AzTrials
AzTrials

Hematologic DiseasesGITMO-HLA-HRNCT02827149

High Resolution Donor Recipient HLA Matching Level in Unrelated HSCT

An observational study of Hematologic Diseases, run by Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo at 39 sites in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Italian, retrospective, prospective, observational, multicentre, spontaneous, non-interventional, non-pharmacological The study aims to analyze in the national Italian experience 1. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Hematologic Diseases
How many people
1,838 participants
Where
39 sitesItaly
Study dates
1 Sep 2017to 21 Sep 2018
How long will I take part?
2 Years
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: This study will enrol adult patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from unrelated adult donor between 1° January 2012 and 31 December 2015.

Who may be able to join

  • Haematological disease
  • Written and signed PROMISE informed consent
  • Patient undergoing unrelated HSCT

Who cannot join

  • Unavailability of HR-HLA pairs typing including at least A, B, C, DRB1 loci

Trial locations and contacts

39 sites in 1 country.

39 sites in 1 country

Italy39 sites
  • Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio

    Alessandria

  • Clinica di Ematologia - Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona

    Ancona

  • Ospedale Mazzoni

    Ascoli Piceno

  • Policlinico di Bari-Ematologia con trapianti

    Bari

  • Divisione di Ematologia - Ospedali Papa Giovanni XXIII

    Bergamo

  • Ospedale San Orsola

    Bologna

  • AO Spedali Civili di Brescia- USD - TMO Adulti

    Brescia

  • Ospedale Binaghi

    Cagliari

  • Ospedale Ferrarotto - Ematologia

    Catania

  • S.C. Ematologia - Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle

    Cuneo

  • Cattedra di Ematologia - Azienda Ospedaliera di Careggi

    Florence

  • Ematologia e Centro Trapianti Midollo Osseo - Ospedale IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza

    Foggia

  • AOU IRCCS San Martino - IST

    Genova

  • Divisione di Ematologia - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori

    Milan

  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

    Milan

  • IEO

    Milan

  • Ospedale San Raffaele

    Milan

  • Divisione Ematologia - Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria - Policlinico -

    Modena

  • Ospedale San Gerardo

    Monza

  • A.O.U. Policlinico Federico II

    Naples

  • AO Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia - Cervello

    Palermo

  • Dipartimento Oncologico La Maddalena

    Palermo

  • Fondazione IRCCS San Matteo

    Pavia, 27100

  • Policlinico San Matteo

    Pavia

  • Dip. Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale

    Perugia

  • Ospedale Civile

    Pescara

  • Ospedale G. Da Saliceto di Piacenza

    Piacenza

  • Centro Unico Regionale Trapianti di Midollo Osseo - Ospedale Bianchi-Melacino-Morelli

    Reggio Calabria

  • A.O. San Camillo Forlanini

    Roma

  • Cattedra di Ematologia - Policlinico

    Roma

  • Divisione di Ematologia - Istituto di Semeiotica Medica - Policlinico A. Gemelli

    Roma

  • Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata

    Roma

  • Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica ed Ematologia - Istituto Clinico Humanitas

    Rozzano (MI)

  • Ospedale Moscati

    Taranto

  • AOU CIttà della Salute e della Scienza

    Torino

  • Ospedale Regina Margherita

    Torino

  • Clinica Ematologica - AOU Santa Maria Della Misericordia

    Udine

  • AOU Integrat

    Verona

  • Ospedale S. Bortolo-Divisione Ematologia

    Vicenza

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: High Resolution Donor Recipient HLA Matching Level in Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Impact on the Transplant Outcome: the Italian Experience

Italian, retrospective, prospective, observational, multicentre, spontaneous, non-interventional, non-pharmacological The study aims to analyze in the national Italian experience

  1. The compatibility level selected by the Italian Transplant Centres using an high resolution HLA typing at the start of search process for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from volunteer unrelated donor
  2. The transplant outcomes in terms of Overall Survival, Disease Free Survival, Relapse Rate and Transplant Related Mortality and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry and Promise registry.
  3. The possible identification of allelic mismatching combinations characterized by increased cross-reactivity associated with higher incidence of acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease .
  4. The possible identification of combinations of allelic mismatching characterized by higher permissiveness.
Read the detailed description

Haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a potentially curative treatment for several haematological disorders, but its application depends on the availability of a suitable donor. Some data show that in US population the likelihood of finding HR 8/8 HLA A, B, C, DRB1 matched donor in NMDP registry is about 75% for white Europeans but only 46% for white patients of Middle Eastern or North African descents. Moreover, this probability decreases for patients belonging to African or Black South/Central American group at 18% and 16%, respectively. Furtherly, recent data have reported a significant improvement in the unrelated donor identification over the years. In particular, they have conducted the unrelated donor searches for 1344 ideal patients in the "Be The Match Registry" database at 2 time points: 2009 and 2012. Their results have shown that 8/8 high resolution HLA match rate (A, B, Cw and DRB1) for White raised from 68% in 2009 to 72% in 2012. Corresponding match rates were 41% to 44% for Hispanic, 44% to 46% for Asian/Pacific Islander), and 27% to 30% for African American/Black race and ethnic groups for 2009 and 2012, respectively. The 2012 10/10 match rates were 67% for White, 38% for Hispanic, 41% for Asian/Pacific Islander, and 23% for African American/Black.

Current available data confer to HLA mismatch (6-7/8) a significant increased risk for grades II to IV and III to IV acute graft versus host disease, chronic graft versus host disease, transplant-related mortality (TRM) and overall mortality compared with HLA-matched cases (8/8). However, it is not yet clear if type (allele/antigen) and locus (HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1) of mismatch are associated with overall mortality. In order to improve the outcome of the unrelated HSCT, many efforts are ongoing for identifying permissive and non permissive HLA disparity both for I and II classes HLA. Recently, several authors have highlighted the crucial role of allelic mismatching Cw combinations in supporting GVL/ graft versus host disease effect with a consequent decreased risk of relapse (p<0.003). On the contrary, Cw disparities as Cw03:03 vs Cw03:04 or Cw07:01 vs Cw07:02 seem to be permissiveness in terms of HSCT clinical outcome. Contemporarily, Japanese meta-analysis on 6967 unrelated HSCT has shown that the presence of HLA-B*51:01 in the donor/recipient pairs is associated with acute graft versus host disease not only for the strong linkage disequilibrium of HLA-C*14:02 and -B*51:01 but also for the effect of HLA-B*51:01 itself. Based on these data, mismatched HLA-C*14:02 should be considered a non-permissive HLA-C mismatch in donor selection because it seems to be a potent risk factor for severe acute graft versus host disease and mortality.

Concerning DPB1 HLA loci, an algorithm for non-permissive HLA-DPB1 disparities has been described, based on T-cell alloreactivity patients, with potential clinical implications. To confirm this data, GITMO analysis has reported an increased but similar overall mortality by non-permissive HLADPB1 disparity in 10 of 10 (HR 2.12; CI, 1.23-3.64; P .006) and 9 of 10 allele-matched transplantations (HR 2.21; CI, 1.28-3.80; P .004), both in early-stage and in advanced-stage disease. Additionally, recent data have reported that among 8/8 matched cases, HLA-DPB1 and -DQB1 mismatch resulted in increased acute graft versus host disease and HLA-DPB1 mismatch is associated with decreased relapse. Non-permissive HLA-DPB1 allele mismatch was also associated with higher TRM compared with permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch or HLA-DPB1 match and increased overall mortality compared with permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch in 8/8 (and 10/10) matched cases. Based on all these reports, the current suggestions concerning the unrelated donor selection consists of a full matching at HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 unrelated donor for optimal HSCT survival, and avoiding non-permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches in otherwise HLA-matched pairs.

In 2009, a previous retrospective Italian analysis, performed on 805 couples, reported that globally there are no differences in terms of outcomes (Overall Survival, Disease Free Survival, Relapse Rate and Transplant Related Mortality and Graft Versus Host Disease) in adult patients with neoplastic diseases transplanted with HLA-matched donor 10/10 or 9/10. However, stratifying patients by stage of disease at transplant, a single HLA incompatibility significantly increases the risk of mortality in patients who received HSCT in early stage whereas this data is not confirmed for patients transplanted in advanced stage of disease. This previous Italian analysis included only 10/10 high-resolution typed pairs from 1999 to 2006, excluding all the others couple without a full HLA typing for avoiding confounding results. According to Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry standard, extended HR HLA was not a mandatory requirement from 1999 to 2006.

From January 2012, all Italian recipients have been typed with HR-HLA typing at the starting of the unrelated donor search process with a consequent advantage in terms of "non selected population" as object of the present observational trial. Moreover, the larger size of cohort of patients who underwent unrelated HSCT during a smaller study period of 2 years should lead to a more effective analysis including the assessments of permissive and non-permissive I and II class HLA incompatibilities. Finally, in order to give a stronger statistical power to this trial, particular efforts have been drawn in order to recovery data about the graft versus host disease prophylaxis.

Keywords
HSCT, high resolution HLA typing, unrelated donor
Medical subject headings
Hematologic Diseases

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. compatibility level

    The compatibility level selected by the Italian Transplant Centres using an high resolution HLA typing at the start of search process for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from volunteer unrelated donor

    Measured: 4 months by Activation of the donor search

  2. Overall survival from transplant

    The transplant outcomes in terms of Overall Survival and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor and Promise Registry.

    Measured: 100 days, 1 year and 2 years from transplant

  3. Disease Free Survival

    The transplant outcomes in terms of Disease Free Survival and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor and Promise Registry

    Measured: 100 days, 1 year and 2 years from transplant

  4. Relapse Rate

    The transplant outcomes in terms of Relapse Rate and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor and Promise Registry.

    Measured: 100 days, 1 year and 2 years from transplant

  5. Transplant Related Mortality

    The transplant outcomes in terms of Transplant Related Mortality and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor and Promise Registry.

    Measured: 100 days, 1 year and 2 years from transplant

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. identification of allelic mismatching

    The possible identification of allelic mismatching combinations characterized by increased cross-reactivity associated with higher incidence of acute or chronic GVHD.

    Measured: 2 years from transplant

  2. identification of allelic mismatching

    1. The possible identification of combinations of allelic mismatching characterized by higher permissiveness.

    Measured: 2 years from transplant

  3. Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGvHD)

    The available information in the EBMT data regard the date of onset and the maximum grade of aGvHD. It is therefore possible to estimate the probability of aGvHD in a competing risks setting (death is a competing event; whether relapse/progression is a competing event must be discussed with the physician). By definition, patients alive (relapse/progression-free) at day 100 without having experienced aGvHD are censored. If the dates of onset are missing for the majority of patients, the analysis can focus only on the occurrence of aGvHD, which is analyzed by a logistic regression model. This method would however be incorrect if there is a (non negligible) percentage of censored observations or if competing events occurred before day 100.

    Measured: from date of transplant to until the date of first event of aCGVD assessed up to 100 days post transplant]

  4. Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGvHD)

    When possible, if information on the date of 1°occurrence of cGvHD is available, it should be analyzed as a time-to-event outcome, being death (and possibly relapse/progression) the competing event; data are censored for patients alive (relapse/progression-free) without episodes of cGvHD at last follow-up. Since cGvHD is defined only for patients surviving at least 100 days, the survival model should consider a left truncation at 100 days; alternatively, the time of occurrence of cGvHD must be computed from 100 days. If information on the timing of cGvHD is not available, the outcome considered is the occurrence, and the statistical model to be used is the logistic regression. Only patients surviving at least 100 days are considered to be at risk of developing cGvHD, therefore the analysis must be restricted to these patients. This analysis is of course not satisfactory because it does not take into account the occurrence of death and censoring.

    Measured: from day +100 post transplant to until the date of first event to cGVHD assessed up to 2 years post enrolment]

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Sep 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2018
  4. Study completion21 Sep 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
1,838 participants (actual)
Target duration
2 Years
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02827149
Sponsor's protocol ID
GITMO-HLA-HR
Acronym
GITMO-HLA-HR
Status last verified
Aug 2021
First submitted
6 Jul 2016
Last updated
20 Aug 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hematologic Diseases, run by Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo at 39 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 39 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

compatibility level (time frame: 4 months by Activation of the donor search). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in