AzTrials
AzTrials

Congestive Heart FailurePASEDNCT02803775

Paced And Sensed Electrical Delay in CRT Therapy (PASED CRT)

A study testing CRT Algorithm in people with Congestive Heart Failure, run by Deborah Heart and Lung Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a well established clinical therapy for patients with symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction and electrocardiographic QRS duration of 120 ms or greater. Multicenter trials have consistently demonstrated CRT "non responder" rates of 32-43% at 6 months. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Congestive Heart Failure
What is being tested?
CRT Algorithm
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
92 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
2 Feb 2017to 4 Feb 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ejection Fraction less than or equal to 35%
  • American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) indicated patients with surface ECG QRS duration greater than or equal to 120ms

Who cannot join

  • Previously placed left ventricular (LV) lead receiving CRT therapy for greater than 3 months
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant
  • Classification of status 1 for cardiac transplant patients for next 9 months,
  • Participating in another clinical investigation with an active treatment arm
  • Life expectancy of less than nine months
  • Age less than 18 years
  • Inability to successfully implant LV lead
  • Unable to provide written informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Deborah Heart and Lung Center

    Browns Mills, New Jersey, 08015

Other trials in United States

About this study

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a well established clinical therapy for patients with symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction and electrocardiographic QRS duration of 120 ms or greater. Multicenter trials have consistently demonstrated CRT "non responder" rates of 32-43% at 6 months. Subsequent studies have shown that utilizing echocardiographic-guided device reprogramming for optimal atrio-ventricular (A-V) and interventricular (VV) delays at rest have improved clinical response. Recently, an echocardiographically validated automated pacemaker programmer-based intra-cardiac electrogram (IEGM) algorithm has been developed for rapid optimization of sino-ventricular (P-V), A-V and V-V delays at resting heart rates that is partially based on the interventricular conduction time delays. Nevertheless, controversy still persists as to the applicability of both echocardiographic and IEGM derived algorithms at elevated heart rates, as with physical activity, when patients are more likely to experience symptoms related to poor cardiac output.

Recent studies have shown clinical benefits of pacing from sites of late intrinsic activation or intra-ventricular conduction delays (IVCD). Some studies have utilized the intrinsic SENSED IVCD method while others used the right ventricle (RV)-PACED IVCD. There have not been any studies to date that compare both methods to determine if one may yield a better clinical outcome with lower non-responder rates.

Read more

This study predicts that the RV paced IVCD method will provide better clinical outcomes than the longest RV sensed IVCD as determined by the clinical composite score.

The study is a prospective double blind study with an additional cross-over group consisting only of non-responders to compare the clinical response in 72 patients receiving CRT therapy. After successful CRT-D implantation and before hospital discharge patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to Group 1 (SENSED) or Group 2 (PACED). The patient will complete a Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, compare echocardiographic data and be assessed by a blinded nurse and physician prior to discharge and at each follow up visit to maintain the double blind design.

After 3 months of follow-up, non-responders from each group will be crossed-over to the other group and followed for an additional 3 months. Clinical data will be collected at the end of that 3 months and compared looking at changes in symptoms, ejection fraction (EF) and other echocardiographic measurements, New York Heart Assocation Function Class ( NYHA) class, clinical composite scores (CCC), device interrogation data and hospital admissions between the two groups to see if there is a statistical difference.

Being tested
CRT Algorithm
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CRT AlgorithmDevice

    Programming based on Electrogram measurement

Study groups in NCT02803775
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PacedActive comparatorPaced arm in which the left heart lead electrode is selected utilizing the longest time to when patient right ventricle lead is pacing. The result of the pacing algorithm becomes the patient's pacing location for the study duration (self-assigned algorithm within this cohort).
Receives: Device: CRT Algorithm
SensedActive comparatorSensed arm is based on the longest time that patient own heart's conduction reaches the left heart lead electrode.The result of the sensing algorithm becomes the patient's pacing location for the study duration (self-assigned algorithm within this cohort).
Receives: Device: CRT Algorithm

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in six-minute walk distance

    Six-minute walk distance (measured in meters)

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months. The six month assessment is optional for non-responders participating in crossover option

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Clinical Composite Score

    Packer Clinical Composite Score Questionnaire captures the following outcomes: death (yes/no field), hospitalizations (yes/no field), global patient assessment (likert scale 1-5 points) , functional heart class (I, II, III, IV).

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months. The six month assessment is optional for non-responders participating in crossover option

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start2 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion4 Feb 2019
  4. Study completion4 Feb 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
92 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02803775
Sponsor's protocol ID
2K15-03
Acronym
PASED
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
7 Jun 2016
Last updated
26 Sep 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Packer M. Proposal for a new clinical end point to evaluate the efficacy of drugs and devices in the treatment of chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2001 Jun;7(2):176-82. doi: 10.1054/jcaf.2001.25652.

    PubMed 11420770

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CRT Algorithm in people with Congestive Heart Failure, run by Deborah Heart and Lung Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in six-minute walk distance (time frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months. The six month assessment is optional for non-responders participating in crossover option). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02803775, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in