Kidney TransplantationCICLOSPOTNCT02830191
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplant Patients by Dried Blood Spot Assay. Interest and Feasibility.
An observational study of Kidney Transplantation, run by University Hospital, Caen.
Trial summary
Ciclosporin A (CsA) is an immunosuppressive drug used in organs and tissues transplantations (kidney, heart, liver, bone marrow ...) to prevent rejection, and in different autoimmune or inflammatory diseases. A therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is required during a CsA treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Kidney Transplantation
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Nov 2014to Jul 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporine at nephrology department of the University Hospital of Caen.
Who may be able to join
- Adult Patient (18 years or older) treated with CsA and monitored for dose adjustment
- Kidney transplantation
- Not objecting to participate in study
Who cannot join
- Objecting to the additional sample by finger prick
- Anticoagulant treatment
- Hemostatic disorder (risk of hematoma)
About this study
Ciclosporin A (CsA) is an immunosuppressive drug used in organs and tissues transplantations (kidney, heart, liver, bone marrow ...) to prevent rejection, and in different autoimmune or inflammatory diseases. A therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is required during a CsA treatment. It is justified by a narrow therapeutic range between efficiency and nephrotoxicity, and by large intra- and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. TDM of CsA is conventionally performed by determining residual concentration, and sometimes concentration at 2 hours after administration. TDM of CsA is currently performed by venous sampling on ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling could be a particularly interesting alternative to conventional blood sampling. With DBS, capillary blood is obtained from a finger prick by the patient himself, and the blood drop obtained is deposited on filter paper, which can be stored at room temperature and then be sent to the laboratory by mail.
This sampling method has several advantages : it requires small blood volumes, it is less invasive than conventional venous sampling, sampling can be performed by the patient himself at home few days before the consultation, and the results of the analysis can be available to the clinician on the day of consultation, allowing dose adjustment more quickly.
Read more
Several studies have been published in recent years using DBS sampling method, for various drugs such as antimalarials, antiepileptics, antiretrovirals, metformin, benzodiazepines, or immunosuppressants. Only one clinical validation study of TDM of CsA using DBS method was published by Wilhelm et al. (2013) in a population of 38 patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. The results showed excellent correlation between the concentrations determined by the two sampling methods.
The investigators propose an observational study at the University Hospital of Caen for clinical validation of DBS sampling for TDM of CsA in kidney transplantation, for which there are no data published. During a nephrology consultation, for each patient, venous and finger prick blood samples are simultaneously collected. CsA assays were performed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for the two sampling methods. A specific LC-MS/MS assay method applied for DBS samples was developed and validated for this study (DBS/LC-MS/MS). Correlation between the results obtained from the two sampling methods will be evaluated, on at least 100 samples. Patients have to answer a questionnaire to assess pain and comfort of DBS sampling, and feasibility of self-sampling at home by this method. The aim of this clinical validation study of DBS sampling is the establishment of the systematic TDM of CsA for renal transplant patients by DBS sampling at the University Hospital of Caen.
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplantation
- Keywords
- Cyclosporine, Dried blood spot
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Correlation between CsA concentrations determined from DBS sampling and conventional venous sampling for each patient (coefficient correlation, Bland-Altman difference plot)
Measured: 8 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Comparison of pain, comfort and practicality of the two sampling methods by a patient questionnaire.
Measured: 8 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2014
- Primary completionJul 2015
- Study completionJul 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Kidney TransplantationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, CaenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Caen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02830191
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 14-050
- Acronym
- CICLOSPOT
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 18 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplant Patients by Dried Blood Spot Assay. Interest and Feasibility.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02830191
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CICLOSPOT / 14-050
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplantation
- Keywords
- Cyclosporine, Dried blood spot
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, CaenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2014
- Primary completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Ciclosporin A (CsA) is an immunosuppressive drug used in organs and tissues transplantations (kidney, heart, liver, bone marrow ...) to prevent rejection, and in different autoimmune or inflammatory diseases. A therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is required during a CsA treatment. It is justified by a narrow therapeutic range between efficiency and nephrotoxicity, and by large intra- and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. TDM of CsA is conventionally performed by determining residual concentration, and sometimes concentration at 2 hours after administration. TDM of CsA is currently performed by venous sampling on ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling could be a particularly interesting alternative to conventional blood sampling. With DBS, capillary blood is obtained from a finger prick by the patient himself, and the blood drop obtained is deposited on filter paper, which can be stored at room temperature and then be sent to the laboratory by mail.
This sampling method has several advantages : it requires small blood volumes, it is less invasive than conventional venous sampling, sampling can be performed by the patient himself at home few days before the consultation, and the results of the analysis can be available to the clinician on the day of consultation, allowing dose adjustment more quickly.
Several studies have been published in recent years using DBS sampling method, for various drugs such as antimalarials, antiepileptics, antiretrovirals, metformin, benzodiazepines, or immunosuppressants. Only one clinical validation study of TDM of CsA using DBS method was published by Wilhelm et al. (2013) in a population of 38 patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. The results showed excellent correlation between the concentrations determined by the two sampling methods.
The investigators propose an observational study at the University Hospital of Caen for clinical validation of DBS sampling for TDM of CsA in kidney transplantation, for which there are no data published. During a nephrology consultation, for each patient, venous and finger prick blood samples are simultaneously collected. CsA assays were performed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for the two sampling methods. A specific LC-MS/MS assay method applied for DBS samples was developed and validated for this study (DBS/LC-MS/MS). Correlation between the results obtained from the two sampling methods will be evaluated, on at least 100 samples. Patients have to answer a questionnaire to assess pain and comfort of DBS sampling, and feasibility of self-sampling at home by this method. The aim of this clinical validation study of DBS sampling is the establishment of the systematic TDM of CsA for renal transplant patients by DBS sampling at the University Hospital of Caen.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporine at nephrology department of the University Hospital of Caen.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult Patient (18 years or older) treated with CsA and monitored for dose adjustment
- Kidney transplantation
- Not objecting to participate in study
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Objecting to the additional sample by finger prick
- Anticoagulant treatment
- Hemostatic disorder (risk of hematoma)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Correlation between CsA concentrations determined from DBS sampling and conventional venous sampling for each patient (coefficient correlation, Bland-Altman difference plot)
Time frame: 8 months
1 secondary outcome
Comparison of pain, comfort and practicality of the two sampling methods by a patient questionnaire.
Time frame: 8 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Apr 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Kidney Transplantation
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) After a Kidney Transplant
Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Biomarker-Guided Mycophenolate Mofetil Elimination in Low-Risk Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Transplant Recipient
Recruiting
Non-Invasive Monitoring of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients and Immunosuppression Personalization: an Open-labeled Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Pediatric Kidney Disease, Transplant;Failure,Kidney
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Kidney Transplantation, run by University Hospital, Caen.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Correlation between CsA concentrations determined from DBS sampling and conventional venous sampling for each patient (coefficient correlation, Bland-Altman difference plot) (time frame: 8 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2019.