AzTrials
AzTrials

EmpowermentNCT02815163

The Effects of Using the Empowerment Model Intervention in Primary Total Hip Replacement Surgery Elders

A study testing Empowerment education in people with Empowerment, run by Tzu-Ting Huang.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Degenerative arthritis is a common and serious chronic illness that impacts the quality of life of older adults. Knowledge about the effects of empowerment education program in older adults with total hip replacement surgery are limited. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Empowerment
What is being tested?
Empowerment education
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
108 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2013to May 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • had 1st THRS
  • ability to speak and read Chinese
  • willingness to participate in this study

Who cannot join

  • cognitive impairment or been diagnosed with a psychiatric illness
  • participation in another study

About this study

Official title: The Effects of Using the Empowerment Model Intervention in Primary Total Hip

Degenerative arthritis is a common and serious chronic illness that impacts the quality of life of older adults. Knowledge about the effects of empowerment education program in older adults with total hip replacement surgery are limited. As far as the investigators know, this is the first study done using empowerment education intervention to promote total hip replacement patients' self-care. This partnership is achieved through active participation to learn as well as sharing their knowledge and experiences with clinicians and patients. Furthermore, patients had developed some degree of self-efficacy and improve their depressive mood from the disease related knowledge acquired.

Read the detailed description

Aims. To exam the effectiveness of the empowerment education program on primary (self-care self-efficacy and competence) and secondary outcomes (Activities of Daily Life, mobility, depressive mood, and quality of life) for older adults with total hip replacement surgery.

Background. Degenerative arthritis is a common and serious chronic illness that impacts the quality of life of older adults. As joints degenerate continuously and the hip has been damaged by arthritis, Activities of Daily Life will be difficult to perform due to severe hip pain and joint stiffness. Therefore, hip replacement surgery should be considered, and effective nursing care should be provided to improve the recovery of older adults.

Design. A prospective randomized control trial. Methods. A trial was conducted from September of 2013 to May of 2014 in two hospitals in northern Taiwan. 108 participants were randomly assigned to either the empowerment education group or the comparison group. The outcomes were collected at the day of discharge (T2), one month after (T3), and 3 months (T4) after the discharge.

Conditions
Empowerment
Being tested
Empowerment education
Medical subject headings
Empowerment

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Empowerment educationOther

    1. admission (1 hour) ▪partnership
    2. 2 ds after THR (30-45min)
    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback
    1. 2 WKs after THR (30 min)
    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback
    1. 6 WKs after THR (30 min)
    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback
    1. 10 WKs after THR (30 min)
    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback
Study groups in NCT02815163
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
comparison groupNo interventionThe CG received no extra care; they could receive the usual routine care for THR in the unit as they had before participation in the study. The routine care included oral instruction by nurses follow by the handout. Also, a brochure was provided of the structure of hip, the risk factors of THR, care before and after THR, complications, care of discharge, and demonstration of rehabilitation with pictures) of THR designed by researchers in this study. Five orthopedics health care experts independently reviewed and rated each item in the brochure on a five-point Likert-type scale in terms of relevance, representativeness, specificity, and clarity.
Empowerment education groupExperimentalThe 5 times total, 12-week EE intervention was aimed to empower older patients with THR to develop their own self-management program to meet their needs. This empowerment education intervention based on 6 empowerment components: "Partnership, listening, dialogue, reflection, action, feedback" and 5-step empowerment strategies: motivating patients self-awareness, assessing the causes of the problem, goal setting, individual self-care plan development, and checking whether goals or plans have been achieved who modified from Freire's 3-stage methodology. The difference between this program and the other health educations for patients with THR are that this program encourages them to explore their needs and worries, their own ability and power to meet their needs, and their capacity to seek and use their social support and resources etc.
Receives: Other: Empowerment education

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total Hip Replacement Self-efficacy Scale

    A five-item evaluation list measured self-efficacy (environment, self-monitoring, regular check-up, medicine, exercise), all components were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (4= fully confident to 0= no confidence at all) with higher scores signifying greater self-efficacy.

    Measured: 5min

  2. Self-care competence Scale

    The knowledge and behaviors subscales measured this variable, which includes knowledge and behavior related to THR self-care. The knowledge subscale contains 15 yes/no questions (6 for posture/ environment, 6 for wound/pain, and 3 for exercise), each with only one correct response. In order to prevent participants that guessed answers from confounding the data, the choice 'I do not know' was also provided. The scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge.

    Measured: 5min

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. ADL

    ADL was assessed using the Barthel scale, which was introduced in 1965 and yielded a score of 0-100, the measure 10 variables. These variables included fecal incontinence, urinary incontinence, and assistance with grooming, feeding, transfers, walking, dressing, climbing stairs, and bathing.

    Measured: 3min

  2. Tinetti mobility

    The Tinetti Mobility Scale (Tinetti et al. 1986) assessed mobility (gait and balance). This scale is simple: no required equipment attached and is quick and convenient to use. Each participant took around 5 minutes to perform the series of activities to assess mobility. The better a participant's performance, the higher the score.

    Measured: 3min

  3. GDS-15

    consisting of 15 questions, was the primary outcome evaluator (Sheikh and Yesavage, 1986). Scores of 0-4 are considered to be normal; 5-8 indicates mild depression; 9-11 indicates moderate depression; and 12-15 indicates severe depression.

    Measured: 3min

  4. SF-36

    The SF-36 questionnaire assesses health-related functions for eight distinct domains, which can be divided into physical component and mental component scales. This 36-item questionnaire was used to measure quality of life.

    Measured: 3min

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2013
  3. Primary completionMay 2014
  4. Study completionMay 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
108 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02815163
Sponsor's protocol ID
97-2081B
Status last verified
May 2018
First submitted
21 Jun 2016
Last updated
23 May 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Empowerment education in people with Empowerment, run by Tzu-Ting Huang.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total Hip Replacement Self-efficacy Scale (time frame: 5min). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in