AzTrials
AzTrials

Mood DisordersThymogNCT02799524

Comparison of Mood Disorders Screening Scales in Geriatric Oncology

An observational study of Mood Disorders, run by University Hospital, Caen at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the scales commonly used in geriatrics and oncology distress thermometer ( analogue scale rated from 0 to 1 for the emotional distress ) , the GDS15 (15 issues closed binary response seeking signs of depression ) the HADS (14 questions assessing the intensity of anxiety signs… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 70 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Mood Disorders
What is being tested?
comparison of screening scales
How many people
93 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Dec 2015to Jul 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 70 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Study population: Men and women 70 years and older with newly diagnosed or relapsed cancer or haematological malignancies (not older than one month)

Who may be able to join

  • Patient 70 years and older with diagnosis of cancer or haematological malignancies ,
  • New diagnosis or relapse announced
  • Supported in the 2 c among : in consultation , or hospital geriatric or oncology / hematology specialty
  • Affiliated Health Insurance

Who cannot join

  • Cognitive problems preventing self

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Caen UH

    Caen, 14033

Other trials in France

About this study

The objective of this study is to evaluate the scales commonly used in geriatrics and oncology distress thermometer ( analogue scale rated from 0 to 1 for the emotional distress ) , the GDS15 (15 issues closed binary response seeking signs of depression ) the HADS (14 questions assessing the intensity of anxiety signs and signs of depression listed 0-3 ).

The prospective observational study will be conducted in parallel on two sites ( University Hospital Centre and François Baclesse ) after informed patient information.

It will be offered to patients 70 years and over with a new diagnosis or relapse of cancer or haematological malignancies in the hospital to meet the mood disorder screening questionnaires .

Read the detailed description

There are various tools validated and recommended by the SiO and SFPO for screening mood disorders in geriatric oncology . The choice among them depends on the usual practices of the various teams , only some scales assessing depressive signs and other signs of anxiety too. None were assessed in a population aged diagnosis of cancer or hematologic malignancy in pre- therapeutic situation.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the scales commonly used in geriatrics and oncology distress thermometer ( analogue scale rated from 0 to 1 for the emotional distress ) , the GDS15 (15 issues closed binary response seeking signs of depression ) the HADS (14 questions assessing the intensity of anxiety signs and signs of depression listed 0-3 ) The prospective observational study will be conducted in parallel on two sites ( University Hospital Centre and François Baclesse ) after informed patient information.

It will be offered to patients 70 years and over with a new diagnosis or relapse of cancer or haematological malignancies in the hospital to meet the mood disorder screening questionnaires .

If one test is abnormal , a clinical psychological care will be offered . When returning home : telephone contact will be made the same day with the doctor , asking him to please make thymic revaluation within 2 weeks ( informed patient). It will be sent to the doctor by post a rubric of Major Depressive Episode criteria of the DSM V to return . If the patient remains hospitalized , the doctor taking care of patient will be contacted to obtain the same information .

In addition, the investigators will study the impact on the management (change or introduction of an antidepressant and / or anxiolytic use of psychotherapy or psychological counseling ... ) to 5 weeks

Conditions
Mood Disorders
Being tested
comparison of screening scales
Medical subject headings
Mood Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • comparison of screening scalesOther

    Concordance degrees Assessment of each of 2 scales ( HADS and GDS ) from the DSM- V , for diagnostic confirmation of major depressive episodes in elderly patients with cancer or haematological malignancies

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Concordance degrees Assessment (HADS and GDS )

    Concordance degrees Assessment of each of 2 scales ( HADS and GDS ) from the DSM- V , for diagnostic confirmation of major depressive episodes in elderly patients with cancer or haematological malignancies

    Measured: 3 weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Correlation between the presence of signs of depression screening by HADS -D ( ≥11 / 21) and GDS ( > 5/15)

    Correlation between the presence of signs of depression screening by HADS -D ( ≥11 / 21) and GDS ( > 5/15) with the following factors: the type of cancer, concept of relapse, there is an oncologic therapeutic project or no , sex , social status, loss of autonomy, presence of pain , severe comorbidities ( CIRS - G≥3 ) , psychiatric history , psychotropic treatment ( anxiolytic , antidepressant) in place

    Measured: 3 weeks

  2. correlation between anxious signs of HADS -A ( ≥11 / 21) and the distress thermometer ( ≥4 / 10) and factors outcome 2

    correlation between anxious signs of HADS -A ( ≥11 / 21) and the distress thermometer ( ≥4 / 10) and the type of cancer, concept of relapse, oncologic therapeutic project or no, sex, social status, loss of autonomy, presence of pain, severe comorbidities, psychiatric history , psychotropic treatment in place

    Measured: 3 weeks

  3. Comparison of the distress thermometer score between screening and revaluation to 3 weeks

    Comparison of the distress thermometer score between screening and revaluation to 3 weeks

    Measured: 3 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2016
  4. Study completionJul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
93 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02799524
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015-A00836-43
Other IDs
15-087
Acronym
Thymog
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
1 Apr 2016
Last updated
21 Aug 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Mood Disorders, run by University Hospital, Caen at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Concordance degrees Assessment (HADS and GDS ) (time frame: 3 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in