AzTrials
AzTrials

InfertilityPhase 2/3NCT02823080

Outcome of Cetrotide Therapy for Management of Women at High-risk of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome

A Phase 2/3 study testing Cetrorelix in people with Infertility, run by Benha University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate safety and efficacy of 3-day cetrotide therapy started on day of oocyte retrieval (Day-0) in women at high-risk for development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) after gonadotropin- releasing hormon agonist induction protocol. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 35 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Infertility
What is being tested?
Cetrorelix
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Oct 2014to May 2017
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 35 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • number of retrieved oocytes was ≥20
  • mean number of follicles with a diameter of >16 mm was ≥18
  • serum E2 concentrations of ≥3500 pg/ml
  • ovarian diameter on the day of ovum retrieval of >10 cm
  • presentation of evident symptoms of OHSS on the day of aspiration .

Who cannot join

  • 1- Absence of one or more of the items of the inclusion criteria.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Benha university hospitalا

    Banhā, El Qalubia

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Sequential E2 Levels Not Ovarian Maximal Diameter Estimates Were Correlated With Outcome of Cetrotide Therapy for Management of Women at High-risk of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome

To evaluate safety and efficacy of 3-day cetrotide therapy started on day of oocyte retrieval (Day-0) in women at high-risk for development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) after gonadotropin- releasing hormon agonist induction protocol.

Patients \& Methods: Forty-eight women fulfilling inclusion criteria underwent ultrasound scanning for maximal ovarian diameter (MOD) estimation and ascites grading. Patients underwent embryo freezing, but study group received 3-day Cetrotide sc injection (0.25 mg/day) started on Day-0. Serum E2, pain scores and MOD were checked daily. Hematocrit value (Ht%), total leucocytic count (TLC), gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations and ascites grading were re-evaluated on Day-3, 6 and 8

Read the detailed description

The current study is conducted at Assisted Reproduction Unit at Almana general Hospital, kingdom of saudi arabia.and other private centers in Egypt. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethical Committee. The study aimed to include women suspected to be at high risk for development of OHSS during agonist ovarian stimulation protocol.The study includes only women of couples singed written consent to participate in the study, to undergo embryo freezing and to postpone for transfer of cryopreserved embryo.

All patients are clinically evaluated for the presence of abdominal pain and if present will be graduated using a numerical pain visual analogue scale (VAS) with 0 means no pain and 10 means severe intolerable pain. Patients are evaluated for the presence of nausea and/or vomiting and sense of abdominal distension. Symptoms are scored using verbal analogue scale as nil, mild, moderate, and severe symptom. Blood samples are obtained under complete aseptic condition for estimation of serum E2 level and determination of hematocrit value (Ht%) and total leucocytic count (TLC).

Then, all patients underwent ultrasound scanning for estimation of ovarian measurements that were represented as the maximal ovarian diameter (MOD) and for ascites grading if present. Ultrasound scanning is performed using a 5 megahertz vaginal probe , otherwise a 3.5 megahertz, 2.6 megahertz or 5megahertz abdominal probe is used if visualization using a vaginal probe is compromised. Ascites is graded according to the quantity of fluid accumulation in the peritoneal cavity with the patient in the anti-Trendelenburg position.

Women fulfilling inclusion criteria were randomely allocated,using sealed envelops, into two equal groups. Group with embryo freezing alone (Control group) or while the other group additionally receives cetrotide subcutaneous injection in a daily dose of 0.25 mg started on day of oocyte retrieval for 3 days (Study group). Symptomatic treatment for associated symptoms as analgesics, antiemetics and antispasmodics are also prescribed. Patients are categorized according to classification grading of OHSS.

Class Clinical features Biochemical features

Mild - Abdominal distension/ discomfort

  • Mild nausea/vomiting
  • Diarrhea
  • Ovarian size usually < 8 cm No clinically important laboratory findings

Moderate - Mild features plus

  • US evidence of ascites - Elevated Ht (>41%)
  • Elevated TLC >15,000/ ml
  • Hypoproteinemia

Severe - Mild \& Moderate features plus

  • Clinically detected ascites
  • Severe abdominal pain
  • Intractable nausea
  • Rapid weight gain (>1 kg/24 hr)
  • Pleural effusion
  • Severe dyspnea
  • Oliguria/anuria
  • Low blood/central venous pressures
  • Syncope
  • Venous thrombosis
  • Hemoconcentration (Ht >55%)
  • TLC >25,000/ ml
  • Serum creatinine >1.6 mg/dl
  • creatinine clearance <50 ml/min
  • Hyponatremia (Na+<135milliequivalent per litre)
  • Hypokalemia (K+ < 5 milliequivalent per litre)
  • Elevated liver enzymes

Critical - Severe features plus

  • Anuria/ Acute renal failure
  • Arrhythmia
  • Pericardial effusion
  • Massive hydrothorax
  • Thrombo-embolism
  • Arterial thrombosis
  • (ARDS)Adult respiratory distress syndrome
  • Sepsis - Worsening of biochemical findings seen with severe OHSS

US: Ultrasound; Ht%:Ht; Hematocrit value; TLC: Total leucocytic count: ARDS; adult respiratory distress syndrome.

All patients are managed as outpatients unless management of severe symptoms necessitated hospital admission. Pain scores, serum E2 levels and MOD are evaluated daily. Patients are evaluated for associated symptoms previously determined during clinical evaluation, ascites grading and TLC and Ht value were evaluated at 3 and 6 days and on end of the trial on the 8th day after oocyte retrieval.

Conditions
Infertility
Being tested
Cetrorelix
Medical subject headings
Infertility

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CetrorelixDrug

    Also called cetrotide

    study group received 3-day Cetrorelix Acetate sc injection (0.25 mg/day) started on Day-0. Serum E2, pain scores and MOD were checked daily. Hematocrit value (Ht%), total leucocytic count (TLC), gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations and ascites control (24 patients) did not receive Cetrorelix Acetate. Grading were re-evaluated on Day-3, 6 and 8.

Study groups in NCT02823080
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
cetrotideActive comparatorstudy group (24 patients = intervention) received intervention for 3-daysCetrorelix Acetate sc injection (0.25 mg/day) started on Day-0. Serum E2, pain scores and MOD were checked daily. Hematocrit value (Ht%), total leucocytic count (TLC), gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations and ascites grading were re-evaluated on Day-3, 6 and 8.
Receives: Drug: Cetrorelix
no cetrotideNo interventioncontrol group (24 patients) did not receive 3-daysCetrorelix Acetate (no intervention). Serum E2, pain scores and MOD were checked daily. Hematocrit value (Ht%), total leucocytic count (TLC), gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations and ascites grading were re-evaluated on Day-3, 6 and 8.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Daily Serum E2 Levels

    Serum E2 levels (Serum E2 level in picograms/ml) were evaluated daily.

    Measured: 8 days

  2. Daily Maximal Ovarian Diameter

    MOD (maximal ovarian diameter in mm) were evaluated daily.

    Measured: 8 days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Daily Numerical Pain Visual Analogue Scale Score

    -All patients were clinically evaluated for the presence of abdominal pain and if present was graduated using a numerical pain visual analogue scale (VAS) with 0 means no pain and 10 means severe intolerable pain .

    Measured: 8 days.

  2. Daily Hematocrits Value

    Blood samples were obtained under complete aseptic condition for determination of hematocrits value (Ht%)

    Measured: 0-8 days.

  3. Ultrasound Detected Severity Grades of Ascites From Days 0-8

    -US detected severity grades of ascites determined at Day -0, Day -3 and Day -8.

    Measured: 0-8 days

  4. Daily Total Leucocytic Count

    TLC(x 1ooo cells/ml)

    Measured: 0 -8days.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2014
  3. Primary completionApr 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
48 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02823080
Sponsor's protocol ID
Benha U
Other IDs
kmsalama
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
21 Jun 2016
Last updated
30 Mar 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976 Jun;2(2):175-84. No abstract available.

    PubMed 1026900
  • Lainas TG, Sfontouris IA, Zorzovilis IZ, Petsas GK, Lainas GT, Kolibianakis EM. Management of severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by re-initiation of GnRH antagonist. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 Oct;15(4):408-12. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60366-5.

    PubMed 17908403
  • Albano C, Smitz J, Camus M, Riethmuller-Winzen H, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Comparison of different doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril. 1997 May;67(5):917-22. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81407-0.

    PubMed 9130900
  • Navot D, Bergh PA, Laufer N. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment. Fertil Steril. 1992 Aug;58(2):249-61. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55188-7.

    PubMed 1633889
  • Salama KM, Abo Ragab HM, El Sherbiny MF, Morsi AA, Souidan II. Sequential E2 levels not ovarian maximal diameter estimates were correlated with outcome of cetrotide therapy for management of women at high-risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a randomized controlled study. BMC Womens Health. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0466-z.

    PubMed 29132339

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Cetrorelix in people with Infertility, run by Benha University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Daily Serum E2 Levels (time frame: 8 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02823080, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in