Jaw, Edentulous, PartiallyNCT02772172
Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Two Different CBCT-derived Templates
A study testing Surgical Template in people with Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The main purpose of the present study is to evaluate the dental implant placement using two different CBCT-derived templates and to study the related factors that affect accuracy so as to support the further clinical application of the technique. Thirty patients with partial edentulous denture are recruited. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
- What is being tested?
- Surgical Template
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Aug 2016to Feb 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Partial edentulism
- Missing more than three teeth in succession
- Presence of adjacent teeth
- Systemically healthy
- Good maxillomandibular relation
- Maximal mouth opening>5 mm
Who cannot join
- Poor oral hygiene
- Severe parafunctional habits, for example, bruxing and clenching
- Presence of clinically active periodontal disease as expressed by probing pocket depths≥4 mm in combination with bleeding on probing
- Maxillary sinus involvement
- Conditions that might lead to a possibly lowered regenerative capacity of the bone, for example, osteoporosis and Paget's disease
- Pregnant or expecting to be pregnant
Show all 12Show fewer
- History of drug and alcohol abuse
- History of systemic diseases that would contraindicate oral surgical treatment, for example, uncontrolled diabetes (defined as HBA1c level >7%)
- Radiotherapy in the head and neck area
- On certain medications like bisphosphonates or steroids currently or within the past three months
- Unwillingness to return for the follow-up examination
- Smokers (more than20 cigarettes per day). Subjects smoking <20 cigarettes per day were requested to stop smoking before and after surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Guanghua school of stomatology, hospital of stomtology, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000
Zhuofan Chen, professor, +8613902241868, dentistczf@163.com
About this study
Official title: Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Two Different CBCT-derived Templates: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
The main purpose of the present study is to evaluate the dental implant placement using two different CBCT-derived templates and to study the related factors that affect accuracy so as to support the further clinical application of the technique. Thirty patients with partial edentulous denture are recruited. They are randomized to two groups. A radiographic guide is prepared before CT/CBCT scan. The CT/CBCT scan DICOM files are loaded in a planning program and converted into 3D computer images. A surgical template is fabricated through this virtual planning. After 6 weeks, if the implants are judged stable, the patient has the option of replacing the fixed prosthesis. Patients are recalled for oral hygiene maintenance and prosthetic controls every 6 months for the entire duration of the study.
- Conditions
- Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
- Being tested
- Surgical Template
- Medical subject headings
- Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Surgical TemplateDevice
Also called GuideMia, control
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| GuideMia surgical template | Active comparator | A radiographic guide is prepared before CT/CBCT scan. The CT/CBCT scan DICOM files are loaded in GuideMia program and converted into 3D computer images. A surgical template is fabricated through this virtual planning. Receives: Device: Surgical Template |
| Control surgical template | Active comparator | A radiographic guide is prepared before CT/CBCT scan. The CT/CBCT scan DICOM files are loaded in control program and converted into 3D computer images. A surgical template is fabricated through this virtual planning. Receives: Device: Surgical Template |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Position changes between the planned and achieved implant position
Accuracy analysis. The linear and angular deviations between the planned and achieved implant position are analyzed.
Measured: Change from preoperative to postoperative within 1 week
Secondary outcomes (7)
Implant and prosthesis survival
Implant and prosthesis survival will be determined at 6 months,12months and 18 months
Measured: Up to 18 months after baseline
Radiographic bone level
Radiographic bone level will be recorded at 6 months,12months and 18 months
Measured: Up to 18 months after baseline
The incidence of biological and mechanical complications
The incidence of biological and mechanical complications will be recorded at baseline, 6 months,12months and 18 months
Measured: Up to 18 months after baseline
Probing depth
Probing depth will be recorded at 6 months,12months and 18 months
Measured: Up to 18 months after baseline
Modified plaque index
Modified plaque index will be recorded at 6 months,12months and 18 months
Measured: Up to 18 months after baseline
Modified bleeding index
Modified bleeding index will be recorded at 6 months,12months and 18 months
Measured: Up to 18 months after baseline
Gingival index
Gingival index will be recorded at 6 months,12months and 18 months
Measured: Up to 18 months after baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2016
- Primary completionNov 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Jaw, Edentulous, PartiallyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sun Yat-sen UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Zhuofan Chen, Sun Yat-sen University
- Investigators
- Zhuofan Chen, professor, Principal investigator, School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02772172
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ZhuofanChen
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 4 May 2016
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lopes A, Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Sanchez-Fernandez E. The NobelGuide(R) All-on-4(R) Treatment Concept for Rehabilitation of Edentulous Jaws: A Prospective Report on Medium- and Long-Term Outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e406-16. doi: 10.1111/cid.12260. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
PubMed 25195544Sun Y, Luebbers HT, Agbaje JO, Schepers S, Politis C, Van Slycke S, Vrielinck L. Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using CBCT-Derived Mucosa-Supported Stereolithographic Template. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17(5):862-70. doi: 10.1111/cid.12189. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
PubMed 24341829Polizzi G, Cantoni T. Five-year follow-up of immediate fixed restorations of maxillary implants inserted in both fresh extraction and healed sites using the NobelGuide system. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Apr;17(2):221-33. doi: 10.1111/cid.12102. Epub 2013 Jun 23.
PubMed 23789721
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Two Different CBCT-derived Templates: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02772172
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ZhuofanChen
- Conditions
- Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2016
- Primary completion
- Nov 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main purpose of the present study is to evaluate the dental implant placement using two different CBCT-derived templates and to study the related factors that affect accuracy so as to support the further clinical application of the technique. Thirty patients with partial edentulous denture are recruited. They are randomized to two groups. A radiographic guide is prepared before CT/CBCT scan. The CT/CBCT scan DICOM files are loaded in a planning program and converted into 3D computer images. A surgical template is fabricated through this virtual planning. After 6 weeks, if the implants are judged stable, the patient has the option of replacing the fixed prosthesis. Patients are recalled for oral hygiene maintenance and prosthetic controls every 6 months for the entire duration of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| GuideMia surgical template | Active comparator | Device: Surgical TemplateA radiographic guide is prepared before CT/CBCT scan. The CT/CBCT scan DICOM files are loaded in GuideMia program and converted into 3D computer images. A surgical template is fabricated through this virtual planning. |
| Control surgical template | Active comparator | Device: Surgical TemplateA radiographic guide is prepared before CT/CBCT scan. The CT/CBCT scan DICOM files are loaded in control program and converted into 3D computer images. A surgical template is fabricated through this virtual planning. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Partial edentulism
- Missing more than three teeth in succession
- Presence of adjacent teeth
- Systemically healthy
- Good maxillomandibular relation
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Poor oral hygiene
- Severe parafunctional habits, for example, bruxing and clenching
- Presence of clinically active periodontal disease as expressed by probing pocket depths≥4 mm in combination with bleeding on probing
- Maxillary sinus involvement
- Conditions that might lead to a possibly lowered regenerative capacity of the bone, for example, osteoporosis and Paget's disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical TemplateAlso: GuideMia, control | Device | Control surgical template, GuideMia surgical template |
Primary outcome
Position changes between the planned and achieved implant position
Time frame: Change from preoperative to postoperative within 1 week
Accuracy analysis. The linear and angular deviations between the planned and achieved implant position are analyzed.
7 secondary outcomes
Implant and prosthesis survival
Time frame: Up to 18 months after baseline
Radiographic bone level
Time frame: Up to 18 months after baseline
The incidence of biological and mechanical complications
Time frame: Up to 18 months after baseline
Probing depth
Time frame: Up to 18 months after baseline
Modified plaque index
Time frame: Up to 18 months after baseline
Modified bleeding index
Time frame: Up to 18 months after baseline
Gingival index
Time frame: Up to 18 months after baseline
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2016.
- Results publication: PubMed 25195544Lopes A, Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Sanchez-Fernandez E. The NobelGuide(R) All-on-4(R) Treatment Concept for Rehabilitation of Edentulous Jaws: A Prospective Report on Medium- and Long-Term Outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e406-16. doi: 10.1111/cid.12260. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 24341829Sun Y, Luebbers HT, Agbaje JO, Schepers S, Politis C, Van Slycke S, Vrielinck L. Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using CBCT-Derived Mucosa-Supported Stereolithographic Template. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17(5):862-70. doi: 10.1111/cid.12189. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 23789721Polizzi G, Cantoni T. Five-year follow-up of immediate fixed restorations of maxillary implants inserted in both fresh extraction and healed sites using the NobelGuide system. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Apr;17(2):221-33. doi: 10.1111/cid.12102. Epub 2013 Jun 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Active, not recruiting
L-PRF Block vs Composite Graft for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
Alveolar Ridge Resorption After Extraction, Alveolar Bone Loss
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Digital and Conventional Clasp-retained Partial Dentures (DIGICLASP)
Partial Edentulism
Active, not recruiting
Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Clinical Outcome of PrimeTaper EV Implant in Single Tooth Restorations
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Recruiting
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of UV-Treated Dental Implants With or Without Melatonin in the Upper Posterior Jaw
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Bone Resorption
Active, not recruiting
A Clinical Study on Acuris™ - Conometric Concept for Single Tooth Restoration
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zhuofan Chen, professor principal investigator
School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Surgical Template in people with Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Zhuofan Chen, Professor (+86-20-83862537, 1330177020@qq.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Position changes between the planned and achieved implant position (time frame: Change from preoperative to postoperative within 1 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02772172, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2016.