AzTrials
AzTrials

Incomplete ColonoscopyCfC100NCT02826993

Patients With Incomplete Colonoscopy a Comparison of Colon Capsule Endoscopy and CT Colonography

A study testing CCE in incomplete Colonoscopies in people with Incomplete Colonoscopy and CT Colonography, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A total of 8000 colonoscopies are performed on a yearly basis on the Funen Island. Between 5% and 10% of those are incomplete due to excessive pain, fixed colon loops, and other reasons. The current standard procedure is to refer the patient to the department of radiology for a CT-colonography. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
CCE in incomplete Colonoscopies
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Jun 2016to Sep 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Incomplete colonoscopy

Who cannot join

  • Previous gastrointestinal surgery except for appendectomy
  • Known inflammatory bowel disease including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis
  • An ostomy
  • Diabetes
  • Symptoms on bowel obstruction
  • Pacemakers
  • Kidney diseases

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Odense University Hospital, Svendborg Sygehus

    Svendborg, 5700

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Can Colon Capsule Endoscopy Substitute CT Colonography in the Large Bowel Examination of Persons Whose Colonoscopy Was Incomplete?

A total of 8000 colonoscopies are performed on a yearly basis on the Funen Island. Between 5% and 10% of those are incomplete due to excessive pain, fixed colon loops, and other reasons. The current standard procedure is to refer the patient to the department of radiology for a CT-colonography. In some instances the radiology department can offer the investigation the next day, and thus in the same colon preparation. At other times they cannot, and the patient has to go through an second colon preparation for the colonography.

A CCE procedure could be provided to the participants immediately after the failed colonoscopy and the investigation can be completed the next morning in the same bowel preparation without a visit to the radiology department.

Read the detailed description

Optical colonoscopy is the standard method for evaluating the colon. This technique allows evaluation of the entire colon in most patients. Full colonoscopy including examination of the cecum is associated with an increased detection rate of advanced neoplasia, as 33-50% of advanced neoplasia is located in the proximal colon. After an incomplete optical colonoscopy, participants are required to undergo another test in order to exclude clinically relevant lesions to reduce the risk of proximal cancer which has been shown to increase by twofold when colonoscopy was incomplete.

Endoscopic and radiological options to complete the colon assessment have been available in the last decades. Multiple alternative endoscopic techniques-such as colonoscopy with thinner colonoscopes, gastroscopes and device-assisted enteroscopes have been described. However, none of them has been clearly standardized.

CT colonography (CTC), is a relatively new imaging technique that was first described in 1994. In large randomized trials on symptomatic patients, CTC has been shown to be as equally effective as colonoscopy - for the detection of large colorectal polyps and already developed colorectal cancer.

Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) is a promising new technology that may have the potential to complement existing diagnostic methods to screen people for colorectal cancer. Delivered correctly, it may reduce costs, increase utilization of medical services, reduce risks for patients and overall improve screening rates among the population.

A total of 8000 colonoscopies are performed on a yearly basis on the Funen Island and about 10% of those are incomplete due to excessive pain, fixed colon loops, and others causes. The current standard procedure is to refer the participant to the Department of Radiology for a CT-colonography.

Being tested
CCE in incomplete Colonoscopies
Keywords
PillCAM2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CCE in incomplete ColonoscopiesDevice

    Also called PillCams2

    When the initial colonoscopy has failed, participants are invited to ingest a CCE on the day prior to their subsequent CT colonography. Thus, the CCE and CT will be compared within subjects for their ability to identify and estimate sizes of polyps

Study groups in NCT02826993
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CCE in incomplete ColonoscopiesExperimentalPatients in which colonoscopy is not possible are invited for CT colonography and those patients are examined by Camera Capsule Endoscopy the day before the CT colonography and the two different examinations are compared.
Receives: Device: CCE in incomplete Colonoscopies

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity and specificity of CCE compared to CTC

    The sensitivity and specificity of CCE will be measured in terms of n of polyps detected by CCE compared to n of polyps detected by CTC

    Measured: Up to 14 days for conducting both procedures

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Size estimation

    Each polyp is estimated in terms of size through the use of both technologies

    Measured: Up to 14 days for conducting both procedures

  2. Polyp miss rate

    The rate of polyps missed by CCE and CTC respectively compared to a colonoscopy that will be performed in full sedation for participants in whom discrepancy is found between the two modalities (CCE and CTC)

    Measured: Up to 30 days for conducting all three procedures

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2019
  4. Study completionSep 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02826993
Sponsor's protocol ID
OdenseUH_MKL1
Acronym
CfC100
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
20 May 2016
Last updated
10 Sep 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Deding U, Herp J, Havshoei AL, Kobaek-Larsen M, Buijs MM, Nadimi ES, Baatrup G. Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy. Application of artificial intelligence algorithms to identify complete colonic investigations. United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Aug;8(7):782-789. doi: 10.1177/2050640620937593.

    PubMed 32731841

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CCE in incomplete Colonoscopies in people with Incomplete Colonoscopy and CT Colonography, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity and specificity of CCE compared to CTC (time frame: Up to 14 days for conducting both procedures). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02826993, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in