AscitesPhase 2NCT02821377
Metabolic Effects of Furosemide +HSS in Refractory Ascites
A Phase 2 study testing intravenous furosemide, Hypertonic saline solutions and Seriated paracentesis in people with Ascites and Cirrhosis, run by University of Palermo at 3 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Introduction: Patients with chronic liver diseases are usually thin as a result of hypermetabolism and malnutrition expressed by reduced levels of leptin and impairment of other adyponectins such as visfatin. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- What is being tested?
- intravenous furosemide, Hypertonic saline solutions and Seriated paracentesis
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Dec 2013to Apr 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Refractory ascites defined according to the International Ascites Club criteria
Who cannot join
- inability to obtain informed consent
- possible non-cirrhotic ascites
- congestive heart failure (defined by clinical exam and echocardiogram)
- acute renal failure
- hepatocellular carcinoma based on the Barcelona Clinic liver Cancer (BCLC) criteria
- complete portal vein thrombosis, active sepsis or other incurable cancers
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Italy3 sites
Antonino Tuttolomondo
Palermo, Italy, 90127
Internal Medicine Ward of Palermo University Hospital
Palermo, Italy, 90127
Internal Medicine Ward, University of Palermo
Palermo, Italy, 90127
About this study
Official title: Immune-inflammatory and Metabolic Effects of High Dose Furosemide Plus Hypertonic Saline Solution (HSS) Treatment in Cirrhotic Subjects With Refractory Ascite
Introduction: Patients with chronic liver diseases are usually thin as a result of hypermetabolism and malnutrition expressed by reduced levels of leptin and impairment of other adyponectins such as visfatin.
Aims: To evaluate the metabolic and inflammatory effects of intravenous high-dose furosemide plus hypertonic saline solutions (HSS) compared with repeated paracentesis and a standard oral diuretic schedule, in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites.
Read more
Methods; All consecutive cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites unresponsive to outpatient treatment will be enrolled . Enrolled subjects will be randomized to treatment with intravenous infusion of furosemide (125-250mg⁄bid) plus small volumes of HSS from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge (Group A ), or repeated paracentesis from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge (Group B, ).
Plasma levels of ANP, BNP, Leptin, visfatin, IL-1β, TNF-a, IL-6 were measured before and after the two type of treatment.
Read the detailed description
Cirrhosis and congestive heart failure (CHF) are major clinical disease states characterized by renal sodium and water retention with edema formation. Abnormalities of circulatory and volume homeostasis in these diseases elicit neuro-hormonal responses influencing renal function and leading to retention of sodium and water.Cytokines constitute a complex network of molecules involved in the regulation of the inflammatory response and the homeostasis of organ functions. Moreover cytokines coordinate physiologic and pathologic processes in the liver, such as liver growth and regeneration, as well as inflammatory processes including viral liver disease, liver fibrosis and cirrhosis .
Furthermore, patients with chronic liver diseases are usually thin as a result of hypermetabolism, diminished food intake, and malnutrition, and leptin is thought to be involved in this process. Furthermore, other adipocytokines play an important role in lipid metabolism and liver disease progression. Visfatin a 52-kDa protein that has been cloned as pre-B cell colony-enhancing factor (PBEF), and liver and muscle have been reported to be the tissues with the highest expression levels of this protein. Recently, visfatin has also been proposed as an adipokine secreted by adipose tissue.
A recent study reported that patients with chronic HBV infection have significantly higher serum levels of adiponectin and visfatin, but lower leptin levels than healthy controls, and that serum adipocytokine levels independently correlate with HBV viremia, HBsAg levels, and liver fibrosis stages.
Another recent study reported that in subjects with alcoholic cirrhosis following adjustment for fat mass, visfatin levels were significantly higher from Child-Pugh Class A to Class C. Furthermore, leptin, the first described adipokine, interplays with hepatic metabolism, and data from a small study suggest that recombinant leptin administration has a possibly beneficial effect on steatosis, but not fibrosis, in NAFLD patients with hypo-leptinemia and a very recent study reported that in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), leptin is upregulated, and promotes liver fibrosis by directly activating hepatic stellate cells (HSC) via the hedgehog pathway and the hedgehog-regulated osteopontin (OPN).
Nevertheless, to the best of knowledge, no study has addressed the effectiveness of treatment of complications of cirrhosis such as ascites and fluid overload on these inflammatory and metabolic abnormalities.
According to the International Ascites Club, refractory ascites is defined by the lack of response to high doses of diuretics (spironolactone 400mg⁄day and furosemide 160mg⁄day) or the development of adverse effects (hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, hepatic encephalopathy or renal failure) that prohibit further use of diuretics.
A recent clinical trial reported that intravenous hypertonic saline solutions (HSS) plus high-dose furosemide is a safe and effective alternative to repeated paracentesis when treating hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites.
Specific objective and hypothesis:
On this basis, the hypothesis of this trial was that the clinical effectiveness of high dose furosemide + HSS could be accomplished by parallel effects on inflammatory, natriuretic and metabolic pathways expressed by changes of cytokines, natriuretic peptides, leptin and visfatin serum levels after treatment.
Thus the aim of this trial will be to evalute the metabolic and inflammatory effects of intravenous high-dose furosemide plus HSS compared with repeated paracentesis and a standard oral diuretic schedule, in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites, evaluating their effects on a panel of serum biomarkers such as some inflammatory cytokines, ANP/BNP, leptin and visfatin serum levels by means of analysis of differences of their serum levels before and after treatment with high dose furosemide + HSS.
Materials and methods All consecutive cirrhotic patients presenting with ascites unresponsive to ambulatory treatment at Palermo University Hospital (Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico 'Paolo Giaccone') who will be admitted to the Internal Medicine Ward from December 2013 to December 2015 will be offered enrolment in the study protocol after a diagnosis of ascites had been made and all potential contraindications excluded.
Refractory ascites was defined according to the International Ascites Club criteria 1 as either: (a) diuretic-resistant refractory ascites: <1.5kg ⁄week weight loss while being treated with furosemide (160mg⁄day) and spironolactone (400mg⁄day) or an equivalent dose of a loop-acting and distal-acting diuretic; or (b) diuretic-intractable refractory ascites: <1.5kg⁄week weight loss as a result of the inability to use an effective dose of diuretic because of development of diuretic-induced hyponatremia (sodium level <125mEq⁄ L), hyperkalemia (potassium level >5.5mEq⁄L), renal failure (doubling of serum creatinine or values >2.5g⁄dL) or encephalopathy; (c) previous dietary restriction of sodium between 50-66mEq ⁄day.
Exclusion criteria were: inability to obtain informed consent, possible non-cirrhotic ascites, congestive heart failure (defined by clinical exam and echocardiogram), acute renal failure, hepatocellular carcinoma based on the Barcelona Clinic liver Cancer (BCLC) criteria , complete portal vein thrombosis, active sepsis or other incurable cancers. The study was approved by the institutional Ethics Committee and written informed consent was obtained for all patients.
Daily clinical and laboratory evaluation Treatment protocol Group A: treatment with intravenous infusion of furosemide (doses 125-250mg⁄ bid) plus small volumes of HSS (150mL 1.4-4.6% NaCl), from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge ( 8 days of treatment) , with water restriction and a normal sodium diet.
Group B: repeated paracentesis (4-6L daily) from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge with albumin reinfusion at a rate of 5-8g⁄ L of removed ascites. The last paracentesis (at 3 days from admission after 8 days was a total paracentesis (8.1±2.7L) plus iv albumin infusion (8g per liter of ascitic fluid removed) following a method previously described.
Blood sample collection Blood samples from each subject enrolled wil, be drawn after at least 30 minutes of bed rest in a supine position, within 24h of admission and after 8 days of active treatment. Blood samples were centrifuged (10,000g) and the resulting supernatant was immediately frozen at -80°C until analysis was completed.
Metabolic and immune-inflammatory biochemical evaluation Will be evaluate plasma levels of ANP, BNP, Leptin, visfatin, and IL-1β, TNF-a, IL-6 that will be measured using a sandwich ELISA (Human IL-1β, TNF-a, IL-6 6 Diaclone). ANP and BNP plasma concentration was measured in duplicate by a solid phase sandwich immune-radiometric assay for human BNP (IRMA, ANP and BNP, Shering cis bio int). The minimum detectable concentrations for the diagnostic tests are: TNF-a: 8pg/mL; IL-1β: <1pg/mL; IL-6: <0.81pg/mL; ANP: 3.1pg/mL; BNP: 5pg/mL.
Leptin and visfatin will be measured by ELISA Sandwich (leptin Mediagnost and visfatin Phoenix Pharmaceticals Inc); the minimum detectable concentration for these diagnostic teste were: leptin 0.8ng/ml; visfatin: 1.8ng/ml.
- Being tested
- intravenous furosemide, Hypertonic saline solutions, Seriated paracentesis
- Keywords
- cirrhosis, ascites, immunology, inflammation, nutrition
- Medical subject headings
- Ascites, Fibrosis, Inflammation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
intravenous furosemideDrug
Also called furosemide +HSS
treatment with intravenous infusion of furosemide (doses 125-250mg⁄ bid) plus small volumes of HSS (150mL 1.4-4.6% NaCl), from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge, with water restriction and a normal sodium diet.
Hypertonic saline solutionsDrug
Also called HSS
Intravenous small volumes of HSS (150mL 1.4-4.6% NaCl), plus treatment with intravenous infusion of furosemide (doses 125-250mg⁄ bid) from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge, with water restriction and a normal sodium diet.
Seriated paracentesisProcedure or surgery
Also called paracentesis
repeated paracentesis from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| intravenous furosemide | Experimental | intravenous infusion of furosemide (doses 125-250mg⁄ bid) from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge Intervention: drug: furosemide ; other name: lasix Receives: Drug: intravenous furosemide; Drug: Hypertonic saline solutions |
| intravenous hypertonic saline solutions | Experimental | small volumes of hypertonic saline solutions (HSS) (150mL 1.4-4.6% NaCl), from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge Intervention: Hypertonic saline solutions (1.4-4.6%NaCl) Intervention other name: not specified Receives: Drug: intravenous furosemide; Drug: Hypertonic saline solutions |
| seriated paracentesis | Active comparator | no intervention Intervention: no drug only seriated paracentesis repeated paracentesis from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge Receives: Procedure: Seriated paracentesis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Δ-ANP
difference between ANP serum levels at admission and ANP serum levels at discharge.
Measured: 8 days
Secondary outcomes (6)
Δ-BNP (pg/ml): evaluated by means of the difference between BNP plasma levels at admission and BNP plasma levels at discharge.
difference between BNP serum levels at admission and BNP serum levels at discharge.
Measured: 8 days
Δ IL-1beta (pg/ml): evaluated by means of the difference between IL-1beta plasma levels at admission and IL-1beta plasma levels at discharge.
difference between IL-1 beta serum levels at admission and IL-1 beta serum levels
Measured: 8 days
Δ-visfatin (ng/ml): evaluated by means of the difference between serum visfatin at admission and serum visfatin at discharge.
difference between serum visfatin at admission and serum visfatin at discharge.
Measured: 8 days
Δ-Leptin (ng/ml): evaluated by means of the difference between serum leptin at admission and serum leptin at discharge.
difference between serum leptin at admission and serum leptin at discharge.
Measured: 8 days
Δ-TNF-alfa (ng/ml): evaluated by means of the difference between serum TNF-alfa at admission and serum TNF-alfa discharge.
difference between serum TNF-alfa at admission and serum TNF-alfa at discharge.
Measured: 8 days
Δ-TNF-alfa (ng/ml): evaluated by means of the difference between serum IL-6 at admission and serum IL-6 at discharge.
difference between serum IL-6 at admission and serum Il-6 at discharge.
Measured: 8 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2013
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionApr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AscitesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Palermo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Antonino Tuttolomondo, University of Palermo
- Investigators
- Antonio Pinto, MD, Study chair, University of Palermo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02821377
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 21771
- Status last verified
- Jun 2016
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 1 Jul 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Licata G, Tuttolomondo A, Licata A, Parrinello G, Di Raimondo D, Di Sciacca R, Camma C, Craxi A, Paterna S, Pinto A. Clinical Trial: High-dose furosemide plus small-volume hypertonic saline solutions vs. repeated paracentesis as treatment of refractory ascites. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Aug;30(3):227-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04040.x. Epub 2009 May 12.
PubMed 19438847Tuttolomondo A, Pinto A, Di Raimondo D, Corrao S, Di Sciacca R, Scaglione R, Caruso C, Licata G. Changes in natriuretic peptide and cytokine plasma levels in patients with heart failure, after treatment with high dose of furosemide plus hypertonic saline solution (HSS) and after a saline loading. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 May;21(5):372-9. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.10.014. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
PubMed 20346637
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jul 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immune-inflammatory and Metabolic Effects of High Dose Furosemide Plus Hypertonic Saline Solution (HSS) Treatment in Cirrhotic Subjects With Refractory Ascite
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02821377
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 21771
- Keywords
- cirrhosis, ascites, immunology, inflammation, nutrition
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PalermoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2013
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction: Patients with chronic liver diseases are usually thin as a result of hypermetabolism and malnutrition expressed by reduced levels of leptin and impairment of other adyponectins such as visfatin.
Aims: To evaluate the metabolic and inflammatory effects of intravenous high-dose furosemide plus hypertonic saline solutions (HSS) compared with repeated paracentesis and a standard oral diuretic schedule, in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites.
Methods; All consecutive cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites unresponsive to outpatient treatment will be enrolled . Enrolled subjects will be randomized to treatment with intravenous infusion of furosemide (125-250mg⁄bid) plus small volumes of HSS from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge (Group A ), or repeated paracentesis from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge (Group B, ).
Plasma levels of ANP, BNP, Leptin, visfatin, IL-1β, TNF-a, IL-6 were measured before and after the two type of treatment.
Detailed description
Cirrhosis and congestive heart failure (CHF) are major clinical disease states characterized by renal sodium and water retention with edema formation. Abnormalities of circulatory and volume homeostasis in these diseases elicit neuro-hormonal responses influencing renal function and leading to retention of sodium and water.Cytokines constitute a complex network of molecules involved in the regulation of the inflammatory response and the homeostasis of organ functions. Moreover cytokines coordinate physiologic and pathologic processes in the liver, such as liver growth and regeneration, as well as inflammatory processes including viral liver disease, liver fibrosis and cirrhosis .
Furthermore, patients with chronic liver diseases are usually thin as a result of hypermetabolism, diminished food intake, and malnutrition, and leptin is thought to be involved in this process. Furthermore, other adipocytokines play an important role in lipid metabolism and liver disease progression. Visfatin a 52-kDa protein that has been cloned as pre-B cell colony-enhancing factor (PBEF), and liver and muscle have been reported to be the tissues with the highest expression levels of this protein. Recently, visfatin has also been proposed as an adipokine secreted by adipose tissue.
A recent study reported that patients with chronic HBV infection have significantly higher serum levels of adiponectin and visfatin, but lower leptin levels than healthy controls, and that serum adipocytokine levels independently correlate with HBV viremia, HBsAg levels, and liver fibrosis stages.
Another recent study reported that in subjects with alcoholic cirrhosis following adjustment for fat mass, visfatin levels were significantly higher from Child-Pugh Class A to Class C. Furthermore, leptin, the first described adipokine, interplays with hepatic metabolism, and data from a small study suggest that recombinant leptin administration has a possibly beneficial effect on steatosis, but not fibrosis, in NAFLD patients with hypo-leptinemia and a very recent study reported that in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), leptin is upregulated, and promotes liver fibrosis by directly activating hepatic stellate cells (HSC) via the hedgehog pathway and the hedgehog-regulated osteopontin (OPN).
Nevertheless, to the best of knowledge, no study has addressed the effectiveness of treatment of complications of cirrhosis such as ascites and fluid overload on these inflammatory and metabolic abnormalities.
According to the International Ascites Club, refractory ascites is defined by the lack of response to high doses of diuretics (spironolactone 400mg⁄day and furosemide 160mg⁄day) or the development of adverse effects (hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, hepatic encephalopathy or renal failure) that prohibit further use of diuretics.
A recent clinical trial reported that intravenous hypertonic saline solutions (HSS) plus high-dose furosemide is a safe and effective alternative to repeated paracentesis when treating hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites.
Specific objective and hypothesis:
On this basis, the hypothesis of this trial was that the clinical effectiveness of high dose furosemide + HSS could be accomplished by parallel effects on inflammatory, natriuretic and metabolic pathways expressed by changes of cytokines, natriuretic peptides, leptin and visfatin serum levels after treatment.
Thus the aim of this trial will be to evalute the metabolic and inflammatory effects of intravenous high-dose furosemide plus HSS compared with repeated paracentesis and a standard oral diuretic schedule, in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites, evaluating their effects on a panel of serum biomarkers such as some inflammatory cytokines, ANP/BNP, leptin and visfatin serum levels by means of analysis of differences of their serum levels before and after treatment with high dose furosemide + HSS.
Materials and methods All consecutive cirrhotic patients presenting with ascites unresponsive to ambulatory treatment at Palermo University Hospital (Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico 'Paolo Giaccone') who will be admitted to the Internal Medicine Ward from December 2013 to December 2015 will be offered enrolment in the study protocol after a diagnosis of ascites had been made and all potential contraindications excluded.
Refractory ascites was defined according to the International Ascites Club criteria 1 as either: (a) diuretic-resistant refractory ascites: <1.5kg ⁄week weight loss while being treated with furosemide (160mg⁄day) and spironolactone (400mg⁄day) or an equivalent dose of a loop-acting and distal-acting diuretic; or (b) diuretic-intractable refractory ascites: <1.5kg⁄week weight loss as a result of the inability to use an effective dose of diuretic because of development of diuretic-induced hyponatremia (sodium level <125mEq⁄ L), hyperkalemia (potassium level >5.5mEq⁄L), renal failure (doubling of serum creatinine or values >2.5g⁄dL) or encephalopathy; (c) previous dietary restriction of sodium between 50-66mEq ⁄day.
Exclusion criteria were: inability to obtain informed consent, possible non-cirrhotic ascites, congestive heart failure (defined by clinical exam and echocardiogram), acute renal failure, hepatocellular carcinoma based on the Barcelona Clinic liver Cancer (BCLC) criteria , complete portal vein thrombosis, active sepsis or other incurable cancers. The study was approved by the institutional Ethics Committee and written informed consent was obtained for all patients.
Daily clinical and laboratory evaluation Treatment protocol Group A: treatment with intravenous infusion of furosemide (doses 125-250mg⁄ bid) plus small volumes of HSS (150mL 1.4-4.6% NaCl), from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge ( 8 days of treatment) , with water restriction and a normal sodium diet.
Group B: repeated paracentesis (4-6L daily) from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge with albumin reinfusion at a rate of 5-8g⁄ L of removed ascites. The last paracentesis (at 3 days from admission after 8 days was a total paracentesis (8.1±2.7L) plus iv albumin infusion (8g per liter of ascitic fluid removed) following a method previously described.
Blood sample collection Blood samples from each subject enrolled wil, be drawn after at least 30 minutes of bed rest in a supine position, within 24h of admission and after 8 days of active treatment. Blood samples were centrifuged (10,000g) and the resulting supernatant was immediately frozen at -80°C until analysis was completed.
Metabolic and immune-inflammatory biochemical evaluation Will be evaluate plasma levels of ANP, BNP, Leptin, visfatin, and IL-1β, TNF-a, IL-6 that will be measured using a sandwich ELISA (Human IL-1β, TNF-a, IL-6 6 Diaclone). ANP and BNP plasma concentration was measured in duplicate by a solid phase sandwich immune-radiometric assay for human BNP (IRMA, ANP and BNP, Shering cis bio int). The minimum detectable concentrations for the diagnostic tests are: TNF-a: 8pg/mL; IL-1β: <1pg/mL; IL-6: <0.81pg/mL; ANP: 3.1pg/mL; BNP: 5pg/mL.
Leptin and visfatin will be measured by ELISA Sandwich (leptin Mediagnost and visfatin Phoenix Pharmaceticals Inc); the minimum detectable concentration for these diagnostic teste were: leptin 0.8ng/ml; visfatin: 1.8ng/ml.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| intravenous furosemide | Experimental | Drug: intravenous furosemide, Drug: Hypertonic saline solutionsintravenous infusion of furosemide (doses 125-250mg⁄ bid) from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge Intervention: drug: furosemide ; other name: lasix |
| intravenous hypertonic saline solutions | Experimental | Drug: intravenous furosemide, Drug: Hypertonic saline solutionssmall volumes of hypertonic saline solutions (HSS) (150mL 1.4-4.6% NaCl), from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge Intervention: Hypertonic saline solutions (1.4-4.6%NaCl) Intervention other name: not specified |
| seriated paracentesis | Active comparator | Procedure: Seriated paracentesisno intervention Intervention: no drug only seriated paracentesis repeated paracentesis from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Refractory ascites defined according to the International Ascites Club criteria
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- inability to obtain informed consent
- possible non-cirrhotic ascites
- congestive heart failure (defined by clinical exam and echocardiogram)
- acute renal failure
- hepatocellular carcinoma based on the Barcelona Clinic liver Cancer (BCLC) criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| intravenous furosemideAlso: furosemide +HSStreatment with intravenous infusion of furosemide (doses 125-250mg⁄ bid) plus small volumes of HSS (150mL 1.4-4.6% NaCl), from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge, with water restriction and a normal sodium diet. | Drug | intravenous furosemide, intravenous hypertonic saline solutions |
| Hypertonic saline solutionsAlso: HSSIntravenous small volumes of HSS (150mL 1.4-4.6% NaCl), plus treatment with intravenous infusion of furosemide (doses 125-250mg⁄ bid) from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge, with water restriction and a normal sodium diet. | Drug | intravenous furosemide, intravenous hypertonic saline solutions |
| Seriated paracentesisAlso: paracentesisrepeated paracentesis from the first day after admission until 3 days before discharge | Procedure or surgery | seriated paracentesis |
Primary outcome
Δ-ANP
Time frame: 8 days
difference between ANP serum levels at admission and ANP serum levels at discharge.
6 secondary outcomes
Δ-BNP (pg/ml): evaluated by means of the difference between BNP plasma levels at admission and BNP plasma levels at discharge.
Time frame: 8 days
Δ IL-1beta (pg/ml): evaluated by means of the difference between IL-1beta plasma levels at admission and IL-1beta plasma levels at discharge.
Time frame: 8 days
Δ-visfatin (ng/ml): evaluated by means of the difference between serum visfatin at admission and serum visfatin at discharge.
Time frame: 8 days
Δ-Leptin (ng/ml): evaluated by means of the difference between serum leptin at admission and serum leptin at discharge.
Time frame: 8 days
Δ-TNF-alfa (ng/ml): evaluated by means of the difference between serum TNF-alfa at admission and serum TNF-alfa discharge.
Time frame: 8 days
Δ-TNF-alfa (ng/ml): evaluated by means of the difference between serum IL-6 at admission and serum IL-6 at discharge.
Time frame: 8 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jul 2016.
- Background: PubMed 19438847Licata G, Tuttolomondo A, Licata A, Parrinello G, Di Raimondo D, Di Sciacca R, Camma C, Craxi A, Paterna S, Pinto A. Clinical Trial: High-dose furosemide plus small-volume hypertonic saline solutions vs. repeated paracentesis as treatment of refractory ascites. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Aug;30(3):227-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04040.x. Epub 2009 May 12.
- Background: PubMed 20346637Tuttolomondo A, Pinto A, Di Raimondo D, Corrao S, Di Sciacca R, Scaglione R, Caruso C, Licata G. Changes in natriuretic peptide and cytokine plasma levels in patients with heart failure, after treatment with high dose of furosemide plus hypertonic saline solution (HSS) and after a saline loading. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 May;21(5):372-9. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.10.014. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ascites
Recruiting
Optimal Treatment Strategy for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis, Paracentesis
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Low Dose Versus Standard Dose Albumin
Decompensated Cirrhosis and Ascites
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Lenvatinib in Combination With Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients With Malignant Ascites
STOMACH NEOPLASM, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
High Dose Albumin in Refractory Ascites
Ascites
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of a TIPS Prognostic Model
Portal Hypertension Related to Cirrhosis, Ascites
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Antonio Pinto, MD study chair
University of Palermo
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing intravenous furosemide, Hypertonic saline solutions and Seriated paracentesis in people with Ascites and Cirrhosis, run by University of Palermo at 3 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Δ-ANP (time frame: 8 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02821377, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2016.