AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal CancerNCT02812550

Full-spectrum Endoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening

A study testing colonoscopy procedure in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Hospital del Rio Hortega.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the adenoma detection rates of full-spectrum endoscopy versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening programme. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 69 years
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Cancer
What is being tested?
colonoscopy procedure
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
249 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
May 2015to Jun 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 69 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patient referred for colorectal cancer screening with positive fecal inmunological test.
  • Age between 50 and 69 years

Who cannot join

  • history of colonic resection,
  • high risk for colorectal cancer like family history of colorectal cancer o polyposis syndrome,
  • inflammatory bowel disease,
  • patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding symptoms,
  • acute diverticulitis,
  • colonic strictures,
  • poor bowel preparation (Boston scale less than 5 points)

About this study

Official title: Impact of Full-spectrum Endoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the adenoma detection rates of full-spectrum endoscopy versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening programme.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer is the third most common neoplasia and the second leading cause of cancer death in West countries. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for prevention of colorectal cancer disease. Screening for colorectal cancer with biennial faecal occult blood testing is a widely used strategy followed by colonoscopy for those with a positive test. Colonoscopy identifies polyps during the procedure as well as polyp removal in order to prevent progression to cancer. Although, interval cancer appears after a colonoscopy because of 22-28% of polyp missed rates. Advanced Technology may improve adenoma detection rates so decrease interval cancer and reduce mortally. Full-spectrum endoscopy with 330º angle vision decrease adenoma miss rate in general population.

The investigators conducted a randomized trial in patients from colorectal cancer screening programme (aged 50-69 years) after faecal immunological test positive. One arm the colonoscopy is performed with standard forward view colonoscopy (170º angle view) and the other arm is performed with full-spectrum endoscopy (EndoChoice) (330º angle view)

Being tested
colonoscopy procedure
Keywords
full-spectrum endoscopy, polyp detection rate, colorectal cancer, colorectal screening, adenoma detection rate, endoscopic innovations
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • colonoscopy procedureProcedure or surgery

    endoscopy performed with a standard forward view colonoscopy or with full-spectrum endoscopy

Study groups in NCT02812550
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
full-spectrum colonoscopyOtherColonoscopy is performed with a full-spectrum colonoscopy (330º angle of view)
Receives: Procedure: colonoscopy procedure
standar forward-viewing colonoscopyOtherColonoscopy is performed with standar forward-viewing colonoscopy (170º angle of view)
Receives: Procedure: colonoscopy procedure

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. adenoma detection rate in the two different colonoscopies

    number of colonoscopies at wich one or more histologically confirmed adenomas were found divided by the total number of colonoscopies performed in the same time period.

    Measured: one week

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. time to caecal intubation in each group

    time to reach appendicular orifice

    Measured: one week

  2. total procedure time in each group

    time since the begining of the procedure till is totally finish

    Measured: one week

  3. Adverse events

    Any inmediatly complication

    Measured: one week

  4. advance adenoma rate in each group

    10mm or greater in size, villous component or high grade dysplasia

    Measured: one week

  5. polyp detection rate in right and left colon in each group

    Measured: one week

  6. polyp retrieval rate in each group

    proportion of resected polyps that were retrieved and sent for histologically analysis

    Measured: one week

  7. caecal intubation rate in each group

    proportion of all colonoscopic procedures in which the caecum, terminal ileum was reached

    Measured: one week

  8. colonoscopy withdrawal time

    average time taken withdraw the colonoscope from the caecal pole to the anus.

    Measured: one week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2015
  3. Primary completionMay 2016
  4. Study completionJun 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
249 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02812550
Sponsor's protocol ID
GRS 1073/A/15
Status last verified
Jun 2016
First submitted
15 Jun 2016
Last updated
24 Jun 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Nunez-Rodriguez H, Diez-Redondo P, Perez-Miranda M, Gonzalez Sagrado M, Conde R, De la Serna C. Role of Full-spectrum Endoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Randomized Trial. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar;53(3):191-196. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000975.

    PubMed 29283904

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing colonoscopy procedure in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Hospital del Rio Hortega.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

adenoma detection rate in the two different colonoscopies (time frame: one week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02812550, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in