StrokeGASPARNCT02808078
Gait Adaptation for Stroke Patients With Augmented Reality
A study testing Gait training with augmented reality and Standard training in people with Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Philippe Terrier at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The GASPAR trial is a pragmatic, parallel-arms, single-center, non-blinded, superiority randomized control trial in neurorehabilitation. The main objective is to test whether a 4 weeks gait rehabilitation program that uses augmented reality is superior to a conventional treadmill training program of equivalent… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Traumatic Brain Injury, Spinal Cord Injury
- What is being tested?
- Gait training with augmented reality and Standard training
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Jun 2016to Dec 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Participants fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the study:
- Informed Consent as documented by signature
- Stroke patients, patients with traumatic brain injury, or patients with spinal cord injury in the acute to sub-acute phase (maximum 40 days after the incident)
- Need for gait rehabilitation in reason of at least one of the following conditions: Paresis of the lower extremities. Severe balance disorders. No walking at entry due to the neurological injury
- Ability to walk 2 minutes without or with minimal aid, namely: With the help of one person, or: With walking aid (cane, walker)
The presence of any one of the following exclusion criteria will lead to exclusion of the participant:
- Age < 18 years
- Other clinically significant concomitant disease states (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, etc.) that may threaten the health in case of sustained exercise.
- Concomitant gait disorders induced by acute to sub-acute musculoskeletal injuries, e.g. fracture of the lower extremities.
- Severe pre-existent gait disorders that deeply affect walking abilities and gait pattern, either due to musculoskeletal (e.g. severe osteoarthritis) or neurological (e.g. Parkinson's disease) etiologies.
- Severe non-corrected visual impairment
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Clinique Romande de Réadaptation
Sion, Valais, 1951
Philippe Terrier, PhD, Philippe.Terrier@crr-suva.ch
Rossano Cathia, MSc, Cathia.Rossano@crr-suva.ch
About this study
Official title: Visually-guided Gait Training in Paretic Patients During First Rehabilitation: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The GASPAR trial is a pragmatic, parallel-arms, single-center, non-blinded, superiority randomized control trial in neurorehabilitation. The main objective is to test whether a 4 weeks gait rehabilitation program that uses augmented reality is superior to a conventional treadmill training program of equivalent intensity. Baseline assessments precede allocation, which consists in blocking randomization (2:1 ratio) with stratification according to the disease etiology. Post-intervention assessments serve to compare the short-term efficacy of the intervention between the two groups. Three months after discharge, follow-up assessments take place to detect potential long-term effects.
Read the detailed description
After a lesion to the central nervous system, many patients suffer from a diminished walking capability. During the first rehabilitation phase, specific cares help the recovery of motor function to offer the best chances of returning to normal walk. For example, the repeated practice of walking exercises facilitates the gain of muscular strength and stimulates motor relearning. However, in patients, who have finished the first rehabilitation phase, it is often observed strong limping, unsteady gait, and a bad management of obstacle clearance. Thus, these individuals fall frequently, with risk of severe injury. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of gait training on a treadmill equipped with an augmented reality system. Shapes are displayed onto the treadmill belt with a projector (beamer): the patient adapts his/her gait to the drawing that unfolds in front of him/her. It is possible to train gait symmetry for coordination enhancement or to exercise obstacle clearance and gait agility. Another advantage of this type of treadmill is the capability to continuously analyze gait with integrated sensors and, hence, to give real-time feedback to the patient. Whereas the method seems promising, thorough studies that would confirm its efficacy are lacking. Therefore, the investigators seek to conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare visually-guided gait training with a more classical training method. During four weeks, participants will train, according to their abilities, three to five times a week during 30 minutes on the augmented-reality treadmill. A group of control patients will train at comparable intensity but without the visual guidance of gait. Using the data collected during the training sessions, the investigators will study whether the evolution of locomotor function differs between both groups. Furthermore, several questionnaires will be filled in by the participants to document the self-evaluation of their progress. In the long term, the investigators expect to first improve the efficacy of gait rehabilitation and second to better understand the recovery process of locomotor function during the first months after a stroke.
- Conditions
- Stroke, Traumatic Brain Injury, Spinal Cord Injury
- Being tested
- Gait training with augmented reality, Standard training
- Keywords
- Instrumented treadmill, Augmented reality, Neurorehabilitation, Gait disorders
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Spinal Cord Injuries, Mobility Limitation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gait training with augmented realityDevice
20 sessions (30 min. duration) over 4 weeks of gait training with augmented reality.
Standard trainingDevice
20 sessions (30 min. duration) over 4 weeks of gait training without augmented reality.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Augmented reality training | Experimental | Gait training with augmented reality Receives: Device: Gait training with augmented reality |
| Standard training | Active comparator | Gait training without augmented reality Receives: Device: Standard training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in walking speed
Walking speed, measured with the 2-minute walk test
Measured: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 5)
Secondary outcomes (12)
Change in postural control
Capabilities to ensure an optimal postural control. Measured with the Berg Balance test
Measured: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 5)
Fear of falling during the hospitalization
Subjective assessment of the fear of falling. Measured with the adapted Falls Efficacy Scale (FES)
Measured: week 5
Fear of falling at home
Subjective assessment of the fear of falling. Measured with the adapted Falls Efficacy Scale (FES)
Measured: after discharge at 3-4 month
Quality of life at home
Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36)
Measured: after discharge at 3-4 month
Perception of the intervention
purpose-designed questionnaire that will ask to the participant about their perception of the intervention. The questionnaire will evaluate the satisfaction with intensity, duration and difficulty of the intervention. Other questions will ask about the perceived training effects on walking speed and confidence.
Measured: During the intervention, week 2 and 4
Changes in stride and step lengths
Measured with the embedded sensors of the treadmills
Measured: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Changes in stride and step durations
Measured with the embedded sensors of the treadmills
Measured: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Change in step width
Measured with the embedded sensors of the treadmills
Measured: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Change in left/right asymmetry of step lengths
Measured with the embedded sensors of the treadmills
Measured: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Change in left/right asymmetry of step durations
Measured with the embedded sensors of the treadmills
Measured: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Changes in stance and swing phases
Measured with the embedded sensors of the treadmills
Measured: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Change in gait variability
Stride-to-stride variability of gait parameters (outcomes 7-12)
Measured: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2016
- Primary completionJul 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Philippe Terrier
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- Swiss Heart Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Philippe Terrier, Clinique Romande de Readaptation
- Investigators
- Philippe Terrier, PhD, Principal investigator, Institute for Research in Rehabilitation and Clinique romande de réadaptation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02808078
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CliniqueRR-04
- Acronym
- GASPAR
- Status last verified
- Dec 2017
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 6 Dec 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: At the end of the study, final anonymized database will be made available through a specialized online repository
Publications
Rossano C, Terrier P. Visually-guided gait training in paretic patients during the first rehabilitation phase: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Oct 27;17(1):523. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1630-8.
PubMed 27788679
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Dec 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Visually-guided Gait Training in Paretic Patients During First Rehabilitation: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02808078
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GASPAR / CliniqueRR-04
- Conditions
- Stroke, Traumatic Brain Injury, Spinal Cord Injury
- Keywords
- Instrumented treadmill, Augmented reality, Neurorehabilitation, Gait disorders
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Philippe TerrierResearch network
- Collaborators
- Swiss Heart Foundation
- Study start
- Jun 2016
- Primary completion
- Jul 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The GASPAR trial is a pragmatic, parallel-arms, single-center, non-blinded, superiority randomized control trial in neurorehabilitation. The main objective is to test whether a 4 weeks gait rehabilitation program that uses augmented reality is superior to a conventional treadmill training program of equivalent intensity. Baseline assessments precede allocation, which consists in blocking randomization (2:1 ratio) with stratification according to the disease etiology. Post-intervention assessments serve to compare the short-term efficacy of the intervention between the two groups. Three months after discharge, follow-up assessments take place to detect potential long-term effects.
Detailed description
After a lesion to the central nervous system, many patients suffer from a diminished walking capability. During the first rehabilitation phase, specific cares help the recovery of motor function to offer the best chances of returning to normal walk. For example, the repeated practice of walking exercises facilitates the gain of muscular strength and stimulates motor relearning. However, in patients, who have finished the first rehabilitation phase, it is often observed strong limping, unsteady gait, and a bad management of obstacle clearance. Thus, these individuals fall frequently, with risk of severe injury. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of gait training on a treadmill equipped with an augmented reality system. Shapes are displayed onto the treadmill belt with a projector (beamer): the patient adapts his/her gait to the drawing that unfolds in front of him/her. It is possible to train gait symmetry for coordination enhancement or to exercise obstacle clearance and gait agility. Another advantage of this type of treadmill is the capability to continuously analyze gait with integrated sensors and, hence, to give real-time feedback to the patient. Whereas the method seems promising, thorough studies that would confirm its efficacy are lacking. Therefore, the investigators seek to conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare visually-guided gait training with a more classical training method. During four weeks, participants will train, according to their abilities, three to five times a week during 30 minutes on the augmented-reality treadmill. A group of control patients will train at comparable intensity but without the visual guidance of gait. Using the data collected during the training sessions, the investigators will study whether the evolution of locomotor function differs between both groups. Furthermore, several questionnaires will be filled in by the participants to document the self-evaluation of their progress. In the long term, the investigators expect to first improve the efficacy of gait rehabilitation and second to better understand the recovery process of locomotor function during the first months after a stroke.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Augmented reality training | Experimental | Device: Gait training with augmented realityGait training with augmented reality |
| Standard training | Active comparator | Device: Standard trainingGait training without augmented reality |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gait training with augmented reality20 sessions (30 min. duration) over 4 weeks of gait training with augmented reality. | Device | Augmented reality training |
| Standard training20 sessions (30 min. duration) over 4 weeks of gait training without augmented reality. | Device | Standard training |
Primary outcome
Change in walking speed
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 5)
Walking speed, measured with the 2-minute walk test
12 secondary outcomes
Change in postural control
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 5)
Fear of falling during the hospitalization
Time frame: week 5
Fear of falling at home
Time frame: after discharge at 3-4 month
Quality of life at home
Time frame: after discharge at 3-4 month
Perception of the intervention
Time frame: During the intervention, week 2 and 4
Changes in stride and step lengths
Time frame: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Changes in stride and step durations
Time frame: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Change in step width
Time frame: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Change in left/right asymmetry of step lengths
Time frame: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Change in left/right asymmetry of step durations
Time frame: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Changes in stance and swing phases
Time frame: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Change in gait variability
Time frame: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Dec 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27788679Rossano C, Terrier P. Visually-guided gait training in paretic patients during the first rehabilitation phase: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Oct 27;17(1):523. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1630-8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. At the end of the study, final anonymized database will be made available through a specialized online repository
Related trials for Stroke
Recruiting
Connectomic Alterations Following Acute Ischemic Stroke in the MCA Territory
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Clevidipine for the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Stroke
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study Testing How Well the Drug Extract of Ginkgo Biloba Leaves Tablets Works for People With Memory or Thinking Problems After a Stroke When Added to Standard Treatment
Ischemic Stroke Hospitalized, Impairment, Cognitive
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Anti-inflammatory and Anti-thrombotic Therapy With colcHicine and Low Dose Rivaroxaban for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Reduction in Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
CoMind Early Feasibility Study
Intracranial Pressure, Intracranial Pressure Changes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philippe Terrier, PhD principal investigator
Institute for Research in Rehabilitation and Clinique romande de réadaptation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Gait training with augmented reality and Standard training in people with Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Philippe Terrier at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Philippe Terrier, PhD (+41 27 603 2077, Philippe.Terrier@crr-suva.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in walking speed (time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 5)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02808078, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2017.