AzTrials
AzTrials

Autism Spectrum DisorderNCT02813564

Cognitive Training in Children With ASD

A study testing Cognitive Assessment & Video-game INtervention Solutions (CAVINS) in people with Autism Spectrum Disorder, run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Plasticity refers to susceptibility of an organism to change. Cognitive training is an intervention approach based on the notion of plasticity. It entails the repeated exercise of a set of higher-order cognitive abilities over several weeks after which performance gains are expected on the trained as well as untrained… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 7 years
Conditions the study is for
Autism Spectrum Disorder
What is being tested?
Cognitive Assessment & Video-game INtervention Solutions (CAVINS)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
2 Mar 2018to 1 Mar 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 7 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • A diagnosis of ASD
  • Age between 3-7 years

Who cannot join

  • History of head injury
  • Current medical problems that would preclude their participation in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • McMaster University

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1

    Diana Tajik-Parvinchi, PhD, 9056171631, dparvinchi@mcmaster.ca

    Geoffrey Hall, PhD, 9055259140 ext. 23033, hallg@mcmaster.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Targeted Cognitive Training: Assessment and Plasticity in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

Plasticity refers to susceptibility of an organism to change. Cognitive training is an intervention approach based on the notion of plasticity. It entails the repeated exercise of a set of higher-order cognitive abilities over several weeks after which performance gains are expected on the trained as well as untrained tasks. Cognitive training has produced successful results in various clinical groups, but its benefits have not been explored in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The present study will develop a software-based training program tailored to the cognitive deficits in ASD. The investigators will also examine possible training-induced functional changes within the brain using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). Fifty children with ASD 3-7 years will be recruited and randomly assigned to the control (n=25) or the training group (n=25). A subgroup of these samples will carry out the response inhibition and set-shifting tasks in the fMRI scanner. The study will consist of a pre-post design and a four-month follow up. Repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) will be carried out with group (training, control) as the between subjects factor and Time (pre- post-training, follow-up) as the within subjects factor to identify training induced cognitive improvements. To determine training-induced biological changes within the brain, activity maps associated with response inhibition and set-shifting at pre-training and post-training sessions will be entered into a group ANOVA and contrasted for differences within- and between groups.

Read the detailed description
  1. INTRODUCTION Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a severe neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by deficits of social and communicative skills, restricted set of interests, activities and/or repetitive behaviours that are typically observed in early childhood. The prevalence of ASD is about 1 in 68 children and it is the fastest growing developmental disability. The cost of diagnosing and treating ASD is estimated to be around $236-262 billion annually.

Plasticity broadly refers to the susceptibility of an organism to change. The human brain shows incredible plastic capacity. Multiple neuronal networks can sustain the same cognitive function (a mental ability) with different systems supporting the same function in different individuals. This "many-to-one" structure-function relationship is one form of plasticity. Examining neural networks responsible for a cognitive process in different individuals can provide insight into the plastic capacity of that process.

Cognitive training is centered on the notion of plasticity. It entails the repeated exercise of a specific cognitive process (or multiple processes) over several weeks, after which performance gains are expected on the trained task as well as various untrained tasks that directly or indirectly involve the targeted cognitive process(s). The generalization of performance gains to untrained tasks is termed "transfer" and is essential to the efficacy of the training. Cognitive training has been used to remediate deficits in adults with strokes, multiple sclerosis, Schizophrenia, children with working memory deficits , children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), healthy pre-kindergarten children, as well as to enhance cognitive performance in healthy young adults, and healthy older adults. Yet, the benefits of this intervention for children with ASD have received relatively little attention.

Recent research indicates that disrupted patterns of cortical development in ASD may lead to its clinical manifestation. More specifically earlier reports have shown a pattern of reduced long-range cortical connectivity and increased localized functional connectivity in ASD. This pattern has been recently verified using highly stringent imaging analysis methods. This altered functional connectivity may be especially disruptive to cognitive functions that demand integrative information processing such as executive functioning (higher order cognitive functions that control other cognitive processes eg. Conscious control of thought and action), theory of mind, face processing, language and communication, all of which have been previously established as impaired processes in ASD.

Moreover, approximately 50-70% of children with ASD are diagnosed with intellectual disability, which manifests as cognitive impairments. Intellectual disability has been shown to place children with ASD at risk for a "low functioning" trajectory throughout life and at risk for having more severe symptoms. Cognitive training has been shown to enhance executive functions underlying intellectual capacity such as working memory, fluid intelligence, executive attention as well as academic achievement . Cognitive training delivered at an early age may strengthen the processes that are important for intellectual capacity and therefore improve the clinical trajectory of ASD.

Although these recent theories of ASD point to deficits of executive functions, this field is currently lacking an evidence-based intervention, which directly tackles deficits of executive functions. The existing interventions for ASD (mainly consisting of behavioural skills development) are complex in administration and require highly trained staff. As a result, these approaches have placed an extremely high demand on clinics and practitioners creating long wait lists. These approaches have poor accessibility for many families and schools. The most striking and consistent limitation of the existing interventions is an apparent lack of transfer of learned skills to other conditions and contexts. Meaning, new learned behaviours are limited to the specific context in which they are trained. Generalization to other tasks and contexts is a distinguishing strength of cognitive training, this approach can be used at home via a personal computer providing more accessibility, and it can be used in conjunction with the behavioral skills development to improve the child's receptiveness to learning. Thus, cognitive training may have the potential to provide promising results in the areas where the existing treatments have shown limitations.

The present project intends to first develop a software based cognitive training program tailored to cognitive needs of children with ASD (Cognitive Assessment and Video-game Intervention Solutions, CAVINS)(phase 1) and then examine the program's efficacy through clinical trials and imaging of the brain (Clinical Trials and Imaging Phases). The imaging component will provide the opportunity to learn about the neural framework of some of the targeted cognitive processes as well as training-induced changes in each process. This intervention will target several functions implicated in ASD such as the ability to shift attention to a different aspect of the task, inhibitory control, working memory, planning, reasoning, selective attention, and face processing. During the imaging phase, as our first step, the investigators will use functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to identify training-induced changes in the brain associated with set-shifting and response inhibition.

Response inhibition consists of two distinct forms, the restraint of a response and the cancellation of a response. Preventing a response from being initiated characterizes the restraint process whereas termination of a response that is already underway represents the cancellation process. Additionally the ability to monitor, detect and adjust behaviour following an erroneous response represents error processing and is an inherent component of response inhibition. Difficulties of response inhibition have been hypothesized to be responsible for the stereotyped and repetitive behaviour observed in ASD, predictive of "theory of mind" performances in preschoolers, and associated with altered connectivity between the frontal cortex and the striatal and parietal regions as well as volume differences and altered development of the striatum. Similarly, lower accuracy on set-shifting tasks is associated with reduced activation in frontal, striatal, and parietal cortexes and is hypothesized to be responsible for mental inflexibility, restricted and repetitive behaviours observed in ASD.

Several imaging studies have demonstrated modifications in the underlying neural network following completion of cognitive training in healthy adults. However, similar studies in children are very scarce. Currently, there are no studies that have examined training-induced changes within the brain in children with ASD. Findings from the present project will reveal benefits of cognitive training in ASD, generalization and persistence of potential benefits, identify biological changes associated with training, and provide much needed insight into the plasticity of the systems supporting two cognitive functions implicated in ASD.

Being tested
Cognitive Assessment & Video-game INtervention Solutions (CAVINS)
Keywords
Autism, Cognitive Training, Brain, fMRI
Medical subject headings
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autistic Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cognitive Assessment & Video-game INtervention Solutions (CAVINS)Behavioural

    This is a computerized "video-game" like intervention. The participants will exercise/strengthen the cognitive (mental) deficits that may be responsible for symptom profiles such as socialization impairments, academic disabilities, and repetitive behaviour for several weeks. This program will stimulate communication between brain regions that make up an information processing neural network in order to promote proper network development.

Study groups in NCT02813564
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Training groupExperimentalThis group of children will receive the software based intervention program (CAVINS) and will train at home during the training phase.
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Assessment & Video-game INtervention Solutions (CAVINS)
Control groupNo interventionThis group of children will play video-games-as-usual and return in about 3 weeks for their next assessment appointment.
fMRI-training groupExperimentalThis sub-group of children from the "Training group" will carry out two of the tasks in the fMRI scanner during the baseline appointment. They will then go home and train on CAVINS (the intervention) during the training phase.
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Assessment & Video-game INtervention Solutions (CAVINS)
fMRI-Control groupNo interventionThis sub-group of children from the "Control group" will carry out two of the tasks in the fMRI scanner during the baseline appointment. They will then go home and play video-games-as-usual until their next assessment appointment (after about 3 weeks).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Dimensional Change Card Sorting task (DCCS): Measuring change in mental flexibility

    This is a set-shifting task

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. The Go/NoGo task: Measuring change in inhibitory control

    This is a response inhibition task

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. The preschool version of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-P): Measuring change in everyday executive functions

    This questionnaire captures real life executive control abilities of children

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Flanker Test: Measuring change in selective attention

    This task measures the ability to pay attention to a given aspect of a task and ignore distractors

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Aberrant Behaviour Checklist (ABC): Measuring change in behaviour

    This is a rating scale. A person who knows the participant well completes it. This scale will captures behavioural symptom areas. The informant rates the participant on a scale from 0 (not at all a problem) to 3 (the problem is severe in degree).

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Tower of Hanoi: Measuring change in planning ability

    measures planning and organizational abilities

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. The Stroop-like day-night: Measuring change in inhibitory control

    This task has been used to measure working memory + inhibition

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Sequential Order (SO): Measuring change in reasoning ability

    A measure of children's fluid reasoning

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT): Measuring change in communication abilities

    A language assessment scale

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start2 Mar 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02813564
Sponsor's protocol ID
0323
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
18 Dec 2015
Last updated
21 Aug 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Aron AR, Poldrack RA. Cortical and subcortical contributions to Stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 1;26(9):2424-33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4682-05.2006.

    PubMed 16510720
  • Buschkuehl M, Jaeggi SM, Hutchison S, Perrig-Chiello P, Dapp C, Muller M, Breil F, Hoppeler H, Perrig WJ. Impact of working memory training on memory performance in old-old adults. Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):743-53. doi: 10.1037/a0014342.

    PubMed 19140646
  • Chein JM, Morrison AB. Expanding the mind's workspace: training and transfer effects with a complex working memory span task. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Apr;17(2):193-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.2.193.

    PubMed 20382919
  • Chevrier AD, Noseworthy MD, Schachar R. Dissociation of response inhibition and performance monitoring in the stop signal task using event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Dec;28(12):1347-58. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20355.

    PubMed 17274022
  • Cox RW. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res. 1996 Jun;29(3):162-73. doi: 10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014.

    PubMed 8812068
  • Dahlin E, Nyberg L, Backman L, Neely AS. Plasticity of executive functioning in young and older adults: immediate training gains, transfer, and long-term maintenance. Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):720-30. doi: 10.1037/a0014296.

    PubMed 19140643
  • Hoekzema E, Carmona S, Ramos-Quiroga JA, Barba E, Bielsa A, Tremols V, Rovira M, Soliva JC, Casas M, Bulbena A, Tobena A, Vilarroya O. Training-induced neuroanatomical plasticity in ADHD: a tensor-based morphometric study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Oct;32(10):1741-9. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21143. Epub 2011 Mar 1.

    PubMed 21365715
  • Holmes J, Gathercole SE, Dunning DL. Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Dev Sci. 2009 Jul;12(4):F9-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00848.x.

    PubMed 19635074
  • Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Jonides J, Perrig WJ. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 May 13;105(19):6829-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801268105. Epub 2008 Apr 28.

    PubMed 18443283
  • Klingberg T, Fernell E, Olesen PJ, Johnson M, Gustafsson P, Dahlstrom K, Gillberg CG, Forssberg H, Westerberg H. Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD--a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;44(2):177-86. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200502000-00010.

    PubMed 15689731
  • MEZZACAPPA, E. & BUCKNER, J. C. 2010. Working memory training for children with attention problems or hyperactivity: A school-based pilot study. School Mental Health, 2, 202-208.

  • Noppeney U, Friston KJ, Price CJ. Degenerate neuronal systems sustaining cognitive functions. J Anat. 2004 Dec;205(6):433-42. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00343.x.

    PubMed 15610392
  • Richmond LL, Morrison AB, Chein JM, Olson IR. Working memory training and transfer in older adults. Psychol Aging. 2011 Dec;26(4):813-22. doi: 10.1037/a0023631. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

    PubMed 21707176
  • Thaler NS, Allen DN, Park BS, McMurray JC, Mayfield J. Attention processing abnormalities in children with traumatic brain injury and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: differential impairment of component processes. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Nov;32(9):929-36. doi: 10.1080/13803391003596488. Epub 2010 Apr 16.

    PubMed 20401771
  • Thorell LB, Lindqvist S, Bergman Nutley S, Bohlin G, Klingberg T. Training and transfer effects of executive functions in preschool children. Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):106-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00745.x.

    PubMed 19120418

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cognitive Assessment & Video-game INtervention Solutions (CAVINS) in people with Autism Spectrum Disorder, run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Diana Parvinchi, PhD (905-525-9140 ext. 24784, dparvinchi@mcmaster.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Dimensional Change Card Sorting task (DCCS): Measuring change in mental flexibility (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02813564, which also lists 21 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in