Breast DiseasesNCT02810236
Focal Breast Pain: Does a Normal Ultrasound Provide Reassurance?
A study testing Ultrasound and Discussion in people with Breast Diseases and Mastodynia, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigator hypothesizes that a benign directed ultrasound, when performed after a normal digital mammogram, will provide women with focal breast pain additional reassurance that the etiology of their symptom is benign. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Diseases, Mastodynia, Anxiety
- What is being tested?
- Ultrasound and Discussion
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2018to 30 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- women
- over the age of 30
- primary focal breast pain, i.e. pain localizable by the patient to within one breast quadrant without other associated symptoms.
Who cannot join
- diffuse, radiating, or axillary pain
- associated palpable findings at the site of pain
- skin changes (erythema, thickening)
- nipple changes (discharge, retraction)
- currently pregnant or breast-feeding
- history of recent trauma or infection of the affected breast
- history of ipsilateral breast cancer will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
About this study
The investigator hypothesizes that a benign directed ultrasound, when performed after a normal digital mammogram, will provide women with focal breast pain additional reassurance that the etiology of their symptom is benign. 160 women over the age of thirty with focal breast pain who present to the Breast Imaging Clinic for evaluation between 3/1/2016 - 7/1/2018 will be selected and randomized to three groups using a block randomization technique. All study participants will complete a survey assessing psychosocial factors, then receive a digital mammogram. Patients with a negative mammogram will continue on with the study and will either have a conversation about their negative mammogram with a radiologist or receive a directed ultrasound. A second survey will be conducted assessing psychosocial factors. All study participants who did not receive an ultrasound will receive an ultrasound so that all study participants are provided with the standard of care for focal breast pain. The results of the survey will be compared and appropriate statistical analyses such as an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test will be conducted to determine any statistically significant differences between the three randomized groups. The risks/safety issues of this study are believed to be minimal.
Read the detailed description
Protocol Title: Focal Breast Pain: Does a normal ultrasound provide reassurance?
Purpose of the Study: The investigator hypothesizes that a benign directed ultrasound, when performed after a normal digital mammogram, will provide women with focal breast pain additional reassurance that the etiology of their symptom is benign.
Background \& Significance: Breast pain is one of the most common symptoms for which women seek medical care. While up to 80% of women experience breast pain at some point in their lives, most commonly breast pain results from a benign etiology such as trauma, infection, pregnancy, lactation, or simple cysts. In contrast, breast cancer is only reported in up to 7% of women presenting with focal breast pain. Despite the uncommon association between breast cancer and focal breast pain, a diagnostic imaging workup is often requested. Current American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria guidelines rate the use of mammography and ultrasound for the evaluation of non-cyclical, focal, unilateral or bilateral breast pain in patients 30 years and older as "may be appropriate." Traditionally both mammography and ultrasound are performed in women over the age of 30, who present with noncyclical, focal breast pain as imaging can often exclude a treatable benign cause of pain and/or provide reassurance.
The investigator recently completed a retrospective study evaluating the utility of digital mammography and directed ultrasound in women with focal breast pain. It was observed that performing directed ultrasound following digital mammography was potentially beneficial in women with mammographically dense breast tissue. In contrast, the investigator demonstrated that directed ultrasound in conjunction with digital mammography was of low utility in women with non-dense breast tissue. These findings suggest that directed ultrasound might be unnecessary in the work up of focal breast pain for women with non-dense breast tissue.
However, there is anecdotal evidence that a directed ultrasound yielding benign findings following a normal digital mammogram might further reassure women that the cause of focal breast pain is benign. These potential psychological benefits may drive the continued use of ultrasound in the work up of focal breast pain, even though their diagnostic utility is low.
Design and Procedures:
Subject Selection, Recruitment, and Compensation
The study team (Principal investigator (PI), Co-PI, and Study coordinator) will select up to 160 women, who present to the Breast Imaging Clinic for evaluation of focal breast pain between 3/1/2016 - 7/1/2018. Inclusion criteria include women over the age of 30 with primary focal breast pain, i.e. pain localizable by the patient to within one breast quadrant without other associated symptoms. Women with diffuse, radiating, or axillary pain, associated palpable findings at the site of pain, skin changes (erythema, thickening) or nipple changes (discharge, retraction), currently pregnant or breast-feeding, history of recent trauma or infection of the affected breast, and history of ipsilateral breast cancer will be excluded.
Based on the investigator's clinical judgement, the investigator anticipates a minimum effect size of d=.4 for anxiety. A sample size of n =80 per group (total n = 160) has power of 0.8 to detect differences with an effect size of d=.4 using a one-tailed alpha = .05.
Study participants will include women referred for imaging because of focal breast pain and women who report focal breast pain to the technologist or radiologist prior to imaging. Once a patient is identified as a possible candidate, the PI, Co-PI, or study coordinator will look at electronic medical record, Epic. to see if they meet inclusion criteria and do not have any exclusion criteria. If there are none, the patient will be approached to see if they are willing to participate in the study. While the number of patients who present in a typical week to Duke with focal breast pain has not been studied, anecdotally, approximately 1-2 patients per day have been evaluated for focal breast pain. Study participants will not be compensated.
Consent Process
Study participants will include women referred for imaging because of focal breast pain and women who report focal breast pain to the technologist or radiologist prior to imaging. Once a patient is identified as a possible candidate, the PI, Co-PI, or study coordinator will look at Epic to see if they meet inclusion criteria and do not have any exclusion criteria. If there are none, the patient will be approached to see if they are willing to participate in the study. Only a member of the study team (Karen Johnson, MD, Lars Grimm, MD, and Michael Cho, MD) will approach a potential participant for the consent process. If a member of the study team is not available, the potential subject will not be recruited. Subjects who are able to provide legally effective consent will be recruited.
While the number of patients who present in a typical week to Duke with focal breast pain has not been studied, anecdotally, approximately 1-2 patients per day have been evaluated for focal breast pain.
This study will serve as the 3/2 research project for Michael Cho, MD. Dr. Cho has requested 37 weeks of dedicated research time during his 4th year to recruit patients. Dr. Cho will continue to recruit patients during his Breast imaging fellowship if needed. As such, Dr. Cho will be primarily responsible for the consent process. Dr. Cho will work with Steve Shipes to learn about the consent process and Maestro data entry.
Study Design
Once a patient volunteers to participate, the investigator will utilize a block randomization technique to randomize the study participants into two groups (Group A and B), ensuring comparable numbers across the study groups. The patient will then be consented. Pertinent demographic and medical data will also be collected.
All included study participants will be asked to complete a short survey, based on the State Anxiety scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (18). This survey will primarily assess psychosocial metrics, including, but not limited to anxiety, comfort, and level of concern for malignancy.
All study participants will receive a digital mammogram, which is the standard of care for patients presenting with focal breast pain. Patients with no imaging correlate to the focal breast pain (Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 1 and 2) will continue on with the study. Patients with an imaging finding at the site of focal pain (BI-RADS 0, 4, or 5) will be excluded from the study and receive the standard care that is appropriate for the imaging finding.
Women with BI-RADS 1 and 2 digital mammograms will proceed with the study and be informed of their imaging findings. Study participants randomized to Group A will receive their mammogram results from a Breast imaging fellow or fellowship trained Breast imaging radiologist. Participants in Group B will receive their mammogram results from a Breast imaging fellow or fellowship trained Breast imaging radiologist and additionally receive a directed ultrasound in the area of focal pain, which is the standard of care for focal breast pain.
All study participants will be asked to complete a second survey, based on the State Anxiety scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.
Participants in Groups A will receive a directed ultrasound of their breast at the end of the visit ensuring that all women receive the standard of care. One of the research collaborators will approach subjects in groups A following the 2nd survey to disclose the minor deception and explain to the subjects the necessity of the deception for the purposes of the study. The collaborator will also explain that the current standard of care for patients with focal breast pain is a targeted ultrasound. The standard of care ultrasound will then be performed by a Breast imaging fellow or fellowship trained breast radiologist.
Risk/Benefit Assessment
The risks of this study are believed to be minimal, including the potential loss of confidentiality. The digital mammogram and directed ultrasound patients will receive are the standard of practice for women with focal breast pain. Women in this study would have received these imaging tests regardless of their participation in the study and therefore the potential risks of imaging are not considered additional risks of this study.
Costs to the Subject: There are no projected direct financial costs to the subjects involved in this study.
Data Analysis \& Statistical Considerations: The results of the survey will be compared and appropriate statistical analyses including but not limited to analysis of variance and multiple two sample t-tests conducted to determine any statistically significant differences between the three randomized groups.
Data \& Safety Monitoring: There are no anticipated safety concerns. The study coordinator (MC) will be responsible for the data collection and storage. Paper surveys will be stored in a locked cabinet in the Breast imaging reading room (Cancer Center Room 2S33) in the Cancer Center Breast Imaging Department (Clinic 2-1) which is accessible by badge only. Any digital data will be stored on an encrypted external hard drive (Western Digital) with a backup on Duke approved cloud storage (Box) and DTHS managed shared drive.
Privacy, Data Storage \& Confidentiality: A de-identification code will be assigned to the patients to be used as their identifier. The linking code identifying the subject will be kept for the duration of the study and will be securely stored on an encrypted external hard drive (Western Digital) with a backup on Duke approved cloud storage (Box) and DTHS managed shared drive.
- Conditions
- Breast Diseases, Mastodynia, Anxiety
- Being tested
- Ultrasound, Discussion
- Keywords
- Focal breast pain, Directed Ultrasound, Reassurance, Anxiety
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Diseases, Mastodynia, Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
UltrasoundProcedure or surgery
Ultrasound will be performed.
DiscussionBehavioural
Radiologist will discuss with the patient the findings on mammogram.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| No ultrasound | Active comparator | No ultrasound recommended. Discussion with radiologist. Receives: Behavioral: Discussion |
| Ultrasound | Active comparator | Ultrasound recommended. Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in anxiety using modified STAI questionnaire
Measure change in anxiety following intervention using modified STAI
Measured: baseline, day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Feb 2018
- Primary completion30 Nov 2019
- Study completion30 Nov 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Duke UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duke University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michael Taylor-Cho, MD, Principal investigator, Duke UniversityLars Grimm, MD, Principal investigator, Duke University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02810236
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00070445
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 23 May 2016
- Last updated
- 30 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Masroor I, Afzal S, Sakhawat S, Khan N, Beg MA, Kawal D. Negative predictive value of mammography and sonography in mastalgia with negative physical findings. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009 Sep;59(9):598-601.
PubMed 19750852Mansel RE. ABC of breast diseases. Breast pain. BMJ. 1994 Oct 1;309(6958):866-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6958.866. No abstract available.
PubMed 7950621Howard MB, Battaglia T, Prout M, Freund K. The effect of imaging on the clinical management of breast pain. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jul;27(7):817-24. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1982-4. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
PubMed 22331398Morrow M. The evaluation of common breast problems. Am Fam Physician. 2000 Apr 15;61(8):2371-8, 2385.
PubMed 10794579Jokich P, Newell MS, Bailey L, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® breast pain. Available at http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/ BreastPain.pdf. American College of Radiology. Accessed June 20, 2015.
Barton MB, Elmore JG, Fletcher SW. Breast symptoms among women enrolled in a health maintenance organization: frequency, evaluation, and outcome. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Apr 20;130(8):651-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-8-199904200-00005.
PubMed 10215561Preece PE, Mansel RE, Bolton PM, Hughes LM, Baum M, Gravelle IH. Clinical syndromes of mastalgia. Lancet. 1976 Sep 25;2(7987):670-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)92477-6.
PubMed 60528Srivastava A, Mansel RE, Arvind N, Prasad K, Dhar A, Chabra A. Evidence-based management of Mastalgia: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Breast. 2007 Oct;16(5):503-12. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 May 16.
PubMed 17509880Harvey JA, Mahoney MC, Newell MS, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® palpable breast masses. Available at http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/PalpableBreastMasses.pdf. American College of Radiology. Accessed June 20, 2015.
Vaidyanathan L, Barnard K, Elnicki DM. Benign breast disease: when to treat, when to reassure, when to refer. Cleve Clin J Med. 2002 May;69(5):425-32. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.69.5.425.
PubMed 12022387Noroozian M, Stein LF, Gaetke-Udager K, Helvie MA. Long-term clinical outcomes in women with breast pain in the absence of additional clinical findings: mammography remains indicated. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jan;149(2):417-24. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3257-3. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
PubMed 25556516Olcucuoglu E, Yilmaz G. Mastodynia: is imaging necessary in young patients? Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2013 Mar 1;29(1):17-9. doi: 10.5152/UCD.2013.04. eCollection 2013.
PubMed 25931836Tumyan L, Hoyt AC, Bassett LW. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain. Breast J. 2005 Sep-Oct;11(5):333-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.00018.x.
PubMed 16174154Leddy R, Irshad A, Zerwas E, Mayes N, Armeson K, Abid M, Cluver A, Campbell A, Ackerman S, Lewis M. Role of breast ultrasound and mammography in evaluating patients presenting with focal breast pain in the absence of a palpable lump. Breast J. 2013 Nov-Dec;19(6):582-9. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12178. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
PubMed 24011215Leung JW, Kornguth PJ, Gotway MB. Utility of targeted sonography in the evaluation of focal breast pain. J Ultrasound Med. 2002 May;21(5):521-6; quiz 528-9. doi: 10.7863/jum.2002.21.5.521.
PubMed 12008815
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Focal Breast Pain: Does a Normal Ultrasound Provide Reassurance?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02810236
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00070445
- Conditions
- Breast Diseases, Mastodynia, Anxiety
- Keywords
- Focal breast pain, Directed Ultrasound, Reassurance, Anxiety
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Duke UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigator hypothesizes that a benign directed ultrasound, when performed after a normal digital mammogram, will provide women with focal breast pain additional reassurance that the etiology of their symptom is benign. 160 women over the age of thirty with focal breast pain who present to the Breast Imaging Clinic for evaluation between 3/1/2016 - 7/1/2018 will be selected and randomized to three groups using a block randomization technique. All study participants will complete a survey assessing psychosocial factors, then receive a digital mammogram. Patients with a negative mammogram will continue on with the study and will either have a conversation about their negative mammogram with a radiologist or receive a directed ultrasound. A second survey will be conducted assessing psychosocial factors. All study participants who did not receive an ultrasound will receive an ultrasound so that all study participants are provided with the standard of care for focal breast pain. The results of the survey will be compared and appropriate statistical analyses such as an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test will be conducted to determine any statistically significant differences between the three randomized groups. The risks/safety issues of this study are believed to be minimal.
Detailed description
Protocol Title: Focal Breast Pain: Does a normal ultrasound provide reassurance?
Purpose of the Study: The investigator hypothesizes that a benign directed ultrasound, when performed after a normal digital mammogram, will provide women with focal breast pain additional reassurance that the etiology of their symptom is benign.
Background \& Significance: Breast pain is one of the most common symptoms for which women seek medical care. While up to 80% of women experience breast pain at some point in their lives, most commonly breast pain results from a benign etiology such as trauma, infection, pregnancy, lactation, or simple cysts. In contrast, breast cancer is only reported in up to 7% of women presenting with focal breast pain. Despite the uncommon association between breast cancer and focal breast pain, a diagnostic imaging workup is often requested. Current American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria guidelines rate the use of mammography and ultrasound for the evaluation of non-cyclical, focal, unilateral or bilateral breast pain in patients 30 years and older as "may be appropriate." Traditionally both mammography and ultrasound are performed in women over the age of 30, who present with noncyclical, focal breast pain as imaging can often exclude a treatable benign cause of pain and/or provide reassurance.
The investigator recently completed a retrospective study evaluating the utility of digital mammography and directed ultrasound in women with focal breast pain. It was observed that performing directed ultrasound following digital mammography was potentially beneficial in women with mammographically dense breast tissue. In contrast, the investigator demonstrated that directed ultrasound in conjunction with digital mammography was of low utility in women with non-dense breast tissue. These findings suggest that directed ultrasound might be unnecessary in the work up of focal breast pain for women with non-dense breast tissue.
However, there is anecdotal evidence that a directed ultrasound yielding benign findings following a normal digital mammogram might further reassure women that the cause of focal breast pain is benign. These potential psychological benefits may drive the continued use of ultrasound in the work up of focal breast pain, even though their diagnostic utility is low.
Design and Procedures:
Subject Selection, Recruitment, and Compensation
The study team (Principal investigator (PI), Co-PI, and Study coordinator) will select up to 160 women, who present to the Breast Imaging Clinic for evaluation of focal breast pain between 3/1/2016 - 7/1/2018. Inclusion criteria include women over the age of 30 with primary focal breast pain, i.e. pain localizable by the patient to within one breast quadrant without other associated symptoms. Women with diffuse, radiating, or axillary pain, associated palpable findings at the site of pain, skin changes (erythema, thickening) or nipple changes (discharge, retraction), currently pregnant or breast-feeding, history of recent trauma or infection of the affected breast, and history of ipsilateral breast cancer will be excluded.
Based on the investigator's clinical judgement, the investigator anticipates a minimum effect size of d=.4 for anxiety. A sample size of n =80 per group (total n = 160) has power of 0.8 to detect differences with an effect size of d=.4 using a one-tailed alpha = .05.
Study participants will include women referred for imaging because of focal breast pain and women who report focal breast pain to the technologist or radiologist prior to imaging. Once a patient is identified as a possible candidate, the PI, Co-PI, or study coordinator will look at electronic medical record, Epic. to see if they meet inclusion criteria and do not have any exclusion criteria. If there are none, the patient will be approached to see if they are willing to participate in the study. While the number of patients who present in a typical week to Duke with focal breast pain has not been studied, anecdotally, approximately 1-2 patients per day have been evaluated for focal breast pain. Study participants will not be compensated.
Consent Process
Study participants will include women referred for imaging because of focal breast pain and women who report focal breast pain to the technologist or radiologist prior to imaging. Once a patient is identified as a possible candidate, the PI, Co-PI, or study coordinator will look at Epic to see if they meet inclusion criteria and do not have any exclusion criteria. If there are none, the patient will be approached to see if they are willing to participate in the study. Only a member of the study team (Karen Johnson, MD, Lars Grimm, MD, and Michael Cho, MD) will approach a potential participant for the consent process. If a member of the study team is not available, the potential subject will not be recruited. Subjects who are able to provide legally effective consent will be recruited.
While the number of patients who present in a typical week to Duke with focal breast pain has not been studied, anecdotally, approximately 1-2 patients per day have been evaluated for focal breast pain.
This study will serve as the 3/2 research project for Michael Cho, MD. Dr. Cho has requested 37 weeks of dedicated research time during his 4th year to recruit patients. Dr. Cho will continue to recruit patients during his Breast imaging fellowship if needed. As such, Dr. Cho will be primarily responsible for the consent process. Dr. Cho will work with Steve Shipes to learn about the consent process and Maestro data entry.
Study Design
Once a patient volunteers to participate, the investigator will utilize a block randomization technique to randomize the study participants into two groups (Group A and B), ensuring comparable numbers across the study groups. The patient will then be consented. Pertinent demographic and medical data will also be collected.
All included study participants will be asked to complete a short survey, based on the State Anxiety scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (18). This survey will primarily assess psychosocial metrics, including, but not limited to anxiety, comfort, and level of concern for malignancy.
All study participants will receive a digital mammogram, which is the standard of care for patients presenting with focal breast pain. Patients with no imaging correlate to the focal breast pain (Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 1 and 2) will continue on with the study. Patients with an imaging finding at the site of focal pain (BI-RADS 0, 4, or 5) will be excluded from the study and receive the standard care that is appropriate for the imaging finding.
Women with BI-RADS 1 and 2 digital mammograms will proceed with the study and be informed of their imaging findings. Study participants randomized to Group A will receive their mammogram results from a Breast imaging fellow or fellowship trained Breast imaging radiologist. Participants in Group B will receive their mammogram results from a Breast imaging fellow or fellowship trained Breast imaging radiologist and additionally receive a directed ultrasound in the area of focal pain, which is the standard of care for focal breast pain.
All study participants will be asked to complete a second survey, based on the State Anxiety scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.
Participants in Groups A will receive a directed ultrasound of their breast at the end of the visit ensuring that all women receive the standard of care. One of the research collaborators will approach subjects in groups A following the 2nd survey to disclose the minor deception and explain to the subjects the necessity of the deception for the purposes of the study. The collaborator will also explain that the current standard of care for patients with focal breast pain is a targeted ultrasound. The standard of care ultrasound will then be performed by a Breast imaging fellow or fellowship trained breast radiologist.
Risk/Benefit Assessment
The risks of this study are believed to be minimal, including the potential loss of confidentiality. The digital mammogram and directed ultrasound patients will receive are the standard of practice for women with focal breast pain. Women in this study would have received these imaging tests regardless of their participation in the study and therefore the potential risks of imaging are not considered additional risks of this study.
Costs to the Subject: There are no projected direct financial costs to the subjects involved in this study.
Data Analysis \& Statistical Considerations: The results of the survey will be compared and appropriate statistical analyses including but not limited to analysis of variance and multiple two sample t-tests conducted to determine any statistically significant differences between the three randomized groups.
Data \& Safety Monitoring: There are no anticipated safety concerns. The study coordinator (MC) will be responsible for the data collection and storage. Paper surveys will be stored in a locked cabinet in the Breast imaging reading room (Cancer Center Room 2S33) in the Cancer Center Breast Imaging Department (Clinic 2-1) which is accessible by badge only. Any digital data will be stored on an encrypted external hard drive (Western Digital) with a backup on Duke approved cloud storage (Box) and DTHS managed shared drive.
Privacy, Data Storage \& Confidentiality: A de-identification code will be assigned to the patients to be used as their identifier. The linking code identifying the subject will be kept for the duration of the study and will be securely stored on an encrypted external hard drive (Western Digital) with a backup on Duke approved cloud storage (Box) and DTHS managed shared drive.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| No ultrasound | Active comparator | Behavioral: DiscussionNo ultrasound recommended. Discussion with radiologist. |
| Ultrasound | Active comparator | Procedure: UltrasoundUltrasound recommended. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- women
- over the age of 30
- primary focal breast pain, i.e. pain localizable by the patient to within one breast quadrant without other associated symptoms.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- diffuse, radiating, or axillary pain
- associated palpable findings at the site of pain
- skin changes (erythema, thickening)
- nipple changes (discharge, retraction)
- currently pregnant or breast-feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| UltrasoundUltrasound will be performed. | Procedure or surgery | Ultrasound |
| DiscussionRadiologist will discuss with the patient the findings on mammogram. | Behavioural | No ultrasound |
Primary outcome
Change in anxiety using modified STAI questionnaire
Time frame: baseline, day 1
Measure change in anxiety following intervention using modified STAI
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Dec 2022.
- Background: PubMed 19750852Masroor I, Afzal S, Sakhawat S, Khan N, Beg MA, Kawal D. Negative predictive value of mammography and sonography in mastalgia with negative physical findings. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009 Sep;59(9):598-601.
- Background: PubMed 7950621Mansel RE. ABC of breast diseases. Breast pain. BMJ. 1994 Oct 1;309(6958):866-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6958.866. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22331398Howard MB, Battaglia T, Prout M, Freund K. The effect of imaging on the clinical management of breast pain. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jul;27(7):817-24. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1982-4. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
- Background: PubMed 10794579Morrow M. The evaluation of common breast problems. Am Fam Physician. 2000 Apr 15;61(8):2371-8, 2385.
- BackgroundJokich P, Newell MS, Bailey L, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® breast pain. Available at http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/ BreastPain.pdf. American College of Radiology. Accessed June 20, 2015.
- Background: PubMed 10215561Barton MB, Elmore JG, Fletcher SW. Breast symptoms among women enrolled in a health maintenance organization: frequency, evaluation, and outcome. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Apr 20;130(8):651-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-8-199904200-00005.
- Background: PubMed 60528Preece PE, Mansel RE, Bolton PM, Hughes LM, Baum M, Gravelle IH. Clinical syndromes of mastalgia. Lancet. 1976 Sep 25;2(7987):670-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)92477-6.
- Background: PubMed 17509880Srivastava A, Mansel RE, Arvind N, Prasad K, Dhar A, Chabra A. Evidence-based management of Mastalgia: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Breast. 2007 Oct;16(5):503-12. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 May 16.
- BackgroundHarvey JA, Mahoney MC, Newell MS, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® palpable breast masses. Available at http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/PalpableBreastMasses.pdf. American College of Radiology. Accessed June 20, 2015.
- Background: PubMed 12022387Vaidyanathan L, Barnard K, Elnicki DM. Benign breast disease: when to treat, when to reassure, when to refer. Cleve Clin J Med. 2002 May;69(5):425-32. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.69.5.425.
- Background: PubMed 25556516Noroozian M, Stein LF, Gaetke-Udager K, Helvie MA. Long-term clinical outcomes in women with breast pain in the absence of additional clinical findings: mammography remains indicated. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jan;149(2):417-24. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3257-3. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
- Background: PubMed 25931836Olcucuoglu E, Yilmaz G. Mastodynia: is imaging necessary in young patients? Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2013 Mar 1;29(1):17-9. doi: 10.5152/UCD.2013.04. eCollection 2013.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Diseases
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Augmented-Reality ICG Fluorescence Second-Look for Residual Nodal Disease After Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer, Breast Neoplasms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Taylor-Cho, MD principal investigator
Duke University
Lars Grimm, MD principal investigator
Duke University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ultrasound and Discussion in people with Breast Diseases and Mastodynia, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in anxiety using modified STAI questionnaire (time frame: baseline, day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02810236, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Dec 2022.