AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyPhase 1/2NCT02788045

Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity Study of Different Vaccine Regimens of Trivalent Ad26.Mos.HIV or Tetravalent Ad26.Mos4.HIV Along With Clade C Glycoprotein (gp)140 in Healthy Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Uninfected Adults

A Phase 1/2 study testing Ad26.Mos.HIV, Ad26.Mos4.HIV and Clade C gp140 in people with Healthy, run by Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V. at 10 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety/tolerability of the 2 different vaccine regimens of priming with trivalent Ad26.Mos.HIV and boosting with trivalent Ad26.Mos.HIV and Clade C gp140 plus adjuvant or priming with tetravalent Ad26.Mos4.HIV and boosting with Ad26.Mos4.HIV and Clade C glycoprotein (gp)140… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Ad26.Mos.HIV, Ad26.Mos4.HIV and Clade C gp140
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
201 participants
Where
10 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
8 Jul 2016to 25 Apr 2022
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Are negative for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection at screening
  • Is healthy on the basis of physical examination, medical history, electrocardiogram (ECG), and vital signs measurement performed at screening
  • Are willing/able to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions specified in the protocol and study procedures
  • Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test (beta human chorionic gonadotropin [beta hCG]) at the Screening visit, and a negative urine pregnancy test pre-dose on Day 1
  • Are assessed by the clinic staff as being at low risk for HIV infection

Who cannot join

  • Has chronic hepatitis B (measured by hepatitis B surface antigen test) or active hepatitis C (measured by hepatitis C virus [HCV] Ab test; if positive, HCV ribonucleic acid [RNA] PCR test will be used to confirm active versus past HCV infection), active syphilis infection, chlamydia, gonorrhea, or trichomonas . Active syphilis documented by serology unless positive serology is due to past treated infection
  • Has had a thyroidectomy or active thyroid disease requiring medication during the last 12 months (not excluded: a stable thyroid supplementation)
  • Has had major psychiatric illness and/or substance abuse problems during the past 12 months (including hospitalization or periods of work disability) that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude participation
  • Has been in receipt of any licensed vaccine within 14 days prior to the first dose of study vaccine/placebo, plans to receive within 14 days after the first study vaccination, or plans to receive within 14 days before or after the second, third or fourth vaccination
  • Is a recipient of a prophylactic or therapeutic HIV vaccine candidate at any time, or a recipient of other experimental vaccine(s) within the last 12 months prior to the Day 1 visit (Vaccination 1). For participants who received an experimental vaccine (except HIV vaccine) more than 12 months prior to the Day 1 visit (Vaccination 1), documentation of the identity of the experimental vaccine must be provided to the sponsor, who will determine eligibility on a case-by-case basis

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 2 countries.

10 sites in 2 countries

United States9 sites
  • Study site

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Study site

    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Study site

    Decatur, Georgia

  • Study site

    New York, New York

  • Study site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Rochester, New York

  • Study site

    San Francisco, California

  • Study site

    Seattle, Washington

  • Study site

    Silver Spring, Maryland

Other trials in United States

Rwanda1 site
  • Study site

    Kigali

Other trials in Rwanda

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Phase 1/2a Study in Healthy HIV Uninfected Adults to Assess the Safety/Tolerability and Immunogenicity of 2 Different Prime/Boost Regimens; Priming With Trivalent Ad26.Mos.HIV and Boosting With Trivalent Ad26.Mos.HIV And Clade C Gp140 Plus Adjuvant or Priming With Tetravalent Ad26.Mos4.HIV and Boosting With Tetravalent Ad26.Mos4.HIV and Clade C Gp140 Plus Adjuvant

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety/tolerability of the 2 different vaccine regimens of priming with trivalent Ad26.Mos.HIV and boosting with trivalent Ad26.Mos.HIV and Clade C gp140 plus adjuvant or priming with tetravalent Ad26.Mos4.HIV and boosting with Ad26.Mos4.HIV and Clade C glycoprotein (gp)140 plus adjuvant. Immune responses of the different vaccine schedules will be assessed.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Ad26.Mos.HIV, Ad26.Mos4.HIV, Clade C gp140, Placebo

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ad26.Mos.HIVBiological

    Recombinant replication-deficient Ad26 vectored vaccine and consists of 3 Ad26 vectors, one containing a mosaic insert of envelope (Env) sequence, and 2 vectors containing mosaic inserts of Gag and Pol sequences (Ad26.Mos.1.Env + Ad26.Mos1.Gag-Pol + Ad26.Mos2.Gag-Pol). Total dose is 5*10^10 viral particle per 0.5 milliliter (mL) injection administered intramuscularly.

  • Ad26.Mos4.HIVBiological

    Recombinant replication-deficient Ad26 vectored vaccine and consists of 4 Ad26 vectors, 2 containing a mosaic insert of envelope (Env) sequence, and 2 vectors containing mosaic inserts of Gag and Pol sequences (Ad26.Mos.1.Env + Ad26.Mos.2S.Env + Ad26.Mos1.Gag-Pol + Ad26.Mos2.Gag-Pol). Total dose is 5*10^10 viral particle per 0.5mL injection administered intramuscularly.

  • Clade C gp140Biological

    Clade C gp140 vaccine containing 250 mcg of total protein, mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant, per 0.5 mL injection administered intramuscularly.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Normal saline 0.9 percent (%), 0.5 mL injection administered intramuscularly.

Study groups in NCT02788045
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1A: Ad26.Mos.HIVExperimentalParticipants will receive Ad26.Mos.HIV vaccine at Week 0 and 12, followed by Ad26.Mos.HIV vaccine + Clade C glycoprotein 140 vaccine containing 250 micrograms (mcg) of total protein mixed with adjuvant (aluminum phosphate) at Week 24 and 48.
Receives: Biological: Ad26.Mos.HIV; Biological: Clade C gp140
Group 1B: PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive placebo at Weeks 0, 12, 24 and 48.
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Group 2A: Ad26.Mos4.HIVExperimentalParticipants will receive Ad26.Mos4.HIV vaccine at Week 0 and 12; followed by Ad26.Mos4.HIV vaccine + Clade C glycoprotein 140 vaccine containing 250 micrograms (mcg) of total protein mixed with adjuvant (aluminum phosphate) at Week 24 and 48. Participants will be included in an optional Long-term Extension (LTE) phase (3 years or 4 years Follow-up after Week 72, every 6 months visit) to assess immunogenicity and safety (serious adverse events [SAEs]).
Receives: Biological: Ad26.Mos4.HIV; Biological: Clade C gp140
Group 2B: PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive placebo at Weeks 0, 12, 24 and 48.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local Adverse Events (AEs) Post First Vaccination

    Solicited local AEs were predefined local events (at the injection site: erythema, induration, swelling, itching and warmth) that were by definition considered as related to the study vaccine and collected within 7 days after vaccination.

    Measured: 7 days after first vaccination on Day 1 (Day 8)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local AEs Post Second Vaccination

    Solicited local AEs were predefined local events (at the injection site: erythema, induration, swelling, itching and warmth) that were by definition considered as related to the study vaccine and collected within 7 days after vaccination.

    Measured: 7 days after second vaccination on Day 85 (Day 92)

  3. Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local AEs Post Third Vaccination

    Solicited local AEs were predefined local events (at the injection site: erythema, induration, swelling, itching and warmth) that were by definition considered as related to the study vaccine and collected within 7 days after vaccination.

    Measured: 7 days after third vaccination on Day 169 (Day 176)

  4. Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local AEs Post Fourth Vaccination

    Solicited local AEs were predefined local events (at the injection site: erythema, induration, swelling, itching and warmth) that were by definition considered as related to the study vaccine and collected within 7 days after vaccination.

    Measured: 7 days after fourth vaccination on Day 337 (Day 344)

  5. Percentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic AEs Post First Vaccination

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical event that occurred in a participant administered an investigational product, and it did not necessarily indicated only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. Solicited systemic AEs including pyrexia/fever, headache, fatigue, myalgia, nausea and chills were collected within 7 days after vaccination.

    Measured: 7 days after first vaccination on Day 1 (Day 8)

  6. Percentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic AEs Post Second Vaccination

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical event that occurred in a participant administered an investigational product, and it did not necessarily indicated only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. Solicited systemic AEs including pyrexia/fever, headache, fatigue, myalgia, nausea and chills were collected within 7 days after vaccination.

    Measured: 7 days after second vaccination on Day 85 (Day 92)

  7. Percentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic AEs Post Third Vaccination

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical event that occurred in a participant administered an investigational product, and it did not necessarily indicated only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. Solicited systemic AEs including pyrexia/fever, headache, fatigue, myalgia, nausea and chills were collected within 7 days after vaccination.

    Measured: 7 days after third vaccination on Day 169 (Day 176)

  8. Percentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic AEs Post Fourth Vaccination

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical event that occurred in a participant administered an investigational product, and it did not necessarily indicated only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. Solicited systemic AEs including pyrexia/fever, headache, fatigue, myalgia, nausea and chills were collected within 7 days after vaccination.

    Measured: 7 days after fourth vaccination on Day 337 (Day 344)

  9. Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs for 28 Days After First Vaccination

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical event that occurred in a participant administered an investigational product, and it did not necessarily indicated only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. Unsolicited AEs were defined as the AEs other than those categorized as "solicited AEs" and were required to be collected for any events that occurred from the time of vaccination and through the subsequent 28 days.

    Measured: 28 days after first vaccination on Day 1 (Day 29)

  10. Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs for 28 Days After Second Vaccination

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical event that occurred in a participant administered an investigational product, and it did not necessarily indicated only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. Unsolicited AEs were defined as the AEs other than those categorized as "solicited AEs" and were required to be collected for any events that occurred from the time of vaccination and through the subsequent 28 days.

    Measured: 28 days after second vaccination on Day 85 (Day 113)

  11. Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs for 28 Days After Third Vaccination

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical event that occurred in a participant administered an investigational product, and it did not necessarily indicated only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. Unsolicited AEs were defined as the AEs other than those categorized as "solicited AEs" and were required to be collected for any events that occurred from the time of vaccination and through the subsequent 28 days.

    Measured: 28 days after third vaccination on Day 169 (Day 197)

  12. Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs for 28 Days After Fourth Vaccination

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical event that occurred in a participant administered an investigational product, and it did not necessarily indicated only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. Unsolicited AEs were defined as the AEs other than those categorized as "solicited AEs" and were required to be collected for any events that occurred from the time of vaccination and through the subsequent 28 days.

    Measured: 28 days after fourth vaccination on Day 334 (Day 362)

  13. Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations From Vaccination Due to AEs

    Percentage of participants with discontinuations from vaccination due to AEs were reported.

    Measured: Up to Week 72

  14. Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During Main Study

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical event that occurred in a participant administered an investigational product, and it did not necessarily indicated only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. SAE was defined as any AE that resulted in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, was life-threatening experience, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect and would jeopardize participant and/or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.

    Measured: Up to Week 72

  15. Percentage of Participants With SAEs During Long Term Extension (LTE) Period

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical event that occurred in a participant administered an investigational product, and it did not necessarily indicated only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. SAE was defined as any AE that resulted in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, was life-threatening experience, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect and would jeopardize participant and/or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arm only.

    Measured: From Week 96 to Week 264

  16. Percentage of Participants With AEs of Special Interest During Main Study

    Percentage of participants with AEs of special interest during main study were reported. HIV infection was considered as an AE of special interest.

    Measured: Up to Week 72

  17. Percentage of Participants With AEs of Special Interest During LTE Period

    Percentage of participants with AEs of special interest during LTE period were reported. HIV infection was considered as an AE of special interest. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arm only.

    Measured: From Week 96 to Week 264

  18. Percentage of Responders for Envelop (Env) Clade A (92UG037.1), B (1990a), and C (Con C), (C97ZA.012) Specific Binding Antibody Titers at Week 28

    Percentage of responders for envelop (Env) Clade A (92UG037.1), B (1990a), and C (Con C), (C97ZA.012) specific binding antibody titers at Week 28 were reported. Env Clade A (92UG037.1), B (1990a), and C (Con C), (C97ZA.012)-specific binding antibody titers were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The response was defined as post-baseline value greater than (>) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) if baseline value less than (<) LLOQ or missing or defined as post-baseline value >3-fold increase from baseline if baseline value greater than or equal to (>=) LLOQ.

    Measured: Week 28

  19. Percentage of Responders for Envelop (Env) Clade A (92UG037.1), B (1990a), and C (Con C), (C97ZA.012) Specific Binding Antibody Titers at Week 52

    Percentage of responders for envelop (Env) Clade A (92UG037.1), B (1990a), and C (Con C), (C97ZA.012) specific binding antibody titers at Week 52 were reported. Env Clade A (92UG037.1), B (1990a), and C (Con C), (C97ZA.012)-specific binding antibody titers were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The response was defined as post-baseline value greater than (>) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) if baseline value less than (<) LLOQ or missing or defined as post-baseline value >3-fold increase from baseline if baseline value greater than or equal to (>=) LLOQ.

    Measured: Week 52

  20. Percentage of Responders for Envelop (Env) Clade A (92UG037.1), B (1990a), and C (Con C), (C97ZA.012) Specific Binding Antibody Titers at Week 72

    Percentage of responders for envelop (Env) Clade A (92UG037.1), B (1990a), and C (Con C), (C97ZA.012) specific binding antibody titers at Week 72 were reported. Env Clade A (92UG037.1), B (1990a), and C (Con C), (C97ZA.012)-specific binding antibody titers were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The response was defined as post-baseline value greater than (>) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) if baseline value less than (<) LLOQ or missing or defined as post-baseline value >3-fold increase from baseline if baseline value greater than or equal to (>=) LLOQ.

    Measured: Week 72

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Percentage of Responders for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Neutralizing Antibody (HIV nAb)

    The functionality of vaccine-induced antibody responses was investigated by the determination of nAb activity in a virus neutralization assay (VNA) using TZM-bl cells and Env-pseudotyped viruses. The response was defined as post-baseline value >LLOQ. The LLOQ for this assay was an inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 20 (fold-dilution). The data was collected for the responses against Tier 1 HIV strain Clade C (MW965.26 and C97ZA.012).

    Measured: Weeks 28, 52 and 72

  2. Percentage of Responders for Env Antibody-dependent Cellular Phagocytosis (ADCP) gp Antibody

    The functionality of vaccine-induced antibody responses was investigated by the determination of ADCP. The response was defined as post-baseline value > limit of detection (LOD) if baseline value <LOD or missing or defined as post-baseline value >3-fold increase from baseline if baseline value >=LOD. The lower limits of detection (LODs) for this assay were 5.16, 6.43, 6.49, 4.32 and 4.28 (phagocytic score) for Clade A (92UG037.1), Clade B (1990a), Clade C (Con C), Clade C (C97ZA.012), and Mos1, respectively.

    Measured: Weeks 28, 52 and 72

  3. Percentage of Responders With Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) T Cell Responses Assessed Using Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay (ELISpot)

    Frozen peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMCs) were analyzed by interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) (ELISpot). The response was defined as post-baseline value >P95 if baseline <P95 or missing or defined as post-baseline value >3-fold increase from baseline if baseline >=P95.

    Measured: Weeks 26, 52 and 72

  4. Percentage of Responders for Immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) and IgG3 Gylcoprotein (gp) 140 Binding Antibody Assessed Using Clade C (C97ZA.012) Env Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

    Vaccine-induced binding antibody IgG1 and IgG3 subclass responses were investigated using Clade C (C97ZA.012) specific ELISAs. The response was defined as post-baseline value >LLOQ if baseline <LLOQ or missing or defined as post-baseline value >3-fold increase from baseline if baseline >=LLOQ. The LLOQs for this assay were 12.3 and 12.4 for IgG1 and IgG3, respectively.

    Measured: Weeks 28, 52 and 72

  5. Percentage of Responders for CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cell Responses

    Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) was performed to examine the type of T-cell responding to vaccination. Responder definition was based on the Fisher's exact text between cytokine producing cells and non-producing cells in stimulated versus non-stimulated conditions.

    Measured: Weeks 28, 52 and 72

  6. Percentage of Participants With T-cell Development

    As per change in planned analysis, this outcome measure was not performed since it was no longer considered relevant to interpret the immunogenicity of the vaccines.

    Measured: Up to Week 264

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start8 Jul 2016
  3. Primary completion25 Apr 2022
  4. Study completion25 Apr 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
201 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02788045
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR108152
Other IDs
VAC89220HPX2004
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
27 May 2016
Last updated
25 May 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Baden LR, Stieh DJ, Sarnecki M, Walsh SR, Tomaras GD, Kublin JG, McElrath MJ, Alter G, Ferrari G, Montefiori D, Mann P, Nijs S, Callewaert K, Goepfert P, Edupuganti S, Karita E, Langedijk JP, Wegmann F, Corey L, Pau MG, Barouch DH, Schuitemaker H, Tomaka F; Traverse/HVTN 117/HPX2004 Study Team. Safety and immunogenicity of two heterologous HIV vaccine regimens in healthy, HIV-uninfected adults (TRAVERSE): a randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 1/2a study. Lancet HIV. 2020 Oct;7(10):e688-e698. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30229-0.

    PubMed 33010242

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Ad26.Mos.HIV, Ad26.Mos4.HIV and Clade C gp140 in people with Healthy, run by Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V. at 10 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in United States, Rwanda. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Jun 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local Adverse Events (AEs) Post First Vaccination (time frame: 7 days after first vaccination on Day 1 (Day 8)). The study lists 20 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02788045, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in