AzTrials
AzTrials

HIVEDBPNCT02835820

Effects of Diet on Brain Processing

A study testing Ketogenic Diet in people with HIV and Neurocognitive Impairment, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Randomized control pilot 12 week feeding trial to compare the preliminary effects of ketogenic diet (versus patient choice diet) on HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment. N = 20 (n = 10/10) randomized to diet condition. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
HIV, Neurocognitive Impairment
What is being tested?
Ketogenic Diet
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
17 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2016to 15 Feb 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Stable HIV participants (CD4+ lymphocyte count > 350 cells/mm3) for at least two years
  • prescribed their current cART regimen for at least six months) with mild to moderate cognitive impairment

Who cannot join

  • Drug/alcohol abuse
  • History of Parkinsons
  • Alzheimers, stroke or traumatic brain injury
  • diabetes mellitus
  • renal insufficiency

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UAB 1917 Clinic

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Effect of a Ketogenic Diet on HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Impairment

Randomized control pilot 12 week feeding trial to compare the preliminary effects of ketogenic diet (versus patient choice diet) on HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment. N = 20 (n = 10/10) randomized to diet condition. Pilot data necessary to evaluate the feasibility and determine initial data for primary outcomes in order to accurately determine needed sample size for larger clinical trial.

Outcomes: 1) cognition (NIH Toolkit), 2) cardiometabolic markers (insulin glucose, insulin resistance, markers of inflammation), and 3) neural activity (as determined by functional MRI..

Read the detailed description

Specific Aims: In medically stable, older (> 50 years) HIV patients with cognitive impairment, this study will:

Overall: Test the feasibility of recruitment, retention, and adherence to a ketogenic diet versus patient choice diet (PCD) intervention.

Primary: Compare the impact of a 12-week KD versus PCD on:

  1. Cognitive function (at 12 weeks).
  2. Inflammation (at 12 weeks).
  3. Cardiometabolic profile (at 12 weeks).
  4. Persistence of cognitive effects (at 18 weeks). Secondary: In a subsample (n = 5; experimental group):
  5. Examine the changes in neural activity and neurocognitive functioning as demonstrated via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), after a 12 week KD diet.
  6. Assess the level of agreement between NIH Neurocognitive Tests and MRI in the assessment of neurocognitive functioning.

INNOVATION: Brain metabolism regulation and reduced neural inflammation via dietary approaches have only recently been explored in the treatment/management of progressive cognitive disorders in humans. Preliminary results in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's patients suggest that the use of ketones for brain fuel improves brain metabolism and cerebral perfusion as well as reduces accumulation of harmful brain proteins20 To date, the effects of a KD in cognitively impaired older HIV patients have not been explored. In addition, this study proposes the use of MRI testing to examine the longitudinal, physiologic changes in the brain of cognitively impaired, older HIV patients consuming a KD for 12 weeks. Moreover, this study will utilize the new FDA-approved Magnetom Prisma 3T MRI system to better visualize small-scale neural brain abnormalities.

Research Design and Methods Design/Setting: Using an experimental design, a total of 20 older (> 50 years), stable HIV participants (CD4+ lymphocyte count > 350 cells/mm3 for at least two years and prescribed their current cART regimen for at least six months) with self-identified "forgetfulness" and demonstrate cognitive impairment (score </= on Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status -Modified (TICS-M)) will be recruited from the 1917 clinic (data extracted/verified using 1917 Clinic database) and will be randomly assigned to either the ketogenic diet (KD)(< CHO 50 grams/day) (n = 10) or the patient choice diet (PCD) (no dietary restrictions/changes) (n = 10) group for 12 weeks. In addition, the first five (n = 5) eligible (i.e., no metal implants, claustrophobia) participants randomized to the experimental group will also be enrolled in an additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) longitudinal study to generate preliminary data regarding the neurological changes associated with cognitive improvement. Previous studies in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease patients have reported significant cognitive improvement at 28, 45, and 90 days of ketosis.

Exclusion Criteria: Current drug or alcohol abuse (> 3 drinks/day), past medical history of mental disorders (i.e., schizophrenia, bipolar), neural injury (i.e., cerebral vascular accident or traumatic brain injury), dementia, Parkinson's, diabetes mellitus, hearing impaired, or any other condition that contraindicates participation. Due to the inconclusive evidence regarding the influence of statin drugs on cognition, statin use will not be exclusionary.

Recruitment: Fliers that provide basic study and PI contact information will be posted in the lobby/exam rooms of the 1917 Clinic. A telephone screening interview will be completed for all interested individuals. During the screening, cognitive impairment will be determined via administration of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Assessment-Modified (TICS-M). TICS-M is a 13-item tool for assessment of cognitive function in older adults. A score < 20 indicates cognitive impairment (equivalent to a score < 25 on the validated/widely used in-person cognitive assessment, Mini Mental Status Exam [MMSE]).

Randomization: Participants will be randomly assigned, using permutated block randomization, to either the KD or PCD group with equal size. The CCTS BERD methodologists will develop the permuted block randomization algorithm. Because this is a diet intervention, it is not possible for participants/study personnel to be blinded to group assignment. In order to minimize bias/ensure allocation concealment, the randomization schedule will include sequentially-numbered, opaque sealed envelopes and will be kept by Dr. Morrison.

Data Collection:

Demographics: Age, education, gender, marital/partner status, employment status/disability eligibility, SES (Medicaid, food stamps, p Public housing eligibility), years since HIV diagnosis (baseline assessment only).

Anthropometrics: Height, weight, BMI, waist and hip circumference assessed at baseline and week 1. Height (nearest 0.1 cm), waist circumference (nearest 0.1 cm), and hip circumference (nearest 0.1 cm) measured with Gulick tape measure. Weight (nearest .01 kg) assessed using a Tanita body composition analyzer BC418, Tanita Corp of America, Arlington Heights, IL. BMI will be calculated. Waist circumference will be measured at the umbilicus at end of inspiration. Hip measures will be evaluated at widest hip portion.

Cognition: Cognition will be determined via the well-validated NIH Cognition Toolbox Battery. The NIH Toolbox is a comprehensive computerized battery that assesses each major cognitive domain in ~30 minutes. This technology has been in design/beta testing for nearly a decade by world-renowned neuropsychologists and computer programmers. Scoring includes the following corrected (age, education, gender, race) scores: fluid cognition composite, crystalized cognition composite, overall cognitive function composite, and scores for each individual domain (i.e., executive function, attention, episodic memory, language, processing speed, and working memory). Impairment scores can be derived from each of the aforementioned scores.

Neuroimaging: All neuroimaging screening, data collection, and data analyses will be conducted by Dr. Jarred Younger. Approved participants will attend a baseline imaging session. All imaging will be performed on the UAB Civitan International Research Center's 3-Telsa Siemens Prisma scanner and 64-channel head/neck receiving coil. Participants will first complete a high-resolution structural scan for group registration. Participants will then complete the T2*-weighted blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional scan. The functional scan will use a "resting-state" protocol in which the participants are instructed to close their eyes and rest. The 12-minute run will collect functional volumes every 2 seconds. Participants will be invited back to the scanner after completing the intervention, at which time they will repeat the entire scan sequence. Structural and functional data will be examined longitudinally to determine changes occurring as a result of the intervention. Changes in gray-matter structure will be examined using a high-dimensional warping (HDW) tensor-based morphometry approach. Functional data will be analyzed using a Fractional Amplitude of Low Frequency Fluctuations (FALFF) approach. The relative activity pattern will be contrasted in the pre-intervention and post-intervention scans to determine areas showing greater or lesser neural activity after the intervention diet. To help mitigate the loss of statistical power due to the low sample size in this preliminary analysis, all statistics will be run within-person with a voxel-wise statistical threshold of p < 0.005.

Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT): Screening consists of a glucose load of 75 g at baseline (time 0). At ~7 am, after a 12-h fast, a flexible intravenous catheter will be placed in an antecubital space. Blood samples will be collected at times 0, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. Sera will be stored at -85oC until analyzed for glucose, insulin, and C-Peptide. Whole-body insulin sensitivity and β cell responsiveness will be derived via OGTT at baseline/week 12.

Analysis of Glucose, C-peptide, and Insulin: Concentrations of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide will be analyzed in the UAB Diabetes Research Center (Core Director: B. Gower, Primary Mentor). Glucose will be measured in 3 µL sera using the Glucose oxidase method on a Stanbio Sirrus analyzer (Stanbio Laboratory, Boerne, TX). Insulin will be assayed in 50-µL aliquots using immunofluorescence on a TOSOH AIA-II analyzer (TOSOH Corp, S. San Francisco, CA). C-peptide will be assayed in 20-µL aliquots using the TOSOH analyzer.

Lipids: Total, high density cholesterol (HDL) and triglycerides will be measured using SIRRUS analyzer (Stanbio Laboratory, Boerne, TX); low density lipoprotein will be calculated using the method of Friedewald.

Inflammation Markers: Assessed by immunoassay in fasting morning sera before and after the intervention. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) will be assessed by turbidometric methods by using a SIRRUS analyzer (Stanbio Laboratory), with reagents obtained from Pointe Scientific, and TNF-a and IFNy, IL-1B, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-12p70 by using electrochemiluminescence (Meso Scale Discovery).

Urine Ketones: Presence of acetoacetic acid (ketones) assessed via Precision XTRA Ketone Monitoring System. All participants will monitor capillary glucose daily for first two weeks and then weekly. Results will be documented on log sheet and returned to study staff. Participants will be contacted via telephone on weeks 4 and 8 to remind of ketone log submission.

Procedures: Eligible participants will be randomized to either the experimental (n = 10) or control group (n = 10) and scheduled for baseline data collection. Laboratory, demographic, and anthropometric assessments will be completed UAB's Clinical Research Unit (CRU). Baseline data will include: demographic questionnaire, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), inflammatory assays and lipid panel as well as an anthropometric evaluation. In addition, participants will be provided training related to the assessment of urine ketones, including a visual aid/handout that displays the color rubric and corresponding numeric value. Even though all snacks and meals for the KD group will be provided, experimental group participants will receive nutritional counseling related to the KD and provided with handouts that highlight important components of a KD so that participants can remain adherent to the intervention even if eating in a restaurant or in other social settings. After completion of the aforementioned items, participants will be escorted to the UAB Hospital cafeteria and provided a voucher for breakfast prior to completion of cognition assessments. After breakfast completion, participants will return to the CRU for completion of the cognitive battery in a private conference room. Completion of the questionnaires will be completed on a laptop computer that is secured by PGP Whole Disk Encryption® software to ensure participant confidentiality/privacy. After completion of the cognitive battery, individuals randomized to the experimental group and willing/eligible to undergo MRI testing, will be escorted to the UAB Highlands radiology department. Delivery of meals/snacks (week 1) will begin the week following baseline data collection. Bi-weekly phone conferences will be conducted with all participants to maintain participant contact as well as to assess for intervention adherence, challenges, and answer questions. In addition, all participants will complete a urine ketone assessment on weeks 4 and 8 and report those findings during conference calls. Note: Participants prescribed medications known to cause abnormal urine color (i.e., azo dyes, nitrofurantoin, and riboflavin) or affect the results (levodopa, hydroxyquinoline , methyldopa/captopril) or who report difficulty distinguishing differences between colors will return to UAB's CRU for serum ketone analysis at weeks 4 and 8. In addition, a survey will be administered to the KD group to determine what participants liked and did not like about the diet (week 12). All participants will be compensated for their time as follows: 1) Baseline and post intervention (wk 12) laboratory and cognitive assessments, $50/visit (N = 20); 2) MRI completion (n = 5), $50/scan; 3) Ketone assessment (wks 4 and 8, n = 20), $10 each; and 4) Six-week post intervention cognitive assessment (wk 18), (N = 20), $25.

Dietary Intervention:

KD: Meals/snacks will be provided/prepared by the UAB Clinical Research Unit's Bionutrition Department, a unit that employs two Dietitians who are all registered through the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and licensed in their perspective states. Food will be delivered weekly via a courier in appropriate food transportation coolers. The UAB Bionutrition Department is has a wealth of experience in research feeding study implementation including studies requiring specialized meal plans. Meals will be matched for energy content to maintain current energy balance and consist of < 50 grams CHO/day. Daily CHO intake will primarily be derived from fresh vegetables.

PCD group: Participants in this group will be instructed to maintain their normal dietary patterns. To ensure control group participants are not electively consuming a ketogenic diet (< 50 g CHO/day) during the 12 week intervention, participants will complete an at-home urine ketone screen and report results to project coordinator or PI on weeks 4 and 8. If a ketogenic diet is electively being consumed by a member of PCD group, the participant will be allowed to complete the study; however, the participant's data won't be included in analyses.

Intervention Fidelity: Intervention fidelity will be assessed using strategies consistent across the literature. 31-34 35 A comprehensive manual will be developed detailing recruitment, retention, assessment, and standardized intervention protocols. Standardized checklists will be utilized to review procedures. When a checklist item is not met, reasons will be explored/re-training will occur. Each participant will be contacted by telephone biweekly to reinforce intervention concepts (based on group assignment), appointment reminders, answer questions, and address areas of concern. Intervention adherence will be assessed at weeks 4 and 8 via urine ketone analysis unless contraindicated which, in case, serum ketones will be analyzed.

Statistical Analysis:

Demographic, Anthropometrics and Baseline Characteristics: Demographic data (i.e., age, education, gender, marital/partner status, employment status, and years since HIV diagnosis; anthropometrics (i.e., height, weight, BMI, waist and hip circumference); and baseline measures including cognition (cognitive scores and impairment score), inflammatory markers (CRP, TNF-a, IFNy, IL-1B, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-12p70), cardiometabolic factors (OGTT, glucose, C-peptide, and insulin) will be reported for each subject. Comparisons between the diet groups will be conducted to assess the degree to which comparability of randomization was achieved.

Primary analysis: All the primary outcomes (impairment score, inflammatory markers and cardiometabolic factors) will be examined by an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) including the change from baseline to completion of diet treatment as dependent variable, study group as independent variable, and baseline measures as a covariate, to evaluate the effects of a 12 week KD versus PCD. The lasting cognitive effects of a 12 week KD versus PCD six weeks post intervention completion will be examine by an ANCOVA including the change of impairment score form 12 week to 18 week as dependent variable, study group as independent variable, and impairment score at 12 week as a covariate.

Secondary analysis: The changes in neural activity and neurocognitive functioning as demonstrated via MRI in the subsample of KD group will be examined by a paired t test. Spearman R correlation will be conducted to assess level of agreement between NIH Neurocognitive Tests and MRI in the assessment of neurocognitive function in medically stable HIV patients aged > 50 years.

Next steps: An important reason for conducting this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility and determine initial data for the primary outcomes, in order to perform a sample size calculation for a larger trial. The mean and the standard error of the difference between the changes of KD group and PCD group will be used for the sample size calculation to reach an 80% power. In addition, the study protocol, data collection questionnaires, randomization procedure, recruitment and consent, and acceptability of intervention will be evaluated. Findings and the tested/improved protocol of this study will support an R21/R01 mechanism (i.e., PAR-15-280/PAR-15-282: Multidisciplinary Studies of HIV and Aging) that will include and expand upon following specific aim and hypotheses:

Specific aim: Compare the cognitive, cardiometabolic, and neural structural effects of a KD versus PCD in medically stable, older (> 50 years) HIV patients with cognitive impairment.

It is postulated that, in comparison to the control group, older (aged > 50 years) HIV positive, cognitively impaired individuals randomized to the KD will demonstrate the following:

Hypothesis 1: Improved cognition. Hypothesis 2: Decreased insulin, glucose, and systemic inflammation as well as improved insulin sensitivity.

Hypothesis 3: Heightened neural activity as observed by MRI.

Being tested
Ketogenic Diet
Keywords
HIV, Neurocognitive, Ketogenic Diet

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ketogenic DietDietary supplement

    12 week delivery of all meals/snacks (eucaloric) prepared by a registered dietician.

Study groups in NCT02835820
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ketogenic Diet GroupExperimentalKetogenic meals (3 meals/day, 7 days/week x 12 weeks) prepared and delivered to participants.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Ketogenic Diet
Patient Choice DietNo interventionControl.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Neurocognition: Mean Score of Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (Total) at Baseline

    The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test is used to measure episodic verbal learning and memory. The range of the score for the Hopkins Verbal Learning score is as follows: > 130 superior; 120-129 high; 110-119 bright, normal; 90-109 average; 85-89 low average; 70-84 borderline mental deficit; 35-49 moderate mental deficit; 20-34 severe mental deficit; 20-25 profound mental deficit.

    Measured: baseline

  2. Neurocognition: Mean Score of Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (Total) at 12 Weeks Post Baseline

    The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test is used to measure episodic verbal learning and memory. The range of the score for the Hopkins Verbal Learning score is as follows: > 130 superior; 120-129 high; 110-119 bright, normal; 90-109 average; 85-89 low average; 70-84 borderline mental deficit; 35-49 moderate mental deficit; 20-34 severe mental deficit; 20-25 profound mental deficit.

    Measured: baseline to week 12

  3. Neurocognition: Mean Score of Hopkins Verbal Learning Test at 18 Weeks Post Baseline

    The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test is used to measure episodic verbal learning and memory. The range of the score for the Hopkins Verbal Learning score is as follows: > 130 superior; 120-129 high; 110-119 bright, normal; 90-109 average; 85-89 low average; 70-84 borderline mental deficit; 35-49 moderate mental deficit; 20-34 severe mental deficit; 20-25 profound mental deficit.

    Measured: baseline to week 18

  4. Neurocognition: Mean Score of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale at Baseline

    The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale is an II test to measure intelligence and cognitive ability. The Full Scale scores are: beyond 130 place an individual in the superior or gifted range; scores between 120-129 suggest very bright; scores between 110-119 are bright normal; scores as 90-109 are average; scores of 85-89 suggest average intelligence; score of 70-84 suggests low average intelligence; score of 50 - 69 suggests borderline mental functioning; score of 50 - 69 suggests mild mental retardation; score of 35-49 suggests moderate retardation; 20 - 34 suggests severe retardation; below 20 - 25 suggests profound retardation

    Measured: baseline

  5. Neurocognition: Mean Score of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale at 12 Weeks Post Baseline

    The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale is an I! test to measure intelligence and cognitive ability. The Full Scale scores are: beyond 130 place an individual in the superior or gifted range; scores between 120-129 suggest very bright; scores between 110-119 are bright normal; scores as 90-109 are average; scores of 85-89 suggest average intelligence; score of 70-84 suggests low average intelligence; score of 50 - 69 suggests borderline mental functioning; score of 50 - 69 suggests mild mental retardation; score of 35-49 suggests moderate retardation; 20 - 34 suggests severe retardation; below 20 - 25 suggests profound retardation

    Measured: baseline to 12 weeks

  6. Neurocognition: Mean Score of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale at 18 Weeks Post Baseline

    The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale is an I! test to measure intelligence and cognitive ability. The Full Scale scores are: beyond 130 place an individual in the superior or gifted range; scores between 120-129 suggest very bright; scores between 110-119 are bright normal; scores as 90-109 are average; scores of 85-89 suggest average intelligence; score of 70-84 suggests low average intelligence; score of 50 - 69 suggests borderline mental functioning; score of 50 - 69 suggests mild mental retardation; score of 35-49 suggests moderate retardation; 20 - 34 suggests severe retardation; below 20 - 25 suggests profound retardation

    Measured: baseline to 18 weeks

  7. Neurocognition: Mean Score of Trail Making A and B at Baseline

    Trails A (simple) and Trails B (alternative) neuropsychological assessments provide information on cognitive processes such as visual search, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and executive functions (i.e., memory, problem solving, verbal reasoning). It is sensitive to cognitive impairment associated with dementia. The average score for trail making is 29 seconds. Scores over 78 seconds suggest a deficit.

    Measured: baseline

  8. Neurocognition: Mean Score of Trail Making A and B at 12 Weeks Post Baseline

    Trails A (simple) and Trails B (alternative) neuropsychological assessments provide information on cognitive processes such as visual search, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and executive functions (i.e., memory, problem solving, verbal reasoning).It is sensitive to cognitive impairment associated with dementia. The average score for trail making is 29 seconds. Scores over 78 seconds suggest a deficit.

    Measured: baseline to 12 weeks

  9. Neurocognition: Mean Score of Trail Making A and B at 18 Weeks Post Baseline

    Trails A (simple) and Trails B (alternative) neuropsychological assessments provide information on cognitive processes such as visual search, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and executive functions (i.e., memory, problem solving, verbal reasoning). It is sensitive to cognitive impairment associated with dementia. The average score for trail making is 29 seconds. Scores over 78 seconds suggest a deficit.

    Measured: baseline to 18 weeks

  10. Neurocognition: Mean Score of Stroop Test at Baseline

    The score of greater than is considered normal; a score of 40 or less is considered "low" whereas a score greater than 40 is considered "normal".

    Stroop test is named after the instrument developer, John Stroop. The instrument title is not an acronym.

    Measured: baseline

  11. Neurocognition: Mean Score of Stroop Test at 12 Weeks Post Baseline

    The score of greater than is considered normal; a score of 40 or less is considered "low" whereas a score greater than 40 is considered "normal".

    Stroop test is named after the instrument developer, John Stroop. The instrument title is not an acronym.

    Measured: Baseline to 12 weeks

  12. Neurocognition: Mean Score of Stroop Test at 18 Weeks Post Baseline

    The STROOP measures brain damage. The score of greater than is considered normal; a score of 40 or less is considered "low" whereas a score greater than 40 is considered "normal".

    Stroop test is named after the instrument developer, John Stroop. The instrument title is not an acronym.

    Measured: baseline to 18 weeks

  13. Cardiometabolic Markers: Mean Fasting Glucose Measures at Baseline

    A fasting blood sugar level less than 100mg/dl is normal. A fasting blood sugar level of 100- 126mg/dl is considered prediabetic. 126mg/dl or greater suggests diabetes

    Measured: baseline

  14. Cardiometabolic Markers: Mean Fasting Glucose Measures at 12 Weeks Post Baseline

    A fasting blood sugar level less than 100mg/dl is normal. A fasting blood sugar level of 100- 126mg/dl is considered prediabetic. 126mg/dl or greater suggests diabetes

    Measured: baseline to 12 weeks

  15. Cardiometabolic Markers: Mean Markers of Inflammation (C-reactive Protein) Measures at Baseline

    C-reactive protein (CRP) , a protein in the blood, indicates inflammation, specifically in the heart.. CRP levels rise with inflammation. A CRP concentration of below 1.0 mg/L indicates low risk; 1.0 to 3.0 mg/L suggests an average risk. Greater than 3.0 mg/L suggests a high risk.

    Measured: baseline

  16. Cardiometabolic Markers: Mean Markers of Inflammation (C-reactive Protein) Measures at 12 Weeks Post Baseline

    C-reactive protein (CRP) , a protein in the blood, indicates inflammation, specifically in the heart.. CRP levels rise with inflammation. A CRP concentration of below 1.0 mg/L indicates low risk; 1.0 to 3.0 mg/L suggests an average risk. Greater than 3.0 mg/L suggests a high risk.

    Measured: baseline to 12 weeks

  17. Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF or TNF-α)

    Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF or TNF-α) is a major pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in inflammatory events. Being one of the most important pro-inflammatory cytokines, TNF-α participates in vasodilatation and edema formation, and leukocyte adhesion to epithelium through expression of adhesion molecules; it regulates blood coagulation, and also contributes to oxidative stress in sites of inflammation.

    Measured: baseline

  18. Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF or TNF-α)

    Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF or TNF-α) is a major pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in inflammatory events. Being one of the most important pro-inflammatory cytokines, TNF-α participates in vasodilatation and edema formation, and leukocyte adhesion to epithelium through expression of adhesion molecules; it regulates blood coagulation, and also contributes to oxidative stress in sites of inflammation.

    Measured: baseline to week 12

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Neural Activity: Presence or Absence of Impaired Bloodflow in the Brain at Baseline as Determined by a Functional MRI

    Functional MRI is used to determine blood flow in the brain. Absence of blood flow impairment will be recorded as '0' and impairment will be recorded as '1'

    Measured: baseline

  2. Neural Activity: Presence or Absence of Impaired Bloodflow in the Brain at 12 Weeks Post Baseline as Determined by a Functional MRI

    Functional MRI is used to determine blood flow in the brain. Absence of blood flow impairment will be recorded as '0' and impairment will be recorded as '1'

    Measured: Baseline to 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2016
  3. Primary completion30 Jan 2018
  4. Study completion15 Feb 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
17 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02835820
Sponsor's protocol ID
HIV and Diet Study
Acronym
EDBP
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
6 May 2016
Last updated
16 Dec 2019
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Morrison SA, Fazeli PL, Gower B, Willig AL, Younger J, Sneed NM, Vance DE. Cognitive Effects of a Ketogenic Diet on Neurocognitive Impairment in Adults Aging With HIV: A Pilot Study. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2020 May-Jun;31(3):312-324. doi: 10.1097/JNC.0000000000000110.

    PubMed 31725105

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ketogenic Diet in people with HIV and Neurocognitive Impairment, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Dec 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Neurocognition: Mean Score of Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (Total) at Baseline (time frame: baseline). The study lists 18 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02835820, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in