AzTrials
AzTrials

Neonatal Asphyxial EncephalopathyPhase 2NCT02826941

Moderate Hypothermia in Neonatal Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy

A Phase 2 study testing hypothermia and normothermia in people with Neonatal Asphyxial Encephalopathy and Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy, run by Medical University of South Carolina.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was a multicenter, randomized, controlled pilot trial of moderate systemic hypothermia (33°C) vs normothermia (37°C) for 48 hours in infants with neonatal encephalopathy instituted within 6 hours of birth or hypoxic-ischemic event. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 35 weeks and older
What is being tested?
hypothermia and normothermia
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
65 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jun 1999to Jun 2004
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 35 weeks and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • One clinical indication of hypoxic-ischemic injury
  • cord gas pH ≤ 7.0 or base deficit ≥13,
  • initial infant gas pH < 7.1,
  • Apgar score ≤5 at 10 minutes,
  • continued resuscitation after 5 min,
  • fetal bradycardia with heart rate < 80 beats per minute lasting ≥15 min,
Show all 14Show fewer
  • postnatal event O2 sat <70% or arterial O2<35 for 20 min with ischemia
  • And two neurologic findings of neonatal encephalopathy, abnormalities of:
  • tone,
  • reflexes,
  • state of consciousness,
  • seizures,
  • posturing,
  • autonomic dysfunction

Who cannot join

  • Maternal chorioamnionitis,
  • sepsis at birth,
  • birth weight or head circumference <10%,
  • presumed chromosomal abnormality

About this study

This study was a multicenter, randomized, controlled pilot trial of moderate systemic hypothermia (33°C) vs normothermia (37°C) for 48 hours in infants with neonatal encephalopathy instituted within 6 hours of birth or hypoxic-ischemic event.

Read the detailed description

The trial tested the ability to initiate systemic hypothermia in outlying hospitals and participating tertiary care centers, and determined the incidence of adverse neurologic outcomes of death and developmental scores at 12 months by Bayley II or Vineland tests between normothermic and hypothermic groups. This trial identified potential safety outcomes, compared the adverse effects of hypothermia among hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) infants in the normothermic and hypothermic treatment groups, and obtained rates of adverse outcomes.

Being tested
hypothermia, normothermia
Keywords
hypothermia treatment
Medical subject headings
Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • hypothermiaOther

    Also called whole body cooling

    Systemic hypothermia by Cincinnati Sub-Zero Blanketrol II®, servo-controlled to 33.0 degrees C rectal temperature, started within 6hours of hypoxic ischemic birth, and continued for 48hours

  • normothermiaOther

    Rectal temperatures in neonates receiving normothermia were maintained at 37.0+or -0.5 degrees C, using overhead warmer or Cincinnati Sub-Zero Blanketrol II®, servo-controlled to rectal temperature of 37.0 degrees C.

Study groups in NCT02826941
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HypothermiaExperimentalIf randomized to hypothermia, plastic bags filled with ice wrapped in a washcloth were applied to the head and body for approximately 2 hours, then the infant was placed on an adult-size, water-circulating, cooling blanket (Cincinnati Sub-Zero Blanketrol II®, Cincinnati, OH), servo-controlled to rectal temperature to 33 ± 0.5 °C for 48 hours at the participating tertiary care center. Rewarming by 0.5°C per hour was begun after 48 hours of hypothermia.
Receives: Other: hypothermia
NormothermiaPlacebo comparatorIf randomized to normothermia, rectal temperatures were maintained at 37 ± 0.5 °C per standard neonatal intensive care unit practice, using adult-size, water-circulating, cooling blanket (Cincinnati Sub-Zero Blanketrol II®, Cincinnati, OH), servo-controlled to rectal temperature of 37 ± 0.5 if baby was febrile.
Receives: Other: normothermia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Death or severely abnormal Psychomotor Development Index scores on Bayley II

    Death or severe outcomes

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. bradycardia

    number of patients with heart rate < 80 bpm

    Measured: 0-96 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 1999
  3. Primary completionJun 2004
  4. Study completionJun 2004

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
65 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02826941
Sponsor's protocol ID
NS38062
Other IDs
R01NS038062
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
23 May 2016
Last updated
11 Jul 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: upon request

Publications

  • Eicher DJ, Wagner CL, Katikaneni LP, Hulsey TC, Bass WT, Kaufman DA, Horgan MJ, Languani S, Bhatia JJ, Givelichian LM, Sankaran K, Yager JY. Moderate hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy: efficacy outcomes. Pediatr Neurol. 2005 Jan;32(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2004.06.014.

    PubMed 15607598
  • Eicher DJ, Wagner CL, Katikaneni LP, Hulsey TC, Bass WT, Kaufman DA, Horgan MJ, Languani S, Bhatia JJ, Givelichian LM, Sankaran K, Yager JY. Moderate hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy: safety outcomes. Pediatr Neurol. 2005 Jan;32(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2004.06.015.

    PubMed 15607599
  • Jenkins DD, Lee T, Chiuzan C, Perkel JK, Rollins LG, Wagner CL, Katikaneni LP, Bass WT, Kaufman DA, Horgan MJ, Laungani S, Givelichian LM, Sankaran K, Yager JY, Martin R. Altered circulating leukocytes and their chemokines in a clinical trial of therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct;14(8):786-95. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182975cc9.

    PubMed 23897243
  • Jenkins DD, Rollins LG, Perkel JK, Wagner CL, Katikaneni LP, Bass WT, Kaufman DA, Horgan MJ, Languani S, Givelichian L, Sankaran K, Yager JY, Martin RH. Serum cytokines in a clinical trial of hypothermia for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012 Oct;32(10):1888-96. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.83. Epub 2012 Jul 18.

    PubMed 22805873

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing hypothermia and normothermia in people with Neonatal Asphyxial Encephalopathy and Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy, run by Medical University of South Carolina.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Death or severely abnormal Psychomotor Development Index scores on Bayley II (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02826941, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in