AzTrials
AzTrials

Carcinoma, HepatocellularNCT02832882

RFA for Small HCC With No-touch Technique Using Octopus Electrode

A study testing No-touch RFA and Conventional tumor puncture RFA in people with Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, run by Seoul National University Hospital.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study, the investigators are going to prospectively compare the clinical outcomes (technical success rate, 12 month local tumor progression rate, complication rate, tumor seeding rate) of Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with octopus electrode and no-touch technique for Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to those of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What is being tested?
No-touch RFA and Conventional tumor puncture RFA
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
118 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
21 Oct 2016to 17 Jan 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Child-Pugh class A
  • patient with 1cm-2.5cm sized HCC
  • 1 or 2 HCCs
  • being referred for curative purpose of RFA
  • sign informed consent

Who cannot join

  • maximum tumor diameter greater than 2.5cm
  • Child-Pugh class B or C
  • more than 3 HCC lesions
  • invisible tumor even after US/CT or US/MR fusion
  • presence of vascular tumor thrombosis or extrahepatic metastasis
  • severe coagulopathy (PLT < 50K, PT < 50% of normal range)

About this study

Official title: Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Octopus Electrode and No-touch Technique: Preliminary Study

In this study, the investigators are going to prospectively compare the clinical outcomes (technical success rate, 12 month local tumor progression rate, complication rate, tumor seeding rate) of Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with octopus electrode and no-touch technique for Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to those of RFA with conventional tumor puncture method with the same device.

Being tested
No-touch RFA, Conventional tumor puncture RFA
Keywords
HCC, RFA
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • No-touch RFAProcedure or surgery

    No-touch RFA indicates RFA without tumor puncture. In this study, no-touch RFA is performed using Octopus electrodes.

  • Conventional tumor puncture RFAProcedure or surgery

    Conventional tumor puncture RFA indicates routine procedure of RFA in our institution. In this study, RFA procedure is performed using Octopus electrodes.

Study groups in NCT02832882
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
No-touch RFA armExperimentalNo-touch RFA arm indicates RFA procedure using Octopus electrode and no touch technique.
Receives: Procedure: No-touch RFA
Conventional tumor puncture RFA armActive comparatorConventional tumor puncture RFA arm indicates RFA procedure using Octopus electrode and conventional tumor puncture technique.
Receives: Procedure: Conventional tumor puncture RFA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 12 month local tumor progression (LTP) rate

    Measured: 12 month after RFA

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. tumor seeding rate

    incidence of tract seeding after RFA.

    Measured: 12 months after RFA

  2. Complication rate related with RFA

    RFA-related complication rate such as death, abscess, bleeding..etc.

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Technical success rate

    presence or absence of residual lesion on follow-up imaging

    Measured: 1 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start21 Oct 2016
  3. Primary completion11 Sep 2018
  4. Study completion17 Jan 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
118 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02832882
Sponsor's protocol ID
SNUH-2016-2244
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
3 Jun 2016
Last updated
22 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing No-touch RFA and Conventional tumor puncture RFA in people with Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, run by Seoul National University Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

12 month local tumor progression (LTP) rate (time frame: 12 month after RFA). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in