AzTrials
AzTrials

NSAID-induced GastropathyPhase 4BiGARDNCT02788123

A Study To Assess The Efficacy And Safety Of Bismuth Tripotassium Dicitrate (De-Nol) In Combination With Pantoprazole And Pantoprazole Monotherapy In Treatment Of Subjects With Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAID)-Induced Gastropathy

A Phase 4 study testing bismuth tripotassium dicitrate and pantoprazole in people with NSAID-induced Gastropathy, run by Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. at 5 sites in Russia.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical efficacy of bismuth tripotassium dicitrate (De-Nol) in combination with pantoprazole versus pantoprazole monotherapy in subjects with NSAID-induced gastropathy in 14±2 days of treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
NSAID-induced Gastropathy
What is being tested?
bismuth tripotassium dicitrate and pantoprazole
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
9 participants
Where
5 sitesRussia
Study dates
3 Mar 2017to 13 Jun 2017
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Verified diagnosis of NSAID-induced gastropathy:
  • Presence of gastric ulcer(s) and/or erosions (modified Lanza score greater than or equal to 5) based on EGDS findings at screening and;
  • NSAIDs administration within 7 days before screening.
  • Negative pregnancy test at screening and at Visit 1 (for females only using test strip to detect chorionic gonadotropin in urine),
  • Subjects' consent to use a reliable contraception method starting from screening throughout the whole study and for 1 week after its termination.

Who cannot join

  • Severe complications of NSAID-gastropathy (bleedings, perforations, etc.)
  • The subjects requiring concomitant therapy using the drugs specified in "Forbidden concomitant therapy".
  • Ulcerative esophagitis grade C and higher according to Los-Angeles classification.
  • Expressed hepatic and renal impairment.
  • Any esophageal and gastric surgery that can make subject ineligible for study participation.
  • Abuse of psychoactive substances including alcohol which may interfere with the subject's participation and fulfillment of all the protocol requirements.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Participation in other clinical studies within 30 days prior to Screening Visit.
  • Administration of bismuth products less than 2 months prior to screening.
  • Administration of PPIs or histamine Н2-receptor antagonists less than 2 weeks prior to screening.
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the components of the study drugs or contraindications to them.
  • Pregnancy and lactation.
  • Inability to perform follow-up EGDS after 2 and/or 4 weeks of the study.
  • Any condition or concomitant disease and laboratory parameter abnormalities which renders the subject ineligible for the study.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

Russia5 sites
  • Site RU70001

    Moscow

  • Site RU70008

    Saint Petersburg

  • Site RU70012

    Saint Petersburg

  • Site RU70006

    Volgograd

  • Site RU70013

    Volgograd

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: Phase IV, Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized Study in Parallel Groups To Assess The Efficacy And Safety Of Bismuth Tripotassium Dicitrate (De-Nol®) In Combination With Pantoprazole And Pantoprazole Monotherapy In Treatment Of Patients With NSAID Induced Gastropathy

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical efficacy of bismuth tripotassium dicitrate (De-Nol) in combination with pantoprazole versus pantoprazole monotherapy in subjects with NSAID-induced gastropathy in 14±2 days of treatment.

Read the detailed description

This study has a screening period (up to 3±2 days duration). Randomization will be held in each stratum (H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative) on the Visit 1. Treatment period will consist of 2 visits: Visit 2 (up to 14±2 days after Visit 1) in subjects with completely healed ulcer(s) and erosions after control esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDS) and Visit 3 (up to 28±2 days after Visit 1) in subjects with not healed ulcers and erosions after control EGDS on Visit 2. The period of follow-up safety assessments will last 1 week after the end of the study treatment

Being tested
bismuth tripotassium dicitrate, pantoprazole
Keywords
De-Nol, NSAID-induced gastropathy, Pantoprazole, Bismuth tripotassium dicitrate, Russia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • bismuth tripotassium dicitrateDrug

    Also called De-Nol

    oral

  • pantoprazoleDrug

    Also called Controloc

    oral

Study groups in NCT02788123
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
bismuth tripotassium dicitrate and pantoprazoleExperimentalParticipants will receive bismuth tripotassium dicitrate (twice daily) and pantoprazole (once daily) as single tablets
Receives: Drug: bismuth tripotassium dicitrate; Drug: pantoprazole
pantoprazoleActive comparatorParticipants will receive pantoprazole (once daily) as single tablet
Receives: Drug: pantoprazole

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of subjects in each group reaching complete healing of NSAID-induced gastropathy at week 2 of therapy

    Modified Lanza score 0-2 (inclusively) shall be considered as healing. The modified Lanza scale is utilized to grade the degree of gastritis

    Measured: Week 2

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Proportion of subjects reaching complete healing of NSAID-induced gastropathy in H.pylori-negative subjects in each treatment group at week 2

    Modified Lanza scale 0-2 scores (inclusively) shall be considered as complete healing

    Measured: Week 2

  2. Proportion of subjects reaching complete healing of NSAID-induced gastropathy in H.pylori-positive subjects in each treatment group at week 2

    Modified Lanza scale 0-2 scores (inclusively) shall be considered as complete healing

    Measured: Week 2

  3. Proportion of subjects reaching complete healing of NSAID-induced gastropathy in H.pylori-negative subjects in each treatment group at week 4

    Subjects reached complete healing of NSAID-induced gastric ulcers and erosions by Visit 2 shall also be analyzed

    Measured: Week 4

  4. Proportion of subjects reaching complete healing of NSAID-induced gastropathy in H.pylori-positive subjects in each treatment group at week 4

    Subjects reached complete healing of NSAID-induced gastric ulcers and erosions by Visit 2 shall also be analyzed

    Measured: Week 4

  5. Proportion of subjects reaching complete healing of NSAID-induced gastropathy in subjects with NSAID-induced gastropathy with modified Lanza scale greater than or equal to 5 and <7 at screening in each treatment group at week 2

    The modified Lanza scale is utilized to grade the degree of gastritis. Modified Lanza scale 0-2 scores (inclusively) shall be considered as complete healing

    Measured: Week 2

  6. Proportion of subjects reaching complete healing of NSAID-induced gastropathy in subjects with NSAID-induced gastropathy with modified Lanza scale =7 at screening in each treatment group at week 2

    The modified Lanza scale is utilized to grade the degree of gastritis. Modified Lanza scale 0-2 scores (inclusively) shall be considered as complete healing

    Measured: Week 2

  7. Proportion of subjects reaching complete healing of NSAID-induced gastropathy in subjects with NSAID-induced gastropathy with modified Lanza scale greater than or equal to 5 and <7 at screening in each treatment group at week 4

    The modified Lanza scale is utilized to grade the degree of gastritis. Modified Lanza scale 0-2 scores (inclusively) shall be considered as complete healing. Subjects reached complete healing of NSAID-induced gastric ulcers and erosions by Visit 2 shall also be analyzed

    Measured: Week 4

  8. Proportion of subjects reaching complete healing of NSAID-induced gastropathy in subjects with NSAID-induced gastropathy with modified Lanza scale =7 at screening in each treatment group at week 4

    The modified Lanza scale is utilized to grade the degree of gastritis. Modified Lanza scale 0-2 scores (inclusively) shall be considered as complete healing. Subjects reached complete healing of NSAID-induced gastric ulcers and erosions by Visit 2 shall also be analyzed

    Measured: Week 4

  9. Proportion of subjects reaching complete healing of NSAID-induced gastropathy in each treatment group at week 4

    Subjects reached complete healing of NSAID-induced gastric ulcers and erosions by Visit 2 shall also be analyzed

    Measured: Week 4

  10. Changes in modified Lanza as compared to visit 1 (baseline) in H.pylori-negative subjects in each treatment group

    The modified Lanza scale is utilized to grade the degree of gastritis

    Measured: Baseline, week 2 and week 4

  11. Changes in modified Lanza as compared to visit 1 (baseline) in H.pylori-positive subjects in each treatment group

    The modified Lanza scale is utilized to grade the degree of gastritis

    Measured: Baseline, week 2 and week 4

  12. Changes in modified Lanza as compared to Visit 1 (baseline) in subjects with NSAID-induced gastropathy with modified Lanza scale greater than or equal to 5 and <7 at screening in each treatment group

    The modified Lanza scale is utilized to grade the degree of gastritis

    Measured: Baseline, week 2 and week 4

  13. Changes in modified Lanza as compared to Visit 1 (baseline) in subjects with NSAID-induced gastropathy with modified Lanza scale =7 at screening in each treatment group

    The modified Lanza scale is utilized to grade the degree of gastritis

    Measured: Baseline, week 2 and week 4

  14. Changes in modified Lanza as compared to visit 1 (baseline) in each treatment group

    The modified Lanza scale is utilized to grade the degree of gastritis

    Measured: Baseline, week 2 and week 4

  15. Changes in GSRS as compared to visit 1 (baseline) in H.pylori-negative subjects in each treatment group

    Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). The GSRS contains a list of questions on subject's well-being within the period from subject's last visit to study site

    Measured: Baseline, week 2 and week 4

  16. Changes in GSRS as compared to visit 1 (baseline) in H.pylori-positive subjects in each treatment group

    Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). The GSRS contains a list of questions on subject's well-being within the period from subject's last visit to study site

    Measured: Baseline, week 2 and week 4

  17. Changes in GSRS as compared to Visit 1 (baseline) in subjects with NSAID-induced gastropathy with modified Lanza scale greater than or equal to 5 and <7 at screening in each treatment group

    The GSRS contains a list of questions on subject's well-being within the period from subject's last visit to study site. The modified Lanza scale is utilized to grade the degree of gastritis

    Measured: Baseline, week 2 and week 4

  18. Changes in GSRS as compared to Visit 1 (baseline) in subjects with NSAID-induced gastropathy with modified Lanza scale =7 at screening in each treatment group

    The GSRS contains a list of questions on subject's well-being within the period from subject's last visit to study site. The modified Lanza scale is utilized to grade the degree of gastritis

    Measured: Baseline, week 2 and week 4

  19. Changes in GSRS as compared to visit 1 (baseline) in each treatment group

    The GSRS contains a list of questions on subject's well-being within the period from subject's last visit to study site

    Measured: Baseline, week 2 and week 4

  20. Safety assessed by nature, frequency and severity of Adverse Events (AEs)

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a study drug or has undergone study procedures and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment

    Measured: Up to day 35

  21. Safety assessed by nature, frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Adverse event (AE) is considered "serious" if the investigator or sponsor view any of the following outcomes: Death, life-threatening, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly or birth defect, hospitalization, or medically important events

    Measured: Up to day 35

  22. Number of participants with Physical Exam abnormalities and/or adverse events related to treatment

    Number of participants with potentially clinically significant physical exam values

    Measured: Up to day 35

  23. Number of participants with vital signs abnormalities and/or adverse events related to treatment

    Number of participants with potentially clinically significant vital sign values

    Measured: Up to day 35

  24. Safety assessed through esophagogastroduodenoscopy

    Amount of gastric content and its nature (mucus, bile, blood), gastric mucosa condition (edema, hyperemia, erosions, mucosal hemorrages, atrophy, hypertrophy) shall be evaluated during esophagogastroduodenoscopy

    Measured: Up to day 35

  25. Number of participants with laboratory value abnormalities and/or adverse events related to treatment

    Number of participants with potentially clinically significant laboratory values

    Measured: Up to day 35

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start3 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completion29 May 2017
  4. Study completion13 Jun 2017

Why it stopped: Internal reassessment of the medicinal product development strategy by Sponsor

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
9 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02788123
Sponsor's protocol ID
3593-MA-3026-RU
Acronym
BiGARD
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
27 May 2016
Last updated
21 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing bismuth tripotassium dicitrate and pantoprazole in people with NSAID-induced Gastropathy, run by Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. at 5 sites in Russia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Internal reassessment of the medicinal product development strategy by Sponsor). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of subjects in each group reaching complete healing of NSAID-induced gastropathy at week 2 of therapy (time frame: Week 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in