Corneal AbrasionPhase 2/3NCT02771392
Treatment of Corneal Abrasions With Topical Tetracaine
A Phase 2/3 study testing Ophthalmic Tetracaine and Normal Saline in people with Corneal Abrasion, run by New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Corneal abrasion (CA) is one of the most common eye injuries, accounting for 10% of eye-related emergency visits.1 A 1985 survey showed that around 3% of all visits to US general practitioners were for corneal abrasions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Corneal Abrasion
- What is being tested?
- Ophthalmic Tetracaine and Normal Saline
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2016to Oct 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients > 18 years of age with a primary diagnosis of uncomplicated corneal abrasion presenting to NYMH emergency department
Who cannot join
- Patients<18 years of age with complicated corneal abrasions or other eye injuries
- Present more than 36 hours after their initial injury
- Had previous eye surgery or cataracts
- Wear contact lenses or if their injury was caused from contact lens wear
- Had injured both eyes
- Unable to give informed consent
Show all 13Show fewer
- Current infectious or chemical conjunctivitis
- Have a grossly contaminated foreign body in their eye
- Currently suffering from an ocular infection
- Currently or previously had herpes keratitis
- Allergies to tetracaine or similar medication classes
- Had an injury requiring urgent ophthalmologic evaluation; including penetrating eye injuries, large or complicated corneal abrasions, or injuries causing a significant disruption of visio)
- Unable to attend follow up in 48 hours
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
New York Methodist Hospital
Brooklyn, New York, 11215
Laura Melville, M.D., 718-780-5040, lmelville@me.com
About this study
Official title: Treatment of Corneal Abrasions With Topical Tetracaine: an Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy
Corneal abrasion (CA) is one of the most common eye injuries, accounting for 10% of eye-related emergency visits.1 A 1985 survey showed that around 3% of all visits to US general practitioners were for corneal abrasions. In addition, in 2008, approximately 27,450 work-related eye injuries and illnesses occurred that caused missed time from work.1Due to the large number of nerve endings even small corneal injuries can produce significant pain. The discomfort is typically most pronounced in the first 24-48 hours, and in many cases showed a loss in time at work and disruption of daily activities. The current standard of care in the emergency department includes topical analgesia and antibiotics with a change to oral analgesics upon discharge. Despite the ineffectiveness of oral analgesics in treating CA pain, most physicians do not prescribe topical analgesics based on standard medical teaching. The study's aim is to further investigate the role of tetracaine in the outpatient management of CA utilizing models already established to ensure safety. To accomplish this investigators will employ a prospective, double blind, randomized control model to compare undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride to normal saline in patients presenting to the ED with uncomplicated corneal abrasions. Tetracaine will be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, each containing 0.5 mL of preservative-free, undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride (a total of 1.5 mL or approximately 50 drops will be provide to avoid overuse). Saline will also be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, plastic bullets. Follow up visits or calls will be provide at 48 hour to reevaluate symptoms an asses the patients perceived pain using VAS provided in participant introduction packet during the informed consent process.
Read the detailed description
Corneal abrasion (CA) is one of the most common eye injuries, accounting for 10% of eye-related emergency visits.1 A 1985 survey showed that around 3% of all visits to US general practitioners were for corneal abrasions. In addition, in 2008, approximately 27,450 work-related eye injuries and illnesses occurred that caused missed time from work.1Due to the large number of nerve endings even small corneal injuries can produce significant pain. The discomfort is typically most pronounced in the first 24-48 hours, and in many cases showed a loss in time at work and disruption of daily activities. The current standard of care in the emergency department includes topical analgesia and antibiotics with a change to oral analgesics upon discharge. Despite the ineffectiveness of oral analgesics in treating CA pain, most physicians do not prescribe topical analgesics based on standard medical teaching. This teaching is extrapolated from data from case reports and animal studies reporting complications associated with long-term use; including addiction, infection, ulceration, and increased healing time. Previous studies have also rejected topical analgesia citing equivocal effectiveness and inconclusive safety data. However, all of the early human case reports described patients who used topical anesthetics inappropriately-either far too frequently, for too prolonged a treatment period, or with too concentrated an anesthetic. Contrary to the medical cannon, studies have now begun show the effectiveness of topical anesthetics in reducing pain, and safe application when given at low doses and when given in quantities lasting only 24-48 hours. A recent prospective, randomized trial, published in Academic Emergency Medicine, observed the efficacy and safety of tetracaine compared to normal saline in 116 patients presenting with uncomplicated CA. The intervention was either undiluted topical tetracaine hydrochloride 1% or saline, applied up to every 30 minutes for 24 hours. The study showed topical tetracaine used for 24 hours was safe, revealing no difference in complications between the two groups, with all individuals attaining full healing within 1 month. Additionally, median visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were lower in the tetracaine group at all study time points after presentation, however statistical significance was not observed. Furthermore, patient surveys on overall effectiveness revealed that patients perceived tetracaine to be significantly more effective than saline. In fact, several researchers now recommend that the short-term use of tetracaine eye drops for 24 hours for pain relief from simple corneal abrasions should become routine practice. Nevertheless both skeptics and supporters agree that more research is needed in order to appropriately establish topical analgesics as a the standard of care. The importance of conducting research in the management of CA is underscored by the significant impact topical analgesics may provide in reliving patients pain compared to standard treatment. The study's aim is to further investigate the role of tetracaine in the outpatient management of CA utilizing models already established to ensure safety. This study will employ a prospective, double blind, randomized control model to compare undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride to normal saline in patients presenting to the ED with uncomplicated corneal abrasions. Tetracaine will be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, each containing 0.5 mL of preservative-free, undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride (a total of 1.5 mL or approximately 50 drops will be provide to avoid overuse). Saline will also be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, plastic bullets. Follow up visits or calls will be provide at 48 hour to reevaluate symptoms an asses the patients perceived pain using VAS provided in participant introduction packet during the informed consent process.
STUDY PROCEDURES
- Study visits and parameters to be measured Patients will be assessed using a VAS upon follow up at 48 hours. Patients will also be evaluated for complications either by phone or at a follow-up visit, which is at the participants discretion. All patients will be encouraged to follow up with ophthalmology as-per standard protocol.
- Drugs to be used (dose, method, schedule of administration, dose modifications, toxicities), include Toxicity Grading Scale (if applicable) Tetracaine will be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, each containing 0.5 mL of preservative-free, undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride (a total of 1.5 mL or approximately 50 drops will be provide to avoid overuse). Patient will be instructed to use no more than 1-2 drops in the affected eye every 30 minutes while awake for 24-48 hours
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
- List of variables and their definition Variables will include perceived pain using a VAS, and overall perceived effectiveness of solution provided.
- Outcome measures,endpoints The outcome of interest is weather-or-not tetracaine is superior to placebo in controlling pain caused by CA
- Type of analysis A two sample T-test will be used comparing the average pain scale between the tetracaine and placebo group
- Sample size of 100-200 patients is expected
- Conditions
- Corneal Abrasion
- Being tested
- Ophthalmic Tetracaine, Normal Saline
- Medical subject headings
- Corneal Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ophthalmic TetracaineDrug
Also called 1% tetracaine solution
1-2 drops to affected eye every 15-30 minutes over 24-48 hours as need
Normal SalineOther
Also called sodium chloride in 0.85% solution
1-2 drops to affected eye every 15-30 minutes over 24-48 hours as need
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tetracaine Group | Experimental | Patients with he primary diagnosis of corneal abrasion will be treated with ophthalmic tetracaine. Tetracaine will be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, each containing 0.5 mL of preservative-free, undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride (a total of 1.5 mL or approximately 50 drops will be provide to avoid overuse). Patients will be instructed to use 1-2 drops of up to every 30 min for pain control over a 48 hour period with subsequent followup with the ophthalmologist. Receives: Drug: Ophthalmic Tetracaine |
| Normal Saline Group | Placebo comparator | Patients with the primary diagnosis of corneal abrasion will be treated with normal saline eye drops. Normal saline will be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, each containing 0.5 mL of normal saline. Patients will be instructed to use 1-2 drops of up to every 30 min for pain control over a 48 hour period with subsequent followup with the ophthalmologist. Receives: Other: Normal Saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain assessed with Visual Analog Scale
Participants receiving both arms of the study (Tetracaine and Normal Saline) will be provided with a Visual Analog Scale in there study welcome packet. Scales will be completed at the end of 48 hours and submitted at follow up visit or mailed in if visit is deferred.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2016
- Primary completionJun 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Corneal AbrasionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Charles Pereyra, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
- Investigators
- Laura Melville, M.D., Study director, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02771392
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CA001
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 2 May 2016
- Last updated
- 13 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Plan to share data of pain perception and complications of patients
Publications
Waldman N, Densie IK, Herbison P. Topical tetracaine used for 24 hours is safe and rated highly effective by patients for the treatment of pain caused by corneal abrasions: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;21(4):374-82. doi: 10.1111/acem.12346.
PubMed 24730399Pruet CM, Feldman RM, Kim G. Re: "topical tetracaine used for 24 hours is safe and rated highly effective by patients for the treatment of pain caused by corneal abrasions: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial". Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;21(9):1062-3. doi: 10.1111/acem.12470. No abstract available.
PubMed 25269590Swaminathan A, Otterness K, Milne K, Rezaie S. The Safety of Topical Anesthetics in the Treatment of Corneal Abrasions: A Review. J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):810-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.069. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
PubMed 26281814Segal KL, Fleischut PM, Kim C, Levine B, Faggiani SL, Banerjee S, Gadalla F, Lelli GJ Jr. Evaluation and treatment of perioperative corneal abrasions. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:901901. doi: 10.1155/2014/901901. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
PubMed 24672709Algarni AM, Guyatt GH, Turner A, Alamri S. Antibiotic prophylaxis for corneal abrasion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 27;5(5):CD014617. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014617.pub2.
PubMed 35622535
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of Corneal Abrasions With Topical Tetracaine: an Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02771392
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CA001
- Conditions
- Corneal Abrasion
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2016
- Primary completion
- Jun 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Corneal abrasion (CA) is one of the most common eye injuries, accounting for 10% of eye-related emergency visits.1 A 1985 survey showed that around 3% of all visits to US general practitioners were for corneal abrasions. In addition, in 2008, approximately 27,450 work-related eye injuries and illnesses occurred that caused missed time from work.1Due to the large number of nerve endings even small corneal injuries can produce significant pain. The discomfort is typically most pronounced in the first 24-48 hours, and in many cases showed a loss in time at work and disruption of daily activities. The current standard of care in the emergency department includes topical analgesia and antibiotics with a change to oral analgesics upon discharge. Despite the ineffectiveness of oral analgesics in treating CA pain, most physicians do not prescribe topical analgesics based on standard medical teaching. The study's aim is to further investigate the role of tetracaine in the outpatient management of CA utilizing models already established to ensure safety. To accomplish this investigators will employ a prospective, double blind, randomized control model to compare undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride to normal saline in patients presenting to the ED with uncomplicated corneal abrasions. Tetracaine will be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, each containing 0.5 mL of preservative-free, undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride (a total of 1.5 mL or approximately 50 drops will be provide to avoid overuse). Saline will also be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, plastic bullets. Follow up visits or calls will be provide at 48 hour to reevaluate symptoms an asses the patients perceived pain using VAS provided in participant introduction packet during the informed consent process.
Detailed description
Corneal abrasion (CA) is one of the most common eye injuries, accounting for 10% of eye-related emergency visits.1 A 1985 survey showed that around 3% of all visits to US general practitioners were for corneal abrasions. In addition, in 2008, approximately 27,450 work-related eye injuries and illnesses occurred that caused missed time from work.1Due to the large number of nerve endings even small corneal injuries can produce significant pain. The discomfort is typically most pronounced in the first 24-48 hours, and in many cases showed a loss in time at work and disruption of daily activities. The current standard of care in the emergency department includes topical analgesia and antibiotics with a change to oral analgesics upon discharge. Despite the ineffectiveness of oral analgesics in treating CA pain, most physicians do not prescribe topical analgesics based on standard medical teaching. This teaching is extrapolated from data from case reports and animal studies reporting complications associated with long-term use; including addiction, infection, ulceration, and increased healing time. Previous studies have also rejected topical analgesia citing equivocal effectiveness and inconclusive safety data. However, all of the early human case reports described patients who used topical anesthetics inappropriately-either far too frequently, for too prolonged a treatment period, or with too concentrated an anesthetic. Contrary to the medical cannon, studies have now begun show the effectiveness of topical anesthetics in reducing pain, and safe application when given at low doses and when given in quantities lasting only 24-48 hours. A recent prospective, randomized trial, published in Academic Emergency Medicine, observed the efficacy and safety of tetracaine compared to normal saline in 116 patients presenting with uncomplicated CA. The intervention was either undiluted topical tetracaine hydrochloride 1% or saline, applied up to every 30 minutes for 24 hours. The study showed topical tetracaine used for 24 hours was safe, revealing no difference in complications between the two groups, with all individuals attaining full healing within 1 month. Additionally, median visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were lower in the tetracaine group at all study time points after presentation, however statistical significance was not observed. Furthermore, patient surveys on overall effectiveness revealed that patients perceived tetracaine to be significantly more effective than saline. In fact, several researchers now recommend that the short-term use of tetracaine eye drops for 24 hours for pain relief from simple corneal abrasions should become routine practice. Nevertheless both skeptics and supporters agree that more research is needed in order to appropriately establish topical analgesics as a the standard of care. The importance of conducting research in the management of CA is underscored by the significant impact topical analgesics may provide in reliving patients pain compared to standard treatment. The study's aim is to further investigate the role of tetracaine in the outpatient management of CA utilizing models already established to ensure safety. This study will employ a prospective, double blind, randomized control model to compare undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride to normal saline in patients presenting to the ED with uncomplicated corneal abrasions. Tetracaine will be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, each containing 0.5 mL of preservative-free, undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride (a total of 1.5 mL or approximately 50 drops will be provide to avoid overuse). Saline will also be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, plastic bullets. Follow up visits or calls will be provide at 48 hour to reevaluate symptoms an asses the patients perceived pain using VAS provided in participant introduction packet during the informed consent process.
STUDY PROCEDURES
- Study visits and parameters to be measured Patients will be assessed using a VAS upon follow up at 48 hours. Patients will also be evaluated for complications either by phone or at a follow-up visit, which is at the participants discretion. All patients will be encouraged to follow up with ophthalmology as-per standard protocol.
- Drugs to be used (dose, method, schedule of administration, dose modifications, toxicities), include Toxicity Grading Scale (if applicable) Tetracaine will be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, each containing 0.5 mL of preservative-free, undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride (a total of 1.5 mL or approximately 50 drops will be provide to avoid overuse). Patient will be instructed to use no more than 1-2 drops in the affected eye every 30 minutes while awake for 24-48 hours
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
- List of variables and their definition Variables will include perceived pain using a VAS, and overall perceived effectiveness of solution provided.
- Outcome measures,endpoints The outcome of interest is weather-or-not tetracaine is superior to placebo in controlling pain caused by CA
- Type of analysis A two sample T-test will be used comparing the average pain scale between the tetracaine and placebo group
- Sample size of 100-200 patients is expected
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tetracaine Group | Experimental | Drug: Ophthalmic TetracainePatients with he primary diagnosis of corneal abrasion will be treated with ophthalmic tetracaine. Tetracaine will be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, each containing 0.5 mL of preservative-free, undiluted 1% tetracaine hydrochloride (a total of 1.5 mL or approximately 50 drops will be provide to avoid overuse). Patients will be instructed to use 1-2 drops of up to every 30 min for pain control over a 48 hour period with subsequent followup with the ophthalmologist. |
| Normal Saline Group | Placebo comparator | Other: Normal SalinePatients with the primary diagnosis of corneal abrasion will be treated with normal saline eye drops. Normal saline will be supplied in three plastic prefilled, commercially available vials, each containing 0.5 mL of normal saline. Patients will be instructed to use 1-2 drops of up to every 30 min for pain control over a 48 hour period with subsequent followup with the ophthalmologist. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients > 18 years of age with a primary diagnosis of uncomplicated corneal abrasion presenting to NYMH emergency department
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patients<18 years of age with complicated corneal abrasions or other eye injuries
- Present more than 36 hours after their initial injury
- Had previous eye surgery or cataracts
- Wear contact lenses or if their injury was caused from contact lens wear
- Had injured both eyes
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ophthalmic TetracaineAlso: 1% tetracaine solution1-2 drops to affected eye every 15-30 minutes over 24-48 hours as need | Drug | Tetracaine Group |
| Normal SalineAlso: sodium chloride in 0.85% solution1-2 drops to affected eye every 15-30 minutes over 24-48 hours as need | Other | Normal Saline Group |
Primary outcome
Pain assessed with Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Participants receiving both arms of the study (Tetracaine and Normal Saline) will be provided with a Visual Analog Scale in there study welcome packet. Scales will be completed at the end of 48 hours and submitted at follow up visit or mailed in if visit is deferred.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 May 2016.
- Background: PubMed 24730399Waldman N, Densie IK, Herbison P. Topical tetracaine used for 24 hours is safe and rated highly effective by patients for the treatment of pain caused by corneal abrasions: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;21(4):374-82. doi: 10.1111/acem.12346.
- Background: PubMed 25269590Pruet CM, Feldman RM, Kim G. Re: "topical tetracaine used for 24 hours is safe and rated highly effective by patients for the treatment of pain caused by corneal abrasions: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial". Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;21(9):1062-3. doi: 10.1111/acem.12470. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26281814Swaminathan A, Otterness K, Milne K, Rezaie S. The Safety of Topical Anesthetics in the Treatment of Corneal Abrasions: A Review. J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):810-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.069. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 24672709Segal KL, Fleischut PM, Kim C, Levine B, Faggiani SL, Banerjee S, Gadalla F, Lelli GJ Jr. Evaluation and treatment of perioperative corneal abrasions. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:901901. doi: 10.1155/2014/901901. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35622535Algarni AM, Guyatt GH, Turner A, Alamri S. Antibiotic prophylaxis for corneal abrasion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 27;5(5):CD014617. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014617.pub2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Plan to share data of pain perception and complications of patients
Related trials for Corneal Abrasion
Not yet recruiting
IN PATIENTS WITH CORNEAL ABRASIONS TREATED WITH COLLAGEN CORNEAL SHIELDS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT SETTING
Corneal Abrasions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Comparing KB803 and Matched Placebo in Patients With Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa
Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa, DEB - Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study of ELK-003 Eye Drops for Treating Ocular Manifestations of Epidermolysis Bullosa
Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa, Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB)
RecruitingObservational study
A Natural History Study of Corneal Abrasions in Patients With Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (DEB)
Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica, Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica, Recessive
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Laura Melville, M.D. study director
New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Ophthalmic Tetracaine and Normal Saline in people with Corneal Abrasion, run by New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Charles A Pereyra, M.D. (516 587-4520, cap9126@nyp.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain assessed with Visual Analog Scale (time frame: Up to 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02771392, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2016.