AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankle FracturesNCT02823275

Post Operative Quality of Life and Pain in Ankle Fractures: Cast Versus Functional Treatment

A study testing Functional mobilisation and Short term plaster cast fixation in people with Ankle Fractures, run by Rijnstate Hospital at 2 sites in Netherlands.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Rationale: Ankle fractures are common traumatic lesions. In order to restore the anatomical situation of the ankle joint to prevent posttraumatic arthritis, these fractures often need surgical treatment. Both cast immobilisation and functional treatment have proved to be reliable postoperative treatment regimes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Ankle Fractures
What is being tested?
Functional mobilisation and Short term plaster cast fixation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
13 participants
Where
2 sitesNetherlands
Study dates
Jan 2012to Nov 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-65 at the time of surgery
  • Ankle fractures needing operative correction
  • Weber type B or C, Lauge Hansen type supination-adduction, supination-external rotation and pronation-external rotation
  • Closed fractures
  • Postoperative stable for exercise
  • Operated at the University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen or Alysis Zorggroep, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem

Who cannot join

  • Open fractures
  • Fractures with complete dislocation of the ankle joint
  • Body Mass Index > 30
  • Previous ankle fracture on the affected side
  • Concomitant traumatic injuries reducing the ability for postoperative mobilization
  • Pre-existent use of pain medication, medication affecting fracture- and wound healing
  • Postoperative unstable for exercise
  • Co-morbidity: pain syndromes, Fontaine IIB, III and IV, symptomatic venous insufficiency, auto-immune disorders, rheumatic arthritis

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Netherlands2 sites
  • Rijnstate

    Arnhem, Gelderland

  • Radboud University

    Nijmegen, Gelderland

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Post Operative Evaluation of Quality of Life and Pain in Ankle Fractures: Cast Immobilisation Versus Functional Treatment

Rationale: Ankle fractures are common traumatic lesions. In order to restore the anatomical situation of the ankle joint to prevent posttraumatic arthritis, these fractures often need surgical treatment. Both cast immobilisation and functional treatment have proved to be reliable postoperative treatment regimes. Insight into the quality of life and the level of pain is necessary to determine if these treatments can be related to higher patient satisfaction and earlier resumption of daily activities and work.

Objective: The aim of this study is to examine two postoperative treatments for surgically corrected ankle fractures. Postoperative, direct functional mobilisation is compared to short term plaster cast fixation. The focus of this study is on quality of life, pain and the use of pain medication, and resumption of work and daily activities.

Read more

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Quality of life, Function, pain, swelling, daily activities and work, disabilities (pain disability index), complications

Conditions
Ankle Fractures
Being tested
Functional mobilisation, Short term plaster cast fixation
Medical subject headings
Ankle Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Functional mobilisationOther

    functional mobilisation

  • Short term plaster cast fixationOther

    2 weeks cast immobilisation

Study groups in NCT02823275
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Functional mobilisationActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Functional mobilisation
plaster cast fixationExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Short term plaster cast fixation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. pain

    Visual Analog Pain Scale

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. Pain medication used

    amount of pain medication used

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2012
  3. Primary completionNov 2012
  4. Study completionNov 2012

Why it stopped: Investigator changed jobs

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
13 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02823275
Sponsor's protocol ID
683-250210-Nicolaas
Status last verified
Jun 2016
First submitted
27 Jun 2016
Last updated
6 Jul 2016
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Functional mobilisation and Short term plaster cast fixation in people with Ankle Fractures, run by Rijnstate Hospital at 2 sites in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Investigator changed jobs). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

pain (time frame: 6 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jul 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in