Pediatric ObesityNCT02770196
Intervention Study of Cost-Offset Community Supported Agriculture (CO-CSA)
A study testing CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education in people with Pediatric Obesity and Child Nutrition Disorders, run by Cornell University at 29 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to better understand how participation in cost-subsidized community supported agriculture programs paired with tailored education can affect diet quality and energy balance among children in low-income households. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pediatric Obesity, Child Nutrition Disorders
- What is being tested?
- CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 305 participants
- Where
- 29 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2015to 14 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- English-speaking
- Parent or legal guardian of a child in the household between the ages of two and 12 years
- Self-reported income less than 185% of the Federal Poverty Level or report enrollment in SNAP, WIC, or Head Start
- Has access to a computer from which s/he can complete on-line data collection
- Has an active e-mail account or willing to create an e-mail account
- Has not participated in CSA in the past three years
Show all 11Show fewer
- Willing to purchase the 50% CO-CSA share (can use SNAP benefits if desired and available)
- Willing to attend CSA-tailored education sessions
- Willing to make a firm commitment to three years of participation (2016 enrollment) or two years of participation (2017 enrollment), with timing of the off-set benefit determined by randomization
- Complete baseline survey
- Pay deposit to farm
Who cannot join
- Non-English-speaking
- Not the parent or legal guardian of a child in the household between the ages of two and 12 years
- Self-reported income equal to or greater than 185% of the Federal Poverty Level and no report of SNAP, WIC, or Head Start enrollment
- Does not have access to a computer from which s/he can complete on-line data collection
- Does not have an active e-mail account or is not able or willing to create an e-mail account
- Has participated in CSA in the past three years
Show all 11Show fewer
- Not able or willing to purchase the 50% CO-CSA share
- Not able or willing to attend CSA-tailored education sessions
- Not able or willing to make a firm commitment to three years of participation (for 2016 enrollment) or two years of participation (2017 enrollment), with timing of the off-set benefit determined by randomization
- Not able or willing to complete baseline survey
- Not able or willing to pay deposit to farm
Trial locations and contacts
29 sites in 1 country.
29 sites in 1 country
United States29 sites
Barker
Barker, New York, 14012
Bristol
Bristol, Vermont, 05443; 05472
Burlington
Burlington, Vermont, 05401; 05402; 05405
Burlington
Burlington, Vermont, 05406; 05408
Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27510; 27514; 27515
Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27516; 27517; 27599; 27707
Corning
Corning, New York, 14830
Cuttingsville
Cuttingsville, Vermont, 05738
Gasport
Gasport, New York, 14067
Hinesburg
Hinesburg, Vermont, 05461; 05462; 05445
La Conner
La Conner, Washington, 98257
Lockport
Lockport, New York, 14094
Ludlow
Ludlow, Vermont, 05149
Medina
Medina, New York, 14103
Mount Vernon
Mount Vernon, Washington, 98274
Newfane
Newfane, New York, 14108
Olympia
Olympia, Washington, 98502
Pittsboro
Pittsboro, North Carolina, 23712
Rochester
Rochester, Washington, 98579
Rutland
Rutland, Vermont, 05701; 05702; 05736
Rutland
Rutland, Vermont, 05759; 05765
Sedro Woolley
Sedro-Woolley, Washington, 98284
Siler City
Siler City, North Carolina, 27344
South Burlington
South Burlington, Vermont, 05407; 05403; 05482
Starksboro
Starksboro, Vermont, 05461; 05473
Starksboro
Starksboro, Vermont, 05487; 05469; 05443
Vergennes
Vergennes, Vermont, 05491
Watertown
Watertown, New York, 13601
Winooski
Winooski, Vermont, 05404; 05439; 05446; 05449
About this study
Official title: Farm Fresh Foods for Healthy Kids: Innovative Community Supported Agriculture Cost-Offset Intervention to Prevent Childhood Obesity and Strengthen Local Agricultural Economies
The purpose of this study is to better understand how participation in cost-subsidized community supported agriculture programs paired with tailored education can affect diet quality and energy balance among children in low-income households.
Read the detailed description
Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) is an innovative approach to increasing consumer access to and consumption of fresh produce, thereby lowering obesity prevalence. However, CSA "share" costs may be a barrier for low-income households with children. This multistate study examines whether subsidizing the cost of CSAs, integrated with tailored education: 1) increases consumption of fruits and vegetables, 2) substitutes fruits and vegetables for more energy-dense foods, and 3) improves overall diet quality and energy balance, thus helping children maintain healthy body weights. It also investigates how cost-offset CSAs ("CO-CSAs") contribute to local agricultural economies. Given the well-documented risk for obesity and limited access to fresh produce among low-income individuals, those households are the target of the intervention in four geographically-diverse states: Vermont, New York, North Carolina and Washington.
FORMATIVE AND LONGITUDINAL RESEARCH: Qualitative and quantitative research is being used to inform implementation of the randomized trial, refine outcome assessment strategies, and provide information needed to design a tailored curriculum to enhance low-income households' knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors related to the use of CSA produce and healthy eating.
In the first year of the study, the investigators conducted interviews and focus groups with stakeholders to gather in-depth data related to the potential of CO-CSA operations to meet the needs and preferences of low-income households and the types of information that would be most valuable to include in the study's curriculum. Key stakeholder groups included adults and children from low-income households, CSA farmers, current full-paying CSA members, and nutrition educators.
The investigators also are conducting a longitudinal quantitative examination of dietary behaviors among current CO-CSA participants in an existing statewide program in Vermont. Using online surveys, the investigators are measuring dietary outcomes quarterly among children, and biannually among adults, from low-income households in the program. Data from Year 1 was used to inform the intervention, while data from subsequent time points will provide an opportunity for analysis of longitudinal patterns.
RANDOMIZED INTERVENTION: In the second phase of the project, the investigators will implement and evaluate a three-year delayed intervention randomized controlled trial of CO-CSA plus skill-based, CSA-tailored education in the four states. The investigators will compare changes in dietary behaviors, reported consumption, energy intake, and weight status parameters between children aged 2-12 in 120 control and 120 intervention households. Two hundred households were enrolled in 2016 and an additional 40 households will be enrolled in 2017. Participant households enrolled in 2016 will receive a CO-CSA share for two seasons and education during their first CO-CSA season (Y1 for intervention households and Y2 for control households). Households enrolled in 2017 will receive a CO-CSA share and education for one season (Y2 for intervention households and Y3 for control households). In addition to outcomes with participants, investigators will conduct economic analysis to evaluate the impact of CO-CSA for farms and communities. While these analyses are not related to the human participants, they are central to the overall project goals.
- Conditions
- Pediatric Obesity, Child Nutrition Disorders
- Being tested
- CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education
- Keywords
- Community-Supported Agriculture, Local Food System, Vegetable, Fruit, Childhood Obesity
- Medical subject headings
- Pediatric Obesity, Child Nutrition Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CO-CSA plus Nutrition EducationBehavioural
Participants will receive subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year. In addition, they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group One (Two-year Intervention, 2016 Enrollment) | Experimental | Group one intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year in 2016 and 2017. During the 2016 season they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce. Receives: Behavioral: CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education |
| Group Two (Delayed Two-year Intervention, 2016 Enrollment) | Experimental | Group two intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year in 2017 and 2018. During the 2017 season they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce. Receives: Behavioral: CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education |
| Group Three (One-year Intervention, 2017 Enrollment) | Experimental | Group three intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks in 2017 and will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce. Receives: Behavioral: CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education |
| Group Four (Delayed One-year Intervention, 2017 Enrollment) | Experimental | Group four delayed intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks in 2018 and will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce. Receives: Behavioral: CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in child's fruit and vegetable intake as measured by short dietary screener
Data collected using the National Cancer Institute's All-Day Fruit and Vegetable Screener.
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 12 month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in child's fruit and vegetable intake as measured by 24-hour dietary recall
Data collected with dietary recalls using the online Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24) system
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in child's intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and processed snacks as measured by short dietary questionnaire
Data collected using the Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center's 'Beverage and Snack Questionnaire 2'
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 12-month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in child's intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and processed snacks as measured by 24-hour dietary recall
Data collected with dietary recalls using the online Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24) system
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in child's caloric intake as a percent of estimated energy requirements
Data collected with dietary recalls using the online Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24) system
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in child's dermal carotenoid levels
Carotenoid levels measured by resonance Raman spectroscopy using the Bio-Photonic Scanner (NuSkin Enterprises)
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in child's diet quality
Data collected with dietary recalls using the online Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24) system
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (12)
Change in child's BMI percentile
Height and weight measured by trained research staff
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in child's physical activity
Data collected using survey question on physical activity adapted from Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) questionnaire
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 12 month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in child's sedentary behavior
Data collected using survey questions on TV, video, and computer use adapted from Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) questionnaire
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 12 month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Changes in parent's ability to select, store, and prepare CSA produce
Data collected using questionnaire module on parent's ability to select, store, and prepare CSA produce
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Changes in parent's ability to prepare foods to minimize added (solid) fat and sugar
Data collected using questionnaire module on parent's ability to prepare foods to minimize added (solid) fat and sugar
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Changes in parent's ability to substitute fruit and vegetables for energy-dense foods
Data collected using questionnaire module on parent's ability to substitute fruit and vegetables for energy-dense foods
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Changes in parent's knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about fruits and vegetables
Data collected using questionnaire module on parent's knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about fruits and vegetables
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Changes in availability and accessibility of fruits and vegetables in the home
Data collected using questionnaire module on the availability and accessibility of fruits and vegetables in the home
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in parent's fruit and vegetable intake as measured by short dietary screener
Data collected using the National Cancer Institute's All-Day Fruit and Vegetable Screener
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 12 month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in parent's intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and processed snacks as measured by short dietary questionnaire
Data collected using the Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center's 'Beverage and Snack Questionnaire 2'
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 12 month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in parent's dermal carotenoid levels
Carotenoid levels measured by resonance Raman spectroscopy using the Bio-Photonic Scanner (NuSkin Enterprises)
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Changes in household food security
Data collected using the USDA 6-item Food Security Survey Module with 30-day reference period
Measured: Baseline to 4 months, 12 month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2015
- Primary completion6 Dec 2018
- Study completion14 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pediatric ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 305 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cornell University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Vermont, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, The Evergreen State College
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rebecca A. Seguin, PhD, Principal investigator, Cornell UniversityKarla Hanson, PhD, Principal investigator, Cornell UniversityJane Kolodinsky, PhD, Principal investigator, University of VermontMarilyn Sitaker, PhD, Principal investigator, The Evergreen State CollegeAlice Ammerman, PhD, Principal investigator, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillStephanie Jilcott-Pitts, PhD, Principal investigator, East Carolina University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02770196
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB #: 1501005266
- Other IDs
- 2015-68001-23230, 2015
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Garner JA, Hanson KL, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Sitaker MH, Ammerman AS, Kenkel D, Seguin-Fowler RA. Cost analysis and cost effectiveness of a subsidized community supported agriculture intervention for low-income families. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Jul 10;20(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01481-7.
PubMed 37430305Seguin-Fowler RA, Hanson KL, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Sitaker M, Ammerman AS, Marshall GA, Belarmino EH, Garner JA, Wang W. Community supported agriculture plus nutrition education improves skills, self-efficacy, and eating behaviors among low-income caregivers but not their children: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Aug 31;18(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01168-x.
PubMed 34461931Lu I, Hanson KL, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Ammerman AS, Sitaker M, Wang W, Volpe LC, Belarmino EH, Garner J, Gonsalves L, Seguin RA. Perceptions of nutrition education classes offered in conjunction with a community-supported agriculture intervention among low-income families. Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jul;24(10):3028-3036. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002773. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
PubMed 32830626Seguin RA, Morgan EH, Hanson KL, Ammerman AS, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Sitaker M, Becot FA, Connor LM, Garner JA, McGuirt JT. Farm Fresh Foods for Healthy Kids (F3HK): An innovative community supported agriculture intervention to prevent childhood obesity in low-income families and strengthen local agricultural economies. BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 8;17(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4202-2.
PubMed 28390403
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Farm Fresh Foods for Healthy Kids: Innovative Community Supported Agriculture Cost-Offset Intervention to Prevent Childhood Obesity and Strengthen Local Agricultural Economies
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02770196
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB #: 1501005266
- Conditions
- Pediatric Obesity, Child Nutrition Disorders
- Keywords
- Community-Supported Agriculture, Local Food System, Vegetable, Fruit, Childhood Obesity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 305 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cornell UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Vermont, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, The Evergreen State College
- Study start
- Apr 2015
- Primary completion
- 6 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to better understand how participation in cost-subsidized community supported agriculture programs paired with tailored education can affect diet quality and energy balance among children in low-income households.
Detailed description
Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) is an innovative approach to increasing consumer access to and consumption of fresh produce, thereby lowering obesity prevalence. However, CSA "share" costs may be a barrier for low-income households with children. This multistate study examines whether subsidizing the cost of CSAs, integrated with tailored education: 1) increases consumption of fruits and vegetables, 2) substitutes fruits and vegetables for more energy-dense foods, and 3) improves overall diet quality and energy balance, thus helping children maintain healthy body weights. It also investigates how cost-offset CSAs ("CO-CSAs") contribute to local agricultural economies. Given the well-documented risk for obesity and limited access to fresh produce among low-income individuals, those households are the target of the intervention in four geographically-diverse states: Vermont, New York, North Carolina and Washington.
FORMATIVE AND LONGITUDINAL RESEARCH: Qualitative and quantitative research is being used to inform implementation of the randomized trial, refine outcome assessment strategies, and provide information needed to design a tailored curriculum to enhance low-income households' knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors related to the use of CSA produce and healthy eating.
In the first year of the study, the investigators conducted interviews and focus groups with stakeholders to gather in-depth data related to the potential of CO-CSA operations to meet the needs and preferences of low-income households and the types of information that would be most valuable to include in the study's curriculum. Key stakeholder groups included adults and children from low-income households, CSA farmers, current full-paying CSA members, and nutrition educators.
The investigators also are conducting a longitudinal quantitative examination of dietary behaviors among current CO-CSA participants in an existing statewide program in Vermont. Using online surveys, the investigators are measuring dietary outcomes quarterly among children, and biannually among adults, from low-income households in the program. Data from Year 1 was used to inform the intervention, while data from subsequent time points will provide an opportunity for analysis of longitudinal patterns.
RANDOMIZED INTERVENTION: In the second phase of the project, the investigators will implement and evaluate a three-year delayed intervention randomized controlled trial of CO-CSA plus skill-based, CSA-tailored education in the four states. The investigators will compare changes in dietary behaviors, reported consumption, energy intake, and weight status parameters between children aged 2-12 in 120 control and 120 intervention households. Two hundred households were enrolled in 2016 and an additional 40 households will be enrolled in 2017. Participant households enrolled in 2016 will receive a CO-CSA share for two seasons and education during their first CO-CSA season (Y1 for intervention households and Y2 for control households). Households enrolled in 2017 will receive a CO-CSA share and education for one season (Y2 for intervention households and Y3 for control households). In addition to outcomes with participants, investigators will conduct economic analysis to evaluate the impact of CO-CSA for farms and communities. While these analyses are not related to the human participants, they are central to the overall project goals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group One (Two-year Intervention, 2016 Enrollment) | Experimental | Behavioral: CO-CSA plus Nutrition EducationGroup one intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year in 2016 and 2017. During the 2016 season they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce. |
| Group Two (Delayed Two-year Intervention, 2016 Enrollment) | Experimental | Behavioral: CO-CSA plus Nutrition EducationGroup two intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year in 2017 and 2018. During the 2017 season they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce. |
| Group Three (One-year Intervention, 2017 Enrollment) | Experimental | Behavioral: CO-CSA plus Nutrition EducationGroup three intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks in 2017 and will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce. |
| Group Four (Delayed One-year Intervention, 2017 Enrollment) | Experimental | Behavioral: CO-CSA plus Nutrition EducationGroup four delayed intervention participants in CO-CSA plus nutrition education will receive a subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks in 2018 and will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- English-speaking
- Parent or legal guardian of a child in the household between the ages of two and 12 years
- Self-reported income less than 185% of the Federal Poverty Level or report enrollment in SNAP, WIC, or Head Start
- Has access to a computer from which s/he can complete on-line data collection
- Has an active e-mail account or willing to create an e-mail account
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Non-English-speaking
- Not the parent or legal guardian of a child in the household between the ages of two and 12 years
- Self-reported income equal to or greater than 185% of the Federal Poverty Level and no report of SNAP, WIC, or Head Start enrollment
- Does not have access to a computer from which s/he can complete on-line data collection
- Does not have an active e-mail account or is not able or willing to create an e-mail account
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CO-CSA plus Nutrition EducationParticipants will receive subsidized share of CSA produce (50% standard member price) weekly for approximately 20 weeks each year. In addition, they will attend nine skill-based, nutrition education sessions focused on use of CSA produce. | Behavioural | Group Four (Delayed One-year Intervention, 2017 Enrollment), Group One (Two-year Intervention, 2016 Enrollment), Group Three (One-year Intervention, 2017 Enrollment), Group Two (Delayed Two-year Intervention, 2016 Enrollment) |
Primary outcome
Change in child's fruit and vegetable intake as measured by short dietary screener
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 12 month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Data collected using the National Cancer Institute's All-Day Fruit and Vegetable Screener.
Change in child's fruit and vegetable intake as measured by 24-hour dietary recall
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Data collected with dietary recalls using the online Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24) system
Change in child's intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and processed snacks as measured by short dietary questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 12-month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Data collected using the Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center's 'Beverage and Snack Questionnaire 2'
Change in child's intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and processed snacks as measured by 24-hour dietary recall
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Data collected with dietary recalls using the online Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24) system
Change in child's caloric intake as a percent of estimated energy requirements
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Data collected with dietary recalls using the online Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24) system
Change in child's dermal carotenoid levels
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Carotenoid levels measured by resonance Raman spectroscopy using the Bio-Photonic Scanner (NuSkin Enterprises)
Change in child's diet quality
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Data collected with dietary recalls using the online Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24) system
12 secondary outcomes
Change in child's BMI percentile
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in child's physical activity
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 12 month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in child's sedentary behavior
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 12 month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Changes in parent's ability to select, store, and prepare CSA produce
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Changes in parent's ability to prepare foods to minimize added (solid) fat and sugar
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Changes in parent's ability to substitute fruit and vegetables for energy-dense foods
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Changes in parent's knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about fruits and vegetables
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Changes in availability and accessibility of fruits and vegetables in the home
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in parent's fruit and vegetable intake as measured by short dietary screener
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 12 month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in parent's intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and processed snacks as measured by short dietary questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 12 month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Change in parent's dermal carotenoid levels
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 16-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Changes in household food security
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 12 month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37430305Garner JA, Hanson KL, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Sitaker MH, Ammerman AS, Kenkel D, Seguin-Fowler RA. Cost analysis and cost effectiveness of a subsidized community supported agriculture intervention for low-income families. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Jul 10;20(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01481-7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34461931Seguin-Fowler RA, Hanson KL, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Sitaker M, Ammerman AS, Marshall GA, Belarmino EH, Garner JA, Wang W. Community supported agriculture plus nutrition education improves skills, self-efficacy, and eating behaviors among low-income caregivers but not their children: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Aug 31;18(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01168-x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32830626Lu I, Hanson KL, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Ammerman AS, Sitaker M, Wang W, Volpe LC, Belarmino EH, Garner J, Gonsalves L, Seguin RA. Perceptions of nutrition education classes offered in conjunction with a community-supported agriculture intervention among low-income families. Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jul;24(10):3028-3036. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002773. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28390403Seguin RA, Morgan EH, Hanson KL, Ammerman AS, Jilcott Pitts SB, Kolodinsky J, Sitaker M, Becot FA, Connor LM, Garner JA, McGuirt JT. Farm Fresh Foods for Healthy Kids (F3HK): An innovative community supported agriculture intervention to prevent childhood obesity in low-income families and strengthen local agricultural economies. BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 8;17(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4202-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pediatric Obesity
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of a 10-week Multicomponent Intervention Combined With Parent Education on Binge Eating Behavior in Children and Adolescents
Binge Eating Disorder, Binge Eating
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Tirzepatide (LY3298176) Once Weekly Versus Placebo in Pediatric Participants 6 to Less Than 12 Years of Age Who Have Obesity (ADVANCE-SURMOUNT-KIDS)
Obesity
Recruiting
National Childhood Obesity Prevention Programme BE FIT 24
Childhood Obesity
RecruitingPhase 2
Oxytocin for Weight Loss in Adolescents
Obesity, Adolescent, Oxytocin
RecruitingPhase 3
A Platform Trial for Pediatric Participants With Obesity or Overweight (LY900040)
Obesity, Overweight
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rebecca A. Seguin, PhD principal investigator
Cornell University
Karla Hanson, PhD principal investigator
Cornell University
Jane Kolodinsky, PhD principal investigator
University of Vermont
29 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CO-CSA plus Nutrition Education in people with Pediatric Obesity and Child Nutrition Disorders, run by Cornell University at 29 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 29 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in child's fruit and vegetable intake as measured by short dietary screener (time frame: Baseline to 4 months, 12 month follow-up, 16-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up, and 28-month follow-up). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02770196, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2026.