Acute PainPhase 3NCT02820324
Study of Oliceridine (TRV130) for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acute Pain After Abdominoplasty
A Phase 3 study testing Oliceridine and Morphine in people with Acute Pain, run by Trevena Inc. at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of intravenous (IV) oliceridine administered as needed (PRN) compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe acute pain after abdominoplasty. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Pain
- What is being tested?
- Oliceridine and Morphine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 407 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2016to Jan 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Has undergone abdominoplasty with no additional collateral procedures.
- Experiences a pain intensity rating of moderate to severe acute pain.
- Able to provide written informed consent before any study procedure.
Who cannot join
- ASA Physical Status Classification System classification of P3 or worse.
- Has surgical or post-surgical complications.
- Has clinically significant medical conditions or history of such conditions that may interfere with the interpretation of efficacy, safety, or tolerability data obtained in the trial, or may interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of drugs.
- Has previously participated in another TRV130 clinical study.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77027
Research Site
Pasadena, California, 91105
Research Site
Pasadena, Maryland, 21122
Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85027
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo and Active-Controlled Study of Oliceridine (TRV130) for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acute Pain After Abdominoplasty
The primary objective is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of intravenous (IV) oliceridine administered as needed (PRN) compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe acute pain after abdominoplasty.
- Conditions
- Acute Pain
- Being tested
- Oliceridine, Placebo, Morphine
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OliceridineDrug
PlaceboDrug
MorphineDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment 1 Oliceridine | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Oliceridine |
| Treatment 2 Oliceridine | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Oliceridine |
| Treatment 3 Oliceridine | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Oliceridine |
| Treatment 4 Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Treatment 5 Morphine | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Morphine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Patients Who Respond to Study Medication at the 24-hr Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Assessment Compared to Placebo.
The NPRS is an 11-point scale from 0-10 where "0" = no pain and "10" = the most intense pain imaginable. A patient was a responder if: their final time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)-24 corresponded to a ≥30% improvement without rescue pain medication during the Randomized Treatment Period, without early discontinuation of study medication for any reason, and without reaching the study medication dosing limit.
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (4)
Number of Respiratory Safety Events Compared to Morphine.
Respiratory Safety Events were defined as a clinically relevant worsening of respiratory status.
Measured: 24 hours
Duration of Respiratory Events Compared to Morphine.
Respiratory Safety Events were defined as a clinically relevant worsening of respiratory status.
Measured: 24 hours
Odds Ratio of Patients Who Respond to Study Medication at the 24-hr NPRS Assessment Compared to Morphine.
Odds ratio of 24-hour responder analysis versus morphine. Number of patients who responded to study medication at the 24-hr NPRS assessment is captured in the primary outcome measure.
Measured: 24 hours
Number of Patients With Treatment-related Adverse Events Compared to Placebo and Compared to Morphine.
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2016
- Primary completionDec 2016
- Study completionJan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 407 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Trevena Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Franck Skobieranda, MD, Study director, Trevena Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02820324
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CP130-3002
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 9 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Singla NK, Skobieranda F, Soergel DG, Salamea M, Burt DA, Demitrack MA, Viscusi ER. APOLLO-2: A Randomized, Placebo and Active-Controlled Phase III Study Investigating Oliceridine (TRV130), a G Protein-Biased Ligand at the mu-Opioid Receptor, for Management of Moderate to Severe Acute Pain Following Abdominoplasty. Pain Pract. 2019 Sep;19(7):715-731. doi: 10.1111/papr.12801. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
PubMed 31162798
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo and Active-Controlled Study of Oliceridine (TRV130) for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acute Pain After Abdominoplasty
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02820324
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CP130-3002
- Conditions
- Acute Pain
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 407 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Trevena Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2016
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Oct 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of intravenous (IV) oliceridine administered as needed (PRN) compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe acute pain after abdominoplasty.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment 1 Oliceridine | Experimental | Drug: Oliceridine |
| Treatment 2 Oliceridine | Experimental | Drug: Oliceridine |
| Treatment 3 Oliceridine | Experimental | Drug: Oliceridine |
| Treatment 4 Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
| Treatment 5 Morphine | Active comparator | Drug: Morphine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Has undergone abdominoplasty with no additional collateral procedures.
- Experiences a pain intensity rating of moderate to severe acute pain.
- Able to provide written informed consent before any study procedure.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- ASA Physical Status Classification System classification of P3 or worse.
- Has surgical or post-surgical complications.
- Has clinically significant medical conditions or history of such conditions that may interfere with the interpretation of efficacy, safety, or tolerability data obtained in the trial, or may interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of drugs.
- Has previously participated in another TRV130 clinical study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Oliceridine | Drug | Treatment 1 Oliceridine, Treatment 2 Oliceridine, Treatment 3 Oliceridine |
| Placebo | Drug | Treatment 4 Placebo |
| Morphine | Drug | Treatment 5 Morphine |
Primary outcome
Number of Patients Who Respond to Study Medication at the 24-hr Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Assessment Compared to Placebo.
Time frame: 24 hours
The NPRS is an 11-point scale from 0-10 where "0" = no pain and "10" = the most intense pain imaginable. A patient was a responder if: their final time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)-24 corresponded to a ≥30% improvement without rescue pain medication during the Randomized Treatment Period, without early discontinuation of study medication for any reason, and without reaching the study medication dosing limit.
4 secondary outcomes
Number of Respiratory Safety Events Compared to Morphine.
Time frame: 24 hours
Duration of Respiratory Events Compared to Morphine.
Time frame: 24 hours
Odds Ratio of Patients Who Respond to Study Medication at the 24-hr NPRS Assessment Compared to Morphine.
Time frame: 24 hours
Number of Patients With Treatment-related Adverse Events Compared to Placebo and Compared to Morphine.
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31162798Singla NK, Skobieranda F, Soergel DG, Salamea M, Burt DA, Demitrack MA, Viscusi ER. APOLLO-2: A Randomized, Placebo and Active-Controlled Phase III Study Investigating Oliceridine (TRV130), a G Protein-Biased Ligand at the mu-Opioid Receptor, for Management of Moderate to Severe Acute Pain Following Abdominoplasty. Pain Pract. 2019 Sep;19(7):715-731. doi: 10.1111/papr.12801. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
Related trials for Acute Pain
Not yet recruiting
Human Experimental Models of Pain (HEMP)
Acute Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
REctus Sheath Trial
Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of MK-6916 in Participants With Pain After Bunion Removal Surgery (MK-6916-007)
Pain Management
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Investigating the Analgesic Potential of (2R,6R)-HNK in Acute Pain in Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers
Not yet recruiting
Post-operative Pain and Clinical Outcome After Single-cone Obturation With a Calcium Silicate-based Versus Epoxy Resin Sealer
Post Operative Pain, Acute, Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Franck Skobieranda, MD study director
Trevena Inc.
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Oliceridine and Morphine in people with Acute Pain, run by Trevena Inc. at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Oct 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Patients Who Respond to Study Medication at the 24-hr Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Assessment Compared to Placebo. (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02820324, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2020.