Mental HandicapSABNCT02818374
The Oral Accessibility Spatula (Spatule SAB)
A study testing oral accessibility spatula (SAB) in people with Mental Handicap, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville at 7 sites in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency and the safe use of a new medical device to improve the oral accessibility of disabled people during the oral-dental examination. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Mental Handicap
- What is being tested?
- oral accessibility spatula (SAB)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Mar 2016to Mar 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Mental disability patient with behavioural troubles known or noticed during the approach of hand for dental examination
- Venham Scale score of 2 and higher, meaning opposing, after an approach toward the oral cavity
- Information of the responsible person for the patient, if necessary, and followed by the dated signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- pregnant or nursing woman
- lack of social security
- people under guardianship
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
France7 sites
CHU Dijon
Dijon
Centre Hospitalier Emile Durkheim
Épinal, 88000
Clinique Saint Francois
Haguenau
CHR Metz-Thionville- Mercy Hospital
Metz, 57085
CHRU Nancy
Nancy, 54000
CHRU Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67000
CHR METZ THIONVILLE- Bel-Air Hospital
Thionville, 57126
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Use of an Innovative Medical Device for Improving Oral Accessibility in People With Disabilities, Presenting Behavioral Disorders: The Oral Accessibility Spatula (Spatule SAB)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency and the safe use of a new medical device to improve the oral accessibility of disabled people during the oral-dental examination.
Read the detailed description
The oral examination of people with behavioural handicap seems to be difficult. Those patients react with defensive reflexes which limit spontaneously the amplitude of their oral cavity or prevent them to keep open their mouth for a sufficient time to process the examination. This difficulty can be caused by various reasons: cerebral motor disability, behavioral troubles or mental disability, and it affects people of all ages.
The current methods keeping open the mouth like wedges are often unsuitable for those patients. Moreover, no other device exists or is described even in literature. An innovative medical device has to be developed, in order to offer to disabled patients and the users or dentists a comfort during the oral-dental examination.
The oral accessibility spatula, made out polypropylene plastic, is designed into two parts :
- a handle to hold the spatula by the user
- a thin plastic surface introduced into the mouth, which is dull with a round edge and has holes on the sides to lock the spatula between the upper and lower teeth.
Primary objective :
To evaluate the buccal access during a first oral-dental examination without and then with the oral accessibility spatula (SAB).
Secondary objective :
To evaluate the safe use of the SAB To evaluate the tolerance of the exam without, and then with the SAB
Primary endpoint :
Visibility and dental examination of incisor-canine sectors, premolars and molars using a probe, assessed by an oral accessibility score determined based on intra oral accessible areas with and without oral accessibility Spatula device
Secondary endpoints :
The safety of the spatula will be assessed by analyzing the reported adverse effects and their relative frequency The dental exam tolerance evaluation; with and without Oral Accessibility .Spatula
Methodology :
Multi-center interventional prospective study, open-label Only one medical check per patient
Procedures :
Any patient with a behavioral handicap, and who consults with dentist for a preventive check-up or a oral-dental curative act, is examined by an inclusion operator who checks the inclusion or non-inclusion criteria, and especially the behavior with Venham Scale (only patients with a score of 2 and higher, meaning opposing, after an approach toward the oral cavity are included).
The oral accessibility score of each eligible patient is performed twice, without the SAB first, and then with the SAB.
The incidents and/or potential injuries are reported from a standardized grid. Venham scale score is measured a second time during the oral-dental examination without or with the spatula.
Patients number :
Without the SAB, the rate of patients with an oral accessibility score of at least level 8 is 20%.
The protocol forecasts hypothetically a 20% highering of this rate after the use of SAB (so 40% of patients with a score of 8 and higher). With a total staff of 140 patients, this hypothesis is validated with an α risk set at 5% and a statistical power at 90%. 200 patients are expected in order to take into account a potential center effect and a potential investigator effect, and a study output rate of 10%.
Trial Time :
Only one medical check per patient, so the total duration goes with the inclusion period of 18 months.
Expected study start : first semester of 2016 End of inclusion : second semester of 2017 End of study : second semester of 2017
Statistical Analysis :
The major analysis will be the comparison of the oral accessibility scores during the examination with or without the SAB. Each patient will be his own control, and the examinations always will be performed without the SAB in first, and secondly with the SAB, by the same dental surgeon.
Expected Benefits :
The expected result is the proof of a best examination quality with no risk for the patient. The major prospect is the availability of the SAB to dental surgeons to improve the therapeutic indications and the quality of examinations, then to parents, carers and caregivers, in order to make possible and easier the application of a oral-dental health suitable for handicapped or disabled people.
So, the expected benefits are :
- early diagnostic of the oral-dental diseases
- improved efficiency of the tooth care
- reduction of the use of general anesthesia for oral examinations
- help for tooth washing in order to improve significantly the oral-dental healthy level
- improved prevention by the availability of the spatula to parents, carers and physicians.
Quality Assurance Plan :
Data will be recorded in a Paper Case Report from medical records. The patients will undergo only one medical examination for the study. No follow-up is expected.
- Conditions
- Mental Handicap
- Being tested
- oral accessibility spatula (SAB)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
oral accessibility spatula (SAB)Device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Disabled People with behavioral trouble | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: oral accessibility spatula (SAB) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visibility and dental examination of incisor-canine sectors, premolars and molars using a probe, assessed by an oral accessibility score determined based on intra oral accessible areas with and without oral accessibility Spatula device
score of 0 = no access to 12 = total accessibility
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (2)
The safety of the spatula will be assessed by analyzing the reported adverse effects and their relative frequency
Measured: 1 day
The dental exam tolerance evaluation with and without Oral Accessibility Spatula
using Venham behaviour scale
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2016
- Primary completionDec 2018
- Study completionMar 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mental HandicapStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02818374
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014-02-CHRMT
- Acronym
- SAB
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 30 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Mogenot M, Hein-Halbgewachs L, Goetz C, Ouamara N, Droz-Desprez D, Strazielle C, Albecker S, Mengus B, Strub M, Maniere MC, Richardin P, Wang S, Piga G, Dalstein A, Anastasio D. Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of an innovative medical device for improving oral accessibility during oral examination in special-needs patients: A multicentric clinical trial. PLoS One. 2020 Sep 28;15(9):e0239898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239898. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32986784
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Use of an Innovative Medical Device for Improving Oral Accessibility in People With Disabilities, Presenting Behavioral Disorders: The Oral Accessibility Spatula (Spatule SAB)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02818374
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SAB / 2014-02-CHRMT
- Conditions
- Mental Handicap
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-ThionvilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency and the safe use of a new medical device to improve the oral accessibility of disabled people during the oral-dental examination.
Detailed description
The oral examination of people with behavioural handicap seems to be difficult. Those patients react with defensive reflexes which limit spontaneously the amplitude of their oral cavity or prevent them to keep open their mouth for a sufficient time to process the examination. This difficulty can be caused by various reasons: cerebral motor disability, behavioral troubles or mental disability, and it affects people of all ages.
The current methods keeping open the mouth like wedges are often unsuitable for those patients. Moreover, no other device exists or is described even in literature. An innovative medical device has to be developed, in order to offer to disabled patients and the users or dentists a comfort during the oral-dental examination.
The oral accessibility spatula, made out polypropylene plastic, is designed into two parts :
- a handle to hold the spatula by the user
- a thin plastic surface introduced into the mouth, which is dull with a round edge and has holes on the sides to lock the spatula between the upper and lower teeth.
Primary objective :
To evaluate the buccal access during a first oral-dental examination without and then with the oral accessibility spatula (SAB).
Secondary objective :
To evaluate the safe use of the SAB To evaluate the tolerance of the exam without, and then with the SAB
Primary endpoint :
Visibility and dental examination of incisor-canine sectors, premolars and molars using a probe, assessed by an oral accessibility score determined based on intra oral accessible areas with and without oral accessibility Spatula device
Secondary endpoints :
The safety of the spatula will be assessed by analyzing the reported adverse effects and their relative frequency The dental exam tolerance evaluation; with and without Oral Accessibility .Spatula
Methodology :
Multi-center interventional prospective study, open-label Only one medical check per patient
Procedures :
Any patient with a behavioral handicap, and who consults with dentist for a preventive check-up or a oral-dental curative act, is examined by an inclusion operator who checks the inclusion or non-inclusion criteria, and especially the behavior with Venham Scale (only patients with a score of 2 and higher, meaning opposing, after an approach toward the oral cavity are included).
The oral accessibility score of each eligible patient is performed twice, without the SAB first, and then with the SAB.
The incidents and/or potential injuries are reported from a standardized grid. Venham scale score is measured a second time during the oral-dental examination without or with the spatula.
Patients number :
Without the SAB, the rate of patients with an oral accessibility score of at least level 8 is 20%.
The protocol forecasts hypothetically a 20% highering of this rate after the use of SAB (so 40% of patients with a score of 8 and higher). With a total staff of 140 patients, this hypothesis is validated with an α risk set at 5% and a statistical power at 90%. 200 patients are expected in order to take into account a potential center effect and a potential investigator effect, and a study output rate of 10%.
Trial Time :
Only one medical check per patient, so the total duration goes with the inclusion period of 18 months.
Expected study start : first semester of 2016 End of inclusion : second semester of 2017 End of study : second semester of 2017
Statistical Analysis :
The major analysis will be the comparison of the oral accessibility scores during the examination with or without the SAB. Each patient will be his own control, and the examinations always will be performed without the SAB in first, and secondly with the SAB, by the same dental surgeon.
Expected Benefits :
The expected result is the proof of a best examination quality with no risk for the patient. The major prospect is the availability of the SAB to dental surgeons to improve the therapeutic indications and the quality of examinations, then to parents, carers and caregivers, in order to make possible and easier the application of a oral-dental health suitable for handicapped or disabled people.
So, the expected benefits are :
- early diagnostic of the oral-dental diseases
- improved efficiency of the tooth care
- reduction of the use of general anesthesia for oral examinations
- help for tooth washing in order to improve significantly the oral-dental healthy level
- improved prevention by the availability of the spatula to parents, carers and physicians.
Quality Assurance Plan :
Data will be recorded in a Paper Case Report from medical records. The patients will undergo only one medical examination for the study. No follow-up is expected.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Disabled People with behavioral trouble | Experimental | Device: oral accessibility spatula (SAB) |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Mental disability patient with behavioural troubles known or noticed during the approach of hand for dental examination
- Venham Scale score of 2 and higher, meaning opposing, after an approach toward the oral cavity
- Information of the responsible person for the patient, if necessary, and followed by the dated signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- pregnant or nursing woman
- lack of social security
- people under guardianship
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| oral accessibility spatula (SAB) | Device | Disabled People with behavioral trouble |
Primary outcome
Visibility and dental examination of incisor-canine sectors, premolars and molars using a probe, assessed by an oral accessibility score determined based on intra oral accessible areas with and without oral accessibility Spatula device
Time frame: 1 day
score of 0 = no access to 12 = total accessibility
2 secondary outcomes
The safety of the spatula will be assessed by analyzing the reported adverse effects and their relative frequency
Time frame: 1 day
The dental exam tolerance evaluation with and without Oral Accessibility Spatula
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 32986784Mogenot M, Hein-Halbgewachs L, Goetz C, Ouamara N, Droz-Desprez D, Strazielle C, Albecker S, Mengus B, Strub M, Maniere MC, Richardin P, Wang S, Piga G, Dalstein A, Anastasio D. Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of an innovative medical device for improving oral accessibility during oral examination in special-needs patients: A multicentric clinical trial. PLoS One. 2020 Sep 28;15(9):e0239898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239898. eCollection 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Mental Handicap
Recruiting
A Group Intervention for Promoting Health-related Habits (LEV-G)
Life Style, Health-Related Behavior
Recruiting
Technology in Play for Children With Physical Disabilities: the Dice Model of Play
Disability Physical, Disabilities Mental
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing oral accessibility spatula (SAB) in people with Mental Handicap, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville at 7 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visibility and dental examination of incisor-canine sectors, premolars and molars using a probe, assessed by an oral accessibility score determined based on intra oral accessible areas with and without oral accessibility Spatula device (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02818374, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2026.