AzTrials
AzTrials

InfertilityNCT02802176

Comparing Intra-vaginal Culture of Embryos to In-vitro Culture of Embryos With Minimal Stimulation

A study testing INVOcell device and Traditional IVF in people with Infertility, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate implantation rate with intra-vaginal culture (IVC) with the INVOcell device versus traditional In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) while using minimal stimulation protocols Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 37 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Infertility
What is being tested?
INVOcell device and Traditional IVF
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
39 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2016to 25 Aug 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 37 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Normal uterine cavity
  • One or more years of infertility
  • Normal male partner semen analysis

Who cannot join

  • Age <18 years old or >37 years old
  • Antral Follicle Count (AFC) <8
  • Abnormal male partner semen analysis or use of donor sperm
  • Vaginal inflammation or genital (vaginal, uterine, tubal) infection
  • Uncontrolled chronic disease (such as uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension)
  • Uterine anatomic abnormalities
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Allergy to plastics or inability to use diaphragm retention device
  • Untreated hydrosalpinx
  • Current alcohol abuse (defined by >14 drinks/week)
  • Prior history of IVF cycle where fertilization did not occur
  • History of recurrent pregnancy loss

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California San Francisco - Center for Reproductive Health

    San Francisco, California, 94158

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intra-vaginal Culture of Embryos Using INVOcell Device to In-vitro Culture of Embryos Using Minimal Stimulation Protocols

The purpose of this study is to evaluate implantation rate with intra-vaginal culture (IVC) with the INVOcell device versus traditional In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) while using minimal stimulation protocols

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase IV, single center randomized controlled trial evaluating intra-vaginal culture (IVC) using INVOcell versus traditional In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) using oral stimulation or minimal gonadotropin stimulation protocols. The pilot aims to includes 40 women who will be randomized to either the intra-vaginal culture group (N=20) using INVOcell or to the traditional IVF group (N=20).

Primary aim is implantation rate, which is defined by number gestational sacs seen on early pregnancy ultrasound divided by number of embryos transferred.

Secondary aims are:

  • Embryo quality, which is measured by system similar to the Gardner grading system at cleavage stage. Reported quality will be converted to the simplified SART embryo scoring system which provides an overall categorical embryo grade of "Good", "Fair" or "Poor".
  • Fertilization rate, which is defined by the total number of fertilized oocytes divided by total number of mature oocytes retrieved. This comparison will take place on day-3, as that is when the IVC embryos will be assessed.
  • Clinical pregnancy rate, which is defined by the number of fetal poles with heartbeat seen on ultrasound divided by the number of embryos transferred.
  • Live birth rate, which is defined by the number of living babies delivered divided by the number of transfers
Conditions
Infertility
Being tested
INVOcell device, Traditional IVF
Medical subject headings
Infertility

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • INVOcell deviceDevice

    intra-vaginal culture of embryos using INVOcell device

  • Traditional IVFOther

    traditional culture of embryos in-vitro

Study groups in NCT02802176
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intra-vaginal culture - INVOcell deviceExperimental3 day intra-vaginal incubation using the INVOcell device
Receives: Device: INVOcell device
Traditional IVF cultureActive comparator3 day traditional IVF incubation
Receives: Other: Traditional IVF

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Implantation Rate

    defined by number gestational sacs seen on early pregnancy ultrasound typically done at 6 weeks of gestational age divided by number of embryos transferred

    Measured: approximately 4 weeks following randomization. Clinically this is typically done around 6 weeks of gestational age

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Embryo Quality

    -Embryo quality, which is measured by system similar to the Gardner grading system at cleavage stage. Reported quality will be converted to the simplified SART embryo scoring system which provides an overall categorical embryo grade of "Good", "Fair" or "Poor".

    Measured: measured after 3 days of incubation

  2. Fertilization Rate

    defined by the total number of fertilized oocytes divided by total number of mature oocytes retrieved

    Measured: measured after 3 days of incubation

  3. Clinical Pregnancy Rate

    which is defined by the number of fetal poles with heartbeat seen on early pregnancy ultrasound typically done at 6 weeks of gestational age divided by the number of embryos transferred

    Measured: approximately 4 weeks following randomization. Clinically this is typically done around 6 weeks of gestational age

  4. Live Birth Rate

    which is defined by the number of living babies delivered divided by the number of transfers

    Measured: 9 months after embryo transfer

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2016
  3. Primary completion20 Apr 2022
  4. Study completion25 Aug 2022

Why it stopped: Slow enrollment and completion of screening qualifiers.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Arm 1: intra-vaginal culture using INVOcell device. Arm 2: Traditional In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) culture in an embryology laboratory
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
39 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02802176
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB 166094
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
12 Jun 2016
Last updated
12 Jul 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing INVOcell device and Traditional IVF in people with Infertility, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Jul 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Implantation Rate (time frame: approximately 4 weeks following randomization. Clinically this is typically done around 6 weeks of gestational age). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in