Healthy Volunteers OnlyNCT02769988
Educational Impact of the NLM/National Area Health Education Center Organization (NAO) Project-SHARE Based Teen Health Information Literacy Curriculum
An observational study of Healthy Volunteers Only, run by National Library of Medicine (NLM) at 6 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Background: The Teen Health Information Literacy Project is an after-school program for high school students. It gives them skills to access valid and reliable health data. It also aims to grow young health advocates. Researchers want to find out more about the impact the program has had on students. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 to 18 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy Volunteers Only
- How many people
- 127 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 11 May 2016to 26 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 to 18 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Participation in the NLM / NAO Teen Health Information Literacy Project
Who cannot join
- -NA
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
United States6 sites
Boston AHEC
Boston, Massachusetts
Montana AHEC
Bozeman, Montana
SW Colorado AHEC
Durango, Colorado
Centennial AHEC
Greeley, Colorado
Eastern CT AHEC
New London, Connecticut
Bqli Ahec
Queens, New York
About this study
Official title: Focus Group Evaluation of Educational Impact of the NLM / National Area Health Education Center Organization (NAO) Project-SHARE Based Teen Health Information Literacy Curriculum
Background:
The Teen Health Information Literacy Project is an after-school program for high school students. It gives them skills to access valid and reliable health data. It also aims to grow young health advocates. Researchers want to find out more about the impact the program has had on students. They want to use this feedback to improve the program.
Read more
Objective:
To gain feedback about the Teen Health Information Literacy Project.
Eligibility:
Young people who participated in the Teen Health Information Literacy Project. The project was run by Area Health Education Centers (AHECs) and sponsored by the National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Design:
The study will be explained to students during a program session. They will take consent forms home to their parents.
Participants will split into 6 focus groups. Each one will be conducted at an AHEC project site.
The focus group will be a 90-minute discussion between participants and an evaluator from the NLM. The evaluator will be present either in person or by video conference.
The evaluator will ask participants questions, which may include the following. What did they like and dislike about the program? Why did they decide to participate? What have they learned? Would they recommend this program to another student? How has the program affected their interest in health-related careers?
The discussion will be audio-recorded. The evaluator will use an automated tool to convert recordings into text. After that, she will destroy the audio.
Read the detailed description
The objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of the National Library of Medicine (NLM)/ National Area Health Education Center Organization (NAO) Teen Health Information Literacy Curriculum (based on an earlier Project SHARE curriculum) on the participants : understanding of health disparities in their communities; leadership, health advocacy, and communication skills; sense of self and connectedness with the community; and interest in health-related careers. Study population: The study population consists of program participants at the five participating sites, which include local AHEC chapters of Boston, Brooklyn-Queens-Long Island, Colorado, Eastern Connecticut, and Montana. The program participants are middle and high school students, ranging in ages from 13 to 18 years old. All participants will be invited to participate. Design: The study will involve moderated focus groups at each participating site. Outcome measures: participants understanding of health disparities in their communities; leadership, health advocacy, and communication skills; sense of self and connectedness with the community; and interest in health-related careers.
- Conditions
- Healthy Volunteers Only
- Keywords
- Adolescents, Health Information Literacy, Health Education
- Medical subject headings
- Health Education
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Project SHARE | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Participant's understanding of health disparities in their communities; leadership, health advocacy, and communication skills; sense of self and connectedness with the community; and interest in health-related careers
Measured: End of Program
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study start11 May 2016
- Primary completion5 Oct 2016
- Study completion26 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Healthy Volunteers OnlyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 127 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Library of Medicine (NLM)
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alla Keselman, Ph.D., Principal investigator, National Library of Medicine (NLM)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02769988
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 999916100
- Other IDs
- 16-LM-N100
- Status last verified
- 26 Jun 2018
- First submitted
- 11 May 2016
- Last updated
- 4 Dec 2019
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Dec 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Focus Group Evaluation of Educational Impact of the NLM / National Area Health Education Center Organization (NAO) Project-SHARE Based Teen Health Information Literacy Curriculum
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02769988
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 999916100
- Conditions
- Healthy Volunteers Only
- Keywords
- Adolescents, Health Information Literacy, Health Education
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 127 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Library of Medicine (NLM)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- 11 May 2016
- Primary completion
- 5 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background:
The Teen Health Information Literacy Project is an after-school program for high school students. It gives them skills to access valid and reliable health data. It also aims to grow young health advocates. Researchers want to find out more about the impact the program has had on students. They want to use this feedback to improve the program.
Objective:
To gain feedback about the Teen Health Information Literacy Project.
Eligibility:
Young people who participated in the Teen Health Information Literacy Project. The project was run by Area Health Education Centers (AHECs) and sponsored by the National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Design:
The study will be explained to students during a program session. They will take consent forms home to their parents.
Participants will split into 6 focus groups. Each one will be conducted at an AHEC project site.
The focus group will be a 90-minute discussion between participants and an evaluator from the NLM. The evaluator will be present either in person or by video conference.
The evaluator will ask participants questions, which may include the following. What did they like and dislike about the program? Why did they decide to participate? What have they learned? Would they recommend this program to another student? How has the program affected their interest in health-related careers?
The discussion will be audio-recorded. The evaluator will use an automated tool to convert recordings into text. After that, she will destroy the audio.
Detailed description
The objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of the National Library of Medicine (NLM)/ National Area Health Education Center Organization (NAO) Teen Health Information Literacy Curriculum (based on an earlier Project SHARE curriculum) on the participants : understanding of health disparities in their communities; leadership, health advocacy, and communication skills; sense of self and connectedness with the community; and interest in health-related careers. Study population: The study population consists of program participants at the five participating sites, which include local AHEC chapters of Boston, Brooklyn-Queens-Long Island, Colorado, Eastern Connecticut, and Montana. The program participants are middle and high school students, ranging in ages from 13 to 18 years old. All participants will be invited to participate. Design: The study will involve moderated focus groups at each participating site. Outcome measures: participants understanding of health disparities in their communities; leadership, health advocacy, and communication skills; sense of self and connectedness with the community; and interest in health-related careers.
Study design
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Project SHARE | – | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participation in the NLM / NAO Teen Health Information Literacy Project
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -NA
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Participant's understanding of health disparities in their communities; leadership, health advocacy, and communication skills; sense of self and connectedness with the community; and interest in health-related careers
Time frame: End of Program
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Dec 2019.
Related trials for Healthy Volunteers Only
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn How Different Forms of the Study Medicine Called Berobenatide is Taken up Into the Blood in Adults With Overweight or Obesity
Overweight and/or Obesity, Healthy Participants
Not yet recruiting
Smartphone Camera Measurement of Breathing-Related Heart Rate Variability Compared With ECG in Healthy Adults
Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia, Heart Rate Variability
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study for GSK3862995B in Healthy Participants and Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Clinical Trial of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Food Effect of UBT48128 Tablets in Healthy Participants
Overweight , Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of BCX17725
Netherton Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alla Keselman, Ph.D. principal investigator
National Library of Medicine (NLM)
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Healthy Volunteers Only, run by National Library of Medicine (NLM) at 6 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Participant's understanding of health disparities in their communities; leadership, health advocacy, and communication skills; sense of self and connectedness with the community; and interest in health-related careers (time frame: End of Program). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2019.