Dental Pulp ExposureNCT02789423
Clinical & Radiographical Evaluation of the Effect of Dycal & Biodentine in DPC in Primary Teeth
A study testing Direct Pulp Capping using Dycal and Biodentine in people with Dental Pulp Exposure, run by Modern Dental College and Research Centre, Indore.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was clinical and radiographical evaluation of the effect of calcium hydroxide cement (Dycal) and calcium silicate cement (Biodentine) in direct pulp capping in primary teeth. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 9 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Pulp Exposure
- What is being tested?
- Direct Pulp Capping using Dycal and Biodentine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2013to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 9 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Good health.
- Cooperative behaviour.
- Informed consent from parents.
- Primary molars with clinically active caries.
- No history of spontaneous pain in teeth.
- Restorable tooth with at least one half of root length present.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Absence of pathological mobility.
- Absence of tenderness to percussion.
- Normal gingiva and periodontal condition without the sign of pathology such as redness and swelling of vestibule, draining sinus tract or sensitivity to palpate in the vestibule.
- In addition, the teeth treated by direct pulp capping had only a pin point mechanical exposure (0.5 to 1mm), for which haemorrhage control could be achieved within two minutes before proceeding with direct pulp capping.
- Radiographically, there was absence of internal resorption, external resorption, periapical or furcation radiolucencies and pathology of succedenous permanent tooth follicle.
Who cannot join
- Patients with a history of spontaneous pain, tooth tender to percussion, absence of underlying permanent teeth, internal/external root resorption, apical/furcal lesions, sinus tract, physiologic or pathologic luxation, and/or presence of abscess were excluded from the study.
About this study
Official title: Clinical and Radiographical Evaluation of the Effect of Calcium Hydroxide Cement (Dycal) and Calcium Silicate Cement (Biodentine) in Direct Pulp Capping in Primary Teeth: a Randomized Clinical Trial
The purpose of this study was clinical and radiographical evaluation of the effect of calcium hydroxide cement (Dycal) and calcium silicate cement (Biodentine) in direct pulp capping in primary teeth.
Read the detailed description
The aim of the present study is to compare Calcium Hydroxide cement (Dycal) ® and Calcium Silicate cement (Biodentine)TM as pulp capping agents in primary molars. The objective of this study include the evaluation of clinical and radiographic efficacy of Calcium Hydroxide cement (Dycal) ® and Calcium Silicate cement (Biodentine)TM, and their response in direct pulp capping treatment on primary molars during a 6 months follow up. After following the proper standardized procedure for direct pulp cap. In the current study direct pulp capping was performed using calcium hydroxide cement (Dycal)® and Calcium Silicate cement (Biodentine)TM on 60 primary teeth of children equally divided between 2 study groups randomly of both the sexes aged 4-9 years old. Complete case history was recorded in detail and intraoral periapical radiograph was also taken for teeth indicated for direct pulp capping. Written consent was obtained from the parents of participants before starting the procedure. Strict standardized procedure had been followed and the pulp capping agent (Dycal®/BiodentineTM) were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions.Each patient was evaluated clinically and radiographically for any abnormal clinical signs and symptoms at 1,3 and 6 months postoperatively.Better results for the success of the study could be relatively enhanced by close attention to rigid criteria for case selection, standardization of direct pulp capping procedure and meticulous performance of the procedure appear to be prerequisites for successful treatment.
- Conditions
- Dental Pulp Exposure
- Being tested
- Direct Pulp Capping using Dycal and Biodentine
- Medical subject headings
- Dental Pulp Exposure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Direct Pulp Capping using Dycal and BiodentineProcedure or surgery
Also called DPC
The operative procedure performed as follows: i)Administration of L.A and rubber dam isolation. ii)High-speed carious enamel removal. iii)Dentine mechanical curettage. iv)Manual final dentine curettage using a spoon excavator. v)Hemorrhage control by cotton pellet moistened with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite placed over the exposure for 1-2min. vi)The exposure site would then be dried with sterile cotton pellet.The operator shall apply the pulp capping agent(dycal/Biodentine)according to the manufacturer's instructions.And then another cover of glass ionomer is applied.This would be followed by permanent restoration.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dycal | Active comparator | Intervention: drug: Dycal, Other names: Calcium Hydroxide. Intervention Description:DPC using Dycal for direct pulp exposure was performed in 30 primary molar teeth after proper case selection.Clinical and radiographic evaluation was done.One month post operative criteria evaluated were-Clinical criteria:Spontaneous pain,Defective restoration/Recurrent caries,Sinus formation,TOP,Soft tissue swelling \& Mobility. Radiographic criteria:Defective restoration/Recurrent caries,Periapical or furcal radiolucency,Pathological internal resorption,Replacement resorption,Intracanal calcification \& Physiological resorption.The follow-up was at 3 and 6 months. Receives: Procedure: Direct Pulp Capping using Dycal and Biodentine |
| Biodentine | Active comparator | Intervention: drug: Biodentine, Other names: Calcium Silicate. Intervention Description:DPC using Biodentine for direct pulp exposure was performed in 30 primary molar teeth after proper case selection.Clinical and radiographic evaluation was done.One month post operative criteria were-Clinical criteria:Spontaneous pain,Defective restoration/Recurrent caries,Sinus formation,TOP,Soft tissue swelling \& Mobility.Radiographic criteria:Defective restoration/Recurrent caries, Periapical or furcal radiolucency,Pathological internal resorption,Replacement resorption,Intracanal calcification \& Physiological resorption.The follow-up was at 3 and 6 months. Receives: Procedure: Direct Pulp Capping using Dycal and Biodentine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evidence of effectiveness of Dycal and Biodentine as Direct Pulp Capping agent in primary molars confirmed by clinical and radiographical evaluation.
Clinical Criteria: No spontaneous pain,Defective restoration/Recurrent caries,Sinus formation,TOP,Soft tissue swelling \& Mobility. Radiographic criteria: No Defective restoration/Recurrent caries,Periapical or furcal radiolucency,Pathological internal resorption,Replacement resorption,Intracanal calcification \& Physiological resorption.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2013
- Primary completionJul 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dental Pulp ExposureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Modern Dental College and Research Centre, Indore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Komal Gandhi, Modern Dental College and Research Centre, Indore
- Investigators
- Dr. Komal IM Gandhi, BDS, Principal investigator, DAVVDr. Mishthu Solanki, MDS, Study chair, DAVV
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02789423
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ModernDCRC
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 13 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 5 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Garrocho-Rangel A, Flores H, Silva-Herzog D, Hernandez-Sierra F, Mandeville P, Pozos-Guillen AJ. Efficacy of EMD versus calcium hydroxide in direct pulp capping of primary molars: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 May;107(5):733-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.017. Epub 2009 Feb 8.
PubMed 19201627Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, Mancl L; Northwest Practice-based Research Collaborative in Evidence-based Dentistry (NWP). Comparison of CaOH with MTA for direct pulp capping: a PBRN randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2013 Jul;92(7 Suppl):16S-22S. doi: 10.1177/0022034513484336. Epub 2013 May 20.
PubMed 23690353Fallahinejad Ghajari M, Asgharian Jeddi T, Iri S, Asgary S. Direct pulp-capping with calcium enriched mixture in primary molar teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Iran Endod J. 2010 Winter;5(1):27-30. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
PubMed 23130026Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Oskouei SG. Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping of human primary molars: two year follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 Summer;34(4):317-21. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.34.4.pntq604021604234.
PubMed 20831133Tuzuner T, Alacam A, Altunbas DA, Gokdogan FG, Gundogdu E. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of direct pulp capping therapy in primary molar teeth following haemostasis with various antiseptics: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Dec;13(4):289-92.
PubMed 23270285Shayegan A, Jurysta C, Atash R, Petein M, Abbeele AV. Biodentine used as a pulp-capping agent in primary pig teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2012 Nov-Dec;34(7):e202-8.
PubMed 23265156Asl Aminabadi N, Maljaei E, Erfanparast L, Ala Aghbali A, Hamishehkar H, Najafpour E. Simvastatin versus Calcium Hydroxide Direct Pulp Capping of Human Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013 Winter;7(1):8-14. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2013.002. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
PubMed 23487477
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical and Radiographical Evaluation of the Effect of Calcium Hydroxide Cement (Dycal) and Calcium Silicate Cement (Biodentine) in Direct Pulp Capping in Primary Teeth: a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02789423
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ModernDCRC
- Conditions
- Dental Pulp Exposure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Modern Dental College and Research Centre, IndoreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2013
- Primary completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was clinical and radiographical evaluation of the effect of calcium hydroxide cement (Dycal) and calcium silicate cement (Biodentine) in direct pulp capping in primary teeth.
Detailed description
The aim of the present study is to compare Calcium Hydroxide cement (Dycal) ® and Calcium Silicate cement (Biodentine)TM as pulp capping agents in primary molars. The objective of this study include the evaluation of clinical and radiographic efficacy of Calcium Hydroxide cement (Dycal) ® and Calcium Silicate cement (Biodentine)TM, and their response in direct pulp capping treatment on primary molars during a 6 months follow up. After following the proper standardized procedure for direct pulp cap. In the current study direct pulp capping was performed using calcium hydroxide cement (Dycal)® and Calcium Silicate cement (Biodentine)TM on 60 primary teeth of children equally divided between 2 study groups randomly of both the sexes aged 4-9 years old. Complete case history was recorded in detail and intraoral periapical radiograph was also taken for teeth indicated for direct pulp capping. Written consent was obtained from the parents of participants before starting the procedure. Strict standardized procedure had been followed and the pulp capping agent (Dycal®/BiodentineTM) were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions.Each patient was evaluated clinically and radiographically for any abnormal clinical signs and symptoms at 1,3 and 6 months postoperatively.Better results for the success of the study could be relatively enhanced by close attention to rigid criteria for case selection, standardization of direct pulp capping procedure and meticulous performance of the procedure appear to be prerequisites for successful treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dycal | Active comparator | Procedure: Direct Pulp Capping using Dycal and BiodentineIntervention: drug: Dycal, Other names: Calcium Hydroxide. Intervention Description:DPC using Dycal for direct pulp exposure was performed in 30 primary molar teeth after proper case selection.Clinical and radiographic evaluation was done.One month post operative criteria evaluated were-Clinical criteria:Spontaneous pain,Defective restoration/Recurrent caries,Sinus formation,TOP,Soft tissue swelling \& Mobility. Radiographic criteria:Defective restoration/Recurrent caries,Periapical or furcal radiolucency,Pathological internal resorption,Replacement resorption,Intracanal calcification \& Physiological resorption.The follow-up was at 3 and 6 months. |
| Biodentine | Active comparator | Procedure: Direct Pulp Capping using Dycal and BiodentineIntervention: drug: Biodentine, Other names: Calcium Silicate. Intervention Description:DPC using Biodentine for direct pulp exposure was performed in 30 primary molar teeth after proper case selection.Clinical and radiographic evaluation was done.One month post operative criteria were-Clinical criteria:Spontaneous pain,Defective restoration/Recurrent caries,Sinus formation,TOP,Soft tissue swelling \& Mobility.Radiographic criteria:Defective restoration/Recurrent caries, Periapical or furcal radiolucency,Pathological internal resorption,Replacement resorption,Intracanal calcification \& Physiological resorption.The follow-up was at 3 and 6 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 9 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Good health.
- Cooperative behaviour.
- Informed consent from parents.
- Primary molars with clinically active caries.
- No history of spontaneous pain in teeth.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with a history of spontaneous pain, tooth tender to percussion, absence of underlying permanent teeth, internal/external root resorption, apical/furcal lesions, sinus tract, physiologic or pathologic luxation, and/or presence of abscess were excluded from the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Direct Pulp Capping using Dycal and BiodentineAlso: DPCThe operative procedure performed as follows: i)Administration of L.A and rubber dam isolation. ii)High-speed carious enamel removal. iii)Dentine mechanical curettage. iv)Manual final dentine curettage using a spoon excavator. v)Hemorrhage control by cotton pellet moistened with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite placed over the exposure for 1-2min. vi)The exposure site would then be dried with sterile cotton pellet.The operator shall apply the pulp capping agent(dycal/Biodentine)according to the manufacturer's instructions.And then another cover of glass ionomer is applied.This would be followed by permanent restoration. | Procedure or surgery | Biodentine, Dycal |
Primary outcome
Evidence of effectiveness of Dycal and Biodentine as Direct Pulp Capping agent in primary molars confirmed by clinical and radiographical evaluation.
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical Criteria: No spontaneous pain,Defective restoration/Recurrent caries,Sinus formation,TOP,Soft tissue swelling \& Mobility. Radiographic criteria: No Defective restoration/Recurrent caries,Periapical or furcal radiolucency,Pathological internal resorption,Replacement resorption,Intracanal calcification \& Physiological resorption.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Mar 2019.
- Background: PubMed 19201627Garrocho-Rangel A, Flores H, Silva-Herzog D, Hernandez-Sierra F, Mandeville P, Pozos-Guillen AJ. Efficacy of EMD versus calcium hydroxide in direct pulp capping of primary molars: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 May;107(5):733-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.017. Epub 2009 Feb 8.
- Background: PubMed 23690353Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, Mancl L; Northwest Practice-based Research Collaborative in Evidence-based Dentistry (NWP). Comparison of CaOH with MTA for direct pulp capping: a PBRN randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2013 Jul;92(7 Suppl):16S-22S. doi: 10.1177/0022034513484336. Epub 2013 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 23130026Fallahinejad Ghajari M, Asgharian Jeddi T, Iri S, Asgary S. Direct pulp-capping with calcium enriched mixture in primary molar teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Iran Endod J. 2010 Winter;5(1):27-30. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
- Background: PubMed 20831133Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Oskouei SG. Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping of human primary molars: two year follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 Summer;34(4):317-21. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.34.4.pntq604021604234.
- Background: PubMed 23270285Tuzuner T, Alacam A, Altunbas DA, Gokdogan FG, Gundogdu E. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of direct pulp capping therapy in primary molar teeth following haemostasis with various antiseptics: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Dec;13(4):289-92.
- Background: PubMed 23265156Shayegan A, Jurysta C, Atash R, Petein M, Abbeele AV. Biodentine used as a pulp-capping agent in primary pig teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2012 Nov-Dec;34(7):e202-8.
- Background: PubMed 23487477Asl Aminabadi N, Maljaei E, Erfanparast L, Ala Aghbali A, Hamishehkar H, Najafpour E. Simvastatin versus Calcium Hydroxide Direct Pulp Capping of Human Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013 Winter;7(1):8-14. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2013.002. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dental Pulp Exposure
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Hemostatic Agents on TheraCal PT Pulpotomy Success in Primary Molars
Reversible Pulpitis, Dental Caries
Recruiting
Pomegranate Peel Extract for Primary Molar Pulpotomy
Pulpitis Reversible, Pulp Exposure, Dental
Active, not recruiting
Laser Assisted Pulpotomy Versus MTA Pulpotomy in Permanent Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis
Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
Active, not recruiting
Pulpotomy in Hypominerlized Permanent Molars.
Molar Hypomineralization
Active, not recruiting
Direct Pulp Capping Compared to Partial Pulpotomy in Carious Pulp Exposures
Deep Caries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dr. Komal IM Gandhi, BDS principal investigator
DAVV
Dr. Mishthu Solanki, MDS study chair
DAVV
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Direct Pulp Capping using Dycal and Biodentine in people with Dental Pulp Exposure, run by Modern Dental College and Research Centre, Indore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evidence of effectiveness of Dycal and Biodentine as Direct Pulp Capping agent in primary molars confirmed by clinical and radiographical evaluation. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02789423, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2019.