AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple Sclerosisms-intaktNCT02771652

Effect of an Internet-based At-home Physical Training Protocol on Quality of Life, Fatigue, Functional Performance, Aerobic Capacity and Muscle Strength in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

A study testing e-training in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by University of Erlangen-Nürnberg.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this randomised controlled trial, the feasibility and effectiveness of an internet-based exercise intervention including progressive strength and endurance training (e-training) for PwMS was investigated. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Sclerosis
What is being tested?
e-training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
126 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Feb 2010to Nov 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • diagnosed Multiple Sclerosis (McDonald criteria),
  • an EDSS score of less than or equal to 4.0,
  • not less than 4 weeks of clinical stability prior to inclusion in the study,
  • access to the internet.
  • the taking of immunotherapeutic agents was not relevant and not monitored

Who cannot join

  • primary progressive multiple sclerosis
  • clinically relevant internal disease, especially cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, metabolic and orthopedic diseases

About this study

In this randomised controlled trial, the feasibility and effectiveness of an internet-based exercise intervention including progressive strength and endurance training (e-training) for PwMS was investigated. Primary outcome was health-related quality of life, secondary outcomes were muscle strength, aerobic capacity and lung function, physical activity and fatigue.

Being tested
e-training, Control
Keywords
Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of Life, exercise, internet
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • e-trainingBehavioural

    The e-training intervention is a home-based aerobic and resistance training program. Resistance training was prescribed twice weekly for a period of 12 weeks. No special equipment was necessary except an elastic exercise band or a large gymnastic ball. In addition, endurance training was to be carried out once a week. Training intensity was regulated by the participant's subjective, perceived exertion, which was rated between 6 and 20 on the BORG Scale. The form of activity for the endurance training was freely selected, duration (between 10-60 min) was adjusted to individual fitness levels. Therapists aimed at eliciting a BORG Feedback of between 11 (fairly light) and 16 (hard). The exercise training was home-based and supervised via the internet. Participants continued exercise training for another 12 weeks after the 3month assessment.

  • ControlOther

    After the initial assessment on entry, those assigned to the control group were instructed to maintain their previous physical activity behaviour. After waiting three months, they received the same e-training intervention as the intervention group had received from the start.

Study groups in NCT02771652
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
e-training interventionActive comparatorResistance and endurance training
Receives: Behavioral: e-training
ControlOtherno exercise
Receives: Other: Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire for Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS)

    38 items generate the subscales of fatigue/thinking, mobility of the lower/upper extremities, communication and mood. The HAQUAMS total score is calculated from a mean of the subscales, providing a total score between 1 and 5. Higher scores in HAQUAMS indicate lower levels in HRQoL. The primary outcome will be the change over time from baseline to month 3.

    Measured: Assessments took place at baseline and at 3 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Würzburg Fatigue Scale (WEIMuS)

    This questionnaire contains 17 items that form a physical and cognitive subscale. The total score ranges from zero to a maximum of 68 points (maximum fatigue). The cut-off value for the presence of fatigue is above 32.

    Measured: Assessments took place at baseline, at 3 and 6 months

  2. Muscle strength lower extremities

    Maximum isometric muscle strength was tested with the M3 Diagnos machine (Schnell, Peutenhausen, Germany).

    Measured: Assessments took place at baseline and after 3 and 6 months

  3. Forced vital capacity

    Forced vital capacity (FVC) was tested with the Master Screen CPX System (Viasys Healthcare, Cardinal Health, Germany).

    Measured: Assessments took place at baseline and after 3 and 6 months

  4. Aerobic capacity

    As a marker of endurance capacity, maximal oxygen uptake (VO2peak) was determined by the spiroergometry device Master Screen CPX on a bicycle ergometer (Sanabike 250F, MESA, Germany) at 70-80 revolutions per minute.

    Measured: Assessments took place at baseline and after 3 and 6 months

  5. Physical activity

    Habitual physical activity was assessed with the German version of the Baecke Questionnaire including three activity indices (work, sport, leisure time PA). There were limitations concerning content validity in all indices; therefore, the sport score of the sport index was used. That score is the product of the intensity, duration and frequency of a participant's reported sports activities. Higher scores indicate a higher level of PA.

    Measured: Assessments took place at baseline and after 3 and 6 months

  6. Peak expiratory flow

    Peak expiratory flow (PEF) was tested with the Master Screen CPX System (Viasys Healthcare, Cardinal Health, Germany).

    Measured: Assessments took place at baseline and after 3 and 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 May 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2010
  3. Primary completionJun 2011
  4. Study completionNov 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
126 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02771652
Sponsor's protocol ID
1.01.1/09/007
Acronym
ms-intakt
Status last verified
Jun 2016
First submitted
4 May 2016
Last updated
24 Jun 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Tallner A, Tzschoppe R,Peters S, Mäurer M, Pfeifer K. Internetgestützte Bewegungsförderung bei Personen mit Multipler Sklerose. Neurologie und Rehabilitation 19(1): 35-46, 2013.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing e-training in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by University of Erlangen-Nürnberg.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire for Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS) (time frame: Assessments took place at baseline and at 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02771652, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in