AzTrials
AzTrials

Shoulder PainNCT02817269

Referred Pain Patterns Infraspinatus Muscle

A study testing Manual palpation and Deep dry needling in people with Shoulder Pain, run by Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The first aim of the study will be to identify the most common ReP pattern and compare its coincidence with that described by Travell and Simons. Second, the study aim will be to verify whether there are any significant differences by sex and types of technique used in regard to the ReP pattern of TrP 2 of the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Shoulder Pain
What is being tested?
Manual palpation and Deep dry needling
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
96 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2016to Sep 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged between 18 and 65 years.
  • To remain seated or in front of data visualization screens (tablets, computers or smartphones) for at least 4 hours a day.
  • Shoulder complaints in the last six weeks.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with evidence of serious medical illness.
  • Cognitive impairment.
  • Psychosocial disorders.
  • Bilateral affectation of shoulder pain.
  • Pregnancy.

About this study

Official title: Referred Pain Patterns in Trigger Point 2 of the Infraspinatus Muscle in Patients With Shoulder Pain

The first aim of the study will be to identify the most common ReP pattern and compare its coincidence with that described by Travell and Simons. Second, the study aim will be to verify whether there are any significant differences by sex and types of technique used in regard to the ReP pattern of TrP 2 of the infraspinatus muscle, an area described as more sensitive.Finally, the third aim of the study will be to determine whether deep dry needling will evoke the LTR and ReP more easily than manual palpation.

Read the detailed description

Patients will be recruited from a university's employee and student population by advertising at the university. Patients with shoulder complaints (described as pain felt in the shoulder or upper arm) will be randomly assigned to either an manual palpation or deep dry needling group. Participants will be randomly divided into 2 groups, a deep dry needling group and manual palpation group. Visual analogue scale (VAS), referred pain (ReP) pattern and features of referred pain of the infraspinatus muscle will be all assessed post-technique.

Conditions
Shoulder Pain
Being tested
Manual palpation, Deep dry needling
Keywords
Shoulder pain, Trigger points, Referred pain, Visual analogue scale
Medical subject headings
Shoulder Pain, Pain, Referred

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Manual palpationOther

    The manual palpation level will kept constant by applying enough digital pressure to cause the finger nail bed to blanch. When the nail will be turn pale, the amount of pressure will be measured at approximately 3 4kg/cm2 and will be maintained for 5-10 seconds to evoke referred pain. A manual palpation referred pain will be present if the pain radiated far enough for the patient to feel more than just a local pain.

  • Deep dry needlingOther

    Intramuscular needling will be carried out via deep dry needling into myofascial trigger point (MTrP) area without the introduction any substances. The aim is to elicit a local twitch response upon inserting the needle into the MTrP area and perform a neurological stimulation (by rotating the needle 360 degrees) to more easily evoke referred pain, holding for 10 seconds and then extracting the needle gently. The procedure will be followed by one minute of haemostatic compression.

Study groups in NCT02817269
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Manual palpation groupExperimentalFor the manual palpation group, the reference position will be a lateral position, lying on the non affected shoulder while the affected side will be explored. The arm and elbow are flexed 90° resting on a pillow and legs placed with 90° hip and knee flexion to stabilize the body, with the head resting on a pillow to maintain body alignment. The physiotherapist will be in front of the participant and carried out the examination with flat palpation using the thumb to identify soreness taut band tried to elicit local twitch response and referred pain in the infraspinatus area. First, three attempts will be made to elicit an local twitch response (LTR) using snapping palpation if a response will be obtained. After LRT, referred pain could also be evoked by palpation.
Receives: Other: Manual palpation
Deep dry needling groupExperimentalFor the deep dry needling group, the reference position will be a lateral position, lying on the non affected shoulder while the affected side will be explored. The arm and elbow are flexed 90° resting on a pillow and legs placed with 90° hip and knee flexion to stabilize the body, with the head resting on a pillow to maintain body alignment. The physiotherapist will be in front of the participant and carried out the examination with flat palpation using the thumb to identify soreness taut before making the needle insertion. Sterile stainless steel needles (length 40mm/caliber 0.32 with a cylindrical plastic guide) will be used.
Receives: Other: Deep dry needling

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mapping of Referred Pain Pattern

    The participants from both groups will ask to report whether ReP is evoked and to describe the ReP pattern using an anatomical map of the upper half of the human body divided into eighteen areas. Nine areas corresponded to the anterior part of the body and the other nine to the posterior part of the body.

    Measured: One month

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Prevalence active trigger point

    Active trigger point is considered: Soreness taut band and familiar pain.

    Measured: One month

  2. Evocation of Local Twitch Response

    These were assigned a numerical value of 0 (yes) or 1 (no) for better statistical handling of the data.

    Measured: One month

  3. Subjective pain intensity: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The VAS for pain measures the amount of pain experienced by a subject on a continuum from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 maximum pain.

    Measured: One month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2016
  3. Primary completionAug 2016
  4. Study completionSep 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
96 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02817269
Sponsor's protocol ID
UniversidadMHE-1
Status last verified
Oct 2016
First submitted
21 Jun 2016
Last updated
28 Oct 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Audette JF, Wang F, Smith H. Bilateral activation of motor unit potentials with unilateral needle stimulation of active myofascial trigger points. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;83(5):368-74, quiz 375-7, 389. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000118037.61143.7c.

    PubMed 15100626
  • Borg-Stein J. Management of peripheral pain generators in fibromyalgia. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2002 May;28(2):305-17. doi: 10.1016/s0889-857x(02)00004-2.

    PubMed 12122919
  • Bron C, Dommerholt J, Stegenga B, Wensing M, Oostendorp RA. High prevalence of shoulder girdle muscles with myofascial trigger points in patients with shoulder pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jun 28;12:139. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-139.

    PubMed 21711512
  • Bron C, Wensing M, Franssen JL, Oostendorp RA. Treatment of myofascial trigger points in common shoulder disorders by physical therapy: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN75722066]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Nov 5;8:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-107.

    PubMed 17983467
  • Chou LW, Hsieh YL, Kuan TS, Hong CZ. Needling therapy for myofascial pain: recommended technique with multiple rapid needle insertion. Biomedicine (Taipei). 2014;4(2):13. doi: 10.7603/s40681-014-0013-2. Epub 2014 Aug 2.

    PubMed 25520926
  • Ge HY, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Madeleine P, Arendt-Nielsen L. Topographical mapping and mechanical pain sensitivity of myofascial trigger points in the infraspinatus muscle. Eur J Pain. 2008 Oct;12(7):859-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jan 18.

    PubMed 18203637

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Manual palpation and Deep dry needling in people with Shoulder Pain, run by Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mapping of Referred Pain Pattern (time frame: One month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02817269, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in