AzTrials
AzTrials

Benign Pigmented LesionsPhase 4NCT02800525

Comparison of Picosecond and Q-switched Laser for Benign Pigmented Lesions Treatment

A Phase 4 study testing Picosecond laser and Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in people with Benign Pigmented Lesions, run by Mahidol University at 1 site in Thailand.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of picosecond 532 and 1,064 nanometers laser in the treatment of benign pigmented lesions compared with q-switched 532 and 1,064 nanometers laser. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Benign Pigmented Lesions
What is being tested?
Picosecond laser and Q-switched Nd:YAG laser
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteThailand
Study dates
Jun 2016to Sep 2018
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age >18
  • having any benign pigmented lesions on both sides of the face or any tattoo on any part of body which would like to be removed
  • Fitzpatrick skin phototype 3-5

Who cannot join

  • Previously treated with any laser within 3 months before enrollment into the study
  • Patients with lesions with any clinical suspicion of being pre-cancerous or skin malignancies of any kind
  • Patients who have photosensitive dermatoses
  • Pregnancy and lactation woman
  • Patients with wound infections (herpes, other) on the day of treatment
  • Patients with moderate and severe inflammatory acne, Immunosuppressed patients, history of vitiligo
  • Patients with unrealistic concerns/expectations and inability to do the appropriate post-operative care

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Woraphong Manuskiatti, Prof., M.D. contact

66-2419-9922

siwmn@mahidol.ac.th

Chanida Ungaksornpairote, M.D. contact

66-2-419-9922

Meisjoy@hotmail.com

Thailand1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Dermatology, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

    Bangkok, Bangkok, 10700

    Woraphong - Manuskiatti, Prof.,M.D, +66819150555, Doctorlaser@gmail.com

    Chanida - Ungaksornpairote, M.D., +66834315359, Meisjoy@hotmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: The Comparison of Picosecond 532 and 1,064 Nanometers Laser and Q-switched Nd:YAG 532 and 1,064 Nanometers Laser in the Treatment of Benign Pigmented Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of picosecond 532 and 1,064 nanometers laser in the treatment of benign pigmented lesions compared with q-switched 532 and 1,064 nanometers laser.

Read the detailed description

Benign pigmented lesions can be divided into epidermal lesions such as freckles, lentigines, solar lentigines or cafe au lait macules and dermal lesions such as Nevus of Ota or Hori's nevus.

Q-switched 532 and 1064 nm lasers were reported to be safe and effective in the treatment of these benign pigmented lesions. By using selective photothermolysis theory, both q-switched 532 and 1064 nm lasers target on melanin causes photomechanical destruction of the melanin. However, the occurrence of post inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) were reported especially in patients with darker skin type.

Recently, picosecond 532, 755, 1064 nm laser was reported to treat benign pigmented lesions effectively. With their ultra short pulse duration (picosecond domain), it is ideally believed to be pure photomechanical effects without thermal injury to surrounding tissue. As a result, the incident of PIH should be reduced.

The investigators then aimed to compared the efficacy and efficacy of different pulse duration between nanosecond and picosecond laser in the treatment of benign pigmented lesions.

Being tested
Picosecond laser, Q-switched Nd:YAG laser
Keywords
Benign pigmented lesions, Picosecond laser, Q-switched laser

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Picosecond laserDevice

    Picosecond 532 and 1064 nm laser Treatment of facial pigmented lesions. The energy using depends on the endpoint of immediate whitening of the lesions. The wavelength using depends on the depth of lesions.

  • Q-switched Nd:YAG laserDevice

    Q-switched Nd-YAG 532 and 1064 nm laser. Treatment of facial pigmented lesions. The energy using depends on the endpoint of immediate whitening of the lesions. The wavelength using depends on the depth of lesion.

Study groups in NCT02800525
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Picosecond laserExperimentalThe pigmented lesions on this half-side of the face would be treated with picosecond laser. For epidermal lesions, 1 laser treatment would be performed. For dermal lesions, 5 laser treatments would be performed every 3 month-interval. The wavelength of 532 or 1064 nm would be chosen for appropriate lesions
Receives: Device: Picosecond laser
Q-switched Nd:YAG laserActive comparatorThe pigmented lesions on this half-side of the face would be treated with q-switched Nd:YAG laser. For epidermal lesions, 1 laser treatment would be performed. For dermal lesions, 5 laser treatments would be performed every 3 month-interval. The wavelength of 532 or 1064 nm would be chosen for appropriate lesions
Receives: Device: Q-switched Nd:YAG laser

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Doctor evaluation of improvement using quartile scale

    Quartile scale 0-4

    Measured: For epidermal lesion: 1 and 3 months after 1 laser treatment. For dermal lesion: 1, 3 and 6 months after 5 laser treatments

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Side effect occurrence

    Measured: immediately after treatments, 2, 3, 4, and 12 weeks after the 1st laser treatment, and added more 1, 3 and 6 months after 5 laser treatments for dermal lesions

  2. Patients evaluation of improvement using quartile scale

    Measured: For epidermal lesion: 1 and 3 months after 1 laser treatment. For dermal lesion: 1, 3 and 6 months after 5 laser treatments

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2016
  3. Primary completionSep 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02800525
Sponsor's protocol ID
Si468/2016 (EC1)
Status last verified
Jun 2016
First submitted
7 Jun 2016
Last updated
20 Sep 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Friedman DJ. Successful Treatment of a Red and Black Professional Tattoo in Skin Type VI With a Picosecond Dual-Wavelength, Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet Laser. Dermatol Surg. 2016 Sep;42(9):1121-3. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000780. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27227473
  • Levin MK, Ng E, Bae YS, Brauer JA, Geronemus RG. Treatment of pigmentary disorders in patients with skin of color with a novel 755 nm picosecond, Q-switched ruby, and Q-switched Nd:YAG nanosecond lasers: A retrospective photographic review. Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Feb;48(2):181-7. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22454.

    PubMed 26922302
  • Chan JC, Shek SY, Kono T, Yeung CK, Chan HH. A retrospective analysis on the management of pigmented lesions using a picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser in Asians. Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):23-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22443. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

    PubMed 26696500
  • Bogdan Allemann I, Goldberg DJ. Benign pigmented lesions. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2011;42:81-96. doi: 10.1159/000328267. Epub 2011 Aug 16.

    PubMed 21865801
  • Bukvic Mokos Z, Lipozencic J, Ceovic R, Stulhofer Buzina D, Kostovic K. Laser therapy of pigmented lesions: pro and contra. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2010;18(3):185-9.

    PubMed 20887701

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Picosecond laser and Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in people with Benign Pigmented Lesions, run by Mahidol University at 1 site in Thailand.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Woraphong Manuskiatti, Prof., M.D. (66-2419-9922, siwmn@mahidol.ac.th), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Doctor evaluation of improvement using quartile scale (time frame: For epidermal lesion: 1 and 3 months after 1 laser treatment. For dermal lesion: 1, 3 and 6 months after 5 laser treatments). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02800525, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in