Bone FracturesPhase 3INKNCT02828566
Intranasal Ketamine for Procedural Sedation
A Phase 3 study testing IN ketamine, IV ketamine and IN saline 0.9% in people with Bone Fractures and Dislocations, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's.
Trial summary
This study will examine the effectiveness of intranasal (IN) ketamine compared to standard intravenous (IV) ketamine administration for simple reductions of orthopaedic injuries in the paediatric population. The aim is to assess if IN administration is equivalent to the current standard of care, IV. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bone Fractures, Dislocations
- What is being tested?
- IN ketamine, IV ketamine and IN saline 0.9%
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 470 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Oct 2017to Feb 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Age 4 -17 years
- Up to 80 kg
- Presenting the paediatric emergency department
- Require a closed reduction by procedural sedation and analgesia
- Acute (=< 48 hours) distal radius and/or ulna fracture that is angulated with or without displacement
- No more than 0.5 cm shortening in either the radius or ulna (not both)
Who cannot join
- Previous hypersensitivity reaction to ketamine
- Globe rupture
- Traumatic brain injury with intracranial hemorrhage
- History of uncontrolled hypertension
- Nasal bone deformity
- Duration of reduction expected to be greater than 20 minutes
Show all 19Show fewer
- Poor English or French fluency in the absence of a native language interpreter
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class of 3 or greater
- Previous sedation with ketamine within 24 hours
- Previous diagnosis of schizophrenia or psychosis based on DSM-V criteria
- Pregnancy
- Neuro-cognitive impairment that precludes informed consent, assent, or ability to self-report pain and satisfaction
- Multi-limb trauma
- Hemodynamic compromise
- Glasgow coma score < 15
- Fracture is comminuted
- Fracture is associated with a dislocation
- Hematoma block at index visit
- Unilateral or bilateral nasal obstruction (due to infectious or allergic rhinitis, nasal polyps, septal hematoma, or septal deviation)
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Intranasal Ketamine Versus Intravenous Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children: a Multi-centre Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
This study will examine the effectiveness of intranasal (IN) ketamine compared to standard intravenous (IV) ketamine administration for simple reductions of orthopaedic injuries in the paediatric population. The aim is to assess if IN administration is equivalent to the current standard of care, IV. The population to be studied is children 4-17 years of age who require a simple orthopaedic reduction. Following a double dummy approach to overcome the difficulty in masking interventions, each participant will receive both IV and IN interventions, only one of which will be the real drug. Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) will be assessed using the Dartmouth Operative Conditions Scale (DOCS).
Read the detailed description
Randomization and concealment of allocation will be pharmacy-controlled using a computerized central randomization service. The treating physician, bedside nurse, research assistant, and participant will be blinded to the intervention. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio with a stratified block design of four or six to either (1) IN ketamine (each single dose, 10 mg/kg prepared in 0.9% NS in 3 mL syringe and atomizer, to a maximum of 8 mL) PLUS IV 0.9% NS 0.02 mL/kg or (2) IV ketamine (single dose, 1 mg/kg, to a maximum 80 mg) PLUS intranasal 0.9% NS 0.10 mL/kg divided to both nares. Due to the perceptible differences in interventional routes, each participant will receive both IV and IN interventions using this double-dummy approach. For IN dose volumes less than or equal to 0.5 mL, the entire dose will be delivered into 1 nostril and for doses greater than 0.5 mL, the dose will be divided equally between both nares. Adjunctive sedation will be given as needed in the form of IV ketamine, any dose, for participants who are adequately sedated 1 minute after IV administration at the discretion of the treating physician. Inadequate sedation in this context refers to one of the following: participant's vocalizations are consistent with pain OR participant withdraws or localizes due to pain. Eligible participants will be identified by the treating physician after viewing the radiographs and performing a clinical assessment. The physician will then inform a research assistant (RA) that the participant is eligible. The RA will then seek informed consent and explain the protocol to the family. Baseline demographic information will be obtained. Informed consent for PSA and a pre-anesthetic assessment will be performed by the treating physician in accordance with the usual standard of care. The RA will record a continuous video of the participant's entire body and monitor using an iPad starting immediately after the IV intervention until the participant is awake and able to tolerate oral fluids. DOCS scores will be obtained by two trained outcome assessors every 30 seconds for the entire duration of the video. The outcome assessors will also score the entire video for emergence delirium using the Paediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale every 5 minutes beginning at the completion of fracture reduction until the participant is awake and drinking. Participants will receive standard monitoring of oxygen saturation, blood pressure, respiratory rate, apnea, heart rate, and rash by the attending nurse and physician every 5 minutes as per the usual standard of care. The usual standard of care also includes monitoring post-anesthetic for the presence of known idiosyncratic effects of ketamine that include vomiting, seizure, headache, emergence reaction, and hypersensitivity. The RA will obtain this information from the nursing record at discharge and based on consensus-based Canadian recommendations. Immediately prior to discharge, the RA will also record the duration of stay in the ED, parental, patient, and physician satisfaction with PSA using a 5-item Likert scale, and nasal irritation
- Conditions
- Bone Fractures, Dislocations
- Being tested
- IN ketamine, IV ketamine, IN saline 0.9%, IV saline 0.9%
- Medical subject headings
- Fractures, Bone, Joint Dislocations
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IN ketamineDrug
Also called ketamine hydrochloride
Intranasal ketamine 100 mg/mL solution (10 mg/kg, maximum 800 mg)
IV ketamineDrug
Also called ketamine hydrochloride
Intravenous ketamine 50 mg/mL solution (1 to 1.5 mg/kg, maximum 120 mg)
IN saline 0.9%Drug
Intranasal 0.9% normal saline
IV saline 0.9%Drug
Intravenous 0.9% normal saline
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IN ketamine and IV saline | Experimental | Ketamine, single dose, 10 mg/kg (0.1 mL/kg) of 100 mg/mL solution delivered intranasally using an atomizer and divided to both nares to a maximum of 800 mg (8 mL) AND 0.9% normal saline (NS) 0.02 to 0.03 mL/kg delivered intravenously to a maximum of 2.4 mL Receives: Drug: IN ketamine; Drug: IV saline 0.9% |
| IV ketamine and IN saline | Active comparator | Ketamine, single dose, 1 to 1.5 mg/kg (0.02 to 0.03 mL/kg) of 50 mg/mL solution delivered intravenously, to a maximum of 120 mg (2.4 mL) AND 0.9% normal saline (NS) 0.1 mL/kg delivered intranasally using an atomizer and divided to both nares, to a maximum of 8 mL Receives: Drug: IV ketamine; Drug: IN saline 0.9% |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Adequacy of sedation
Proportion with DOCS score -2 to +2 for duration of fracture reduction
Measured: Duration of fracture reduction
Secondary outcomes (21)
Depth of sedation
Score using Pediatric Sedation State Scale
Measured: Duration of fracture reduction
Onset of adequate sedation
Time interval from first IN sprays to first DOCS score between -2 and +2 in minutes
Measured: Within 1 hour following intervention
Duration of sedation
Duration of time between the first DOCS score -2 to +2 to last DOCS score between -2 and +2 post-fracture reduction
Measured: Within 2 hours following intervention
Proportion of time participant adequately sedated during fracture reduction
Proportion of time DOCS score is -2 to +2 during fracture reduction.
Measured: Within 2 hours following intervention
Adverse events
The proportion of participants with adverse effects between groups will be compared. The list of adverse effects was chosen based on known adverse effects associated with ketamine and consensus-based recommendations for reporting for procedural sedation and analgesia in children.
Measured: Within 2 hours following intervention
Length of stay due to PSA
Time interval from the first pair of IN sprays to discharge
Measured: Within 3 hours of intervention
Duration of procedure
Time of the first pair of IN sprays to the end of cast or splint application
Measured: Within 3 hours of intervention
Caregiver satisfaction
Obtained when patient is awake and drinking using a Visual Analog Scale; Parents not wishing to remain in proximity of child for sedation may opt out
Measured: Within 2 hours of intervention
Participant satisfaction
Obtained when patient is awake and drinking using a Visual Analog Scale; Satisfaction will only be assessed in children at least eight years of age as the VAS has not been validated in younger children.
Measured: Within 2 hours of intervention
Physician satisfaction
Obtained immediately prior to discharge using a Visual Analog Scale
Measured: Within 2 hours of intervention
Nurse satisfaction
Obtained immediately prior to discharge using a Visual Analog Scale
Measured: Within 2 hours of intervention
Requirement for additional sedative medication
Number of doses and type of adjunctive sedative medication required; Deemed inadequate if additional sedative medication given (for IN ketamine group only)
Measured: Within 2 hours of intervention
Analgesic medication
Number of doses and type of analgesic medication required
Measured: Within 2 hours of intervention
Pain
Pain scores will be recorded using the FPS-R on arrival and when the child is awake and drinking
Measured: Within 2 hours of intervention
Emergence delirium
The proportion of children experiencing emergence delirium will be compared using the Paediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale scored from the video every 5 minutes by an outcome assessor starting when fracture reduction is complete to when awake and drinking
Measured: 20 to 80 minutes post-IV intervention
Nasal irritation
Measured using the Faces Pain Scale - Revised when awake and drinking
Measured: Within 2 hours following intervention
Successful sedation
Successful sedation - Based on the definition of Bhatt et al., this will be defined as no unpleasant patient recall of the procedure, no resistance or restraint required during the procedure, no permanent sedation-related complication or no sedation-related event requiring abandonment of the procedure.
Defined as: no unpleasant patient recall of the procedure, no resistance or restraint required during the procedure, no permanent sedation-related complication or no sedation-related event requiring abandonment of the procedure.
Defined as no unpleasant recall of procedure, no resistance or restraint, no permanent sedation related complication, no sedation-related event requiring abandonment of procedure
Measured: Within 2 hours following intervention
Adjunctive IV therapy
Other reasons for IV insertion (analgesia, anxiolysis, fluids, etc.)
Measured: Within 2 hours following intervention
Number of IN sprays received / Intended number of sprays
Number of IN sprays received / Intended number of sprays
Measured: Within 2 hours following intervention
Number of IV attempts
Number of IV attempts and time to IV insertion Number of IV attempts
Measured: Within 2 hours following intervention
Time to IV insertion
Time from first breakage of skin to establishment of successful flow with a flush
Measured: Within 2 hours following intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completionJan 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bone FracturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 470 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Naveen Poonai, MD, Principal investigator, Western University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02828566
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 106550
- Acronym
- INK
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 29 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Heath A, Offringa M, Pechlivanoglou P, Rios JD, Klassen TP, Poonai N, Pullenayegum E; KidsCAN PERC Innovative Paediatric Clinical Trials Team. Determining a Bayesian predictive power stopping rule for futility in a non-inferiority trial with binary outcomes. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Apr 8;18:100561. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100561. eCollection 2020 Jun.
PubMed 32300671
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intranasal Ketamine Versus Intravenous Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children: a Multi-centre Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02828566
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INK / 106550
- Conditions
- Bone Fractures, Dislocations
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 470 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will examine the effectiveness of intranasal (IN) ketamine compared to standard intravenous (IV) ketamine administration for simple reductions of orthopaedic injuries in the paediatric population. The aim is to assess if IN administration is equivalent to the current standard of care, IV. The population to be studied is children 4-17 years of age who require a simple orthopaedic reduction. Following a double dummy approach to overcome the difficulty in masking interventions, each participant will receive both IV and IN interventions, only one of which will be the real drug. Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) will be assessed using the Dartmouth Operative Conditions Scale (DOCS).
Detailed description
Randomization and concealment of allocation will be pharmacy-controlled using a computerized central randomization service. The treating physician, bedside nurse, research assistant, and participant will be blinded to the intervention. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio with a stratified block design of four or six to either (1) IN ketamine (each single dose, 10 mg/kg prepared in 0.9% NS in 3 mL syringe and atomizer, to a maximum of 8 mL) PLUS IV 0.9% NS 0.02 mL/kg or (2) IV ketamine (single dose, 1 mg/kg, to a maximum 80 mg) PLUS intranasal 0.9% NS 0.10 mL/kg divided to both nares. Due to the perceptible differences in interventional routes, each participant will receive both IV and IN interventions using this double-dummy approach. For IN dose volumes less than or equal to 0.5 mL, the entire dose will be delivered into 1 nostril and for doses greater than 0.5 mL, the dose will be divided equally between both nares. Adjunctive sedation will be given as needed in the form of IV ketamine, any dose, for participants who are adequately sedated 1 minute after IV administration at the discretion of the treating physician. Inadequate sedation in this context refers to one of the following: participant's vocalizations are consistent with pain OR participant withdraws or localizes due to pain. Eligible participants will be identified by the treating physician after viewing the radiographs and performing a clinical assessment. The physician will then inform a research assistant (RA) that the participant is eligible. The RA will then seek informed consent and explain the protocol to the family. Baseline demographic information will be obtained. Informed consent for PSA and a pre-anesthetic assessment will be performed by the treating physician in accordance with the usual standard of care. The RA will record a continuous video of the participant's entire body and monitor using an iPad starting immediately after the IV intervention until the participant is awake and able to tolerate oral fluids. DOCS scores will be obtained by two trained outcome assessors every 30 seconds for the entire duration of the video. The outcome assessors will also score the entire video for emergence delirium using the Paediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale every 5 minutes beginning at the completion of fracture reduction until the participant is awake and drinking. Participants will receive standard monitoring of oxygen saturation, blood pressure, respiratory rate, apnea, heart rate, and rash by the attending nurse and physician every 5 minutes as per the usual standard of care. The usual standard of care also includes monitoring post-anesthetic for the presence of known idiosyncratic effects of ketamine that include vomiting, seizure, headache, emergence reaction, and hypersensitivity. The RA will obtain this information from the nursing record at discharge and based on consensus-based Canadian recommendations. Immediately prior to discharge, the RA will also record the duration of stay in the ED, parental, patient, and physician satisfaction with PSA using a 5-item Likert scale, and nasal irritation
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IN ketamine and IV saline | Experimental | Drug: IN ketamine, Drug: IV saline 0.9%Ketamine, single dose, 10 mg/kg (0.1 mL/kg) of 100 mg/mL solution delivered intranasally using an atomizer and divided to both nares to a maximum of 800 mg (8 mL) AND 0.9% normal saline (NS) 0.02 to 0.03 mL/kg delivered intravenously to a maximum of 2.4 mL |
| IV ketamine and IN saline | Active comparator | Drug: IV ketamine, Drug: IN saline 0.9%Ketamine, single dose, 1 to 1.5 mg/kg (0.02 to 0.03 mL/kg) of 50 mg/mL solution delivered intravenously, to a maximum of 120 mg (2.4 mL) AND 0.9% normal saline (NS) 0.1 mL/kg delivered intranasally using an atomizer and divided to both nares, to a maximum of 8 mL |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 4 -17 years
- Up to 80 kg
- Presenting the paediatric emergency department
- Require a closed reduction by procedural sedation and analgesia
- Acute (=< 48 hours) distal radius and/or ulna fracture that is angulated with or without displacement
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Previous hypersensitivity reaction to ketamine
- Globe rupture
- Traumatic brain injury with intracranial hemorrhage
- History of uncontrolled hypertension
- Nasal bone deformity
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IN ketamineAlso: ketamine hydrochlorideIntranasal ketamine 100 mg/mL solution (10 mg/kg, maximum 800 mg) | Drug | IN ketamine and IV saline |
| IV ketamineAlso: ketamine hydrochlorideIntravenous ketamine 50 mg/mL solution (1 to 1.5 mg/kg, maximum 120 mg) | Drug | IV ketamine and IN saline |
| IN saline 0.9%Intranasal 0.9% normal saline | Drug | IV ketamine and IN saline |
| IV saline 0.9%Intravenous 0.9% normal saline | Drug | IN ketamine and IV saline |
Primary outcome
Adequacy of sedation
Time frame: Duration of fracture reduction
Proportion with DOCS score -2 to +2 for duration of fracture reduction
21 secondary outcomes
Depth of sedation
Time frame: Duration of fracture reduction
Onset of adequate sedation
Time frame: Within 1 hour following intervention
Duration of sedation
Time frame: Within 2 hours following intervention
Proportion of time participant adequately sedated during fracture reduction
Time frame: Within 2 hours following intervention
Adverse events
Time frame: Within 2 hours following intervention
Length of stay due to PSA
Time frame: Within 3 hours of intervention
Duration of procedure
Time frame: Within 3 hours of intervention
Caregiver satisfaction
Time frame: Within 2 hours of intervention
Participant satisfaction
Time frame: Within 2 hours of intervention
Physician satisfaction
Time frame: Within 2 hours of intervention
Nurse satisfaction
Time frame: Within 2 hours of intervention
Requirement for additional sedative medication
Time frame: Within 2 hours of intervention
Analgesic medication
Time frame: Within 2 hours of intervention
Pain
Time frame: Within 2 hours of intervention
Emergence delirium
Time frame: 20 to 80 minutes post-IV intervention
Nasal irritation
Time frame: Within 2 hours following intervention
Successful sedation
Time frame: Within 2 hours following intervention
Adjunctive IV therapy
Time frame: Within 2 hours following intervention
Number of IN sprays received / Intended number of sprays
Time frame: Within 2 hours following intervention
Number of IV attempts
Time frame: Within 2 hours following intervention
Time to IV insertion
Time frame: Within 2 hours following intervention
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Aug 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32300671Heath A, Offringa M, Pechlivanoglou P, Rios JD, Klassen TP, Poonai N, Pullenayegum E; KidsCAN PERC Innovative Paediatric Clinical Trials Team. Determining a Bayesian predictive power stopping rule for futility in a non-inferiority trial with binary outcomes. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Apr 8;18:100561. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100561. eCollection 2020 Jun.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bone Fractures
RecruitingObservational study
Bone Stress Injury Recovery and Return to Sport: A Natural History Study
Bone Stress Fracture
Recruiting
SMR Stemless Reverse vs SMR Reverse Shoulder System
Arthroplasty, Replacement
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Diagnostic Potential of Nanox.ARC Tomosynthesis System for Different Diseases
Fracture, Erosion
Recruiting
Buddy Tape vs. Splint for Metacarpal Shaft Fracture Recovery
Non-thumb Metacarpal Shaft Fracture
Active, not recruiting
Impact of Screening and Multicomponent Exercise on Fall Rates, Fractures, and Cardiovascular Health in Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes, Osteoporosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Naveen Poonai, MD principal investigator
Western University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing IN ketamine, IV ketamine and IN saline 0.9% in people with Bone Fractures and Dislocations, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Naveen Poonai, MD (5196858500 ext. 52011, naveen.poonai@lhsc.on.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Adequacy of sedation (time frame: Duration of fracture reduction). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02828566, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2017.