Anemia, Sickle CellPhase 2tDCS/PES_SCDNCT02813629
tDCS Associated With Peripheral Electrical Stimulation for Pain Control in Individuals With Sickle Cell Disease
A Phase 2 study testing tDCS plus PES in people with Anemia, Sickle Cell and Chronic Pain, run by Faculdade Adventista da Bahia at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
So far, no study investigated the safety and efficacy analgesic of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) associated to peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) in individuals with SCD who suffer from chronic pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Anemia, Sickle Cell, Chronic Pain
- What is being tested?
- tDCS plus PES
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Mar 2016to Dec 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Being diagnosed with sickle cell disease hemoglobin electrophoresis.
- Be aged 18 years old to 50 years old.
- Having signed the consent form and clarified.
- Having chronic pain with at least 3 months duration.
- Being diagnosed with femoral head osteonecrosis
- Have more than one type of chronic pain.
Who cannot join
- Have cochlear implants, pacemakers or metallic implant in the skull / brain;
- Have metallic implant application site of peripheral stimulation;
- History of head trauma;
- Pregnancy;
- seizures or epilepsy History;
- Being in drug use that modify neuronal activation threshold (eg antidepressants and anticonvulsants);
- Having diagnosis of fibromyalgia, or any impairment to be confused with the symptoms of SCD;
- Have pain confirmed neuropathic type.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Functional Electrical Stimulation Laboratory
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 40110-902
Abrahão F Baptista, Prof., 55 71 3283-8906, a.baptista@ufabc.edu.br
About this study
Official title: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Associated With Peripheral Electrical Stimulation for Pain Control in Individuals With Sickle Cell Disease
So far, no study investigated the safety and efficacy analgesic of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) associated to peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) in individuals with SCD who suffer from chronic pain. Several studies have reported a decrease in O²Hb concentration in the regions below the electrodes and in other cortical areas during anodic or cathodic tDCS, which implies a risk factor for vasoocclusive events in individuals with SDC due to polymerization of hemoglobin when exposed to these low O²Hb concentrations. For this reasion, the aim main of this study is to assess the effect of a single session of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) associated to peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) on safety and efficacy analgesic in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). Others aims sencondaries are evaluate the effect of a single session of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) associated to peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) on biomarkers neurophysiological and inflammatory.
Read the detailed description
Pain, in its various manifestations, is the symptom most often associated to SCD, being responsible for over 90% of hospital admissions. Oftenly pain has a major impact on the patient's life and is associated with some degree of disability. Chronic pain may reflect the continuity of tissue injury and central nervous system maladaptive plasticity. They start with tissue injuries such as leg ulcers, avascular osteonecrosis, chronic osteomyelitis, arthropathy, or even continue after the repair process, by central nervous sensitization and / or peripheral. The lack of diagnosis in cases of chronic and neuropathic pain in patients with SCD is common, implying inappropriate use of therapeutic resources by the health services, resulting in increased suffering to the patient. The release of inflammatory mediators is related to the perception of pain, and may cause nociceptor sensitization.
The tDCS has the potential to change the neuronal membrane resting potential, this effect is dependent on the polarity, being that cathode produces hyperpolarization, whereas anode produces depolarization, in this way can induce an effect of inhibition and facilitation of neuronal firing, respectively. This effects can induces changes in cortical excitability. Although tDCS may modulate areas related to endogenous pain control, its effects seem to be diffuse, and focality would probably enhance its effects. The peripheral electrical stimulation (PES), in another way, may also modulate cortical excitability, depending mainly on its amplitude and frequency. PES modulation of cortical excitability is very focal, occurring only in the stimulated region. The combination of these two neuromodulatory techniques has showed additive effects in some studies with individuals suffering from chronic pain,which promoting a general effect (tDCS), and the other a more focal effect (TENS). Although this additive effect has been demonstrated, to date, no study evaluate its safety and efficacy in individuals with DF.
As a secondary outcome, the investigators are going to access the influence of the intervention on quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG). Growing evidence points out to different brain characteristics between individuals with chronic pain and healthy. qEEG has high temporal resolution and evaluates primary electrical effects of neural excitation, allowing identify possible patterns of brain functioning in individuals with chronic pain. qEEG allowed the identification of the thalamocortical dysrhythmia (TCD) in patients with chronic pain characterized by an increased low frequency band power density theta (4 - 7Hz) and a decrease in high frequency bands alpha (8 -12Hz) and beta (13 - 30Hz). This dysrhythmic mechanism may occur from the periphery to the thalamus (bottom-up) or cortical dysregulation (top-down), disinhibition of the thalamus. This process results in hyperpolarization of thalamic neurons, leading to a preponderance of low frequency oscillations in qEEG. The persistence thalamic firing at low frequencies can lead to a collateral inhibition in cortical regions around, which could theoretically lead to a decrease in the higher frequencies. This increase occurs at low frequency regions involved in neuro matrix of pain.
The investigators will alse avaluate the influence of the chronic pain sencondary to avascular necrosis of hip joint about cortical motor reorganization using transcranial magnetic stimuation (TMS). Recent data point to a gluteus maximus muscle weakness during maximal voluntary contraction in pronation position in individuals with joint pain in the hip. Similarly, individuals with legg calve perthes who suffer from femoral head necrosis, weakness of the abductor hip musculature was related to poor clinical outcomes. A possible explanation for these findings is cortical motor reorganization, which is associated with motor control impairment, and this has been demonstrated in individuals with chronic lateral epicondylalgia and knee osteoarthritis, where cortical organization is altered and correlated positively with the time of Pain and is associated with the perpetuation of pain. This cortical reorganization can occur in the somatotopic areas corresponding to the motor or sensorial homunculus, having as characteristic an overlap, retraction and "blurring" in the somatotopic representation of a certain region.
The mediators released by cells of the immune and inflammatory system can act directly on neurons sensitizing and enabling them (usually peripheral nociceptors or neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord). There are several mediators in a long and growing list that includes cytokines and neurotrophins.The major cytokines in an acute inflammation are the Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) and the interleukins (IL-1), IL-6 and IL-8, which are important mediators of acute and chronic inflammatory reactions, as well as processes of repair and resolution. High serum levels of IL-8 have been observed in patients in vase-occlusive crisis, important clinical aspect of the pathogenesis of SCD. The presence of the mutant allele A appears to influence the expression of the TNF-alpha, being the AA genotype considered a high producer.
Neurotrophins are dimeric proteins that are essential for the normal development of the nervous system in vertebrates. This family includes the nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and other neurotrophins (NT). Currently, it is recognized that certain neurotrophins, particularly the NGF and the brain-derived neurotrophic factor BDNF play a significant role in nociception, so that the NGF sensitizes nociceptors at the periphery, while the BDNF enhances the response ability of the dorsal horn neurons of the spinal cord. The BDNF gene, which encodes the BDNF protein, located on chromosome 11 at the boundary of regions 11p13 and 11p14 of the human genome has been investigated in a wide range of areas related to neuroplasticity, including differences in brain morphology, learning and memory, interactions with brain stimulation protocols of plasticity induction and recovery after brain injury and has been associated with a wide variety of neurological disorders, including, for example, depression, schizophrenia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
- Conditions
- Anemia, Sickle Cell, Chronic Pain
- Being tested
- tDCS plus PES
- Keywords
- transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Peripheral Electrical Stimulation, Sickle Cell Disease, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, quantitative Electroencephalography
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Sickle Cell, Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tDCS plus PESDevice
Also called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), peripheral electrical stimulation (PES)
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) uses a pair of electrodes and sponges soaked in saline solution placed over specific regions of the head to polarize neurons and produce changes in resting membrane potentials. This changes may increase or decrease neuronal excitability and produce diverse clinical effects, including analgesia.
PES uses also a pair of electrodes over specific regions of the body to promote neuronal action potentials in peripheral nerves. PES over motor threshold increases cortical excitability, and at the sensory threshold decreases excitability.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SS-tDCS (active) plus PES (active) | Active comparator | tDCS plus PES (n=15). Receives: Device: tDCS plus PES |
| SS-tDCS (active) plus PES (simulated) | Active comparator | tDCS plus PES (n=15). Receives: Device: tDCS plus PES |
| SS-tDCS (simulated) plus PES (active) | Active comparator | tDCS plus PES (n=15). Receives: Device: tDCS plus PES |
| SS-tDCS (simulated) plus PES (simulated) | Sham comparator | tDCS plus PES (n=15). Receives: Device: tDCS plus PES |
| SC-tDCS (active) plus PES (active) | Active comparator | tDCS plus PES (n=15). Receives: Device: tDCS plus PES |
| SC-tDCS (active) plus PES (simulated) | Active comparator | tDCS plus PES (n=15). Receives: Device: tDCS plus PES |
| SC-tDCS (simulated) plus PES (active) | Active comparator | tDCS plus PES (n=15). Receives: Device: tDCS plus PES |
| SC-tDCS (simulated) plus PES (simulated) | Sham comparator | tDCS plus PES (n=15). Receives: Device: tDCS plus PES |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in pain intensity
Pain assessment at before and after each intervention:
Actual pain intensity will be assessed using a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 is no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain. Visual analogue scale allows to evaluate the intensity pain of a quantitative way, the subjects will fill a VAS before and after treatment.
Measured: One day
Secondary outcomes (5)
Analysis of brain waves delta, theta, alpha and beta
- Analysis of brain waves: Individuals will be submitted to electroencephalogram following the international classification 10/20 for placement of the electrodes. The researchers will use 30 electrodes referenced by Cz point, ground electrode in Fz point of each individual and the impedance kept below 5 K ohms in all electrodes with a sampling frequency of 600 Hz. All records will be made with closed eyes lasting 4 minutes.
Measured: One day
Dosages of TNF-alpha and BDNF in patients with SCD
- Assessment Dosages of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) will be properly processed and the serum stored at -20ºC. Detection and quantification of serum levels will be performed by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer's instructions, being considered as normal reference values ≤15 pg / ml for IL-8 and p ≤7,8 / mL for TNF-alpha.
Dosages of neurotrophin brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) will be properly processed and the serum stored at -20ºC. The detection and quantification of serum levels will be performed by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The detection limits for the BDNF will be 15 pg/ml.
Measured: One day
Motor cortical reorganization
This outcome will be evaluated with a transcranial magnetic stimulator of single pulse . The procedure consists of ten pulses around the skull vertice with 200μV amplitude.
Measured: One day
Impact of pain in functionality
Assessment of impact of pain in functionality before treatment with a pain disability index (PDI) will be used only in baseline PDI is a 7 questions questionnarie that will be used assess limitations imposed by the presence of pain in daily life activities
Measured: One day
Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)
This scale allows to evaluate objectively both aspects of anxiety and depression. Consists of 2 subscales, each one with 7 items. It will be used to identify the level of anxiety and depression
Measured: One day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2016
- Primary completionDec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anemia, Sickle CellStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Faculdade Adventista da Bahia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Federal University of Bahia
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Abrahão F Baptista, Prof., Principal investigator, Federal University of BahiaWellington S Silva, Prof., Study director, Faculdade Adventista da Bahia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02813629
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 31237514.1.0000.0042
- Acronym
- tDCS/PES_SCD
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 10 May 2016
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Yusuf HR, Atrash HK, Grosse SD, Parker CS, Grant AM. Emergency department visits made by patients with sickle cell disease: a descriptive study, 1999-2007. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Apr;38(4 Suppl):S536-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.001.
PubMed 20331955Ballas SK. Pain management of sickle cell disease. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2005 Oct;19(5):785-802, v. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2005.07.008.
PubMed 16214644Lima MC, Riberto M, Batistella LR, Boggio PS, Fregni F. Estimulação cerebral para o tratamento de dor neuropática. Psicol. teor. prát. 2007; 9(2):142-149
Oliveira LB, Lopes TS, Soares C, Maluf R, Goes BT, Sa KN, Baptista AF. Transcranial direct current stimulation and exercises for treatment of chronic temporomandibular disorders: a blind randomised-controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Oct;42(10):723-32. doi: 10.1111/joor.12300. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
PubMed 25891021Brunoni AR, Pinheiro FS, Boggio PS. Estimulação transcraniana por corrente contínua: in Fregni F, Boggio PS, Brunoni AR. Neuromodulação Terapêutica: Princípios e Avanços da Estimulação cerebral não invasiva em Neurologia, reabilitação, Psiquiatria e Neuropsicologia. São Paulo: Sarvier. 2012: 65-75.
Boggio PS, Amancio EJ, Correa CF, Cecilio S, Valasek C, Bajwa Z, Freedman SD, Pascual-Leone A, Edwards DJ, Fregni F. Transcranial DC stimulation coupled with TENS for the treatment of chronic pain: a preliminary study. Clin J Pain. 2009 Oct;25(8):691-5. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181af1414.
PubMed 19920718Schabrun SM, Jones E, Elgueta Cancino EL, Hodges PW. Targeting chronic recurrent low back pain from the top-down and the bottom-up: a combined transcranial direct current stimulation and peripheral electrical stimulation intervention. Brain Stimul. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):451-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.01.058. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
PubMed 24582372Hazime FA, de Freitas DG, Monteiro RL, Maretto RL, Carvalho NA, Hasue RH, Joao SM. Analgesic efficacy of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Jan 31;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0461-1.
PubMed 25636503Vuckovic A, Hasan MA, Fraser M, Conway BA, Nasseroleslami B, Allan DB. Dynamic oscillatory signatures of central neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. J Pain. 2014 Jun;15(6):645-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
PubMed 24589821de Vries M, Wilder-Smith OH, Jongsma ML, van den Broeke EN, Arns M, van Goor H, van Rijn CM. Altered resting state EEG in chronic pancreatitis patients: toward a marker for chronic pain. J Pain Res. 2013 Nov 25;6:815-24. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S50919.
PubMed 24379694Sarnthein J, Stern J, Aufenberg C, Rousson V, Jeanmonod D. Increased EEG power and slowed dominant frequency in patients with neurogenic pain. Brain. 2006 Jan;129(Pt 1):55-64. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh631. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
PubMed 16183660Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede RD, Zubieta JK. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain. 2005 Aug;9(4):463-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.11.001. Epub 2005 Jan 21.
PubMed 15979027Michels L, Moazami-Goudarzi M, Jeanmonod D. Correlations between EEG and clinical outcome in chronic neuropathic pain: surgical effects and treatment resistance. Brain Imaging Behav. 2011 Dec;5(4):329-48. doi: 10.1007/s11682-011-9135-2.
PubMed 21948245Boord P, Siddall PJ, Tran Y, Herbert D, Middleton J, Craig A. Electroencephalographic slowing and reduced reactivity in neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008 Feb;46(2):118-23. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102077. Epub 2007 May 15.
PubMed 17502876Llinas RR, Ribary U, Jeanmonod D, Kronberg E, Mitra PP. Thalamocortical dysrhythmia: A neurological and neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by magnetoencephalography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Dec 21;96(26):15222-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.26.15222.
PubMed 10611366
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Associated With Peripheral Electrical Stimulation for Pain Control in Individuals With Sickle Cell Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02813629
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- tDCS/PES_SCD / 31237514.1.0000.0042
- Conditions
- Anemia, Sickle Cell, Chronic Pain
- Keywords
- transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Peripheral Electrical Stimulation, Sickle Cell Disease, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, quantitative Electroencephalography
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Faculdade Adventista da BahiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Federal University of Bahia
- Study start
- Mar 2016
- Primary completion
- Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
So far, no study investigated the safety and efficacy analgesic of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) associated to peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) in individuals with SCD who suffer from chronic pain. Several studies have reported a decrease in O²Hb concentration in the regions below the electrodes and in other cortical areas during anodic or cathodic tDCS, which implies a risk factor for vasoocclusive events in individuals with SDC due to polymerization of hemoglobin when exposed to these low O²Hb concentrations. For this reasion, the aim main of this study is to assess the effect of a single session of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) associated to peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) on safety and efficacy analgesic in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). Others aims sencondaries are evaluate the effect of a single session of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) associated to peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) on biomarkers neurophysiological and inflammatory.
Detailed description
Pain, in its various manifestations, is the symptom most often associated to SCD, being responsible for over 90% of hospital admissions. Oftenly pain has a major impact on the patient's life and is associated with some degree of disability. Chronic pain may reflect the continuity of tissue injury and central nervous system maladaptive plasticity. They start with tissue injuries such as leg ulcers, avascular osteonecrosis, chronic osteomyelitis, arthropathy, or even continue after the repair process, by central nervous sensitization and / or peripheral. The lack of diagnosis in cases of chronic and neuropathic pain in patients with SCD is common, implying inappropriate use of therapeutic resources by the health services, resulting in increased suffering to the patient. The release of inflammatory mediators is related to the perception of pain, and may cause nociceptor sensitization.
The tDCS has the potential to change the neuronal membrane resting potential, this effect is dependent on the polarity, being that cathode produces hyperpolarization, whereas anode produces depolarization, in this way can induce an effect of inhibition and facilitation of neuronal firing, respectively. This effects can induces changes in cortical excitability. Although tDCS may modulate areas related to endogenous pain control, its effects seem to be diffuse, and focality would probably enhance its effects. The peripheral electrical stimulation (PES), in another way, may also modulate cortical excitability, depending mainly on its amplitude and frequency. PES modulation of cortical excitability is very focal, occurring only in the stimulated region. The combination of these two neuromodulatory techniques has showed additive effects in some studies with individuals suffering from chronic pain,which promoting a general effect (tDCS), and the other a more focal effect (TENS). Although this additive effect has been demonstrated, to date, no study evaluate its safety and efficacy in individuals with DF.
As a secondary outcome, the investigators are going to access the influence of the intervention on quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG). Growing evidence points out to different brain characteristics between individuals with chronic pain and healthy. qEEG has high temporal resolution and evaluates primary electrical effects of neural excitation, allowing identify possible patterns of brain functioning in individuals with chronic pain. qEEG allowed the identification of the thalamocortical dysrhythmia (TCD) in patients with chronic pain characterized by an increased low frequency band power density theta (4 - 7Hz) and a decrease in high frequency bands alpha (8 -12Hz) and beta (13 - 30Hz). This dysrhythmic mechanism may occur from the periphery to the thalamus (bottom-up) or cortical dysregulation (top-down), disinhibition of the thalamus. This process results in hyperpolarization of thalamic neurons, leading to a preponderance of low frequency oscillations in qEEG. The persistence thalamic firing at low frequencies can lead to a collateral inhibition in cortical regions around, which could theoretically lead to a decrease in the higher frequencies. This increase occurs at low frequency regions involved in neuro matrix of pain.
The investigators will alse avaluate the influence of the chronic pain sencondary to avascular necrosis of hip joint about cortical motor reorganization using transcranial magnetic stimuation (TMS). Recent data point to a gluteus maximus muscle weakness during maximal voluntary contraction in pronation position in individuals with joint pain in the hip. Similarly, individuals with legg calve perthes who suffer from femoral head necrosis, weakness of the abductor hip musculature was related to poor clinical outcomes. A possible explanation for these findings is cortical motor reorganization, which is associated with motor control impairment, and this has been demonstrated in individuals with chronic lateral epicondylalgia and knee osteoarthritis, where cortical organization is altered and correlated positively with the time of Pain and is associated with the perpetuation of pain. This cortical reorganization can occur in the somatotopic areas corresponding to the motor or sensorial homunculus, having as characteristic an overlap, retraction and "blurring" in the somatotopic representation of a certain region.
The mediators released by cells of the immune and inflammatory system can act directly on neurons sensitizing and enabling them (usually peripheral nociceptors or neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord). There are several mediators in a long and growing list that includes cytokines and neurotrophins.The major cytokines in an acute inflammation are the Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) and the interleukins (IL-1), IL-6 and IL-8, which are important mediators of acute and chronic inflammatory reactions, as well as processes of repair and resolution. High serum levels of IL-8 have been observed in patients in vase-occlusive crisis, important clinical aspect of the pathogenesis of SCD. The presence of the mutant allele A appears to influence the expression of the TNF-alpha, being the AA genotype considered a high producer.
Neurotrophins are dimeric proteins that are essential for the normal development of the nervous system in vertebrates. This family includes the nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and other neurotrophins (NT). Currently, it is recognized that certain neurotrophins, particularly the NGF and the brain-derived neurotrophic factor BDNF play a significant role in nociception, so that the NGF sensitizes nociceptors at the periphery, while the BDNF enhances the response ability of the dorsal horn neurons of the spinal cord. The BDNF gene, which encodes the BDNF protein, located on chromosome 11 at the boundary of regions 11p13 and 11p14 of the human genome has been investigated in a wide range of areas related to neuroplasticity, including differences in brain morphology, learning and memory, interactions with brain stimulation protocols of plasticity induction and recovery after brain injury and has been associated with a wide variety of neurological disorders, including, for example, depression, schizophrenia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 8
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SS-tDCS (active) plus PES (active) | Active comparator | Device: tDCS plus PEStDCS plus PES (n=15). |
| SS-tDCS (active) plus PES (simulated) | Active comparator | Device: tDCS plus PEStDCS plus PES (n=15). |
| SS-tDCS (simulated) plus PES (active) | Active comparator | Device: tDCS plus PEStDCS plus PES (n=15). |
| SS-tDCS (simulated) plus PES (simulated) | Sham comparator | Device: tDCS plus PEStDCS plus PES (n=15). |
| SC-tDCS (active) plus PES (active) | Active comparator | Device: tDCS plus PEStDCS plus PES (n=15). |
| SC-tDCS (active) plus PES (simulated) | Active comparator | Device: tDCS plus PEStDCS plus PES (n=15). |
| SC-tDCS (simulated) plus PES (active) | Active comparator | Device: tDCS plus PEStDCS plus PES (n=15). |
| SC-tDCS (simulated) plus PES (simulated) | Sham comparator | Device: tDCS plus PEStDCS plus PES (n=15). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Being diagnosed with sickle cell disease hemoglobin electrophoresis.
- Be aged 18 years old to 50 years old.
- Having signed the consent form and clarified.
- Having chronic pain with at least 3 months duration.
- Being diagnosed with femoral head osteonecrosis
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Have cochlear implants, pacemakers or metallic implant in the skull / brain;
- Have metallic implant application site of peripheral stimulation;
- History of head trauma;
- Pregnancy;
- seizures or epilepsy History;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tDCS plus PESAlso: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), peripheral electrical stimulation (PES)transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) uses a pair of electrodes and sponges soaked in saline solution placed over specific regions of the head to polarize neurons and produce changes in resting membrane potentials. This changes may increase or decrease neuronal excitability and produce diverse clinical effects, including analgesia. PES uses also a pair of electrodes over specific regions of the body to promote neuronal action potentials in peripheral nerves. PES over motor threshold increases cortical excitability, and at the sensory threshold decreases excitability. | Device | SC-tDCS (active) plus PES (active), SC-tDCS (active) plus PES (simulated), SC-tDCS (simulated) plus PES (active), SC-tDCS (simulated) plus PES (simulated), SS-tDCS (active) plus PES (active), SS-tDCS (active) plus PES (simulated), SS-tDCS (simulated) plus PES (active), SS-tDCS (simulated) plus PES (simulated) |
Primary outcome
Change in pain intensity
Time frame: One day
Pain assessment at before and after each intervention: Actual pain intensity will be assessed using a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 is no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain. Visual analogue scale allows to evaluate the intensity pain of a quantitative way, the subjects will fill a VAS before and after treatment.
5 secondary outcomes
Analysis of brain waves delta, theta, alpha and beta
Time frame: One day
Dosages of TNF-alpha and BDNF in patients with SCD
Time frame: One day
Motor cortical reorganization
Time frame: One day
Impact of pain in functionality
Time frame: One day
Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)
Time frame: One day
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2018.
- Background: PubMed 20331955Yusuf HR, Atrash HK, Grosse SD, Parker CS, Grant AM. Emergency department visits made by patients with sickle cell disease: a descriptive study, 1999-2007. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Apr;38(4 Suppl):S536-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.001.
- Background: PubMed 16214644Ballas SK. Pain management of sickle cell disease. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2005 Oct;19(5):785-802, v. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2005.07.008.
- BackgroundLima MC, Riberto M, Batistella LR, Boggio PS, Fregni F. Estimulação cerebral para o tratamento de dor neuropática. Psicol. teor. prát. 2007; 9(2):142-149
- Background: PubMed 25891021Oliveira LB, Lopes TS, Soares C, Maluf R, Goes BT, Sa KN, Baptista AF. Transcranial direct current stimulation and exercises for treatment of chronic temporomandibular disorders: a blind randomised-controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Oct;42(10):723-32. doi: 10.1111/joor.12300. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
- BackgroundBrunoni AR, Pinheiro FS, Boggio PS. Estimulação transcraniana por corrente contínua: in Fregni F, Boggio PS, Brunoni AR. Neuromodulação Terapêutica: Princípios e Avanços da Estimulação cerebral não invasiva em Neurologia, reabilitação, Psiquiatria e Neuropsicologia. São Paulo: Sarvier. 2012: 65-75.
- Background: PubMed 19920718Boggio PS, Amancio EJ, Correa CF, Cecilio S, Valasek C, Bajwa Z, Freedman SD, Pascual-Leone A, Edwards DJ, Fregni F. Transcranial DC stimulation coupled with TENS for the treatment of chronic pain: a preliminary study. Clin J Pain. 2009 Oct;25(8):691-5. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181af1414.
- Background: PubMed 24582372Schabrun SM, Jones E, Elgueta Cancino EL, Hodges PW. Targeting chronic recurrent low back pain from the top-down and the bottom-up: a combined transcranial direct current stimulation and peripheral electrical stimulation intervention. Brain Stimul. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):451-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.01.058. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
- Background: PubMed 25636503Hazime FA, de Freitas DG, Monteiro RL, Maretto RL, Carvalho NA, Hasue RH, Joao SM. Analgesic efficacy of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Jan 31;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0461-1.
- Background: PubMed 24589821Vuckovic A, Hasan MA, Fraser M, Conway BA, Nasseroleslami B, Allan DB. Dynamic oscillatory signatures of central neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. J Pain. 2014 Jun;15(6):645-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
- Background: PubMed 24379694de Vries M, Wilder-Smith OH, Jongsma ML, van den Broeke EN, Arns M, van Goor H, van Rijn CM. Altered resting state EEG in chronic pancreatitis patients: toward a marker for chronic pain. J Pain Res. 2013 Nov 25;6:815-24. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S50919.
- Background: PubMed 16183660Sarnthein J, Stern J, Aufenberg C, Rousson V, Jeanmonod D. Increased EEG power and slowed dominant frequency in patients with neurogenic pain. Brain. 2006 Jan;129(Pt 1):55-64. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh631. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
- Background: PubMed 15979027Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede RD, Zubieta JK. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain. 2005 Aug;9(4):463-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.11.001. Epub 2005 Jan 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Anemia, Sickle Cell
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Investigating the Mechanistic Effects of Mitapivat in Subjects With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Anemia, Sickle Cell Thalassemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Dose-Finding Study of Tebapivat to Assess Efficacy, and Safety in Participants With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)
Sickle Cell Disease
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
A Study to Provide Access to Mitapivat for Participants Who Previously Participated in an Agios-Sponsored Mitapivat Study
Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency, Anemia, Hemolytic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Effect of Mitapivat on Transfusion Burden in Subjects With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)
Sickle Cell Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Hydroxyurea Optimisation in Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Abrahão F Baptista, Prof. principal investigator
Federal University of Bahia
Wellington S Silva, Prof. study director
Faculdade Adventista da Bahia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing tDCS plus PES in people with Anemia, Sickle Cell and Chronic Pain, run by Faculdade Adventista da Bahia at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Abrahão F Baptista, Prof. (55 11 98830-3941, a.baptista@ufabc.edu.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in pain intensity (time frame: One day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02813629, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2018.