at 2 Years After Biologic Assignment
Time frame: 2 Years
Due to incomplete accrual, there was not adequate statistical power to analyze the primary endpoint as specified. Instead, point estimates for the observed proportion of patients surviving at two years post-biologic assignment in each arm were generated descriptively, with 95% CI, using the Kaplan Meier methodology. The event of interest was death from any cause.
29 secondary outcomes
Frequencies of Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Events of Special Interest
Time frame: 2 Years
Change in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD) Assessment From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Transcuspid Regurgitant Jet Velocity (TRJV) Assessment From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Albuminuria Assessment From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Physical Function Changes From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Anxiety Changes From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Depression Changes From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Fatigue Score Changes in From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Sleep Disturbance Changes From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Participation in Social Roles Score Changes From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Pain Interference Score Changes From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component Pain Intensity Changes From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component 28-Day Pain Diary Average Pain Intensity Changes From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Component ASCQ-Me Stiffness Changes From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Forced Expiratory Volume 1 Second (FEV1) From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Ratio of FEV1 to FVC (FEV1/FVC) From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Vital Capacity (VC) From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Total Lung Capacity (TLC) From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Residual Volume (RV) From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Expiratory Reserve Volume (ERV) From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Inspiratory Capacity (IC) From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Change in Pulmonary Function of Oxygen Saturation From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years
Frequencies of Infections
Time frame: 2 years
Percentage of Participants With Grades II-IV Acute GVHD at Day 180 After Biological Assignment
Time frame: 180 days after biological assignment
Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD at Day 600 After Biological Assignment
Time frame: Day 600 after biological assignment
Number of Participants With Primary and Secondary Graft Failure
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Apr 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 39471440Walters MC, Eapen M, Liu Y, El Rassi F, Waller EK, Levine JE, Strouse JJ, Antin JH, Parikh SH, Bakshi N, Dampier C, Jaroscak JJ, Bergmann S, Wong T, Kota V, Pace B, Lekakis LJ, Lulla P, Nickel RS, Kasow KA, Popat U, Smith W, Yu L, DiFronzo N, Geller N, Kamani N, Klings ES, Hassell K, Mendizabal A, Sullivan K, Neuberg D, Krishnamurti L. Hematopoietic cell transplant compared with standard care in adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease. Blood Adv. 2025 Mar 11;9(5):955-965. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013926.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36240296Leonard A, Furstenau D, Abraham A, Darbari DS, Nickel RS, Limerick E, Fitzhugh C, Hsieh M, Tisdale JF. Reduction in vaso-occlusive events following stem cell transplantation in patients with sickle cell disease. Blood Adv. 2023 Jan 24;7(2):227-234. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008137.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30637784Krishnamurti L, Neuberg DS, Sullivan KM, Kamani NR, Abraham A, Campigotto F, Zhang W, Dahdoul T, De Castro L, Parikh S, Bakshi N, Haight A, Hassell KL, Loving R, Rosenthal J, Smith SL, Smith W, Spearman M, Stevenson K, Wu CJ, Wiedl C, Waller EK, Walters MC. Bone marrow transplantation for adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease: Results of a prospective multicenter pilot study. Am J Hematol. 2019 Apr;94(4):446-454. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25401. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network WebsiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Results will be published in a manuscript and supporting information submitted to NIH BioLINCC (including data dictionaries, case report forms, data submission documentation, documentation for outcomes dataset, etc where indicated).
Related trials for Sickle Cell Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Long-term Mitapivat Dosing in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease: An Extension of a Phase I Pilot Study of Mitapivat
Sickle Cell Disease, Hemolytic Anemia
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Escalating Doses of Fostamatinib in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disorders, Sickle Cell Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
Clinical and Biomarker Effects of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Females With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episode in Sickle Cell Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Buprenorphine for the Management of Pain in Children With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Minocycline In Neurocognitive Outcomes - Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease, Cognitive Impairment
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mary Eapen, MD study director
Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research
35 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Busulfan, Fludarabine and r-ATG in people with Sickle Cell Disease, run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 35 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 21 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 35 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Sep 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) at 2 Years After Biologic Assignment (time frame: 2 Years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02766465, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.