Sickle Cell DiseasePhase 2NCT02776202
HLA-Identical Sibling Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation for Individuals With Severe Sickle Cell Disease Using a Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen
A Phase 2 study testing Fludarabine monophosphate in people with Sickle Cell Disease, run by National Guard Health Affairs at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
Trial summary
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common inherited blood disorder in Saudi Arabia . Its clinical severity is widely heterogeneous among patients who share the same genetic mutation . Severe frequent pain crisis, recurrent acute chest syndrome and stroke are features of severe SCD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sickle Cell Disease
- What is being tested?
- Fludarabine monophosphate
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSaudi Arabia
- Study dates
- May 2016to Dec 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- 1. SCD patients who are 3-18 years old. 2. SCD (HbSS, HbSβ° thalassemia or any genotype) with at least one of the following conditions:
- Clinically significant neurologic event (stroke) or any neurologic defect lasting > 24 hours and accompanied by an infarct on cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Minimum of two episodes of acute chest syndrome within the preceding 2-year period defined as new pulmonary alveolar consolidation involving at least one complete lung segment (associated with acute symptoms including fever, chest pain, tachypnea, wheezing, rales or cough that is not attributed to asthma or bronchiolitis) despite adequate supportive care measures
- History of 3 or more severe pain events per year in the 2 years prior to enrollment.
- 3. Availability of 10/10 genotypically HLA identical related donor 4. In patients who have been treated by regular RBC transfusions >12 months, with a liver biopsy that shows no evidence of cirrhosis or active hepatitis 5. Patients must have a Karnofsky score ≥ 50 or WHO/ECOG ≥ 2 for patients age ≥ 16, Lansky score ≥ 50 for patients age < 16.
- 6. Adequate cardiac function: shortening fraction of > 25% or ejection fraction of > 55% by echocardiogram 7. Adequate renal function: serum creatinine within normal limits or creatinine clearance >70 ml/min/1.73 m2 8. Adequate liver function: Total bilirubin within normal limits and AST/ALT <2.5x upper limit of normal
Who cannot join
- 1. Patients with symptomatic cardiac insufficiency or arrhythmia. 2. Patients with cirrhosis on liver biopsy. 3. Hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV seropositive patients. 4. Patients with other disease that would increase toxicity of transplant.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Saudi Arabia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
King Abdul Aziz Medical City for National Guard
Riyadh
Nagham RZ Sheblaq, 009668011111 ext. 53352, sheblaqn@ngha.med.sa
009668011111 ext. 53352, sheblaqn@ngha.med.sa
About this study
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common inherited blood disorder in Saudi Arabia . Its clinical severity is widely heterogeneous among patients who share the same genetic mutation . Severe frequent pain crisis, recurrent acute chest syndrome and stroke are features of severe SCD. Hydroxyurea is an effective treatment of SCD as it ameliorates the severity and frequency of pain crisis and acute chest syndrome and decreases mortality, however, it is less effective in the prevention and treatment of stroke and other end organ dysfunctions . The only readily available cure of SCD is by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) . Most children with SCD who are treated by HSCT receive myeloablative conditioning with excellent results. The application of reduced intensity (RIC) and non-myeloablative (NMA) conditioning regimens are reserved for patients older than 16 years of age because of the increased risks of morbidity and mortality after HSCT6. However, infertility and gonadal failure after myeloablative conditioning are important barriers to the willingness of patients and their families to undergo HSCT . The development of an effective RIC HSCT in SCD that might spare the fertility of SCD patients would have obvious merit.
With the ultimate goal of expanding this curative therapy to SCD patients, we propose to investigate HSCT with a RIC conditioning regimen. We will carry out a pilot study of HSCT from HLA matched sibling donors using thymoglobulin/fludarabine/melphalan conditioning and sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as GVHD prophylaxis in SCD patients with severe complications such as stroke and other severe complications. We hypothesize that HSCT from HLA matched sibling using thymoglobulin/fludarabine/melphalan conditioning in SCD will maintain a level of stable donor chimerism that is sufficient to cure SCD with minimal toxicity.
Read the detailed description
Busulfan-based myeloablative allogeneic HSCT from an HLA-matched related donor in children is associated with high cure rate ranging from 80-90% in different trials, reviewed in 6. Lessons learned from these trials include; rabbit ATG significantly contributes to a lower graft rejection rate, the presence of stable mixed chimerism is sufficient to cure SCD, and the risk of neurological toxicities was minimized by maintaining platelet count greater than 50,000/uL and hemoglobin level between 9-11g/dL, adding phenytoin prophylaxis, and preventing hypertension and hypomagnesemia . We will not present results of these trials here, as the focus of this proposal is to investigate the use of NMA/RIC HSCT in SCD.
2.1 RIC/NMA HSCT in SCD:
- Van Besien et al 8 reported transplant results in two adults with SCD who underwent allogeneic transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling donor after conditioning with fludarabine/melphalan and ATG. One patient was a 40-year-old female who had significant end-organ dysfunction related to SCD (renal failure treated by dialysis, pulmonary diffusion capacity was reduced by 25% and ischemic stroke) and was heavily transfused prior to transplant. She also had RBC alloantibodies and was receiving hydroxyurea and erythropoietin. She was conditioned with ATG 30 mg/kg for 4 consecutive days (day -5 to day -2), fludarabine 30 mg/m2 i.v. for 4 consecutive days (day -5 to day -2) and melphalan 140 mg/m2 i.v. on day -1. The patient had hemodialysis performed on day -5, day -3 and day -1 after chemotherapy was administered. On day 0, the patient received an infusion of cryopreserved G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). GVHD prophylaxis consisted of daily tacrolimus and mini methotrexate regimen (5 mg/m2 given on days 1, 3 and 6). There was successful neutrophil and platelet engraftment and 100% stable chimerism. She developed interstitial pneumonia, possibly secondary to GVHD, 140 days after transplantation and progressed to respiratory failure leading to her death on day 355. The second patient was a 56 year old with SC disease who was heavily pretransfused and had multiple SCD complications. She received the same conditioning, GVHD prophylaxis, and PBSC source as the first patient. She had 100% donor chimerism but died on day 142 secondary to TTP and severe gut GVHD with CNS infection.
- Iannone et al 9 described 6 pediatric patients with SCD who underwent bone marrow transplant from their HLA matched siblings after conditioning with fludarabine 50mg/m2/day for 3-5 days and 200 cGy TBI in addition to horse ATG in one patient. GVHD prophylaxis included MMF and tacrolimus or cyclosporine with various taper schedules. There was minimal toxicity, however, all patients developed graft rejection upon taper of immunosuppressive medications.
- Horan et al 10 described three SCD patients who were heavily transfused prior to transplant and underwent HLA matched sibling transplant after conditioning with fludarabine 25mg/m2 on 5 consecutive days before transplantation (days -6 to -2), rabbit ATG (Thymoglobulin) on 4 consecutive days before transplantation (days -6 to -2) with age adjusted dose, and single dose TBI 200 cGy. GVHD prophylaxis included MMF in the first three months and CSA for at least six months. All had graft rejection except one when the immunosuppression was tapered. There was no GVHD.
- Horwitz et al 11 reported the outcome in two adult SCD patients who underwent HLA matched sibling transplant and PBSC was the source of graft in both cases. Conditioning was TBI 200 cGy followed by fludrabine 24-30 mg/m2 for 4 days and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 for four days and alemtuzumab 100mg for five days. MMF was given in the first 100 days post transplant. Both engrafted successfully with no GVHD and a follow up of 20 months.
- Krishnamurti et al described the use of RIC in seven SCD patients, age range 6-16 years. The conditioning was busulfan 3.2 mg/kg on day -8 and -7, fludarabine 35mg/m2 on days -6 to -2, equine ATG 30mg/kg on days -5 to -1, and total lymphoid irradiation. GVHD prophylaxis was CSA and MMF. CSA was tapered starting day +180 and MMF taper varied from +45 to +220 day. Six patients had stable mixed chimerism after stopping CSA and MMF. One patient had late graft failure. There was a low rate of GVHD.
- Hsieh et al reported the use of non-myeloablative conditioning in SCD patients older than 16 years of age. Graft source was GCSF mobilized PBSC from HLA matched siblings with at least 10 X106 CD34/kg of recipient weight. Conditioning was alemtuzumab (total 1mg/kg divided on days -7 to -3) and single dose TBI 300 cGy on day -2. Presence of major ABO incompatibility was one of the exclusion criteria for this study. Sirolimus was used as GVHD prophylaxis and to prevent graft rejection. Nine of 10 patients engrafted successfully and had stable chimerism, however, all patients continue to be on sirolimus. None of patients had GVHD. They recently updated these promising results in a total of 30 patients and were able to taper off sirolimus in 15 patients.
2.2 Rationale for using thymoglobulin/fludarabine/melphalan conditioning RIC is a feasible option for patients with SCD and can successfully cure the disease. A pre-transplant backbone regimen consisting of Alemtuzumab or ATG, fludarabine, and melphalan has been applied successfully in SCD patients as described above. We anticipate that the toxicity risk is lower than the full myeloablative conditioning using busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BU/CY). Melphalan was reported to cause infertility, mostly when we used with other chemotherapy agents. The use of melphalan alone in the conditioning regimen was reported before to potentially preserve fertility in women. So our regimen could potentially preserve fertility at higher rate compared to BU/CY.
2.3 Rationale for pre-transplant immunosuppression therapy with hydroxyurea Individuals with hemoglobinopathies have in general adequate T cell function and active bone marrow that can lead to higher risk of graft rejection especially among patients who are heavily transfused. Experience with class 3 thalassemia patients showed that pretreatment with hydroxyurea, azathioprine, and fludarabine decreased the risk of graft rejection and allowed the use of lower dose cyclophosphamide . So we will use hydroxyurea prior to transplant to minimize the risk of graft rejection associated with RIC in sickle cell anemia.
2.4 Rationale for using sirolimus and MMF as GVHD prophylaxis: Post-grafting immunosuppression appears crucial to ensuring stable engraftment; an early taper appears to contribute to late graft rejection in several of the series. Sirolimus is an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and it induces immune tolerance and was used successfully as GVHD prophylaxis in adult SCA patients who underwent RIC/ NMA. Sirolimus in combination with calcineurin inhibitors or MMF was utilized effectively in pediatric patients 19-21. However, studies showed increased risk of veno-occlusive disease with the combination of sirolimus and MMF and increased risk of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy when combined with tacrolimus especially among patients who received busulfan-based conditioning 22-24. We will be using a RIC regimen so we do not anticipate that the combination of sirolimus and MMF will cause excess toxicity.
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Disease
- Being tested
- Fludarabine monophosphate
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Sickle Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fludarabine monophosphateDrug
Also called Melphalan, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Sirolimus
The HSCT preparative regimen will consist of
- Thymoglobulin: 2.5 mg /kg/day intravenously (IV) on Days -8 through -5
- Fludarabine: 35 mg/m2/day IV on Days -8 through -4
- Melphalan: 140 mg/m2 IV on Day -3
- Rest on Day -2 and -1
- Day 0 is the day of transplant
- GVHD prophylaxis: sirolimus beginning on Day -1 for at least one year and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) from Day -3 to +45 or to 7 days after neutrophil engraftment, whichever is later.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen | Experimental | The HSCT preparative regimen will consist of
* Thymoglobulin: 2.5 mg /kg/day intravenously (IV) on Days -8 through -5
* Fludarabine: 35 mg/m2/day IV on Days -8 through -4
* Melphalan: 140 mg/m2 IV on Day -3
* Rest on Day -2 and -1
* Day 0 is the day of transplant
* GVHD prophylaxis: sirolimus beginning on Day -1 for at least one year and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) from Day -3 to +45 or to 7 days after neutrophil engraftment, whichever is later. Receives: Drug: Fludarabine monophosphate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
to determine event-free survival (EFS) at 1 year after HLA-Identical sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) using bone marrow (BM) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD).
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
1. To determine the effect of HCT on clinical and laboratory manifestations of severe sickle cell disease including stroke.
Measured: 3 years
determine the incidence of other transplant-related outcomes.
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2016
- Primary completionDec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Sickle Cell DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Guard Health Affairs
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02776202
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RC15/043/R
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 15 May 2016
- Last updated
- 19 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- HLA-Identical Sibling Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation for Individuals With Severe Sickle Cell Disease Using a Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02776202
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RC15/043/R
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Disease
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Guard Health AffairsOther government
- Study start
- May 2016
- Primary completion
- Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common inherited blood disorder in Saudi Arabia . Its clinical severity is widely heterogeneous among patients who share the same genetic mutation . Severe frequent pain crisis, recurrent acute chest syndrome and stroke are features of severe SCD. Hydroxyurea is an effective treatment of SCD as it ameliorates the severity and frequency of pain crisis and acute chest syndrome and decreases mortality, however, it is less effective in the prevention and treatment of stroke and other end organ dysfunctions . The only readily available cure of SCD is by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) . Most children with SCD who are treated by HSCT receive myeloablative conditioning with excellent results. The application of reduced intensity (RIC) and non-myeloablative (NMA) conditioning regimens are reserved for patients older than 16 years of age because of the increased risks of morbidity and mortality after HSCT6. However, infertility and gonadal failure after myeloablative conditioning are important barriers to the willingness of patients and their families to undergo HSCT . The development of an effective RIC HSCT in SCD that might spare the fertility of SCD patients would have obvious merit.
With the ultimate goal of expanding this curative therapy to SCD patients, we propose to investigate HSCT with a RIC conditioning regimen. We will carry out a pilot study of HSCT from HLA matched sibling donors using thymoglobulin/fludarabine/melphalan conditioning and sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as GVHD prophylaxis in SCD patients with severe complications such as stroke and other severe complications. We hypothesize that HSCT from HLA matched sibling using thymoglobulin/fludarabine/melphalan conditioning in SCD will maintain a level of stable donor chimerism that is sufficient to cure SCD with minimal toxicity.
Detailed description
Busulfan-based myeloablative allogeneic HSCT from an HLA-matched related donor in children is associated with high cure rate ranging from 80-90% in different trials, reviewed in 6. Lessons learned from these trials include; rabbit ATG significantly contributes to a lower graft rejection rate, the presence of stable mixed chimerism is sufficient to cure SCD, and the risk of neurological toxicities was minimized by maintaining platelet count greater than 50,000/uL and hemoglobin level between 9-11g/dL, adding phenytoin prophylaxis, and preventing hypertension and hypomagnesemia . We will not present results of these trials here, as the focus of this proposal is to investigate the use of NMA/RIC HSCT in SCD.
2.1 RIC/NMA HSCT in SCD:
- Van Besien et al 8 reported transplant results in two adults with SCD who underwent allogeneic transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling donor after conditioning with fludarabine/melphalan and ATG. One patient was a 40-year-old female who had significant end-organ dysfunction related to SCD (renal failure treated by dialysis, pulmonary diffusion capacity was reduced by 25% and ischemic stroke) and was heavily transfused prior to transplant. She also had RBC alloantibodies and was receiving hydroxyurea and erythropoietin. She was conditioned with ATG 30 mg/kg for 4 consecutive days (day -5 to day -2), fludarabine 30 mg/m2 i.v. for 4 consecutive days (day -5 to day -2) and melphalan 140 mg/m2 i.v. on day -1. The patient had hemodialysis performed on day -5, day -3 and day -1 after chemotherapy was administered. On day 0, the patient received an infusion of cryopreserved G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). GVHD prophylaxis consisted of daily tacrolimus and mini methotrexate regimen (5 mg/m2 given on days 1, 3 and 6). There was successful neutrophil and platelet engraftment and 100% stable chimerism. She developed interstitial pneumonia, possibly secondary to GVHD, 140 days after transplantation and progressed to respiratory failure leading to her death on day 355. The second patient was a 56 year old with SC disease who was heavily pretransfused and had multiple SCD complications. She received the same conditioning, GVHD prophylaxis, and PBSC source as the first patient. She had 100% donor chimerism but died on day 142 secondary to TTP and severe gut GVHD with CNS infection.
- Iannone et al 9 described 6 pediatric patients with SCD who underwent bone marrow transplant from their HLA matched siblings after conditioning with fludarabine 50mg/m2/day for 3-5 days and 200 cGy TBI in addition to horse ATG in one patient. GVHD prophylaxis included MMF and tacrolimus or cyclosporine with various taper schedules. There was minimal toxicity, however, all patients developed graft rejection upon taper of immunosuppressive medications.
- Horan et al 10 described three SCD patients who were heavily transfused prior to transplant and underwent HLA matched sibling transplant after conditioning with fludarabine 25mg/m2 on 5 consecutive days before transplantation (days -6 to -2), rabbit ATG (Thymoglobulin) on 4 consecutive days before transplantation (days -6 to -2) with age adjusted dose, and single dose TBI 200 cGy. GVHD prophylaxis included MMF in the first three months and CSA for at least six months. All had graft rejection except one when the immunosuppression was tapered. There was no GVHD.
- Horwitz et al 11 reported the outcome in two adult SCD patients who underwent HLA matched sibling transplant and PBSC was the source of graft in both cases. Conditioning was TBI 200 cGy followed by fludrabine 24-30 mg/m2 for 4 days and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 for four days and alemtuzumab 100mg for five days. MMF was given in the first 100 days post transplant. Both engrafted successfully with no GVHD and a follow up of 20 months.
- Krishnamurti et al described the use of RIC in seven SCD patients, age range 6-16 years. The conditioning was busulfan 3.2 mg/kg on day -8 and -7, fludarabine 35mg/m2 on days -6 to -2, equine ATG 30mg/kg on days -5 to -1, and total lymphoid irradiation. GVHD prophylaxis was CSA and MMF. CSA was tapered starting day +180 and MMF taper varied from +45 to +220 day. Six patients had stable mixed chimerism after stopping CSA and MMF. One patient had late graft failure. There was a low rate of GVHD.
- Hsieh et al reported the use of non-myeloablative conditioning in SCD patients older than 16 years of age. Graft source was GCSF mobilized PBSC from HLA matched siblings with at least 10 X106 CD34/kg of recipient weight. Conditioning was alemtuzumab (total 1mg/kg divided on days -7 to -3) and single dose TBI 300 cGy on day -2. Presence of major ABO incompatibility was one of the exclusion criteria for this study. Sirolimus was used as GVHD prophylaxis and to prevent graft rejection. Nine of 10 patients engrafted successfully and had stable chimerism, however, all patients continue to be on sirolimus. None of patients had GVHD. They recently updated these promising results in a total of 30 patients and were able to taper off sirolimus in 15 patients.
2.2 Rationale for using thymoglobulin/fludarabine/melphalan conditioning RIC is a feasible option for patients with SCD and can successfully cure the disease. A pre-transplant backbone regimen consisting of Alemtuzumab or ATG, fludarabine, and melphalan has been applied successfully in SCD patients as described above. We anticipate that the toxicity risk is lower than the full myeloablative conditioning using busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BU/CY). Melphalan was reported to cause infertility, mostly when we used with other chemotherapy agents. The use of melphalan alone in the conditioning regimen was reported before to potentially preserve fertility in women. So our regimen could potentially preserve fertility at higher rate compared to BU/CY.
2.3 Rationale for pre-transplant immunosuppression therapy with hydroxyurea Individuals with hemoglobinopathies have in general adequate T cell function and active bone marrow that can lead to higher risk of graft rejection especially among patients who are heavily transfused. Experience with class 3 thalassemia patients showed that pretreatment with hydroxyurea, azathioprine, and fludarabine decreased the risk of graft rejection and allowed the use of lower dose cyclophosphamide . So we will use hydroxyurea prior to transplant to minimize the risk of graft rejection associated with RIC in sickle cell anemia.
2.4 Rationale for using sirolimus and MMF as GVHD prophylaxis: Post-grafting immunosuppression appears crucial to ensuring stable engraftment; an early taper appears to contribute to late graft rejection in several of the series. Sirolimus is an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and it induces immune tolerance and was used successfully as GVHD prophylaxis in adult SCA patients who underwent RIC/ NMA. Sirolimus in combination with calcineurin inhibitors or MMF was utilized effectively in pediatric patients 19-21. However, studies showed increased risk of veno-occlusive disease with the combination of sirolimus and MMF and increased risk of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy when combined with tacrolimus especially among patients who received busulfan-based conditioning 22-24. We will be using a RIC regimen so we do not anticipate that the combination of sirolimus and MMF will cause excess toxicity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen | Experimental | Drug: Fludarabine monophosphateThe HSCT preparative regimen will consist of * Thymoglobulin: 2.5 mg /kg/day intravenously (IV) on Days -8 through -5 * Fludarabine: 35 mg/m2/day IV on Days -8 through -4 * Melphalan: 140 mg/m2 IV on Day -3 * Rest on Day -2 and -1 * Day 0 is the day of transplant * GVHD prophylaxis: sirolimus beginning on Day -1 for at least one year and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) from Day -3 to +45 or to 7 days after neutrophil engraftment, whichever is later. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- 1. SCD patients who are 3-18 years old. 2. SCD (HbSS, HbSβ° thalassemia or any genotype) with at least one of the following conditions:
- 3. Availability of 10/10 genotypically HLA identical related donor 4. In patients who have been treated by regular RBC transfusions >12 months, with a liver biopsy that shows no evidence of cirrhosis or active hepatitis 5. Patients must have a Karnofsky score ≥ 50 or WHO/ECOG ≥ 2 for patients age ≥ 16, Lansky score ≥ 50 for patients age < 16.
- 6. Adequate cardiac function: shortening fraction of > 25% or ejection fraction of > 55% by echocardiogram 7. Adequate renal function: serum creatinine within normal limits or creatinine clearance >70 ml/min/1.73 m2 8. Adequate liver function: Total bilirubin within normal limits and AST/ALT <2.5x upper limit of normal
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Patients with symptomatic cardiac insufficiency or arrhythmia. 2. Patients with cirrhosis on liver biopsy. 3. Hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV seropositive patients. 4. Patients with other disease that would increase toxicity of transplant.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fludarabine monophosphateAlso: Melphalan, Mycophenolate Mofetil, SirolimusThe HSCT preparative regimen will consist of * Thymoglobulin: 2.5 mg /kg/day intravenously (IV) on Days -8 through -5 * Fludarabine: 35 mg/m2/day IV on Days -8 through -4 * Melphalan: 140 mg/m2 IV on Day -3 * Rest on Day -2 and -1 * Day 0 is the day of transplant * GVHD prophylaxis: sirolimus beginning on Day -1 for at least one year and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) from Day -3 to +45 or to 7 days after neutrophil engraftment, whichever is later. | Drug | Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen |
Primary outcome
to determine event-free survival (EFS) at 1 year after HLA-Identical sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) using bone marrow (BM) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD).
Time frame: 3 years
2 secondary outcomes
1. To determine the effect of HCT on clinical and laboratory manifestations of severe sickle cell disease including stroke.
Time frame: 3 years
determine the incidence of other transplant-related outcomes.
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 May 2016.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Sickle Cell Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Long-term Mitapivat Dosing in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease: An Extension of a Phase I Pilot Study of Mitapivat
Sickle Cell Disease, Hemolytic Anemia
RecruitingObservational study
HPC Offered for PRESERVE Expansion
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Escalating Doses of Fostamatinib in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disorders, Sickle Cell Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
Clinical and Biomarker Effects of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Females With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episode in Sickle Cell Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Buprenorphine for the Management of Pain in Children With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
King Abdul Aziz Medical City for National Guard
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Fludarabine monophosphate in people with Sickle Cell Disease, run by National Guard Health Affairs at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
to determine event-free survival (EFS) at 1 year after HLA-Identical sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) using bone marrow (BM) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2016.