EndometriosisPhase 2EDELWEISSNCT02778399
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of OBE2109 in Subjects With Endometriosis
A Phase 2 study testing OBE2109 in people with Endometriosis, run by ObsEva SA at 86 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of a range of oral doses of OBE2109 versus placebo, in reducing endometriosis associated pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Endometriosis
- What is being tested?
- OBE2109
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 328 participants
- Where
- 86 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2016to 1 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- The subject must have had her most recent surgical and - if available - histological, diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis up to 10 years before screening.
- The subject has moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain during the screening period.
- The subject has regular menstrual cycles.
- The subject has a BMI ≥ 18 kg/m2 at the screening visit.
Who cannot join
- The subject is pregnant or breast feeding or is planning a pregnancy within the duration of the treatment period of the study.
- The subject had an interventional surgery for endometriosis performed within a period of 60 days before screening.
- The subject did not respond to prior treatment with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or GnRH antagonists for endometriosis.
- The subject has a history of, or known osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease.
- The subject has chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis and requires chronic analgesic / therapy, or that would interfere with the assessment of endometriosis related pain.
Trial locations and contacts
86 sites in 4 countries.
86 sites in 4 countries
United States71 sites
Site reference ID 421
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Site reference ID 430
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Site reference ID 462
Arcadia, California
Site reference ID 428
Atlanta, Georgia
Site reference ID 459
Atlanta, Georgia
Site reference ID 452
Austin, Texas
Site reference ID 409
Bay City, Michigan
Site reference ID 461
Beaumont, Texas
Site reference ID 457
Boca Raton, Florida
Site reference ID 408
Bristol, Tennessee
Site reference ID 419
Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania
Site reference ID 467
Centreville, Virginia
Site reference ID 455
Chandler, Arizona
Site reference ID 403
Chattanooga, Tennessee
Site reference ID 405
Chino, California
Site reference ID 418
Clearwater, Florida
Site reference ID 476
Columbia, South Carolina
Site reference ID 447
Dallas, Texas
Site reference ID 460
Dallas, Texas
Site reference ID 443
Dayton, Ohio
Site reference ID 474
Denver, Colorado
Site reference ID 422
Draper, Utah
Site reference ID 445
Fall River, Massachusetts
Site reference ID 471
Fall River, Massachusetts
Site reference ID 464
Fort Worth, Texas
Site reference ID 472
Franklin, Ohio
Site reference ID 437
Gainesville, Florida
Site reference ID 478
Glen Burnie, Maryland
Site reference ID 436
Greensboro, North Carolina
Site reference ID 413
Houston, Texas
Site reference ID 434
Houston, Texas
Site reference ID 479
Houston, Texas
Site reference ID 463
Huntington Park, California
Site reference ID 449
Jenkintown, Pennsylvania
Site reference ID 458
Jensen Beach, Florida
Site reference ID 450
Lakewood, Colorado
Site reference ID 425
Longmont, Colorado
Site reference ID 454
Marrero, Louisiana
Site reference ID 453
Metairie, Louisiana
Site reference ID 411
Miami, Florida
Site reference ID 424
Miami, Florida
Site reference ID 435
Miami, Florida
Site reference ID 420
Miami Lakes, Florida
Site reference ID 441
Miami Springs, Florida
Site reference ID 433
Morehead City, North Carolina
Site reference ID 475
Nampa, Idaho
Site reference ID 429
Nashville, Tennessee
Site reference ID 423
New Port Richey, Florida
Site reference ID 466
New York, New York
Site reference ID 407
Norfolk, Virginia
Site refenrec ID 469
Northridge, California
Site reference ID 465
Oak Brook, Illinois
Site reference ID 412
Richmond, Virginia
Site reference ID 417
Richmond, Virginia
Site reference ID 468
Saginaw, Michigan
Site reference ID 473
Saginaw, Michigan
Site reference ID 451
San Antonio, Texas
Site reference ID 431
San Diego, California
Site reference ID 402
Schertz, Texas
Site reference ID 439
Scottsdale, Arizona
Site reference ID 406
Seattle, Washington
Site reference ID 404
Shawnee Mission, Kansas
Site reference ID 427
Southfield, Michigan
Site reference ID 426
Tampa, Florida
Site reference ID 415
Tiffin, Ohio
Site reference ID 440
Tustin, California
Site reference ID 410
Washington D.C., District of Columbia
Site reference ID 432
Webster, Texas
Site reference ID 442
Wellington, Florida
Site reference ID 414
Westerville, Ohio
Site reference ID 456
Wichita, Kansas
Poland5 sites
Site reference ID 101
Katowice
Site reference ID 102
Katowice
Site reference ID 104
Lublin
Site reference ID 105
Lublin
Site reference ID 103
Szczecin
Russia5 sites
Site reference ID 201
Moscow
Site reference ID 202
Moscow
Site reference ID 203
Moscow
Site reference ID 204
Moscow
Site reference ID 205
Saint Petersburg
Ukraine5 sites
Site reference ID 305
Ivano-Frankivsk
Site reefrence ID 303
Kyiv
Site reference ID 301
Kyiv
Site reference ID 302
Kyiv
SIte reference ID 304
Kyiv
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2b Dose-ranging Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of OBE2109 in Subjects With Endometriosis Associated Pain
The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of a range of oral doses of OBE2109 versus placebo, in reducing endometriosis associated pain.
Read the detailed description
The study is a prospective, dose-finding, randomized, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b study investigating the efficacy and safety of OBE2109 in the treatment of 330 women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis associated pain.
Subject will be randomized to one of 6 treatment groups in a 1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio (1 placebo group, 5 dose groups with different dosage/regimen).
Eligible subjects will be offered the opportunity to continue treatment with OBE2109 in an extension phase. Subjects who do not continue in the extension will enter the treatment-free follow-up phase of the study.
- Conditions
- Endometriosis
- Being tested
- Placebo, OBE2109
- Keywords
- Pelvic Pain, Endometriosis, Dysmenorrhea, Dyspareunia
- Medical subject headings
- Endometriosis, Pelvic Pain, Dysmenorrhea, Dyspareunia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo tablets for oral administration once daily
OBE2109Drug
OBE2109 tablets for oral administration once daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OBE2109 50 mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: OBE2109 |
| OBE2109 75mg fixed dose (FD) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: OBE2109 |
| OBE2109 75mg titrated dose (TD) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: OBE2109 |
| OBE2109 100mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: OBE2109 |
| OBE2109 200 mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: OBE2109 |
| Placebo / OBE2109 100mg | Placebo comparator | Participants received placebo for the first 12 weeks and were then crossed-over to active treatment with OBE2109 100mg for a further 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: OBE2109 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Overall Pelvic Pain Score (0-3 VRS)
The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was a response at Week 12, with response defined as a reduction of 30% or greater from baseline in the mean overall pelvic pain score, defined as the mean of daily pain scores reported in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a Verbal Rating Scale for pelvic pain of 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period.
The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
Measured: From baseline to week 12
Secondary outcomes (16)
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Overall Pelvic Pain Score (0-10 NRS)
This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to Week 12 in the mean overall pelvic pain score, defined as the mean of daily pain scores reported in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pelvic pain of 0 (no pelvic pain) to 10 (worst pelvic pain imaginable). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period.
The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
Measured: From baseline to week 12
Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Pelvic Pain Scores (0-3 VRS) for Days With Uterine Bleeding
This endpoint corresponds to a response at Week 12, with response defined as a reduction of 30% or greater from baseline in the mean pelvic pain score for days with uterine bleeding/spotting, defined as the mean of daily pain scores on days with uterine bleeding/spotting recorded in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a Verbal Rating Scale for pelvic pain of 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period.
The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
Measured: From baseline to week 12
Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Pelvic Pain Scores (0-3 VRS) for Days With no Uterine Bleeding
This endpoint corresponds to a response at Week 12, with response defined as a reduction of 30% or greater from baseline in the mean pelvic pain score for days with no uterine bleeding, defined as the mean of daily pain scores on days with no uterine bleeding recorded in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period) on a Verbal Rating Scale for pelvic pain of 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period.
The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
Measured: From baseline to week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Dyspareunia Score (0-3 VRS)
This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to Week 12 in the mean dyspareunia score, defined as the mean of daily dyspareunia scores recorded in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a 0-3 Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) for dyspareunia, with 0 representing "No discomfort during sexual intercourse" and 3 representing "I avoided sexual intercourse because of pain". The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period.
The dyspareunia questionnaire also included an option "not applicable: I was not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse"; for scoring, answering "not applicable" was considered like a missing value.
The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
Measured: From baseline to week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Dyschezia Score (0-10 NRS)
This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to week 12 in the mean dyschezia score, defined as the mean of weekly dyschezia scores reported in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale for dyschezia, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of weekly scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period.
The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
Measured: From baseline to week 12
Percentage of Subjects With Any Analgesics Use at Week 12
This endpoint corresponds to the percentage of subjects at week 12 who recorded at least one pain medication intake in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period).
Measured: Up to week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Score of Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Domain
This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to Week 12 in the mean score of pain dimension of the EHP-30. The EHP-30 questionnaire was answered on electronic diary after activation by site staff during subject's monthly visits at site.
The EHP-30 pain dimension consists of 11 items each addressing the effect of pain on various activities in the past 4 weeks and each assessed on a 5-point scale (0=Never through to 4=Always). Scaled score was equalled to total of raw score of each item in scale divided by the maximum possible raw score of all the items in the dimension, multiplied by 100, resulting in a score on a scale from 0 (best possible health status) to 100 (worst possible health status).
The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
Measured: From baseline to week 12
Percentage of Subjects With Improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 12
The PGIC questionnaire consists of one question rated on a seven point scale (1="Very Much Improved" to 7="Very Much Worse"), with which the subject had to qualify her overall status since the start of the study. The PGIC was answered on electronic diary after activation by site staff during Week 12 visit at site.
This endpoint corresponds to the percentage of subjects with an "improvement" in the PGIC score, which includes all subjects who answered "Very much improved" or "Much improved" or "Minimally improved" at Week 12.
Measured: Up to week 12
Percentage of Subjects With an Endometriosis Severity Score of "Severe" at Week 12
Subject was asked monthly on electronic diary to assess their impression of endometriosis severity, considering the preceding 4-weeks, with following possible answers: no symptoms, very mild, mild, moderate, severe. This question was programmed to raise automatically every 4 weeks on the subject electronic diary. Result reported here is the percentage of subjects who answered "severe" at week 12.
Measured: Up to week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Difficulty in Doing Daily Activities Mean Score
This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to Week 12 in the mean of daily scores for "difficulty in doing daily activities", assessed via electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 (no difficulty doing daily activities) to 10 (unable to do daily activities). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period.
The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
Measured: From baseline to week 12
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
Change from baseline to Week 24 in BMD assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan of LUMBAR SPINE.
Measured: From baseline up to week 24
Number of Non Benign Endometrial Biopsies at Week 24
Any pathological changes in the endometrium at week 24 were assessed from endometrial biopsies. The number of non benign biopsies at Week 24 is presented per treatment arm.
Note: an isolated case of hyperplasia (without atypia) was observed at week 12 in the 200 mg group in a subject whose screening biopsy results were normal. A follow-up biopsy at week 24 revealed no abnormalities.
Measured: Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Endometrial Thickness Measured by Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS)
The endometrium thickness was measured by TVUS at screening and at Week 24 visit by the gynaecologist and result was recorded in mm. This endpoint reports the changes from baseline to Week 24 in the endometrial thickness.
Measured: From baseline up to week 24
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Clinical Laboratory Assessments: LDL
This endpoint reports the change from baseline up to Week 24 in the clinical laboratory assessments: LDL cholesterol.
Measured: From baseline up to week 24
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Laboratory Assessments: HDL
This endpoint reports the change from baseline to week 24 in clinical laboratory assessments: HDL cholesterol.
Measured: From Baseline up to week 24
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Laboratory Assessments: Triglycerides
This endpoint reports the change from baseline to week 24 in clinical laboratory assessments: triglycerides.
Measured: From baseline up to week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2016
- Primary completionApr 2018
- Study completion1 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EndometriosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 328 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ObsEva SA
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- ObsEva SA, Study director, Geneva
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02778399
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15-OBE2109-001
- Acronym
- EDELWEISS
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 3 May 2016
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Donnez J, Taylor HS, Taylor RN, Akin MD, Tatarchuk TF, Wilk K, Gotteland JP, Lecomte V, Bestel E. Treatment of endometriosis-associated pain with linzagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone-antagonist: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2020 Jul;114(1):44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.02.114. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
PubMed 32505383
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2b Dose-ranging Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of OBE2109 in Subjects With Endometriosis Associated Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02778399
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EDELWEISS / 15-OBE2109-001
- Conditions
- Endometriosis
- Keywords
- Pelvic Pain, Endometriosis, Dysmenorrhea, Dyspareunia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 328 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ObsEva SAIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Jul 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of a range of oral doses of OBE2109 versus placebo, in reducing endometriosis associated pain.
Detailed description
The study is a prospective, dose-finding, randomized, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b study investigating the efficacy and safety of OBE2109 in the treatment of 330 women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis associated pain.
Subject will be randomized to one of 6 treatment groups in a 1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio (1 placebo group, 5 dose groups with different dosage/regimen).
Eligible subjects will be offered the opportunity to continue treatment with OBE2109 in an extension phase. Subjects who do not continue in the extension will enter the treatment-free follow-up phase of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OBE2109 50 mg | Experimental | Drug: OBE2109 |
| OBE2109 75mg fixed dose (FD) | Experimental | Drug: OBE2109 |
| OBE2109 75mg titrated dose (TD) | Experimental | Drug: OBE2109 |
| OBE2109 100mg | Experimental | Drug: OBE2109 |
| OBE2109 200 mg | Experimental | Drug: OBE2109 |
| Placebo / OBE2109 100mg | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Drug: OBE2109Participants received placebo for the first 12 weeks and were then crossed-over to active treatment with OBE2109 100mg for a further 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- The subject must have had her most recent surgical and - if available - histological, diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis up to 10 years before screening.
- The subject has moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain during the screening period.
- The subject has regular menstrual cycles.
- The subject has a BMI ≥ 18 kg/m2 at the screening visit.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The subject is pregnant or breast feeding or is planning a pregnancy within the duration of the treatment period of the study.
- The subject had an interventional surgery for endometriosis performed within a period of 60 days before screening.
- The subject did not respond to prior treatment with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or GnRH antagonists for endometriosis.
- The subject has a history of, or known osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease.
- The subject has chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis and requires chronic analgesic / therapy, or that would interfere with the assessment of endometriosis related pain.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PlaceboPlacebo tablets for oral administration once daily | Drug | Placebo / OBE2109 100mg |
| OBE2109OBE2109 tablets for oral administration once daily | Drug | OBE2109 100mg, OBE2109 200 mg, OBE2109 50 mg, OBE2109 75mg fixed dose (FD), OBE2109 75mg titrated dose (TD), Placebo / OBE2109 100mg |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Overall Pelvic Pain Score (0-3 VRS)
Time frame: From baseline to week 12
The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was a response at Week 12, with response defined as a reduction of 30% or greater from baseline in the mean overall pelvic pain score, defined as the mean of daily pain scores reported in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a Verbal Rating Scale for pelvic pain of 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period. The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
16 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Overall Pelvic Pain Score (0-10 NRS)
Time frame: From baseline to week 12
Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Pelvic Pain Scores (0-3 VRS) for Days With Uterine Bleeding
Time frame: From baseline to week 12
Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Pelvic Pain Scores (0-3 VRS) for Days With no Uterine Bleeding
Time frame: From baseline to week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Dyspareunia Score (0-3 VRS)
Time frame: From baseline to week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Dyschezia Score (0-10 NRS)
Time frame: From baseline to week 12
Percentage of Subjects With Any Analgesics Use at Week 12
Time frame: Up to week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Score of Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Domain
Time frame: From baseline to week 12
Percentage of Subjects With Improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 12
Time frame: Up to week 12
Percentage of Subjects With an Endometriosis Severity Score of "Severe" at Week 12
Time frame: Up to week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Difficulty in Doing Daily Activities Mean Score
Time frame: From baseline to week 12
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
Time frame: From baseline up to week 24
Number of Non Benign Endometrial Biopsies at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Endometrial Thickness Measured by Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS)
Time frame: From baseline up to week 24
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Clinical Laboratory Assessments: LDL
Time frame: From baseline up to week 24
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Laboratory Assessments: HDL
Time frame: From Baseline up to week 24
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Laboratory Assessments: Triglycerides
Time frame: From baseline up to week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32505383Donnez J, Taylor HS, Taylor RN, Akin MD, Tatarchuk TF, Wilk K, Gotteland JP, Lecomte V, Bestel E. Treatment of endometriosis-associated pain with linzagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone-antagonist: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2020 Jul;114(1):44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.02.114. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
Related trials for Endometriosis
Not yet recruiting
Prevalence of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) in Women With Endometriosis
SIBO, Endometriosis
Recruiting
Endometriosis Transcriptomic Cell Atlas
Endometriosis, Infertility
Not yet recruiting
Psychotherapy in Patients With Endometriosis: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Endometriosis, Adenomyosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Impact of a Diagnosis or Lack of a Diagnosis of Endometriosis Via a Saliva Test on Pain Catastrophizing, Quality of Life, Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression, and Treatment Adherence
Endometriosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
PRECISION-E2: Teverelix in Women With Endometriosis - Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Precision Medicine Correlates
Endometriosis Pelvic, Endometriosis Ovaries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
ObsEva SA study director
Geneva
86 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing OBE2109 in people with Endometriosis, run by ObsEva SA at 86 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 86 sites in United States, Poland, Russia, Ukraine. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Jul 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Overall Pelvic Pain Score (0-3 VRS) (time frame: From baseline to week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02778399, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2022.