Vertebral Bony MetastasesPhase 2IRON-2NCT02832765
Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy With Integrated-boost in Patients With Spinal Bone Metastases
A Phase 2 study testing A, B and C in people with Vertebral Bony Metastases, run by Heidelberg University at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The primary goal of the study is to determine the local control-rate after radiotherapy (RT) with and without simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) concepts in patients with bone metastases of the spine. Further study objectives are survival, and clinical parameters such as pain, quality of life (QoL) and fatigue. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Vertebral Bony Metastases
- What is being tested?
- A, B and C
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Sep 2016to Feb 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a histologically confirmed tumor diagnosis, with secondarily diagnosed solitary/multiple metastatic spinal bone metastases
- Indication for RT of the bone metastasis
- Age: between 18 and 80 years
- Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70
- Signed Declaration of Informed Consent
- Bisphosphonate therapy
Who cannot join
- Significant neurological or psychiatric disorders, including dementia and epileptic seizures
- Lacking or diminished legal capacity
- foregoing radiotherapy in the planned RT area
- Any medical of psychological condition that the study director considers a preventive factor for the patient's ability to complete the study or to adequately understand the scope of the study and to give his/her consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Harald Rief, MD, PhD contact
Jürgen Debus, MD, PhD contact
Germany1 site
Dept of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Germany
Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
About this study
The primary goal of the study is to determine the local control-rate after radiotherapy (RT) with and without simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) concepts in patients with bone metastases of the spine. Further study objectives are survival, and clinical parameters such as pain, quality of life (QoL) and fatigue. We expect an improvement in local control and consecutively an increased re-sclerotization of the bone metastasis due to a higher biological dose in the tumor area. Therefore patients could benefit in quality-of-life, pain relief and mobility.
Read the detailed description
The vertebral column is the main localization of bone metastases and is where they frequently indicate an advanced stage of a malignant primary disease [1, 2]. Two thirds of all patients with tumors are estimated to develop bone metastases in the course of their disease [3]. Spinal bone metastases are of central impact for patients in a palliative setting. The clinical symptoms include pain at rest and under exercise but also impaired activity of daily life, the risk of pathological fractures, and neurological deficits. Local control is the essential factor for stability of the vertebral body of patients with spinal bone metastases. In regard to re-calcification of former osteolytic lesions, palliative radiotherapy (RT) represents an effective treatment option [4]. The most common schedule was specified as 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can be a safe modality for treating spinal metastasis with enhanced targeting accuracy [5]. Secondly, IMRT to the spine was well tolerated (especially in the spinal cord), had no significant late toxicities, and spared other organs at risk simultaneously [6]. The main problem of the standard schedule is the limited dose application to the metastasis due to organ at risk myelon. Therefore, the aims of this study is to apply a high biological dose in the tumor region and to achieve an improved result related to local control for palliative patients with painful spinal bone metastases. Secondly, the aim is to evaluate QoL, fatigue, and survival of three different RT-techniques. To the best of our knowledge, no comparable randomized study has been described in the literature so far.
- Conditions
- Vertebral Bony Metastases
- Being tested
- A, B, C, D
- Keywords
- Palliative radiotherapy, Bone metastases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ARadiation
Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 30Gy in 10 fractions of the involved spinal bone metastases
BRadiation
Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 30Gy in 10 fractions with an SIB with 40 Gy in 10 fractions to the metastasis of the involved spinal bone metastases
CRadiation
Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 20Gy in 5 fractions of the involved spinal bone metastases
DRadiation
Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 20Gy in 5 fractions with an SIB with 30 Gy in 5 fractions to the metastasis of the involved spinal bone metastases
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 30Gy in 10 fractions Receives: Radiation: A |
| B | Experimental | Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 30Gy in 10 fractions with an SIB with 40 Gy in 10 fractions to the metastasis Receives: Radiation: B |
| C | Experimental | Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 20Gy in 5 fractions Receives: Radiation: C |
| D | Experimental | Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 20Gy in 5 fractions with an SIB with 30 Gy in 5 fractions to the metastasis Receives: Radiation: D |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
local control
local control as bone density is assessed 12 weeks post completion of radiotherapy using follow-up CT scan of the spine
Measured: 3 months after RT
Secondary outcomes (4)
progression-free survival (PFS)
PFS is assessed 2 years post completion of radiotherapy
Measured: 2 years post completion of radiotherapy
pain reduction
pain is evaluated using the VAS pain scale (0-100 points) at completion and 12/ 24 weeks post completion of radiation
Measured: end of treatment, 12 and 24 weeks post completion of radiotherapy
Quality of life
Quality of life is assessed using the EORTC BM22 questionnaire at 12 and 24 weeks post completion of treatment
Measured: 12 and 24 weeks post completion of therapy
Fatigue
Fatigue is assessed using the EORTC FA13 questionnaire
Measured: 12 and 24 weeks post completion of therapy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2016
- Primary completionFeb 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Vertebral Bony MetastasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Heidelberg University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02832765
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRON-2
- Acronym
- IRON-2
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 12 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 14 Jul 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ryu S, Pugh SL, Gerszten PC, Yin FF, Timmerman RD, Hitchcock YJ, Movsas B, Kanner AA, Berk LB, Followill DS, Kachnic LA. RTOG 0631 phase 2/3 study of image guided stereotactic radiosurgery for localized (1-3) spine metastases: phase 2 results. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Mar-Apr;4(2):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
PubMed 24890347Guckenberger M, Sweeney RA, Flickinger JC, Gerszten PC, Kersh R, Sheehan J, Sahgal A. Clinical practice of image-guided spine radiosurgery--results from an international research consortium. Radiat Oncol. 2011 Dec 15;6:172. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-172.
PubMed 22172095Katsoulakis E, Riaz N, Cox B, Mechalakos J, Zatcky J, Bilsky M, Yamada Y. Delivering a third course of radiation to spine metastases using image-guided, intensity-modulated radiation therapy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jan;18(1):63-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.SPINE12433. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
PubMed 23101946Chung Y, Yoon HI, Kim JH, Nam KC, Koom WS. Is helical tomotherapy accurate and safe enough for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb;139(2):243-8. doi: 10.1007/s00432-012-1321-0. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
PubMed 23052695Sprave T, Welte SE, Bruckner T, Forster R, Bostel T, Schlampp I, Nicolay NH, Debus J, Rief H. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with integrated-boost in patients with bone metastasis of the spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Jan 22;19(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2452-7.
PubMed 29357902
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jul 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy With Integrated-boost in Patients With Spinal Bone Metastases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02832765
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRON-2 / IRON-2
- Conditions
- Vertebral Bony Metastases
- Keywords
- Palliative radiotherapy, Bone metastases
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Heidelberg UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2016
- Primary completion
- Feb 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary goal of the study is to determine the local control-rate after radiotherapy (RT) with and without simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) concepts in patients with bone metastases of the spine. Further study objectives are survival, and clinical parameters such as pain, quality of life (QoL) and fatigue. We expect an improvement in local control and consecutively an increased re-sclerotization of the bone metastasis due to a higher biological dose in the tumor area. Therefore patients could benefit in quality-of-life, pain relief and mobility.
Detailed description
The vertebral column is the main localization of bone metastases and is where they frequently indicate an advanced stage of a malignant primary disease [1, 2]. Two thirds of all patients with tumors are estimated to develop bone metastases in the course of their disease [3]. Spinal bone metastases are of central impact for patients in a palliative setting. The clinical symptoms include pain at rest and under exercise but also impaired activity of daily life, the risk of pathological fractures, and neurological deficits. Local control is the essential factor for stability of the vertebral body of patients with spinal bone metastases. In regard to re-calcification of former osteolytic lesions, palliative radiotherapy (RT) represents an effective treatment option [4]. The most common schedule was specified as 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can be a safe modality for treating spinal metastasis with enhanced targeting accuracy [5]. Secondly, IMRT to the spine was well tolerated (especially in the spinal cord), had no significant late toxicities, and spared other organs at risk simultaneously [6]. The main problem of the standard schedule is the limited dose application to the metastasis due to organ at risk myelon. Therefore, the aims of this study is to apply a high biological dose in the tumor region and to achieve an improved result related to local control for palliative patients with painful spinal bone metastases. Secondly, the aim is to evaluate QoL, fatigue, and survival of three different RT-techniques. To the best of our knowledge, no comparable randomized study has been described in the literature so far.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Radiation: AIntensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 30Gy in 10 fractions |
| B | Experimental | Radiation: BIntensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 30Gy in 10 fractions with an SIB with 40 Gy in 10 fractions to the metastasis |
| C | Experimental | Radiation: CIntensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 20Gy in 5 fractions |
| D | Experimental | Radiation: DIntensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 20Gy in 5 fractions with an SIB with 30 Gy in 5 fractions to the metastasis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with a histologically confirmed tumor diagnosis, with secondarily diagnosed solitary/multiple metastatic spinal bone metastases
- Indication for RT of the bone metastasis
- Age: between 18 and 80 years
- Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70
- Signed Declaration of Informed Consent
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Significant neurological or psychiatric disorders, including dementia and epileptic seizures
- Lacking or diminished legal capacity
- foregoing radiotherapy in the planned RT area
- Any medical of psychological condition that the study director considers a preventive factor for the patient's ability to complete the study or to adequately understand the scope of the study and to give his/her consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AIntensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 30Gy in 10 fractions of the involved spinal bone metastases | Radiation | A |
| BIntensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 30Gy in 10 fractions with an SIB with 40 Gy in 10 fractions to the metastasis of the involved spinal bone metastases | Radiation | B |
| CIntensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 20Gy in 5 fractions of the involved spinal bone metastases | Radiation | C |
| DIntensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 20Gy in 5 fractions with an SIB with 30 Gy in 5 fractions to the metastasis of the involved spinal bone metastases | Radiation | D |
Primary outcome
local control
Time frame: 3 months after RT
local control as bone density is assessed 12 weeks post completion of radiotherapy using follow-up CT scan of the spine
4 secondary outcomes
progression-free survival (PFS)
Time frame: 2 years post completion of radiotherapy
pain reduction
Time frame: end of treatment, 12 and 24 weeks post completion of radiotherapy
Quality of life
Time frame: 12 and 24 weeks post completion of therapy
Fatigue
Time frame: 12 and 24 weeks post completion of therapy
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jul 2016.
- Results publication: PubMed 24890347Ryu S, Pugh SL, Gerszten PC, Yin FF, Timmerman RD, Hitchcock YJ, Movsas B, Kanner AA, Berk LB, Followill DS, Kachnic LA. RTOG 0631 phase 2/3 study of image guided stereotactic radiosurgery for localized (1-3) spine metastases: phase 2 results. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Mar-Apr;4(2):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 22172095Guckenberger M, Sweeney RA, Flickinger JC, Gerszten PC, Kersh R, Sheehan J, Sahgal A. Clinical practice of image-guided spine radiosurgery--results from an international research consortium. Radiat Oncol. 2011 Dec 15;6:172. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-172.
- Results publication: PubMed 23101946Katsoulakis E, Riaz N, Cox B, Mechalakos J, Zatcky J, Bilsky M, Yamada Y. Delivering a third course of radiation to spine metastases using image-guided, intensity-modulated radiation therapy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jan;18(1):63-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.SPINE12433. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 23052695Chung Y, Yoon HI, Kim JH, Nam KC, Koom WS. Is helical tomotherapy accurate and safe enough for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb;139(2):243-8. doi: 10.1007/s00432-012-1321-0. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29357902Sprave T, Welte SE, Bruckner T, Forster R, Bostel T, Schlampp I, Nicolay NH, Debus J, Rief H. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with integrated-boost in patients with bone metastasis of the spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Jan 22;19(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2452-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Vertebral Bony Metastases
Not yet recruiting
Stereotactic Radiotherapy for SPinal Metastases With Limited Extent of Epidural Disease
Epiduritis, Vertebral Bone Metastasis
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness Of Radiofrequency Ablation And Stabilization In Metastatic Spine Lesions By Positron Emission Computed Tomography (PET-CT) Confirmation
Bone Cancer Metastatic, Radiofrequency Ablation
RecruitingObservational study
Tumoral Bone Strength Assessment by Numerical Simulation Using Quantitative CT : the MEKANOS Study
Metastases to Bone, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Harald Rief, MD, PhD contact
Jürgen Debus, MD, PhD contact
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing A, B and C in people with Vertebral Bony Metastases, run by Heidelberg University at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Harald Rief, MD, PhD (harald.rief@med.uni-heidelberg.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
local control (time frame: 3 months after RT). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02832765, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2016.