AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreatic CancerDIFFERENTNCT02777463

The Prediction Using Diffusion MRI of the Response Evaluation in BRPC in NAT.

An observational study of Pancreatic Cancer, run by Wakayama Medical University at 1 site in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To investigate the correlation between pretreatment ADC value of diffusion MRI and pathologic response in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma who undergo neoadjuvant therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Pancreatic Cancer
What is being tested?
diffusion-weighted MRI
How many people
28 participants
Where
1 siteJapan
Study dates
Jun 2016to Jan 2020
How long will I take part?
2 Years
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The coefficient of correlation (Peason's r) was r=0.625 in our pilot study in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. To comfirm the producibility, it is judged as bad if the result is less than 10% from our previous study,the correlation coefficient threshold is 0.56 or more. At the setting of 90%confidential interval as 0.2, the number of case is estimated as 28. Considering unexpected situation, 30 cases is enough to analyze the correlation.

The patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer who is expexted to undergo neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent radical surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Japan1 site
  • Wakayama Medical University

    Wakayama, Wakayama, 641-8510

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: The Prediction Using Diffusion-weighted MRI of the Response Evaluation in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

To investigate the correlation between pretreatment ADC value of diffusion MRI and pathologic response in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma who undergo neoadjuvant therapy.

Read the detailed description

Aim: The prediction using diffusion-weighted MRI of the response evaluation in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Study design: Single institution. Single arm. Prospective Phase II Study.

Number of case: 28

Patients: The prediction using dMRI of the response evaluation in borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma (BRPC) in neoadjuvant therapy.

Disease: Pancreatic carcinoma

Method: To investigate the correlation between pretreatment ADC value of diffusion MRI and pathologic response in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma who undergo neoadjuvant therapy.

The correlation between pretreatment ADC value of diffusion MRI and pathologic response evaluated by Evans grade in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma (BRPC) who undergo neoadjuvant therapy.

  1. The correlation between pretreatment ADC value at the abutment site of BRPC and the rate of tumor cell destruction.
  2. The correlation between posttreatment ADC value at the abutment site of BRPC and the rate of tumor cell destruction.
  3. The correlation between the ratio of posttreatment/pretreatment ADC value at the abutment site of BRPC and the rate of tumor cell destruction.
  4. The correlation between pretreatment ADC value of BRPC tumor in a largest diameter and the rate of tumor cell destruction.
  5. The correlation between the ratio of posttreatment/pretreatment ADC value of BRPC tumor in a largest diameter and the rate of tumor cell destruction.
  6. ADC Cut-off value which predict more than 50% and less than 10% in tumor cell destruction rate.
  7. The correlation between the ratio of posttreatment/pretreatment ADC value of BRPC tumor in a largest diameter and the ratio of posttreatment/pretreatment SUV max.
  8. ADC Cut-off value and SUV max cut-off value which predict survival time after surgery more than 2 years and less than 2 years.
  9. The comparison of the accuracy of prediction for pathological diagnosis at abutment site between the ratio of posttreatment/pretreatment ADC value and CT scan.
  10. Three correlation between high ADC value/low ADC value/the ratio of posttreatment/pretreatment ADC value and survival time after surgery.
  11. Three correlation between high ADC value/low ADC value/the ratio of posttreatment/pretreatment ADC value and decreasing rate of CA19-9 value.
  12. The correlation between tumor's limb sign in diffusion MRI and the rate of tumor cell destruction more than 10%.
Being tested
diffusion-weighted MRI
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • diffusion-weighted MRIOther

    Diffusion MRI Patients undergo MRI within 3 weeks before start of neoadjuvant therapy/ 5 weeks after the last dose. The setting of MRI scans for b-values is 0, 50, 1000 s/mm2. The same MRI (the MRI system/scanner Intera Achieva 3.0T from Philips Medical Systems) in the independent institution is used for all patients analyzed on this study. The region of interest is determined by consensus between two experienced MR radiologists in a largest diameter based on images of abdominal CT scans avoiding the vascular area on the image of ADC map. The mean ADC values for each tumor are automatically calculated on the image of ADC map using a tomographic software program.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The statistical analysis of the correlation between pretreatment ADC value of diffusion MRI and pathologic response evaluated by Evans grade in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma (BRPC) who undergo neoadjuvant therapy.

    Measured: The time duration of examinations between pretreatment diffusion MRI and histopathological examination is approximately 4 months.

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. The statistical analysis of the correlation between pretreatment ADC value at the abutment site of BRPC and the rate of tumor cell destruction.

    Measured: The time duration of examinations between pretreatment diffusion MRI and histopathological examination is approximately 4 months.

  2. The statistical analysis of the correlation between posttreatment ADC value at the abutment site of BRPC and the rate of tumor cell destruction.

    Measured: The time duration of examinations between pretreatment diffusion MRI and histopathological examination is approximately 4 months.

  3. The statistical analysis of the correlation between the ratio of posttreatment/pretreatment ADC value at the abutment site of BRPC and the rate of tumor cell destruction.

    Measured: The time duration of examinations between pretreatment diffusion MRI and histopathological examination is approximately 4 months.

  4. The statistical analysis of the correlation between pretreatment ADC value of BRPC tumor in a largest diameter and the rate of tumor cell destruction.

    Measured: The time duration of examinations between pretreatment diffusion MRI and histopathological examination is approximately 4 months.

  5. The statistical analysis of the correlation between the ratio of posttreatment/pretreatment ADC value of BRPC tumor in a largest diameter and the rate of tumor cell destruction.

    Measured: The time duration of examinations between pretreatment diffusion MRI and histopathological examination is approximately 4 months.

  6. The statistical analysis by ROC curve to investigate ADC Cut-off value which predict more than 50% and less than 10% in tumor cell destruction rate.

    Measured: The time duration of examinations between pretreatment diffusion MRI and histopathological examination is approximately 4 months.

  7. The statistical analysis of the correlation between the ratio of posttreatment/pretreatment ADC value of BRPC tumor in a largest diameter and the ratio of posttreatment/pretreatment SUV max in PET-CT.

    Measured: The time duration of examinations between pretreatment diffusion MRI and histopathological examination is approximately 4 months.

  8. The statistical analysis by ROC curve to investigate ADC Cut-off value and SUV max cut-off value which predict survival time after surgery more than 2 years and less than 2 years.

    Measured: Five years after initial therapy.

  9. The statistical analysis of the comparison of the accuracy of prediction for pathological diagnosis at abutment site between the ratio of posttreatment/pretreatment ADC value and CT scan.

    Measured: The time duration of examinations between pretreatment diffusion MRI and histopathological examination is approximately 4 months.

  10. Three correlation between high ADC value/low ADC value/the ratio of posttreatment/pretreatment ADC value and survival time after surgery.

    Measured: The time duration of examinations between pretreatment diffusion MRI and histopathological examination is approximately 4 months.

  11. The statistical analysis of the correlation between high ADC value/low ADC value/the ratio of posttreatment/pretreatment ADC value and decreasing rate of CA19-9 value.

    Measured: The time duration of examinations between pretreatment diffusion MRI and histopathological examination is approximately 4 months.

  12. The statistical analysis of the correlation between tumor's limb sign in diffusion MRI and the rate of tumor cell destruction more than 10%.

    Measured: The time duration of examinations between pretreatment diffusion MRI and histopathological examination is approximately 4 months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 May 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2016
  3. Primary completionJan 2020
  4. Study completionJan 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
28 participants (actual)
Target duration
2 Years
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02777463
Sponsor's protocol ID
ADC-BRPC
Acronym
DIFFERENT
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
11 May 2016
Last updated
20 May 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pancreatic Cancer, run by Wakayama Medical University at 1 site in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The statistical analysis of the correlation between pretreatment ADC value of diffusion MRI and pathologic response evaluated by Evans grade in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma (BRPC) who undergo neoadjuvant therapy. (time frame: The time duration of examinations between pretreatment diffusion MRI and histopathological examination is approximately 4 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in