Hematologic DiseasesGITMO-HLA-HRNCT02827149
High Resolution Donor Recipient HLA Matching Level in Unrelated HSCT
An observational study of Hematologic Diseases, run by Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo at 39 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Italian, retrospective, prospective, observational, multicentre, spontaneous, non-interventional, non-pharmacological The study aims to analyze in the national Italian experience 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hematologic Diseases
- How many people
- 1,838 participants
- Where
- 39 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2017to 21 Sep 2018
- How long will I take part?
- 2 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: This study will enrol adult patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from unrelated adult donor between 1° January 2012 and 31 December 2015.
Who may be able to join
- Haematological disease
- Written and signed PROMISE informed consent
- Patient undergoing unrelated HSCT
Who cannot join
- Unavailability of HR-HLA pairs typing including at least A, B, C, DRB1 loci
Trial locations and contacts
39 sites in 1 country.
39 sites in 1 country
Italy39 sites
Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio
Alessandria
Clinica di Ematologia - Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona
Ancona
Ospedale Mazzoni
Ascoli Piceno
Policlinico di Bari-Ematologia con trapianti
Bari
Divisione di Ematologia - Ospedali Papa Giovanni XXIII
Bergamo
Ospedale San Orsola
Bologna
AO Spedali Civili di Brescia- USD - TMO Adulti
Brescia
Ospedale Binaghi
Cagliari
Ospedale Ferrarotto - Ematologia
Catania
S.C. Ematologia - Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle
Cuneo
Cattedra di Ematologia - Azienda Ospedaliera di Careggi
Florence
Ematologia e Centro Trapianti Midollo Osseo - Ospedale IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza
Foggia
AOU IRCCS San Martino - IST
Genova
Divisione di Ematologia - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Milan
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan
IEO
Milan
Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan
Divisione Ematologia - Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria - Policlinico -
Modena
Ospedale San Gerardo
Monza
A.O.U. Policlinico Federico II
Naples
AO Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia - Cervello
Palermo
Dipartimento Oncologico La Maddalena
Palermo
Fondazione IRCCS San Matteo
Pavia, 27100
Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia
Dip. Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale
Perugia
Ospedale Civile
Pescara
Ospedale G. Da Saliceto di Piacenza
Piacenza
Centro Unico Regionale Trapianti di Midollo Osseo - Ospedale Bianchi-Melacino-Morelli
Reggio Calabria
A.O. San Camillo Forlanini
Roma
Cattedra di Ematologia - Policlinico
Roma
Divisione di Ematologia - Istituto di Semeiotica Medica - Policlinico A. Gemelli
Roma
Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata
Roma
Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica ed Ematologia - Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano (MI)
Ospedale Moscati
Taranto
AOU CIttà della Salute e della Scienza
Torino
Ospedale Regina Margherita
Torino
Clinica Ematologica - AOU Santa Maria Della Misericordia
Udine
AOU Integrat
Verona
Ospedale S. Bortolo-Divisione Ematologia
Vicenza
About this study
Official title: High Resolution Donor Recipient HLA Matching Level in Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Impact on the Transplant Outcome: the Italian Experience
Italian, retrospective, prospective, observational, multicentre, spontaneous, non-interventional, non-pharmacological The study aims to analyze in the national Italian experience
- The compatibility level selected by the Italian Transplant Centres using an high resolution HLA typing at the start of search process for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from volunteer unrelated donor
- The transplant outcomes in terms of Overall Survival, Disease Free Survival, Relapse Rate and Transplant Related Mortality and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry and Promise registry.
- The possible identification of allelic mismatching combinations characterized by increased cross-reactivity associated with higher incidence of acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease .
- The possible identification of combinations of allelic mismatching characterized by higher permissiveness.
Read the detailed description
Haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a potentially curative treatment for several haematological disorders, but its application depends on the availability of a suitable donor. Some data show that in US population the likelihood of finding HR 8/8 HLA A, B, C, DRB1 matched donor in NMDP registry is about 75% for white Europeans but only 46% for white patients of Middle Eastern or North African descents. Moreover, this probability decreases for patients belonging to African or Black South/Central American group at 18% and 16%, respectively. Furtherly, recent data have reported a significant improvement in the unrelated donor identification over the years. In particular, they have conducted the unrelated donor searches for 1344 ideal patients in the "Be The Match Registry" database at 2 time points: 2009 and 2012. Their results have shown that 8/8 high resolution HLA match rate (A, B, Cw and DRB1) for White raised from 68% in 2009 to 72% in 2012. Corresponding match rates were 41% to 44% for Hispanic, 44% to 46% for Asian/Pacific Islander), and 27% to 30% for African American/Black race and ethnic groups for 2009 and 2012, respectively. The 2012 10/10 match rates were 67% for White, 38% for Hispanic, 41% for Asian/Pacific Islander, and 23% for African American/Black.
Current available data confer to HLA mismatch (6-7/8) a significant increased risk for grades II to IV and III to IV acute graft versus host disease, chronic graft versus host disease, transplant-related mortality (TRM) and overall mortality compared with HLA-matched cases (8/8). However, it is not yet clear if type (allele/antigen) and locus (HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1) of mismatch are associated with overall mortality. In order to improve the outcome of the unrelated HSCT, many efforts are ongoing for identifying permissive and non permissive HLA disparity both for I and II classes HLA. Recently, several authors have highlighted the crucial role of allelic mismatching Cw combinations in supporting GVL/ graft versus host disease effect with a consequent decreased risk of relapse (p<0.003). On the contrary, Cw disparities as Cw03:03 vs Cw03:04 or Cw07:01 vs Cw07:02 seem to be permissiveness in terms of HSCT clinical outcome. Contemporarily, Japanese meta-analysis on 6967 unrelated HSCT has shown that the presence of HLA-B*51:01 in the donor/recipient pairs is associated with acute graft versus host disease not only for the strong linkage disequilibrium of HLA-C*14:02 and -B*51:01 but also for the effect of HLA-B*51:01 itself. Based on these data, mismatched HLA-C*14:02 should be considered a non-permissive HLA-C mismatch in donor selection because it seems to be a potent risk factor for severe acute graft versus host disease and mortality.
Concerning DPB1 HLA loci, an algorithm for non-permissive HLA-DPB1 disparities has been described, based on T-cell alloreactivity patients, with potential clinical implications. To confirm this data, GITMO analysis has reported an increased but similar overall mortality by non-permissive HLADPB1 disparity in 10 of 10 (HR 2.12; CI, 1.23-3.64; P .006) and 9 of 10 allele-matched transplantations (HR 2.21; CI, 1.28-3.80; P .004), both in early-stage and in advanced-stage disease. Additionally, recent data have reported that among 8/8 matched cases, HLA-DPB1 and -DQB1 mismatch resulted in increased acute graft versus host disease and HLA-DPB1 mismatch is associated with decreased relapse. Non-permissive HLA-DPB1 allele mismatch was also associated with higher TRM compared with permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch or HLA-DPB1 match and increased overall mortality compared with permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch in 8/8 (and 10/10) matched cases. Based on all these reports, the current suggestions concerning the unrelated donor selection consists of a full matching at HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 unrelated donor for optimal HSCT survival, and avoiding non-permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches in otherwise HLA-matched pairs.
In 2009, a previous retrospective Italian analysis, performed on 805 couples, reported that globally there are no differences in terms of outcomes (Overall Survival, Disease Free Survival, Relapse Rate and Transplant Related Mortality and Graft Versus Host Disease) in adult patients with neoplastic diseases transplanted with HLA-matched donor 10/10 or 9/10. However, stratifying patients by stage of disease at transplant, a single HLA incompatibility significantly increases the risk of mortality in patients who received HSCT in early stage whereas this data is not confirmed for patients transplanted in advanced stage of disease. This previous Italian analysis included only 10/10 high-resolution typed pairs from 1999 to 2006, excluding all the others couple without a full HLA typing for avoiding confounding results. According to Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry standard, extended HR HLA was not a mandatory requirement from 1999 to 2006.
From January 2012, all Italian recipients have been typed with HR-HLA typing at the starting of the unrelated donor search process with a consequent advantage in terms of "non selected population" as object of the present observational trial. Moreover, the larger size of cohort of patients who underwent unrelated HSCT during a smaller study period of 2 years should lead to a more effective analysis including the assessments of permissive and non-permissive I and II class HLA incompatibilities. Finally, in order to give a stronger statistical power to this trial, particular efforts have been drawn in order to recovery data about the graft versus host disease prophylaxis.
- Conditions
- Hematologic Diseases
- Keywords
- HSCT, high resolution HLA typing, unrelated donor
- Medical subject headings
- Hematologic Diseases
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
compatibility level
The compatibility level selected by the Italian Transplant Centres using an high resolution HLA typing at the start of search process for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from volunteer unrelated donor
Measured: 4 months by Activation of the donor search
Overall survival from transplant
The transplant outcomes in terms of Overall Survival and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor and Promise Registry.
Measured: 100 days, 1 year and 2 years from transplant
Disease Free Survival
The transplant outcomes in terms of Disease Free Survival and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor and Promise Registry
Measured: 100 days, 1 year and 2 years from transplant
Relapse Rate
The transplant outcomes in terms of Relapse Rate and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor and Promise Registry.
Measured: 100 days, 1 year and 2 years from transplant
Transplant Related Mortality
The transplant outcomes in terms of Transplant Related Mortality and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor and Promise Registry.
Measured: 100 days, 1 year and 2 years from transplant
Secondary outcomes (4)
identification of allelic mismatching
The possible identification of allelic mismatching combinations characterized by increased cross-reactivity associated with higher incidence of acute or chronic GVHD.
Measured: 2 years from transplant
identification of allelic mismatching
- The possible identification of combinations of allelic mismatching characterized by higher permissiveness.
Measured: 2 years from transplant
Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGvHD)
The available information in the EBMT data regard the date of onset and the maximum grade of aGvHD. It is therefore possible to estimate the probability of aGvHD in a competing risks setting (death is a competing event; whether relapse/progression is a competing event must be discussed with the physician). By definition, patients alive (relapse/progression-free) at day 100 without having experienced aGvHD are censored. If the dates of onset are missing for the majority of patients, the analysis can focus only on the occurrence of aGvHD, which is analyzed by a logistic regression model. This method would however be incorrect if there is a (non negligible) percentage of censored observations or if competing events occurred before day 100.
Measured: from date of transplant to until the date of first event of aCGVD assessed up to 100 days post transplant]
Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGvHD)
When possible, if information on the date of 1°occurrence of cGvHD is available, it should be analyzed as a time-to-event outcome, being death (and possibly relapse/progression) the competing event; data are censored for patients alive (relapse/progression-free) without episodes of cGvHD at last follow-up. Since cGvHD is defined only for patients surviving at least 100 days, the survival model should consider a left truncation at 100 days; alternatively, the time of occurrence of cGvHD must be computed from 100 days. If information on the timing of cGvHD is not available, the outcome considered is the occurrence, and the statistical model to be used is the logistic regression. Only patients surviving at least 100 days are considered to be at risk of developing cGvHD, therefore the analysis must be restricted to these patients. This analysis is of course not satisfactory because it does not take into account the occurrence of death and censoring.
Measured: from day +100 post transplant to until the date of first event to cGVHD assessed up to 2 years post enrolment]
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Sep 2017
- Primary completion1 Sep 2018
- Study completion21 Sep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hematologic DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 1,838 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 2 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Associazione Italiana di Immunogenetica e Biologia dei Trapianti (AIBT), National Marrow Donor Program, University of Rome Tor Vergata
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alessandra Picardi, MD, Principal investigator, Policlinico Università Tor Vergata - Rome
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02827149
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GITMO-HLA-HR
- Acronym
- GITMO-HLA-HR
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- High Resolution Donor Recipient HLA Matching Level in Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Impact on the Transplant Outcome: the Italian Experience
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02827149
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GITMO-HLA-HR / GITMO-HLA-HR
- Conditions
- Hematologic Diseases
- Keywords
- HSCT, high resolution HLA typing, unrelated donor
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,838 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo OsseoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Associazione Italiana di Immunogenetica e Biologia dei Trapianti (AIBT), National Marrow Donor Program, University of Rome Tor Vergata
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Italian, retrospective, prospective, observational, multicentre, spontaneous, non-interventional, non-pharmacological The study aims to analyze in the national Italian experience
- The compatibility level selected by the Italian Transplant Centres using an high resolution HLA typing at the start of search process for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from volunteer unrelated donor
- The transplant outcomes in terms of Overall Survival, Disease Free Survival, Relapse Rate and Transplant Related Mortality and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry and Promise registry.
- The possible identification of allelic mismatching combinations characterized by increased cross-reactivity associated with higher incidence of acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease .
- The possible identification of combinations of allelic mismatching characterized by higher permissiveness.
Detailed description
Haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a potentially curative treatment for several haematological disorders, but its application depends on the availability of a suitable donor. Some data show that in US population the likelihood of finding HR 8/8 HLA A, B, C, DRB1 matched donor in NMDP registry is about 75% for white Europeans but only 46% for white patients of Middle Eastern or North African descents. Moreover, this probability decreases for patients belonging to African or Black South/Central American group at 18% and 16%, respectively. Furtherly, recent data have reported a significant improvement in the unrelated donor identification over the years. In particular, they have conducted the unrelated donor searches for 1344 ideal patients in the "Be The Match Registry" database at 2 time points: 2009 and 2012. Their results have shown that 8/8 high resolution HLA match rate (A, B, Cw and DRB1) for White raised from 68% in 2009 to 72% in 2012. Corresponding match rates were 41% to 44% for Hispanic, 44% to 46% for Asian/Pacific Islander), and 27% to 30% for African American/Black race and ethnic groups for 2009 and 2012, respectively. The 2012 10/10 match rates were 67% for White, 38% for Hispanic, 41% for Asian/Pacific Islander, and 23% for African American/Black.
Current available data confer to HLA mismatch (6-7/8) a significant increased risk for grades II to IV and III to IV acute graft versus host disease, chronic graft versus host disease, transplant-related mortality (TRM) and overall mortality compared with HLA-matched cases (8/8). However, it is not yet clear if type (allele/antigen) and locus (HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1) of mismatch are associated with overall mortality. In order to improve the outcome of the unrelated HSCT, many efforts are ongoing for identifying permissive and non permissive HLA disparity both for I and II classes HLA. Recently, several authors have highlighted the crucial role of allelic mismatching Cw combinations in supporting GVL/ graft versus host disease effect with a consequent decreased risk of relapse (p<0.003). On the contrary, Cw disparities as Cw03:03 vs Cw03:04 or Cw07:01 vs Cw07:02 seem to be permissiveness in terms of HSCT clinical outcome. Contemporarily, Japanese meta-analysis on 6967 unrelated HSCT has shown that the presence of HLA-B*51:01 in the donor/recipient pairs is associated with acute graft versus host disease not only for the strong linkage disequilibrium of HLA-C*14:02 and -B*51:01 but also for the effect of HLA-B*51:01 itself. Based on these data, mismatched HLA-C*14:02 should be considered a non-permissive HLA-C mismatch in donor selection because it seems to be a potent risk factor for severe acute graft versus host disease and mortality.
Concerning DPB1 HLA loci, an algorithm for non-permissive HLA-DPB1 disparities has been described, based on T-cell alloreactivity patients, with potential clinical implications. To confirm this data, GITMO analysis has reported an increased but similar overall mortality by non-permissive HLADPB1 disparity in 10 of 10 (HR 2.12; CI, 1.23-3.64; P .006) and 9 of 10 allele-matched transplantations (HR 2.21; CI, 1.28-3.80; P .004), both in early-stage and in advanced-stage disease. Additionally, recent data have reported that among 8/8 matched cases, HLA-DPB1 and -DQB1 mismatch resulted in increased acute graft versus host disease and HLA-DPB1 mismatch is associated with decreased relapse. Non-permissive HLA-DPB1 allele mismatch was also associated with higher TRM compared with permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch or HLA-DPB1 match and increased overall mortality compared with permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch in 8/8 (and 10/10) matched cases. Based on all these reports, the current suggestions concerning the unrelated donor selection consists of a full matching at HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 unrelated donor for optimal HSCT survival, and avoiding non-permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches in otherwise HLA-matched pairs.
In 2009, a previous retrospective Italian analysis, performed on 805 couples, reported that globally there are no differences in terms of outcomes (Overall Survival, Disease Free Survival, Relapse Rate and Transplant Related Mortality and Graft Versus Host Disease) in adult patients with neoplastic diseases transplanted with HLA-matched donor 10/10 or 9/10. However, stratifying patients by stage of disease at transplant, a single HLA incompatibility significantly increases the risk of mortality in patients who received HSCT in early stage whereas this data is not confirmed for patients transplanted in advanced stage of disease. This previous Italian analysis included only 10/10 high-resolution typed pairs from 1999 to 2006, excluding all the others couple without a full HLA typing for avoiding confounding results. According to Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry standard, extended HR HLA was not a mandatory requirement from 1999 to 2006.
From January 2012, all Italian recipients have been typed with HR-HLA typing at the starting of the unrelated donor search process with a consequent advantage in terms of "non selected population" as object of the present observational trial. Moreover, the larger size of cohort of patients who underwent unrelated HSCT during a smaller study period of 2 years should lead to a more effective analysis including the assessments of permissive and non-permissive I and II class HLA incompatibilities. Finally, in order to give a stronger statistical power to this trial, particular efforts have been drawn in order to recovery data about the graft versus host disease prophylaxis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Target follow-up
- 2 Years
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This study will enrol adult patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from unrelated adult donor between 1° January 2012 and 31 December 2015.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Haematological disease
- Written and signed PROMISE informed consent
- Patient undergoing unrelated HSCT
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Unavailability of HR-HLA pairs typing including at least A, B, C, DRB1 loci
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
compatibility level
Time frame: 4 months by Activation of the donor search
The compatibility level selected by the Italian Transplant Centres using an high resolution HLA typing at the start of search process for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from volunteer unrelated donor
Overall survival from transplant
Time frame: 100 days, 1 year and 2 years from transplant
The transplant outcomes in terms of Overall Survival and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor and Promise Registry.
Disease Free Survival
Time frame: 100 days, 1 year and 2 years from transplant
The transplant outcomes in terms of Disease Free Survival and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor and Promise Registry
Relapse Rate
Time frame: 100 days, 1 year and 2 years from transplant
The transplant outcomes in terms of Relapse Rate and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor and Promise Registry.
Transplant Related Mortality
Time frame: 100 days, 1 year and 2 years from transplant
The transplant outcomes in terms of Transplant Related Mortality and the correlation with the level of HLA matching pairs of donor/recipient included in the Italian Bone Marrow Donor and Promise Registry.
4 secondary outcomes
identification of allelic mismatching
Time frame: 2 years from transplant
identification of allelic mismatching
Time frame: 2 years from transplant
Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGvHD)
Time frame: from date of transplant to until the date of first event of aCGVD assessed up to 100 days post transplant]
Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGvHD)
Time frame: from day +100 post transplant to until the date of first event to cGVHD assessed up to 2 years post enrolment]
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2021.
Related trials for Hematologic Diseases
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study in Children and, Adults With Congenital Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (cTTP) Treated With Adzynma
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alessandra Picardi, MD principal investigator
Policlinico Università Tor Vergata - Rome
39 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hematologic Diseases, run by Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo at 39 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 39 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
compatibility level (time frame: 4 months by Activation of the donor search). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2021.