AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory Distress SyndromeNCT02825953

Does The Surfactant Administration by Aerosolization Effective?

A study testing surfactant, nasal continuous positive airway pressure and non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Surfactant Administration by Aerosolization, run by nihat demir.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The present study was designed to evaluate, in premature babies with RDS breathing spontaneously, the efficacy of combined treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and aerosolized surfactant. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 26 to 34 weeks
What is being tested?
surfactant, nasal continuous positive airway pressure and non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
75 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2016to Jan 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 26 to 34 weeks
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Corrected gestational age >26 week or <34 week,
  • Age 2-36 h
  • Clinically and radiologically diagnosed progressive RDS,
  • FiO2 needed to maintain SaO2 85-95%; >0.4
  • No evident lung or cardiovascular malformation.

Who cannot join

  • Corrected gestational age <26 week or >34 week,
  • Age >36 h
  • Premature babies with RDS but no breathing spontaneously
  • Evident lung or cardiovascular malformation.

About this study

Official title: Does The Surfactant Administration by Aerosolization of Respiratory Distress Syndrome Effective in Spontaneously Breathing Premature Infants ?

The present study was designed to evaluate, in premature babies with RDS breathing spontaneously, the efficacy of combined treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and aerosolized surfactant. The first objective of investigators is to assess the safety of surfactant nebulization in this clinical situation, and to find out whether treatment with aerosolized surfactant would reduce the need for mechanical ventilation. And other aim suggest that aerosolized dates compared with dates of INSURE (intubation-surfactant-extubation) and minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) method.

Read the detailed description

Does The Surfactant Administration by Aerosolization of Respiratory Distress Syndrome effective in Spontaneously Breathing Premature Infants ? Endotracheal bolus application of natural surfactant has been shown to be an effective treatment for idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), especially in premature neonates with weeks of pregnancy > 27 week. However, patients are intubated nasotracheal or orotracheal for this form of treatment. This intubation carries potential risks of injuries to the dental lamina, the larynx, and the trachea, bronchopulmonary infections, and fluctuations in cerebral blood flow, intra- and periventricular haemorrhage (1). In addition, many babies with RDS who initially respond to surfactant therapy later develop chronic lung disease (CLD) (2). With this in mind, the investigators attempt to administer surfactant in a more gentle way, i.e. by nebulization. Administration by aerosol during spontaneous respiration is less traumatic and avoids intubation with the accompanying mechanical and infectious risks and pathophysiological effects.

The present study was designed to evaluate, in premature babies with RDS breathing spontaneously, the efficacy of combined treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and aerosolized surfactant. The first objective of investigators is to assess the safety of surfactant nebulization in this clinical situation, and to find out whether treatment with aerosolized surfactant would reduce the need for mechanical ventilation. And other aim suggest that aerosolized dates compared with dates of INSURE (intubation-surfactant-extubation) and minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) method.

Seventy-five newborn babies from neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Yuzuncu Yil University Medical Scholl (Van, Turkey) will be randomized to treatment with nebulized surfactant (Curosurf®, Chiesi Pharmaceutics, Parma, Italy) or to two control groups receiving INSURE and MIST method. The study will be conducted with 75 infants, 25 in each group. Randomization will be central and performed using sealed envelopes kept at the neonatal ward of Yuzuncu Yil University Medical Centre Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all parents before randomization. Inclusion criteria are corrected gestational age >26 week or <34 week, age 2-36 h, clinically and radiologically diagnosed progressive RDS, FiO2 needed to maintain SaO2 85-95%; >0.4, and no evident lung or cardiovascular malformation.

The surfactant aerosol will generate with a ultrasonic nebulizer (Aeroneb Pro; Aerogen, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) and administer via the nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) equipment into the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA). Surfactant will be diluted to 40 mg/ml with saline before nebulization. These modifications will be introduced to enhance the delivery of nebulized material to the lungs (3). In the control groups, the babies will be supported with the same type of NCPAP equipment, after given surfactant via endotracheal bolus application and MIST method. Parameters will be documented at three different times, namely before application of surfactant (200 mg/kg BW), and 2 h, 6 h after completion of nebulization or application of others.

The infants will be stabilised on NCPAP (Neopuff; Fisher and Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand) in the delivery room and during transport to the NICU. NCPAP or NIPPV will be started within 30 min of birth immediately after randomisation. Both NCPAP and NIPPV will be delivered by a neonatal ventilator (Engström Carestation; GE Healthcare, Madison, USA) via short, binasal Cannula (RAM Cannula; Neotech, Valencia, CA). NCPAP pressure will be set at 5-6 cm H2O, and NIPPV will be set in a non-synchronised mode at 20-30 bpm, with positive end-expiratory pressure of 5-6 cm H2O and peak inspiratory pressure of 15-20 cm H2O. FiO2 will be titrated at 0.21-0.50 to maintain an oxygen saturation level of 90%-95%, as measured via pulse oximeter. Under non-invasive ventilation, the surfactant will be administered as a rescue therapy if the infant required ≥0.40 FiO2 to maintain the target saturation level of 90%-95%.

Findings in chest radiograms before inclusion and head ultrasound images taken as soon as possible according to the clinical situation will be evaluated and graded according to criteria defined by Papile et al. (4) and Kero et al.(5) CLD will be defined as need for supplemental oxygen at 36 wk gestational age.

Statistical evaluation Data will be analyzed using the 20 Windows Version of Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Program (Chicago, IL, USA).

Data were compared using unpaired t-test and Chi-square test, and p-values below <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethical approval The study was approved by the regional ethics committee at the Yuzuncu Yil University Institute, Van, Turkey.

The regional ethics committee No: 05.05.2015/09

Being tested
surfactant, nasal continuous positive airway pressure, non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation, Neopuff, neonatal ventilator
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Distress Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • surfactantDrug

    Also called Curosurf

    the investigators attempt to administer surfactant in a more gentle way, i.e. by nebulization, by minimally invasive surfactant therapy, and endotracheal bolus application of natural surfactant

  • nasal continuous positive airway pressureDevice

    Also called NCPAP

    each infant will be randomly assigned to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV). The infants will be stabilised on NCPAP (Neopuff; Fisher and Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand) in the delivery room and during transport to the NICU. NCPAP or NIPPV will be started within 30 min of birth immediately after randomisation. Both NCPAP and NIPPV will be delivered by a neonatal ventilator (Engström Carestation; GE Healthcare, Madison, USA) via short, binasal Cannula (RAM Cannula; Neotech, Valencia, CA).

  • non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilationDevice

    Also called NIPPV

    each infant will be randomly assigned to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV). The infants will be stabilised on NCPAP (Neopuff; Fisher and Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand) in the delivery room and during transport to the NICU. NCPAP or NIPPV will be started within 30 min of birth immediately after randomisation. Both NCPAP and NIPPV will be delivered by a neonatal ventilator (Engström Carestation; GE Healthcare, Madison, USA) via short, binasal Cannula (RAM Cannula; Neotech, Valencia, CA).

  • NeopuffDevice

    Fisher and Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand

  • neonatal ventilatorDevice

    Also called Engström Carestation

    GE Healthcare, Madison, USA

Study groups in NCT02825953
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Nebulized surfactantActive comparatorFor randomisatio, each infant will be randomly assigned to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV), and than premature babies with RDS breathing spontaneously will be administered surfactant by nebulizer.
Receives: Drug: surfactant; Device: nasal continuous positive airway pressure; Device: non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation; Device: Neopuff; Device: neonatal ventilator
Endotracheal bolus applicationActive comparatorFor randomisatio, each infant will be randomly assigned to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV). The investigators will administer surfactant via fundamental method.
Receives: Drug: surfactant; Device: nasal continuous positive airway pressure; Device: non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation; Device: Neopuff; Device: neonatal ventilator
Minimally invasive surfactant therapyActive comparatorFor randomisatio, each infant will be randomly assigned to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV). After randomisation, the investigators will administer surfactant via minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) method which is recently very popular method
Receives: Drug: surfactant; Device: nasal continuous positive airway pressure; Device: non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation; Device: Neopuff; Device: neonatal ventilator

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The first objective of investigators is to assess the safety of surfactant nebulization in this clinical situation, and to find out whether treatment with aerosolized surfactant would reduce the need for mechanical ventilation.

    The infants will be stabilised on NCPAP (Neopuff; Fisher and Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand) in the delivery room and during transport to the NICU. NCPAP or NIPPV will be started within 30 min of birth immediately after randomisation. Both NCPAP and NIPPV will be delivered by a neonatal ventilator (Engström Carestation; GE Healthcare, Madison, USA) via short, binasal Cannula (RAM Cannula; Neotech, Valencia, CA). NCPAP pressure will be set at 5-6 cm H2O, and NIPPV will be set in a non-synchronised mode at 20-30 bpm, with positive end-expiratory pressure of 5-6 cm H2O and peak inspiratory pressure of 15-20 cm H2O. FiO2 will be titrated at 0.21-0.50 to maintain an oxygen saturation level of 90%-95%, as measured via pulse oximeter. Under non-invasive ventilation, the surfactant will be administered as a rescue therapy if the infant required ≥0.40 FiO2 to maintain the target saturation level of 90%-95%.

    Measured: within the first 72 hour of life

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Chronic Lung Disease (CLD)

    Chronic Lung Disease (CLD) will be defined according to National Institutes of Health criteria.

    Measured: up to 36 weeks of post gestational age

  2. Patent ductus arteriosus

    Echocardiography will be performed routinely for patent ductus arteriosus at a postnatal age of 48-96 h.

    Measured: In 5 days of life

  3. Intraventricular haemorrhage

    We will assess for intraventricular haemorrhage higher than grade II using the Papile classification system

    Measured: Within 1 month of life

  4. Necrotising enterocolitis

    Necrotising enterocolitis with the modified Bell's classification system

    Measured: Within 3 months of life

  5. Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)

    Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring laser treatment based on the criteria of the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Ophthalmology and American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

    Measured: Up to 3 months of life

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2016
  3. Primary completionJan 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
75 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02825953
Sponsor's protocol ID
YYU-09
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
16 Jun 2016
Last updated
11 Jul 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Cowan F, Whitelaw A, Wertheim D, Silverman M. Cerebral blood flow velocity changes after rapid administration of surfactant. Arch Dis Child. 1991 Oct;66(10 Spec No):1105-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.10_spec_no.1105.

    PubMed 1750756
  • Mercier CE, Soll RF. Clinical trials of natural surfactant extract in respiratory distress syndrome. Clin Perinatol. 1993 Dec;20(4):711-35.

    PubMed 8131364
  • Berggren E, Liljedahl M, Winbladh B, Andreasson B, Curstedt T, Robertson B, Schollin J. Pilot study of nebulized surfactant therapy for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2000 Apr;89(4):460-4. doi: 10.1080/080352500750028195.

    PubMed 10830460
  • Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. 1978 Apr;92(4):529-34. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80282-0.

    PubMed 305471
  • Kero PO, Makinen EO. Comparison between clinical and radiological classification of infants with the respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Eur J Pediatr. 1979 Apr 3;130(4):271-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00441363.

    PubMed 436851

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing surfactant, nasal continuous positive airway pressure and non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Surfactant Administration by Aerosolization, run by nihat demir.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The first objective of investigators is to assess the safety of surfactant nebulization in this clinical situation, and to find out whether treatment with aerosolized surfactant would reduce the need for mechanical ventilation. (time frame: within the first 72 hour of life). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02825953, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in