OrchiopexyNCT02768493
Ultrasonographic Assessment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Children Receiving Caudal Block
A study testing 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine and 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine in people with Orchiopexy and Inguinal Hernioplasty, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The recent study revealed that high-volume caudal block caused reduction in cerebral blood flow velocity and cerebral oxygenation. It was supposed to be associated with increased intracranial pressure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 months to 4 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Orchiopexy, Inguinal Hernioplasty, Hydrocelectomy
- What is being tested?
- 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine and 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- May 2016to Aug 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 months to 4 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Pediatric patients
- weighing less than 16 kg
- who receive caudal block before urologic surgery
Who cannot join
- Subjects are ineligible if they have contraindication for caudal block such as infection, coagulopathy, anomaly, or past medical history related to increased intracranial pressure
- ophthalmic disease
- expected operation time is less than 30 minutes
- both parents are unable to communicate or speak Korean.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institue, Yonsei universiy college of medicine
Seoul, 120-752
About this study
The recent study revealed that high-volume caudal block caused reduction in cerebral blood flow velocity and cerebral oxygenation. It was supposed to be associated with increased intracranial pressure. Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter shows a good level of diagnostic accuracy for detecting intracranial hypertension. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of caudal block on intracranial pressure in pediatric patients undergoing urologic surgery. Eighty patients, aged 6 months to 4 years, receiving caudal block before urologic surgery will be divided into high dose group (n=40) and low dose group (n=40). Randomly selected patients of the high dose group are given 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block. In contrast, patients in the low dose group are given 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block. The primary endpoint is the optic nerve sheath diameter after caudal block measured by optic nerve ultrasonography.
- Conditions
- Orchiopexy, Inguinal Hernioplasty, Hydrocelectomy, Diverticulectomy, Fistula Repair, Penoplasty
- Being tested
- 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine, 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaineDrug
Randomly selected patients of the high dose group are given 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block before their surgery. In contrast, patients in the low dose group are given 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block before surgery.
1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaineDrug
Randomly selected patients of the high dose group are given 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block before their surgery. In contrast, patients in the low dose group are given 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block before surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| low dose group | Experimental | Patients in the low dose group are given 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block. Receives: Drug: 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine |
| high dose group | Active comparator | Patients in the high dose group are given 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block. Receives: Drug: 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The difference in the optic nerve sheath diameter between groups
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (2)
The variation in the optic nerve sheath diameter before and after caudal block
Measured: 30 minutes
the difference in the variation of the optic nerve sheath diameter between groups
Measured: 30 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2016
- Primary completionAug 2016
- Study completionAug 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OrchiopexyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yonsei UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yonsei University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02768493
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4-2016-0192
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 8 May 2016
- Last updated
- 9 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Girisgin AS, Kalkan E, Kocak S, Cander B, Gul M, Semiz M. The role of optic nerve ultrasonography in the diagnosis of elevated intracranial pressure. Emerg Med J. 2007 Apr;24(4):251-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.040931.
PubMed 17384377Dubourg J, Javouhey E, Geeraerts T, Messerer M, Kassai B. Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter for detection of raised intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jul;37(7):1059-68. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2224-2. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
PubMed 21505900Dubost C, Le Gouez A, Jouffroy V, Roger-Christoph S, Benhamou D, Mercier FJ, Geeraerts T. Optic nerve sheath diameter used as ultrasonographic assessment of the incidence of raised intracranial pressure in preeclampsia: a pilot study. Anesthesiology. 2012 May;116(5):1066-71. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318246ea1a.
PubMed 22258019Lundblad M, Forestier J, Marhofer D, Eksborg S, Winberg P, Lonnqvist PA. Reduction of cerebral mean blood flow velocity and oxygenation after high-volume (1.5 ml kg(-)(1)) caudal block in infants. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Oct;113(4):688-94. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu161. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
PubMed 24972788Lee B, Koo BN, Choi YS, Kil HK, Kim MS, Lee JH. Effect of caudal block using different volumes of local anaesthetic on optic nerve sheath diameter in children: a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2017 May 1;118(5):781-787. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex078.
PubMed 28486629
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ultrasonographic Assessment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Children Receiving Caudal Block
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02768493
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 4-2016-0192
- Conditions
- Orchiopexy, Inguinal Hernioplasty, Hydrocelectomy, Diverticulectomy, Fistula Repair, Penoplasty
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yonsei UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2016
- Primary completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The recent study revealed that high-volume caudal block caused reduction in cerebral blood flow velocity and cerebral oxygenation. It was supposed to be associated with increased intracranial pressure. Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter shows a good level of diagnostic accuracy for detecting intracranial hypertension. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of caudal block on intracranial pressure in pediatric patients undergoing urologic surgery. Eighty patients, aged 6 months to 4 years, receiving caudal block before urologic surgery will be divided into high dose group (n=40) and low dose group (n=40). Randomly selected patients of the high dose group are given 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block. In contrast, patients in the low dose group are given 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block. The primary endpoint is the optic nerve sheath diameter after caudal block measured by optic nerve ultrasonography.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| low dose group | Experimental | Drug: 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacainePatients in the low dose group are given 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block. |
| high dose group | Active comparator | Drug: 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacainePatients in the high dose group are given 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 months to 4 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pediatric patients
- weighing less than 16 kg
- who receive caudal block before urologic surgery
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subjects are ineligible if they have contraindication for caudal block such as infection, coagulopathy, anomaly, or past medical history related to increased intracranial pressure
- ophthalmic disease
- expected operation time is less than 30 minutes
- both parents are unable to communicate or speak Korean.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaineRandomly selected patients of the high dose group are given 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block before their surgery. In contrast, patients in the low dose group are given 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block before surgery. | Drug | low dose group |
| 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaineRandomly selected patients of the high dose group are given 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block before their surgery. In contrast, patients in the low dose group are given 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine for caudal block before surgery. | Drug | high dose group |
Primary outcome
The difference in the optic nerve sheath diameter between groups
Time frame: 1 day
2 secondary outcomes
The variation in the optic nerve sheath diameter before and after caudal block
Time frame: 30 minutes
the difference in the variation of the optic nerve sheath diameter between groups
Time frame: 30 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Sep 2016.
- Background: PubMed 17384377Girisgin AS, Kalkan E, Kocak S, Cander B, Gul M, Semiz M. The role of optic nerve ultrasonography in the diagnosis of elevated intracranial pressure. Emerg Med J. 2007 Apr;24(4):251-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.040931.
- Background: PubMed 21505900Dubourg J, Javouhey E, Geeraerts T, Messerer M, Kassai B. Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter for detection of raised intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jul;37(7):1059-68. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2224-2. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
- Background: PubMed 22258019Dubost C, Le Gouez A, Jouffroy V, Roger-Christoph S, Benhamou D, Mercier FJ, Geeraerts T. Optic nerve sheath diameter used as ultrasonographic assessment of the incidence of raised intracranial pressure in preeclampsia: a pilot study. Anesthesiology. 2012 May;116(5):1066-71. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318246ea1a.
- Background: PubMed 24972788Lundblad M, Forestier J, Marhofer D, Eksborg S, Winberg P, Lonnqvist PA. Reduction of cerebral mean blood flow velocity and oxygenation after high-volume (1.5 ml kg(-)(1)) caudal block in infants. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Oct;113(4):688-94. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu161. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28486629Lee B, Koo BN, Choi YS, Kil HK, Kim MS, Lee JH. Effect of caudal block using different volumes of local anaesthetic on optic nerve sheath diameter in children: a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2017 May 1;118(5):781-787. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex078.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Orchiopexy
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Caudal Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Orchiopexy: A Prospective Observational Study
Caudal Epidural Anesthesia, Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block
Recruiting
Orchidopexy Randomized Clinical Assessment
Unilateral Cryptorchidism
Recruiting
Transection Versus Ligation of Internal Spermatic Vessels in Laparoscopic Fowler-Stephens Orchidopexy
Cryptorchidism
Recruiting
Comparison of Single Incision Scrotal vs Standard Two Incision Inguinal Orchidopexy in Children Under 10 Years.
Undescended Testis
RecruitingObservational study
Inflammatory Biomarkers as Predictors of PONV Following Pediatric Orchiopexy
Pediatric Anesthesia, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 1.0 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine and 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine in people with Orchiopexy and Inguinal Hernioplasty, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The difference in the optic nerve sheath diameter between groups (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02768493, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2016.