Oral Immunotherapy for Food AllergyNCT02786914
Predictors of Positive Food Challenge
An observational study of Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergy, run by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
Patients with suspected tree-nut or sesame allergy based on sensitization on skin-prick tests (SPT), will be assessed for allergy using component analysis and basophil activation test (BAT) and entered into oral immunotherapy (OIT). Component analysis and BAT will be repeated after completion of OIT. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 45 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergy
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- Apr 2016to Apr 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 45 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: Patients will be recruited from the pool of patients referred to our center for evaluation of food allergy. The investigators have a database of over 1200 food allergic patients (OFC+) that can be utilized to attain the recruitment goal.
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 4-45 years old, with a positive SPT to tree-nuts (walnut, pecan, cashew, pistachio, hazelnut or almond) and/or sesame, and either a history of a reaction in the past year, a positive OFC, or patients refraining from tree-nut consumption.
Who cannot join
- A history of other numerous chronic inflammatory diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease and other autoimmune diseases.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
The institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center
Tsrifin, 70300
Arnon Elizur, MD, +97289779820, elizura@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Nut Cross-Reactivity - ACuiring Knowledge for Elimination Recommendations (NUT-CRACKER) Study
Patients with suspected tree-nut or sesame allergy based on sensitization on skin-prick tests (SPT), will be assessed for allergy using component analysis and basophil activation test (BAT) and entered into oral immunotherapy (OIT). Component analysis and BAT will be repeated after completion of OIT. Patients with tree-nut or sesame allergy treated with the standard of care of elimination diet will serve as controls
Read the detailed description
Patients will be recruited from the pool of patients referred to the investigators center for evaluation of food allergy. For each tree-nut (walnut, pecan, cashew, pistachio, hazelnut or almond) evaluated, 30 patients (ages 4-45 years old), with allergy to at least one tree-nut will be recruited from the database pool referred to above. Skin prick tests (SPT) using standardized 10 mg/ml tree-nut extracts, and BAT will be performed for all suspected allergens. Sera will be taken and sent to ThermoFisher for IgE and IgG4 binding analysis to purified components. Open OFCs will be performed for each tree-nut, unless clinically contraindicated. The results of the OFC will form the basis to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the component testing. Similarly, 40 patients with suspected sesame allergy will be administered SPT and component analysis for sesame, with correlations to OFC.
The investigators will also utilize BAT to directly test whether the identified purified components are sufficient to elicit reactivity. This objective can be met by either utilizing saved patient sera on naive basophils or directly on a subsequently obtained blood sample from the patient. For patients enrolling in OIT (secondary objective), sera will also be taken after completion of the therapeutic regimen, and IgE as well as IgG4 binding to the same components will be assessed and compared to pre-OIT results.
4.2 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND METHODS
4.3 Patients will be grouped by OFC their allergy status result for each tree-nut (patients with a documented IgE-mediated reaction in the previous year or a positive OFC vs. patients with regular consumption of the index food or a negative OFC). Descriptive statistics (proportions for categorical variables, means or medians and standard deviations or inter-quartile range for continuous variables) will be reported for all key participant variables, including baseline and demographic characteristics, SPT, BAT and component testing results.
For the primary objective, the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic tests (wheal for SPT, and CD63 induction for BAT) and IgE/IgG4 binding to the purified components in predicting OFC results allergy will be compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. To this end, the investigators will evaluate molecular allergens singly or in groups for their predictive utilities.
For the secondary objective, OFC positive patients with documented allergy who undergo OIT for tree-nuts (n=15 for each tree-nut) or sesame (n=15) will be grouped according to OIT outcome. Paired t-tests comparing IgE and IgG4 binding of specific molecular allergens in individual patients before and after treatment will be performed. Additionally, the pre-OIT IgE and IgG4 profiles against particular molecular allergens will be compared between OIT outcome groups by t-test. 10 control patients treated with the standard of care of elimination diet will be compared.
Power analysis: Using the Pearson Chi-square test for two proportions, with the assumption that 75% of all OFC+ to tree-nuts will be positive to at least one specific component, in order to detect a result with a P-value of <0.05, 15 positive and 15 negative sera for each tree-nut would yield a power of 0.816. Based on the investigators experience with immunoreactivity as assessed by western blot, in fact the investigators would expect that much more than 75% of OFC+ patients would show IgE reactivity against at least one component. Thus, the investigators feel that a total of thirty sera for each tree-nut should suffice for the analysis.
Total number of patients: 180 patients to be evaluated for tree-nut allergy and 40 for sesame allergy.
- Conditions
- Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergy
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients with positive food challenge to tree-nuts and sesame
Determining the best diagnostic method that would predict a positive vs. negative oral food challenge in food sensitized patients
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of patients with decreased component reactivity for a particular tree-nut and for sesame following OIT
To determine how many patients have decreased reactivity following successful desensitization to the same food in OIT
Measured: 2.5 years
Number of patients with decreased component cross reactivity for a particular tree-nut and for sesame following OIT
To determine how many patients have decreased component reactivity following successful desensitization to a different food in OIT
Measured: 2.5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2016
- Primary completionApr 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Oral Immunotherapy for Food AllergyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02786914
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 235/14
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 5 May 2016
- Last updated
- 17 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Nut Cross-Reactivity - ACuiring Knowledge for Elimination Recommendations (NUT-CRACKER) Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02786914
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 235/14
- Conditions
- Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterOther government
- Study start
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with suspected tree-nut or sesame allergy based on sensitization on skin-prick tests (SPT), will be assessed for allergy using component analysis and basophil activation test (BAT) and entered into oral immunotherapy (OIT). Component analysis and BAT will be repeated after completion of OIT. Patients with tree-nut or sesame allergy treated with the standard of care of elimination diet will serve as controls
Detailed description
Patients will be recruited from the pool of patients referred to the investigators center for evaluation of food allergy. For each tree-nut (walnut, pecan, cashew, pistachio, hazelnut or almond) evaluated, 30 patients (ages 4-45 years old), with allergy to at least one tree-nut will be recruited from the database pool referred to above. Skin prick tests (SPT) using standardized 10 mg/ml tree-nut extracts, and BAT will be performed for all suspected allergens. Sera will be taken and sent to ThermoFisher for IgE and IgG4 binding analysis to purified components. Open OFCs will be performed for each tree-nut, unless clinically contraindicated. The results of the OFC will form the basis to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the component testing. Similarly, 40 patients with suspected sesame allergy will be administered SPT and component analysis for sesame, with correlations to OFC.
The investigators will also utilize BAT to directly test whether the identified purified components are sufficient to elicit reactivity. This objective can be met by either utilizing saved patient sera on naive basophils or directly on a subsequently obtained blood sample from the patient. For patients enrolling in OIT (secondary objective), sera will also be taken after completion of the therapeutic regimen, and IgE as well as IgG4 binding to the same components will be assessed and compared to pre-OIT results.
4.2 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND METHODS
4.3 Patients will be grouped by OFC their allergy status result for each tree-nut (patients with a documented IgE-mediated reaction in the previous year or a positive OFC vs. patients with regular consumption of the index food or a negative OFC). Descriptive statistics (proportions for categorical variables, means or medians and standard deviations or inter-quartile range for continuous variables) will be reported for all key participant variables, including baseline and demographic characteristics, SPT, BAT and component testing results.
For the primary objective, the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic tests (wheal for SPT, and CD63 induction for BAT) and IgE/IgG4 binding to the purified components in predicting OFC results allergy will be compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. To this end, the investigators will evaluate molecular allergens singly or in groups for their predictive utilities.
For the secondary objective, OFC positive patients with documented allergy who undergo OIT for tree-nuts (n=15 for each tree-nut) or sesame (n=15) will be grouped according to OIT outcome. Paired t-tests comparing IgE and IgG4 binding of specific molecular allergens in individual patients before and after treatment will be performed. Additionally, the pre-OIT IgE and IgG4 profiles against particular molecular allergens will be compared between OIT outcome groups by t-test. 10 control patients treated with the standard of care of elimination diet will be compared.
Power analysis: Using the Pearson Chi-square test for two proportions, with the assumption that 75% of all OFC+ to tree-nuts will be positive to at least one specific component, in order to detect a result with a P-value of <0.05, 15 positive and 15 negative sera for each tree-nut would yield a power of 0.816. Based on the investigators experience with immunoreactivity as assessed by western blot, in fact the investigators would expect that much more than 75% of OFC+ patients would show IgE reactivity against at least one component. Thus, the investigators feel that a total of thirty sera for each tree-nut should suffice for the analysis.
Total number of patients: 180 patients to be evaluated for tree-nut allergy and 40 for sesame allergy.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- Patients will be recruited from the pool of patients referred to our center for evaluation of food allergy. The investigators have a database of over 1200 food allergic patients (OFC+) that can be utilized to attain the recruitment goal.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients aged 4-45 years old, with a positive SPT to tree-nuts (walnut, pecan, cashew, pistachio, hazelnut or almond) and/or sesame, and either a history of a reaction in the past year, a positive OFC, or patients refraining from tree-nut consumption.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- A history of other numerous chronic inflammatory diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease and other autoimmune diseases.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Number of patients with positive food challenge to tree-nuts and sesame
Time frame: 1 year
Determining the best diagnostic method that would predict a positive vs. negative oral food challenge in food sensitized patients
2 secondary outcomes
Number of patients with decreased component reactivity for a particular tree-nut and for sesame following OIT
Time frame: 2.5 years
Number of patients with decreased component cross reactivity for a particular tree-nut and for sesame following OIT
Time frame: 2.5 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jan 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergy
Not yet recruiting
Immunotherapy for Curing Toddlers With Severe Food Allergy - a Paradigm Shift From Passive to Active Treatment With Multi-allergen Oral Immunotherapy
Food Allergy in Children
Active, not recruiting
Slow Multiallergen Oral Immunotherapy in Young Children
Food Allergy, Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergy
Not yet recruiting
Oral Immunotherapy for Children With Peanut Allergy
Peanut Allergic Subjects, Peanut Allergies
Not yet recruiting
Oral Immunotherapy for Children With Egg Allergy
Egg Allergy, Egg Hypersensitivity
Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral Immunotherapy Versus Allergen Avoidance in Children Under 2 Years With Food Allergy
Food Allergy in Children, Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergy, run by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Arnon Elizur (+97289779820, elizura@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients with positive food challenge to tree-nuts and sesame (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2018.