AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-Celiac Wheat SensitivityNCT02823522

Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity: Permanent or Transient Condition?

An observational study of Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity, run by University of Palermo at 2 sites in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) has been recently included among the gluten-related diseases. Patients suffering from NCGS are diagnosed after carefully excluding celiac disease (CD), and immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated wheat allergy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity
What is being tested?
Patients recruitment
How many people
280 participants
Where
2 sitesItaly
Study dates
Jul 2016to Dec 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The patients included in the previous retrospective study were contacted by phone, mail and e-mail and invited to come back to the respective clinics where they had been initially diagnosed as NCWS patients: the Department of Internal Medicine of the University Hospital of Palermo and the Department of Internal Medicine of the Hospital of Sciacca.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients previously diagnosed with NCWS by DBPC challenge.

Who cannot join

  • The 22 patients, included in the previous study, who tested positives for anti-endomysial antibodies (EmA) in the culture medium of the duodenal biopsies, even if the villi/crypts ratio in the duodenal mucosa was normal, were excluded from the present study.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Italy2 sites
  • Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Palermo

    Palermo, Palermo, 90129

  • Department of Internal Medicine, Giovanni Paolo II Hospital of Sciacca

    Sciacca, Agrigento, 92019

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity: Permanent or Transient Condition? A Follow-up Study

Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) has been recently included among the gluten-related diseases. Patients suffering from NCGS are diagnosed after carefully excluding celiac disease (CD), and immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated wheat allergy. Then, in the absence of sensitive and specific diagnostic biomarkers for NCGS, a monitoring of the patient during elimination and re-introduction of wheat by a double-blind placebo controlled (DBPC) challenge method has been suggested as diagnostic hallmark. Some studies seem to suggest that wheat components other than gluten can cause the symptoms, and therefore the term "non-celiac wheat sensitivity" (NCWS) has been proposed instead of NCGS. While it is well known that CD is a long-life condition and a strict adherence to the gluten-free diet must be maintained, it is unknown whether this is valid for NCWS. On the year 2012, the researchers published a retrospective study, including 276 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like symptoms who had been diagnosed with NCWS using a DBPC challenge during a ten-years period (2001-2011). The present prospective study aimed to evaluate: A) how many of these patients are still following a wheat-free diet, and B) which percentage was still suffering from NCWS, diagnosed by DBPC wheat challenge, in a subgroup of that cohort.

Read the detailed description

Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) has been recently included among the gluten-related diseases. Patients suffering from NCGS are diagnosed after carefully excluding celiac disease (CD) diagnosis by negative CD-specific serum antibodies and absence of intestinal villi atrophy, and excluding IgE-mediated wheat allergy, by negative serum specific IgE and/or skin prick test with wheat antigens. Then, in the absence of sensitive and specific diagnostic biomarkers for NCGS, a monitoring of the patient during elimination and re-introduction of wheat by a double-blind placebo controlled (DBPC) challenge method has been suggested as diagnostic hallmark. Obviously, this a cumbersome and time-consuming procedure which has been used in few studies.

Despite an increasing percentage of the general population define themselves as "gluten-sensitive", and by the year 2017 the market of the gluten-free products will be worth 6.6 billion of dollars, doubts persist about many aspects of NCGS. Some studies seem to suggest that wheat components other than gluten can cause the symptoms, and therefore the term "non-celiac wheat sensitivity" (NCWS) has been proposed instead of NCGS. Furthermore, while it is well known that CD is a long-life condition and a strict adherence to the gluten-free diet must be maintained, it is unknown whether this is valid for NCWS.

On the year 2012, the researchers published a retrospective study, including 276 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like symptoms who had been diagnosed with NCWS using a DBPC challenge during a ten-years period (2001-2011).

The present prospective study aimed to evaluate the persistence of the NCWS condition in that cohort and, consequently, the researchers estimated : A) how many of these patients are still following a wheat-free diet, and B) which percentage was still suffering from NCWS, diagnosed by DBPC wheat challenge, in a subgroup of that cohort.

Being tested
Patients recruitment

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Patients recruitmentOther

    Between July and November 2016, the patients included in the previous retrospective study were contacted by phone, mail and e-mail and invited to come back to the respective clinics where they had been initially diagnosed as NCWS patients: the Department of Internal Medicine of the University Hospital of Palermo and the Department of Internal Medicine of the Hospital of Sciacca (province of Agrigento).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. How many patients were still following a gluten-free or a wheat-free diet

    A structured questionnaire was administered to evaluate how many patients were still following a gluten-free diet (GFD) and how many a wheat-free diet.

    Measured: Between July and November 2016

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Evaluation of the effect of the GFD on IBS symptoms

    The researchers administered a modified version of the IBS Global Assessment of Improvement (IBS-GAI) score. A responder was defined as a patient whose symptoms were either 'moderately improved' or 'substantially improved' compared with the period preceding the NCWS diagnosis.

    Measured: Between July and November 2016

  2. Evaluation of the severity of the IBS condition

    The researchers administered the IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS), evaluating the change in total IBS-SSS score from the first evaluation (time of the NCWS diagnosis) and the follow-up evaluation (present study). A respondent was classified as a patient whose overall symptom severity on the IBS-SSS changed >50 points.

    Measured: Between July and November 2016

  3. Re-evaluation of the NCWS condition by DBPC-Wheat challenge

    Finally, the repetition of the DBPC-wheat challenge will be proposed to the patients still on GFD. Those who will accept will be randomized to undergo the challenge. It will be performed with the same method used in the retrospective study.

    Measured: Between July and November 2016

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2016
  3. Primary completionAug 2024
  4. Study completionDec 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
280 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02823522
Sponsor's protocol ID
ACPM11
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
27 Jun 2016
Last updated
5 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sapone A, Bai JC, Ciacci C, Dolinsek J, Green PH, Hadjivassiliou M, Kaukinen K, Rostami K, Sanders DS, Schumann M, Ullrich R, Villalta D, Volta U, Catassi C, Fasano A. Spectrum of gluten-related disorders: consensus on new nomenclature and classification. BMC Med. 2012 Feb 7;10:13. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-13.

    PubMed 22313950
  • Ludvigsson JF, Leffler DA, Bai JC, Biagi F, Fasano A, Green PH, Hadjivassiliou M, Kaukinen K, Kelly CP, Leonard JN, Lundin KE, Murray JA, Sanders DS, Walker MM, Zingone F, Ciacci C. The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms. Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):43-52. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301346. Epub 2012 Feb 16.

    PubMed 22345659
  • Catassi C, Elli L, Bonaz B, Bouma G, Carroccio A, Castillejo G, Cellier C, Cristofori F, de Magistris L, Dolinsek J, Dieterich W, Francavilla R, Hadjivassiliou M, Holtmeier W, Korner U, Leffler DA, Lundin KE, Mazzarella G, Mulder CJ, Pellegrini N, Rostami K, Sanders D, Skodje GI, Schuppan D, Ullrich R, Volta U, Williams M, Zevallos VF, Zopf Y, Fasano A. Diagnosis of Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS): The Salerno Experts' Criteria. Nutrients. 2015 Jun 18;7(6):4966-77. doi: 10.3390/nu7064966.

    PubMed 26096570
  • Spence D. Bad medicine: food intolerance. BMJ. 2013 Jan 30;346:f529. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f529. No abstract available.

    PubMed 23364064
  • Carroccio A, Rini G, Mansueto P. Non-celiac wheat sensitivity is a more appropriate label than non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Gastroenterology. 2014 Jan;146(1):320-1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.061. Epub 2013 Nov 22. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24275240
  • Fasano A, Sapone A, Zevallos V, Schuppan D. Nonceliac gluten sensitivity. Gastroenterology. 2015 May;148(6):1195-204. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.12.049. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

    PubMed 25583468
  • Carroccio A, Mansueto P, Iacono G, Soresi M, D'Alcamo A, Cavataio F, Brusca I, Florena AM, Ambrosiano G, Seidita A, Pirrone G, Rini GB. Non-celiac wheat sensitivity diagnosed by double-blind placebo-controlled challenge: exploring a new clinical entity. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;107(12):1898-906; quiz 1907. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.236. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

    PubMed 22825366
  • Francis CY, Morris J, Whorwell PJ. The irritable bowel severity scoring system: a simple method of monitoring irritable bowel syndrome and its progress. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Apr;11(2):395-402. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.142318000.x.

    PubMed 9146781
  • Carroccio A, D'Alcamo A, Iacono G, Soresi M, Iacobucci R, Arini A, Geraci G, Fayer F, Cavataio F, La Blasca F, Florena AM, Mansueto P. Persistence of Nonceliac Wheat Sensitivity, Based on Long-term Follow-up. Gastroenterology. 2017 Jul;153(1):56-58.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.03.034. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

    PubMed 28365444

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity, run by University of Palermo at 2 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

How many patients were still following a gluten-free or a wheat-free diet (time frame: Between July and November 2016). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02823522, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in