Tobacco Use DisorderNCT02781038
Smoking Cessation and a Teachable Moment in Patients With Acute Fractures
A study testing Teaching intervention in people with Tobacco Use Disorder and Bone Fractures, run by University of Pennsylvania.
Trial summary
Patients who smoke and suffer from fractures are worse off than those who do not smoke. Orthopaedic patients represent a group that can benefit from physician contributions to smoking cessation, and a special opportunity to cue this can begin with the orthopaedic surgeon in the acute setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Tobacco Use Disorder, Bone Fractures
- What is being tested?
- Teaching intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Feb 2014to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults age 18 or over, who are not under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections
- Individuals receiving care from University of Pennsylvania Health System clinicians for orthopaedic injuries
- Individuals who self-identify as smokers
Who cannot join
- Under age 18
- Under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections
- Nonsmokers
- People not currently receiving fracture care
About this study
Patients who smoke and suffer from fractures are worse off than those who do not smoke. Orthopaedic patients represent a group that can benefit from physician contributions to smoking cessation, and a special opportunity to cue this can begin with the orthopaedic surgeon in the acute setting. However, the best way to appropriately counsel these patients and assess the impact as a teachable moment remains undetermined.
Read the detailed description
If the patient self-identifies as a smoker, the investigators will consent and randomize to receive the intervention or not. Either way, all will receive a baseline attitude survey. The patient will be given a series of questions that target the areas of interest noted in the model. At some point in their hospitalization, preferably at least one day later and no greater than one week later, the patients will be given the teaching intervention (or not), and receive another attitude survey. After discharge, the patients will be expected in orthopaedic follow up clinic. At that time they will receive another attitude survey. If unable to deliver at that time, they will be contacted by phone or sought at their second clinic follow up.
- Conditions
- Tobacco Use Disorder, Bone Fractures
- Being tested
- Teaching intervention, Control
- Medical subject headings
- Tobacco Use Disorder, Fractures, Bone
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Teaching interventionBehavioural
Also called Pamphlet
Subjects will receive a pamphlet which describes the relationship between smoking and negative outcomes in fracture healing.
ControlBehavioural
Subjects in this group will not receive the pamphlet
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional | Experimental | All subjects will receive a baseline attitude survey. At some point in their hospitalization, preferably at least one day later and no greater than one week later, the patients will be given a teaching intervention and receive another attitude survey. Receives: Behavioral: Teaching intervention |
| Control | Other | All subjects will receive a baseline attitude survey. At some point in their hospitalization, preferably at least one day later and no greater than one week later, the patients will receive another attitude survey. Receives: Behavioral: Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Attitude adjustment
Study-specific 9 question Likert-scale survey
Measured: Change from baseline (inpatient) pre-intervention, to 24 hours post-intervention, to first clinical follow up visit (outpatient) 1-3 weeks post-intervention
Secondary outcomes (1)
Exploratory Impact Assessment
Single binary question
Measured: Change from baseline (inpatient) pre-intervention, to 24 hours post-intervention, to first clinical follow up visit (outpatient) 1-3 weeks post-intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2014
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Tobacco Use DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PennsylvaniaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pennsylvania
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jaimo Ahn, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Pennsylvania
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02781038
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 819551
- Status last verified
- Nov 2017
- First submitted
- 2 May 2016
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Al-Hadithy N, Sewell MD, Bhavikatti M, Gikas PD. The effect of smoking on fracture healing and on various orthopaedic procedures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012 Jun;78(3):285-90.
PubMed 22822565Patel RA, Wilson RF, Patel PA, Palmer RM. The effect of smoking on bone healing: A systematic review. Bone Joint Res. 2013 Jun 14;2(6):102-11. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.26.2000142. Print 2013.
PubMed 23836474An LC, Foldes SS, Alesci NL, Bluhm JH, Bland PC, Davern ME, Schillo BA, Ahluwalia JS, Manley MW. The impact of smoking-cessation intervention by multiple health professionals. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jan;34(1):54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.019.
PubMed 18083451Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992 Sep;47(9):1102-14. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.47.9.1102.
PubMed 1329589Lawson PJ, Flocke SA. Teachable moments for health behavior change: a concept analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jul;76(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.002. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
PubMed 19110395Fonarow GC. In-hospital initiation of statins: taking advantage of the 'teachable moment'. Cleve Clin J Med. 2003 Jun;70(6):502, 504-6. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.70.6.502. No abstract available.
PubMed 12828221Glasgow RE, Stevens VJ, Vogt TM, Mullooly JP, Lichtenstein E. Changes in smoking associated with hospitalization: quit rates, predictive variables, and intervention implications. Am J Health Promot. 1991 Sep-Oct;6(1):24-9. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-6.1.24.
PubMed 10148681McBride CM, Emmons KM, Lipkus IM. Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 2003 Apr;18(2):156-70. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.156.
PubMed 12729175Dohnke B, Ziemann C, Will KE, Weiss-Gerlach E, Spies CD. Do hospital treatments represent a 'teachable moment' for quitting smoking? A study from a stage-theoretical perspective. Psychol Health. 2012;27(11):1291-307. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2012.672649. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
PubMed 22472171
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Smoking Cessation and a Teachable Moment in Patients With Acute Fractures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02781038
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 819551
- Conditions
- Tobacco Use Disorder, Bone Fractures
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PennsylvaniaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients who smoke and suffer from fractures are worse off than those who do not smoke. Orthopaedic patients represent a group that can benefit from physician contributions to smoking cessation, and a special opportunity to cue this can begin with the orthopaedic surgeon in the acute setting. However, the best way to appropriately counsel these patients and assess the impact as a teachable moment remains undetermined.
Detailed description
If the patient self-identifies as a smoker, the investigators will consent and randomize to receive the intervention or not. Either way, all will receive a baseline attitude survey. The patient will be given a series of questions that target the areas of interest noted in the model. At some point in their hospitalization, preferably at least one day later and no greater than one week later, the patients will be given the teaching intervention (or not), and receive another attitude survey. After discharge, the patients will be expected in orthopaedic follow up clinic. At that time they will receive another attitude survey. If unable to deliver at that time, they will be contacted by phone or sought at their second clinic follow up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional | Experimental | Behavioral: Teaching interventionAll subjects will receive a baseline attitude survey. At some point in their hospitalization, preferably at least one day later and no greater than one week later, the patients will be given a teaching intervention and receive another attitude survey. |
| Control | Other | Behavioral: ControlAll subjects will receive a baseline attitude survey. At some point in their hospitalization, preferably at least one day later and no greater than one week later, the patients will receive another attitude survey. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adults age 18 or over, who are not under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections
- Individuals receiving care from University of Pennsylvania Health System clinicians for orthopaedic injuries
- Individuals who self-identify as smokers
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Under age 18
- Under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections
- Nonsmokers
- People not currently receiving fracture care
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Teaching interventionAlso: PamphletSubjects will receive a pamphlet which describes the relationship between smoking and negative outcomes in fracture healing. | Behavioural | Interventional |
| ControlSubjects in this group will not receive the pamphlet | Behavioural | Control |
Primary outcome
Attitude adjustment
Time frame: Change from baseline (inpatient) pre-intervention, to 24 hours post-intervention, to first clinical follow up visit (outpatient) 1-3 weeks post-intervention
Study-specific 9 question Likert-scale survey
1 secondary outcome
Exploratory Impact Assessment
Time frame: Change from baseline (inpatient) pre-intervention, to 24 hours post-intervention, to first clinical follow up visit (outpatient) 1-3 weeks post-intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2017.
- Background: PubMed 22822565Al-Hadithy N, Sewell MD, Bhavikatti M, Gikas PD. The effect of smoking on fracture healing and on various orthopaedic procedures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012 Jun;78(3):285-90.
- Background: PubMed 23836474Patel RA, Wilson RF, Patel PA, Palmer RM. The effect of smoking on bone healing: A systematic review. Bone Joint Res. 2013 Jun 14;2(6):102-11. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.26.2000142. Print 2013.
- Background: PubMed 18083451An LC, Foldes SS, Alesci NL, Bluhm JH, Bland PC, Davern ME, Schillo BA, Ahluwalia JS, Manley MW. The impact of smoking-cessation intervention by multiple health professionals. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jan;34(1):54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.019.
- Background: PubMed 1329589Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992 Sep;47(9):1102-14. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.47.9.1102.
- Background: PubMed 19110395Lawson PJ, Flocke SA. Teachable moments for health behavior change: a concept analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jul;76(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.002. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
- Background: PubMed 12828221Fonarow GC. In-hospital initiation of statins: taking advantage of the 'teachable moment'. Cleve Clin J Med. 2003 Jun;70(6):502, 504-6. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.70.6.502. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 10148681Glasgow RE, Stevens VJ, Vogt TM, Mullooly JP, Lichtenstein E. Changes in smoking associated with hospitalization: quit rates, predictive variables, and intervention implications. Am J Health Promot. 1991 Sep-Oct;6(1):24-9. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-6.1.24.
- Background: PubMed 12729175McBride CM, Emmons KM, Lipkus IM. Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 2003 Apr;18(2):156-70. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.156.
- Background: PubMed 22472171Dohnke B, Ziemann C, Will KE, Weiss-Gerlach E, Spies CD. Do hospital treatments represent a 'teachable moment' for quitting smoking? A study from a stage-theoretical perspective. Psychol Health. 2012;27(11):1291-307. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2012.672649. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Tobacco Use Disorder
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Recruiting
Effectiveness of Volitional Help Sheets as an Adjunct to Treatment to Promote Behavior Change: A Pilot Study on Smoking
Tobacco Dependence
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Lung Health and Breath Biomarkers: Acute Effects of Inhaled Cannabis
Cannabis Use, Tobacco
Recruiting
Young Adult Tobacco/Nicotine and Cannabis Co-use
Tobacco Use Disorder, Nicotine Dependence
RecruitingObservational study
Salivary IL-8 and Serum IL-6 as Biomarkers for Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders in Smokers and Never-Smokers
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders, Oral Lichen Planus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jaimo Ahn, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of Pennsylvania
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Teaching intervention in people with Tobacco Use Disorder and Bone Fractures, run by University of Pennsylvania.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Attitude adjustment (time frame: Change from baseline (inpatient) pre-intervention, to 24 hours post-intervention, to first clinical follow up visit (outpatient) 1-3 weeks post-intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02781038, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2017.