Unipolar DepressionNCT02771535
Long-term Efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT)
A study testing D-MCT and Health Training in people with Unipolar Depression, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Aim of the current study is to investigate the long-term efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT) and to explore whether previously observed effects at the 6-month follow-up of a randomized, controlled, assessor-blind, parallel group trial are maintained at the 3-year follow-up. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Unipolar Depression
- What is being tested?
- D-MCT and Health Training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Mar 2016to May 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- informed consent
- intention-to-treat-sample of the study Evaluation of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MKT) in psychosomatic rehabilitation, DRKS-ID: DRKS00007907 (see Jelinek et al., in press, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics)
- age between 18 and 65 years
- diagnosis of a single episode or recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) or dysthymia (verified by the MINI).
- The exclusion criteria were:
- lifetime psychotic symptoms (i.e., hallucinations, delusions, or mania), suicidality (Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised ≥ 7), intellectual disability (estimated IQ < 70).
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Long-term Efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT): a 3-year Follow up
Aim of the current study is to investigate the long-term efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT) and to explore whether previously observed effects at the 6-month follow-up of a randomized, controlled, assessor-blind, parallel group trial are maintained at the 3-year follow-up.
Read the detailed description
Dissemination of treatment for depression is still unsatisfying: every second patient does not receive, refuses, or is waiting for treatment. Moreover, with a drop-out rate of almost 25% in routine clinical practice, and a 54% relapse rate for treatment responders within the two years after treatment termination, improving treatment is necessary. Metacognitive Training for depression (D-MCT), a low threshold, easy to administer group intervention was designed to fill this gap. It aims at the reduction of depressive symptoms by changing cognitive biases; not only biases targeted in cognitive behavioral therapy but also those identified by basic research. It was positively evaluated with regard to feasibility and acceptance in a non-randomized pilot study. Moreover, efficacy of D-MCT was suggested in a randomized controlled trail (RCT) in comparison to an active control intervention (Jelinek et al., in press). In this trial patients with depressive disorder were completing a psychosomatic outpatient treatment program and were randomly assigned to either D-MCT or general health training. Severity of depression and cognitive biases were assessed at baseline (t0), post treatment (t1) and 6 months (t2) later by raters blind to diagnostic status. Intention-to-treat analyses demonstrated that at the end of treatment, as well as 6 months later, improvement in depression was significantly greater in the D-MCT relative to the health training group at medium effect sizes. A significantly greater number of patients in the D-MCT group were in remission at 6-month follow-up. Moreover, the decrease in cognitive biases and increase in psychological well-being/quality of life was larger in the D-MCT than the health training group over time. Aim of the current study is to investigate the long-term efficacy of D-MCT. For this purpose, an additional 3 year follow-up assessment (t3) is conducted. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS, 17-item version) total score serves as the primary outcome. Self-assessed depression, dysfunctional beliefs, self-esteem, quality of life, and ability to work serve as secondary outcomes.
- Conditions
- Unipolar Depression
- Being tested
- D-MCT, Health Training
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
D-MCTBehavioural
Also called Metacognitive Training for Depression
Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT), 8 sessions (60min); twice a week over a period of 4 weeks. Metacognitive Training for depression (D-MCT) is a low-threshold, easy to administer group intervention. It aims at the reduction of depressive symptoms by changing cognitive biases; not only biases targeted in cognitive behavioral therapy but also those identified by basic research.
Health TrainingBehavioural
Health Training Group (Walking/ Psychoeducation on health); 8 sessions (60min), twice a week over a period of 4 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| D-MCT Group | Experimental | Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT), 8 sessions (60min); twice a week over a period of 4 weeks. Metacognitive Training for depression (D-MCT) is a low-threshold, easy to administer group intervention. It aims at the reduction of depressive symptoms by changing cognitive biases; not only biases targeted in cognitive behavioral therapy but also those identified by basic research. Receives: Behavioral: D-MCT |
| Health Training Group | Active comparator | Health Training Group (Walking/ Psychoeducation on health); 8 sessions (60min), twice a week over a period of 4 weeks Receives: Behavioral: Health Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Primary outcome is change on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS, 17-item version) from baseline to follow-up (t0 - t3)
Measured: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Self-assessed depression
Change in self-assessed depression as measured by the Beck-Depression Inventory (BDI) from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
Measured: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Dysfunctional beliefs
Change in dysfunctional beliefs as measured by the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS) from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
Measured: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs
Change in metacognitive beliefs as measured by the Metacognitions Questionnaire (MCQ-30) from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
Measured: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Quality of life
Change in quality of life as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL-BREF) from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
Measured: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Work status
Work status (full or part-time employment, unemployed, house wife/husband, student, on sick leave, retired) at T3 assessment
Measured: at 3-year follow-up (t3)
Self-esteem
Change in self-esteem as measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE) from from baseline to follow-up (t0 to t3)
Measured: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Remission rate
Remission rate at T3 as measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS score ≤ 8)
Measured: at 3-year follow up (t3)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2016
- Primary completionMay 2017
- Study completionMay 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Unipolar DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lena Jelinek, PD Dr., Principal investigator, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02771535
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1027/106
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 5 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 3 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Moritz S, Veckenstedt R, Andreou C, Bohn F, Hottenrott B, Leighton L, Kother U, Woodward TS, Treszl A, Menon M, Schneider BC, Pfueller U, Roesch-Ely D. Sustained and "sleeper" effects of group metacognitive training for schizophrenia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;71(10):1103-11. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1038.
PubMed 25103718Jelinek L, Hauschildt M, Wittekind CE, Schneider BC, Kriston L, Moritz S. Efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2016;85(4):231-4. doi: 10.1159/000443699. Epub 2016 May 27. No abstract available.
PubMed 27230865Jelinek L, Otte C, Arlt S, Hauschildt M: Denkverzerrungen erkennen und korrigieren: Eine Machbarkeitsstudie zum Metakognitiven Training bei Depression (D-MKT). [Identifying and correcting cognitive biases: A pilot study on the Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT)]. Zeitschrift Für Psychiatr Psychol Und Psychother 61:1-8, 2013.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Long-term Efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT): a 3-year Follow up
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02771535
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1027/106
- Conditions
- Unipolar Depression
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2016
- Primary completion
- May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aim of the current study is to investigate the long-term efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT) and to explore whether previously observed effects at the 6-month follow-up of a randomized, controlled, assessor-blind, parallel group trial are maintained at the 3-year follow-up.
Detailed description
Dissemination of treatment for depression is still unsatisfying: every second patient does not receive, refuses, or is waiting for treatment. Moreover, with a drop-out rate of almost 25% in routine clinical practice, and a 54% relapse rate for treatment responders within the two years after treatment termination, improving treatment is necessary. Metacognitive Training for depression (D-MCT), a low threshold, easy to administer group intervention was designed to fill this gap. It aims at the reduction of depressive symptoms by changing cognitive biases; not only biases targeted in cognitive behavioral therapy but also those identified by basic research. It was positively evaluated with regard to feasibility and acceptance in a non-randomized pilot study. Moreover, efficacy of D-MCT was suggested in a randomized controlled trail (RCT) in comparison to an active control intervention (Jelinek et al., in press). In this trial patients with depressive disorder were completing a psychosomatic outpatient treatment program and were randomly assigned to either D-MCT or general health training. Severity of depression and cognitive biases were assessed at baseline (t0), post treatment (t1) and 6 months (t2) later by raters blind to diagnostic status. Intention-to-treat analyses demonstrated that at the end of treatment, as well as 6 months later, improvement in depression was significantly greater in the D-MCT relative to the health training group at medium effect sizes. A significantly greater number of patients in the D-MCT group were in remission at 6-month follow-up. Moreover, the decrease in cognitive biases and increase in psychological well-being/quality of life was larger in the D-MCT than the health training group over time. Aim of the current study is to investigate the long-term efficacy of D-MCT. For this purpose, an additional 3 year follow-up assessment (t3) is conducted. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS, 17-item version) total score serves as the primary outcome. Self-assessed depression, dysfunctional beliefs, self-esteem, quality of life, and ability to work serve as secondary outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| D-MCT Group | Experimental | Behavioral: D-MCTMetacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT), 8 sessions (60min); twice a week over a period of 4 weeks. Metacognitive Training for depression (D-MCT) is a low-threshold, easy to administer group intervention. It aims at the reduction of depressive symptoms by changing cognitive biases; not only biases targeted in cognitive behavioral therapy but also those identified by basic research. |
| Health Training Group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Health TrainingHealth Training Group (Walking/ Psychoeducation on health); 8 sessions (60min), twice a week over a period of 4 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- informed consent
- intention-to-treat-sample of the study Evaluation of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MKT) in psychosomatic rehabilitation, DRKS-ID: DRKS00007907 (see Jelinek et al., in press, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics)
- age between 18 and 65 years
- diagnosis of a single episode or recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) or dysthymia (verified by the MINI).
- lifetime psychotic symptoms (i.e., hallucinations, delusions, or mania), suicidality (Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised ≥ 7), intellectual disability (estimated IQ < 70).
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| D-MCTAlso: Metacognitive Training for DepressionMetacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT), 8 sessions (60min); twice a week over a period of 4 weeks. Metacognitive Training for depression (D-MCT) is a low-threshold, easy to administer group intervention. It aims at the reduction of depressive symptoms by changing cognitive biases; not only biases targeted in cognitive behavioral therapy but also those identified by basic research. | Behavioural | D-MCT Group |
| Health TrainingHealth Training Group (Walking/ Psychoeducation on health); 8 sessions (60min), twice a week over a period of 4 weeks | Behavioural | Health Training Group |
Primary outcome
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time frame: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Primary outcome is change on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS, 17-item version) from baseline to follow-up (t0 - t3)
7 secondary outcomes
Self-assessed depression
Time frame: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Dysfunctional beliefs
Time frame: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs
Time frame: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Quality of life
Time frame: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Work status
Time frame: at 3-year follow-up (t3)
Self-esteem
Time frame: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)
Remission rate
Time frame: at 3-year follow up (t3)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Aug 2017.
- Background: PubMed 25103718Moritz S, Veckenstedt R, Andreou C, Bohn F, Hottenrott B, Leighton L, Kother U, Woodward TS, Treszl A, Menon M, Schneider BC, Pfueller U, Roesch-Ely D. Sustained and "sleeper" effects of group metacognitive training for schizophrenia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;71(10):1103-11. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1038.
- Background: PubMed 27230865Jelinek L, Hauschildt M, Wittekind CE, Schneider BC, Kriston L, Moritz S. Efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2016;85(4):231-4. doi: 10.1159/000443699. Epub 2016 May 27. No abstract available.
- BackgroundJelinek L, Otte C, Arlt S, Hauschildt M: Denkverzerrungen erkennen und korrigieren: Eine Machbarkeitsstudie zum Metakognitiven Training bei Depression (D-MKT). [Identifying and correcting cognitive biases: A pilot study on the Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT)]. Zeitschrift Für Psychiatr Psychol Und Psychother 61:1-8, 2013.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Unipolar Depression
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 4
Biomarker-Guided Antidepressant Selection
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD)
Recruiting
Targeting Network Dysfunction in Apathy of Late-life Depression Using Digital Therapeutics
Major Depressive Disorder, Apathy
Not yet recruiting
Acute Intermittent Hypoxia Therapy for Depression
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
RecruitingPhase 2
Psilocybin With Pimavanserin Compared to Psilocybin Alone for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
Major Depressive Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lena Jelinek, PD Dr. principal investigator
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing D-MCT and Health Training in people with Unipolar Depression, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (time frame: 3 years from baseline (t0) to 3-year follow up (t3)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02771535, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2017.